August 8, 2026

Ottoman-German Relations During WWI

 

"Victory at Gallipoli, 1915: The German-Ottoman Alliance in the First World War" by Klaus Wolf.


An excerpt from, "Victory at Gallipoli, 1915’ Book Review" Historynet, November 1, 2021:

Author Klaus Wolf’s military career in the Bundeswehr took him to Turkey on three NATO assignments, during which he researched the military cooperation between Turkey and Germany both before and during World War I. First published in 2008 and translated into English by the Gallipoli Association, this volume is lavishly illustrated with maps and photographs.

German involvement in the Ottoman empire dates from the mid–18th century, though its presence in the early 20th century proved key. Wolf profiles several pivotal figures from the period. Among the more complex was Field Marshal Colmar Freiherr von der Goltz, who reached Constantinople in 1909 and whom Wolf describes as “half scholar, half military, half German, half Turk, half aristocrat, half democrat, half general, half boy scout.” Arriving in May 1913 was Lt. Gen. Otto Liman von Sanders, “adroit and versatile in the art of war,” his task to reorganize the Turkish army. While more recent Turkish sources have downplayed the role the German military played in Gallipoli, their involvement was undeniably significant, from tactics to training, leadership and munitions.

An excerpt from, "German Soldiers in the Ottoman Empire, 1914-1918: Introductory Text" by Oliver Stein, Freie Universität Berlin:

To strengthen the allies, the Germans helped with the modernization of the Ottoman army. The small Ottoman air force, which had existed since 1911 in rudimentary form, was expanded with German personnel and material aide. The German Captain Erich Serno thus became the creator of a new Turkish air force that was based on the German model. Serno additionally designed the Ottoman aviator badges, which was the insignia for the flying personnel after 1914.

A large problem in the first year of war consisted in the provision of weapons and ammunition for the Ottoman army. During the most materially intensive combat in the Dardanelles, the Ottoman Empire did not possess its own armament industry and after the transport lines in the Balkans were blocked, they were also unable to receive the necessary amount of supplies from the Central Powers. For this reason, Germany sent many officers, engineers and other specialists to Constantinople in order to build ammunition factories. One of these specialists was Heinrich Frank, who, as the military operational manager of the Navy arsenals’ bullet factory, passed on his knowledge to the Turks. His two service IDs also visually testify to how the service for this group of Germans in the Ottoman Empire was work that straddled two cultures: his German-speaking identification shows him in German officer uniform while the photograph on his Ottoman document features him wearing a Turkish fez.

An excerpt from, "Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Lansing Papers, 1914–1920, Volume I - The Ambassador in Turkey (Elkus) to the Secretary of State, Constantinople, November 17, 1916":

There is little, if any, system in administration and great delay about everything. To get a positive answer quickly to anything is an impossibility and almost so after weeks of negotiation. Delay . . . is the order as to everything. All the foreign powers find this true, and among the greatest complainants are the German and Austrian Ambassadors, who experience the same difficulties as the representatives of neutral powers.

As to military matters, it is stated that the Germans have a written agreement with the Turks, providing for the control by the German officers attached to the Turkish Army and that is the only instrument compelling obedience to German authority, although that is often thwarted

The change recently made in the German Embassy, here, is due to the fact that the former Ambassador stated he could do nothing with the Turks . . .

. . .For many years the Turks played off one foreign power against another. Usually the English against the French. Now there are indications of playing off the United States against Germany. The Germans know this and have suggested unofficially to me that we act in concert in such matters as we can agree upon. I have said, of course, submit what you wish to me and I will consult my government.

. . .Enver, at present, is the most powerful of the ruling triumvirate. He is the Germanophil member, with German military backing, and the ever present argument of military necessity to enforce such measures, ruinous in the opinion of many, to the country’s policy, as the general calling out of all the men up to the age of forty five.

But as a matter of fact, the Turks and Germans are not very good friends. . . . The Turks are already planning how they may best get rid of German supervision as soon as the war is over. But the likelihood is the Germans, if permitted by the Entente, will retain their control even after the war.

A movement against the Greeks of the Asia Minor littoral, similar to that against the Armenians, and a renewal of Armenian deportations is said to have begun with deportations into the interior. At Smyrna, the first deportation has been started, because of a revolutionary plot said to have been discovered by the Government. Three hundred Armenian families are reported as having been sent into the interior.

The food situation has grown worse. The price of bread has been raised again. All other food prices are being increased in proportion. Well-to-do people can still buy everything they need. But there is a distinct visible augmentation of misery among the poor.

