April 24, 2026

Burkert On The Survivability of Small Sects And Monotheistic Cults

 


Wikipedia: 

Walter Burkert (2 February 1931 – 11 March 2015) was a German scholar of Greek mythology and cult.

A professor of classics at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, he taught in the UK and the US. He has influenced generations of students of religion since the 1960s, combining in the modern way the findings of archaeology and epigraphy with the work of poets, historians, and philosophers. He was a member of both the American Philosophical Society and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

He published books on the balance between lore and science among the followers of Pythagoras, and more extensively on ritual and archaic cult survival, on the ritual killing at the heart of religion, on mystery religions, and on the reception in the Hellenic world of Near Eastern and Persian culture, which sets Greek religion in its wider Aegean and Near Eastern context.

An excerpt from, "Ancient Mystery Cults" by Walter Burkert, Harvard University Press, 1987, Pg. 51-53:

In summary, ancient mystery cults did not form religious communities in the sense of Judaism or Christianity. Even Richard Reitzenstein had to acknowledge that the concept of church, ekklesia, has no equivalent in pagan religion; it goes back to the Septuagint. It is remarkable that a term borrowed from the Greek polis system came to designate an organization that was to overthrow and eliminate this very system. Ekklesia indicates quite a different level of involvement, and a claim about the organization of life different from that inherent in a private club or a limited and local clergy. A new and contrasting form of politeia was emerging; we find Philo applying this very term of "political activity," politeia, to the Jewish way of life, and Christians following suit in their own terminology. The Jews had refused total integration into ancient society, and with Christianity there appeared an alternative society in the full sense of potentially independent, self-sufficient, and self-reproducing communities. Here we find from the beginning a concern for the poor, economic cooperation at a level quite uncommon in pagan religion, and the inclusion of the family as the basic unit of piety in the religious system. To educate the children in the fear of God suddenly became the supreme duty of parents, as the Apostolic Fathers already taught. And since the believers were at the same time encouraged to multiply, with a new morality ousting all the well-established forms of population control such as the exposure of children, homosexuality, and prostitution, the ekklesia became a self-reproducing type of community that could not be stopped.

No religious organization outside Judaism had developed such a system, least of all the mysteries with their exclusiveness, their individualism, and their dependence on private wealth. It is true that there were initiations of children: they frequently appear in Bacchic mysteries, and even at Eleusis there was a "child from the hearth" initiated at each festival. But this was a special honor or provision of concerned parents, not a religious or moral duty. It was unthinkable that the entire life of the family should be subject to a special religious orientation, and that every child should find himself inescapably merged in a religious system where apostasy was considered to be worse than death. The very idea of Bacchic, Metroac, or even Isiac "education of children" would approach the ridiculous. Mithras, for one, did not even admit women; he stood for men's clubs in opposition to family life.

There is only one slight indication of a possible movement of mysteries in a similar direction: in the case of the Bacchanalia in 186 B.c., the accusation was that there had been a huge conspiracy (coniuratio) that was to overthrow the existing res publica; "another people is about to arise," alterum iam populum esse. This vision of "another people" that is to oust the populus Romanus Quiritium is a frightening one which in a strange way foretells the proclamation of a new politeia, a new civitas by later Christians. This may also explain why repression was so cruel and radical, with some 6,000 executions at a time. There is nothing comparable in religious history before the persecutions of Christians. One might also mention the movement started in Sicily by Eunous, the inspired prophet and miracle worker of the Syrian Goddess, who became the charismatic leader of the slave revolt that lasted from 136 to 132 B.C. Again, the repression was absolutely relentless. But here the social issues were much more prominent than the religious overtones. Much later, it was for Augustine to proclaim triumphantly that Christianity had swept like a blazing fire through the Oikumene (incendia concitarunt). Earlier pagan charismatics were well advised to beware of arson, and most of them circumspectly avoided launching a "movement."

The basic difference between ancient mysteries, on the one hand, and religious communities, sects, and churches of the Judeo-Christian type, on the other, is borne out by the verdict of history. Jewish, Christian, and Islamic sects have demonstrated astounding capacities for survival, even as minorities in a hostile environment. The Samaritans, split from Jewish orthodoxy, have survived in the world for about 2,400 years; the Mandaeans are about as old as Christianity: the Albingensian movement survived even the European Inquisition; countless sects have been active ever since the Reformation. Christian outposts in Ethiopia, Armenia, and Georgia are no less remarkable for this tenacious vitality. It was quite different with the ancient mysteries, whether those of Eleusis, Bacchus, Meter, Isis, or even Mithras, the "invincible god." With the imperial decrees of 391/92 A.D. prohibiting all pagan cults and with the forceful destruction of the sanctuaries, the mysteries simply and suddenly disappeared. There is not much to be said for either the Masons' or modern witches' claim that they are perpetuating ancient mysteries through continuous tradition. Mysteries could not go underground because they lacked any lasting organization. They were not self-sufficient sects; they were intimately bound to the social system of antiquity that was to pass away. Nothing remained but curiosity, which has tried in vain to resuscitate them.

The Gay Goy King


"Proud Nimrod first the bloody chase began
A mighty hunter, and his prey was man."
- Alexander Pope.

A full understanding of the religious history of the Near East and the West, and the role played by Judaism in both, would do more to explain the current standoff between America and Iran than any bullshit about stopping the spread of nuclear weapons.