As I have already telegraphed the Department, Talaat Pasha stated to me that he saw no reason why the friendly relations between Turkey and America should not continue, even if there was a rupture between America and Germany. Some days after that he told me that he had reported our conversation to the Sultan, and that His Imperial Majesty had thoroughly approved Talaat Pasha’s statements and said he deeply desired the continuation of the friendly relations between the two countries. But Djavid Bey, the new Minister of Finance, was much more outspoken than the Grand Vizier. In the course of a quiet after-dinner confidential conversation at the Embassy, he told me the other day that even if there was a war between Germany and America, Turkey would not break off relations with America. Djavid said that it was only after the war had ceased that people would realize what a calamity it had been. This country would be short of men, would be under the burden of a tremendous debt, the revenues decreased and would have to look outside of Turkey for financial assistance in order to begin the work of construction. “Turkey’s only hope is in the United States. The European countries will be unable or unwilling to help us financially.” “On the other hand,” he continued, “what can we expect to gain if we take part in a war against the United States? Absolutely nothing! I therefore guarantee 90% that if there is war between Germany and the United States, Turkey will stay out of it. At least that is our feeling and our intention to-day.” And he looks upon the above reasons put forward by him as logical and convincing. I asked him what the Turks would do in case the Germans insisted on Turkey performing her duty as an ally to declare war against America. He said Turkey would simply refuse and if Germany still insisted Turkey would ask her to send her 3 to 400,000 troops to do the fighting, as otherwise the Turks would be unable to fight alone. The cordiality now demonstrated by the Ministers may be genuine and sincere, or may be only assumed and serving for some ulterior purpose. . . . Future developments will show whether this demonstration is sincere or not. If not sincere it may serve one of the following two purposes: it may be intended to mislead us, and for the purpose of having America help Turkey now or hereafter,—a repetition under another form of the assurances given to the British Ambassador in 1914 that Turkey would remain neutral—or it may be intended for the edification of Germany, a kind of a warning, if not a threat, to the overbearing ally that she is not the only great power and that if she is not more considerate towards the weaker ally, the latter can find—had found—other friends! Some Turks, however, not friendly towards the Union and Progress Committee have quite a different interpretation for these demonstrations of cordiality. According to what they say the Union and Progress leaders are aware that they will be held responsible for dragging Turkey into this war, which has proved to be disastrous for the Empire; that they will also be held responsible for the Armenian massacres, the persecution of the other non-Turkish races and for endless other misdeeds. Therefore seeing the approach of the day of reckoning and having no confidence in the ability or the willingness of their German ally to help them in the hour of need, they desire to make friends with America now, in order to protect themselves or at least have a friend when that day of reckoning comes.

But it is curious to hear that some German officers here have stated that even if war should occur between America and Germany, Turkey should continue her diplomatic relations with America. These officers are further stated to have said it is not desirable to have a war between Germany and the United States.

It is rumored that both in Turkish and German military circles here there is an apprehension that should war ever be declared between the United States and Turkey, the former can at once send troops and ammunition from the Philippines to the Persian Gulf and thus help the British in Mesopotamia or Palestine.

. . .Turks state to me that Germany does not wish to see here an Ambassador of a great power like the United States, who is too friendly with the Turks, because they wish to impress on the Turks that they are the only power that can protect Turkey, and the only friend Turkey has. I am told on the other hand that the Turks wish to emancipate themselves from this German guardianship.

The feeling in the civilian Turkish circles is far from being friendly to the Germans. In a conversation with a Turkish Minister, the latter said,
“really speaking the Germans had no friends, their manner is such that they can have no friends, that they have a wonderful military organization, of which they are proud, and through their organization they have a strong discipline in their own country holding the people under a permanent guardianship and obedience, and they imagine that they have the same power over all the world. In diplomacy they are poor and what success they have had has been through threat. They think of nothing but themselves and their own interest. They never take into consideration the feelings and interests of others. We are their allies. In this war we have rendered them signal services, and have acted towards them as gentlemen. What have we seen? What are they doing for us. Nothing. In all our dealings with them they raise difficulties. If we have negotiations concerning a loan or anything else, there is not a small point that can be raised in their favor which they would fail to raise. We went into the war without thinking of loans, expenses or other details. Had we asked the Germans at that time to take upon themselves all our war expenses, Germany would have agreed to do so, but as we did not raise that question, to-day we are borrowing money from the Germans and we are indebted to them to the amount of 100,000,000 pounds sterling just for the war expenses. As allies of the Germans, of course, we desire to see Germany win in this war, but do not want to see Germany have such a victory as to become the dictator of the whole world. That would be a misfortune for all.”
I spoke to him about the food question in Germany, and whether the scarcity was such as to force the Germans to put down their arms. The Minister stated that according to his information the German Army was well fed; as to the civilian population, he believed, that through the wonderful organization which they have in Germany, it would be possible to feed them until the new crops. But in his opinion there was another question which was more serious for the Germans than that of the food supply. How long will the material for the manufacture of ammunition last? There is scarcity of coal and scarcity of copper.

These statements did not prevent him from saying that the way the Entente Powers had published their terms of peace was a most stupid piece of business. There were thousands of people in this country, who were against the war and longed for peace, and yet the Entente Governments say that they want to give Constantinople to Russia. All these people now want the continuation of the war.

He knew that there were no diplomats in Germany, that it was only through force that the Germans wanted to deal with every nation, but he had believed that in England and in France there were good diplomats. The way the latter acted in this matter showed him that there is a penury of statesmanship even in those countries.

While speaking of the friendly relations between Turkey and America, I told him that Turkey had many friends in America, but I added in order that these friends might in some way be able to be of any service to this country, there should be put an end to all Armenian massacres as well as Arab or Syrian or other persecutions. He at once stated that he agreed with me entirely. “These things should not have happened.” He said he hoped that very soon we would see an amelioration in the condition of the Armenians, who would be allowed to travel and do business within certain zones. What happened was a most deplorable thing and he said you can be sure that it will not be repeated.

August 6, 2026

The Ozempic Option


I'm just starting to get my head around this Ozempic phenomenon, trying to read up on the latest science surrounding it.

Nothing scares me more than drugs, especially drugs that are sold to the public as short cuts and miracle solutions. All of them have side effects. But I've never had weight issues or a food addiction problem so I can't judge people who choose to take this drug after years of struggle.

Video Title: Grocery Sales Down: Ozempic! Source: Angry Mortgage Podcast. Date Published: August 6, 2026.

The Samson Option

“I think the gradual route is doomed,” said Flynt Leverett, director of the New America Foundation’s Geopolitics of Energy Initiative. “We’ve tried it before without success. It all has to be resolved in one package.” - "U.S. Strategy Towards IranNew America Foundation, September 14, 2006.
"Israel’s nuclear weapons arsenal can be defined as a “public secret”. While not officially acknowledged by the Israeli government, they have never denied nuclear capability. Former Israeli nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu revealed evidence of Israel’s nuclear programme to the British press in 1986 and was kidnapped by Mossad and taken to Israel for trial.

In the 2008 book Culture of War, Professor Van Creveld wrote that any talk of Israel’s nuclear weapons on Israeli soil can lead to arrest, trial and imprisonment; however, news commentators are allowed to use euphemisms such as “the Samson option.”" - Jonathan Bhagan, "Israel’s nuclear weapons programme" Trinidad Guardian, April 21, 2026.

The role of prophecy and esoteric agendas in the USrael-Iran war, and Israel's invasion of Lebanon, are the bottom layer of a cake that are seldom brought up in public discussions. 

Journalists, government officials, and analysts write thousands of pieces on the icing, or debate which food coloring to use when baking this cake. They talk about nuclear programs, fees for oil transit, sanctions, two-state mumbo jumbo. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, the religious plan to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem moves forward.

What we're looking at here is not a regional security crisis, or a nuclear proliferation problem, but a religious war against Islam and Christianity that's being camouflaged as a fight for Israel's existence. 

Israelis are doing far more than spitting on Christians in the street, they want to bring down the entire Christian theology, and erase all traces of the religion in the Holy Land. They possess more than a bloodlust for Palestinians, they have a literal Messiah complex. 

The religious impulse within Israeli politics to transform Jerusalem, destroying Muslim and Christian history in the process, won't go away in a generation. Israel's younger generation is significantly more religious and theologically dogmatic than the young people of its neighbouring countries, Iran included. Their brainwashing by the state has been more successful. 

The other day I saw a video of an Israeli citizen saying one Jewish life is worth the lives of ten million Palestinians. Sadly this is not a fringe opinion in Israeli society. Ideas of Jewish supremacy and the special divine status of Jews have been programmed into Israeli citizens from a young age. 

Ultimately, the education system in Israel has to be reformed if it wants to be perceived as a normal and healthy country. Theories of racial supremacy always leads to genocides, wars, ethnic cleansing, nationalist aggression, and perpetual conflict with one's neighbours.

But we can't wait until Israeli leaders figure their shit out and build a more cohesive, sane, and prosperous society. They pose a threat to the world that must be faced today.

There needs to be a worldwide recognition of the Israeli nuclear weapons program, along with its covert chemical weapons program, leading to their eventual dismantlement. A recognition of Israel's right to exist should only follow those steps. 

August 5, 2026

JFK's Views On Israel


"Ask not what your country can do for you--ask what you can do for your country." - JFK.

"Ask not what you can do for your country--ask what you can do for Israel." - Trump.


Why Hitler Headed East And Why JFK Went To Dallas

The 60th Anniversary of Israel's Assassination of JFK

JFK on Nuclear Weapons

New Storms Ahead: Will Leaders Act Rationally And Prevent WWIII Or Will They Repeat Past Follies?

 

"For the original Zionist philosophy has always maintained that the people of Israel would use their national genius not for selfish purposes but for the enrichment and glory of the entire Middle East. The earliest leaders of the Zionist movement spoke of a Jewish state which would have no military power and which would be content with victories of the spirit.

The compulsions of a harsh and inescapable necessity have compelled Israel to abandon this hope. But I cannot believe that Israel has any real desire to remain indefinitely a garrison state surrounded by fear and hate. And I cannot believe that the Arab world would not find a better basis for unity in a united attack on all their accumulated social problems - an attack in which they could benefit immensely from a closer cooperation with the people of Israel.

The technical skills and genius of Israel have already brought their blessings to Burma and to Ethiopia. Still other nations in Asia and in Africa are eager to benefit from the special skills available in that bustling land. Why should the Middle East alone be cut off from this partnership? And why should not the people of Israel receive the blessings available to them from association with the Arab world?

When we think of the possibilities of this association, an emotion of soaring hope replaces our somber anxieties about the Middle East. Ancient rivers would give their power to new industries. The desert would yield to civilization. Disease would be eradicated, especially the disease that strikes down helpless children. The blight of poverty would be replaced by the blessings of abundance.

But it is a long and painful step from the era of the boycott to the era of partnership - and that step needs the direct encouragement and help of the White House. The next President of the United States should always be personally available to stimulate every experiment in cooperation, from the joint development of a river, to a reconsideration of the Arab refugee problem, to the crowning mercy of the final reconciliation that can be brought only by a true peace settlement.

Peace is our primary objective in the Middle East - and peace is partly our responsibility. "Seek peace, and pursue it" commands the psalmist. And that we must do. With open minds, open hearts, and the priceless asset of our American heritage, we shall seek peace in the Middle East, as elsewhere. And when history writes its verdict, let it be said that we pursued the peace with all the courage, all the strength, and all the resourcefulness at our command.

In this task, I ask for your assistance, your patience, your wisdom, and your support - until we can say to Jew and Arab alike "Peace be within thy walls and plenteousness within thy palaces. For my brethren and companions' sake, I will wish thee prosperity." - Speech by Senator John F. Kennedy, Zionists of America Convention, Statler Hilton Hotel, New York, NY, August 26, 1960.

The cause of Zionism was idealistic and romantic enough at one point, especially in its early stages, to draw the support of European and Western statesmen on the political left. 

Israel also proved it can survive and thrive in successive wars, so it wasn't viewed as a by-product of European or American power. It was perceived to be its own entity. It didn't need to be babied. Left alone, with a steady supply of arms and funding, it could defend itself indefinitely against all Middle Eastern adversaries.

They all assumed this baby would grow up to be a functioning adult well-adjusted to its environment. That obviously did not happen. Israel grew up to become a spoiled monster, not a mature, confident, and able participant in international relations. And the biggest factor for that development is the strange, siamese-like relationship it has nurtured with the United States since the assassination of JFK.

JFK admired the young biblical nation, but he wasn't psychologically or politically captured by the state of Israel. He had his limits, specifically around the nuclear question. He drew the line at Israel arming itself with nuclear weapons, rightly believing that would encourage its worst instincts and put it on the path of war and permanent hostility with its Arab and Muslim neighbours.

JFK's defiance on the nuclear question and inclinations towards peace led to his downfall, and upended the U.S- Israeli alliance to such a degree that today it is one of a master-slave relationship. It isn’t rational or healthy for either side for the Zionist lobby to continue to exert its dominance in Washington. There will be a breaking point. 

India's Solution To Its Overpopulation Problem Must Change

China decided to build, house, feed, and educate its young generation. Its political class lifted millions out of poverty. They tried things like the one child policy. Granted it wasn't the best idea, but at least the Chinese leadership didn't just sit on their ass. They got busy. 

They experimented and planned. They saw potential problems and looked for solutions. Population, food, housing, energy, industry, the economy, wherever they saw an urgent issue they decided to tackle it.

India's political elite told themselves why bother with all that hard work when you can just export the problem to the West? Why build? Why educate? Why publicly invest in the economy? Why have a five or ten year plan? Why build functioning and clean cities to accommodate your growing populations? 

They took the easy road of governance and now we're here.

Their problem is now our problem. 

I can't even go comfortably for a walk these days around the city without fear of being run over by an Indian driver. In just this year alone I've had close calls three times just walking on the sidewalk. I almost got run over again last night after an evening walk. I looked at the driver and it was a smiling Indian guy. 

Respect for pedestrians was obviously not taught in India. It's understandable. There's too many people there to respect the rules of the road. Drivers take charge. And pedestrians there adjusted long ago.

But once you leave India you have to leave that mindset behind. 

The Canadian government has done a poor job re-educating new Indian immigrants about the rules of the road.

These drivers must be taught Canada is not a lawless place. Pedestrians have the right of way.