In the hands of the radical Jews and Shia, neither America nor Iran are normal and ordinary states. 

Washington and Tehran have been turned into messianic vehicles to usher in an end times scenario and the implementation of a unified world state. They are not fighting for their national interests but for a grand project that's religious in nature and more than a century in the making.

With their combined ability to choke off the world economy financially and control the flow of oil they can dictate the course of events and guide the world to a global economic apocalypse. 

For the longest time the great fear of an American-Iranian conflagration was its impact on the world economy. Alexander Pope famously wrote, "fools rush in where angels fear to tread." This perfectly encapsulates Trump's Iran adventure. 

I am certain that Trump couldn't find Iran on a map when Netanyahu told him to attack it. He's a useful idiot par excellence, a man fully owned by the Jews. They couldn't have found a better Goy to serve their needs and fulfill their messianic wishes. It's like he was made in a Goy lab. Just the perfect Goy specimen. Arrogant, stupid, self-conceited, promiscuous, gluttonous, mean-spirited, a ravenous, two-faced, and treacherous beast who respects nothing but power.

Trump bows down before the Jews because he recognizes their power, not because he likes them or believes in their cause. 

Every successful American politician since Kennedy’s murder has been blackmailed and threatened to go along with the program but no one has done so with as much glee as Trump. It's a form of psychological compensation on his part. 

Some still believe he can be saved. They may be correct in that assessment. Trump admits he fears hell. He fears death. He knows all the evil he's done comes with a heavy price. So there is still a soul in there somewhere. 

But, should America and mankind gamble on his transformation into a Christian and a decent man at this late the hour? I say no. It is a risk. He should be put out to pasture. Right now the world needs a sane, straight, and cool operator in the White House, not a gay goy gone mad with rage and impotence. 

Iran's Splendid Isolation Is Coming To An End

Canadian politician George Eulas Foster coined the term "splendid isolation" to describe British foreign policy towards Europe in the 19th century.

Wikipedia: 

Foster is known for coining the term "splendid isolation" in January 1896 when praising Britain's foreign policy of isolation from European affairs.

The term was popularized by Lord Goschen, First Lord of the Admiralty, during a speech at Lewes on 26 February 1896: "We have stood here alone in what is called isolation – our splendid isolation, as one of our colonial friends was good enough to call it." The phrase had appeared in a headline in The Times, on 22 January 1896, paraphrasing a comment by Foster to the Parliament of Canada on 16 January 1896: "In these somewhat troublesome days when the great Mother Empire stands splendidly isolated in Europe."

The ultimate origin of "splendid isolation" is suggested in Robert Hamilton's Canadian Quotations and Phrases, which places the Foster quotation beneath a passage from the following paragraph from Cooney's Compendious History of Northern New Brunswick and GaspĂ© (reprinted in 1896) describing England's situation in 1809–1810 during the Napoleonic Wars:

In the midst of this terrific commotion, England stood erect: wrapt up in her own impregnability, the storm could not affect her: and therefore, while others trembled in its blast, she smiled at its fury. Never did the 'Empress Island' appear so magnificently grand; – she stood by herself, and there was a peculiar splendour in the loneliness of her glory.

This, in turn, echoes the stoicism of Marcus Aurelius: "Be like the promontory against which the waves continually break, but it stands firm and tames the fury of the water around it."

An excerpt from, "The Fall of Heaven: The Pahlavis And The Final Days of Imperial Iran" by Andrew Scott Cooper, Picador, 2018, Pg. 203-204:

"Iran's domestic discontents were overshadowed by the earth-shaking events of late 1973 and early 1974 in the Middle East. Simmering tensions between Israel and Egypt erupted into open warfare in October 1973. Furious that the United States airlifted military supplies to Israel, Arab states in the Middle East imposed an oil embargo that triggered panic buying in the West and sent crude prices soaring. The Shah's decision to remain neutral in the conflict earned him Nixon's gratitude. But he also saw an opportunity to exploit the crisis to Iran's benefit. On December 23, 1973, he hosted a meeting of Persian Gulf oil producers who followed his suggestion that they double the price of oil for the second time in a year. The Shah's oil coup stunned his admirers back in Washington. The "oil shock" devastated the economies of Western oil consumers even as Iran's income from oil doubled to $4.6 billion in 1973-1974, then rocketed to $17.8 billion a year later to a total of $98.2 billion for the next five years. In just a few months the Shah had seized control of the oil markets and established himself as the dominant figure within OPEC, the oil producers' cartel that set prices and determined levels of oil production. Rather than invest Iran's new billions offshore in bonds, treasury notes, and real estate, the Shah decided to pump it straight back into the domestic economy to give it the push he felt was needed to break the cycle of poverty and under- development. Finally, after decades of struggle and turmoil. the Shah felt himself to be untouchable and indispensable. He had broken free from the Russians, the British, and now the Americans. "Iran is not a volcano now," he assured a visitor to Niavaran. "I want the standard of living in Iran in ten years' time to be exactly on a level with that in Europe today. In twenty years' time we shall be ahead of the United States." 

The Shah stood at the apex of a new world economic order. "Once dismissed by Western diplomats as an insecure, ineffective playboy-King, this emperor of oil commands new respect these days, as much for his ambitions as for his wealth," declared Time magazine. "In the 33rd year of an often uncertain reign, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi has brought Iran to a threshold of grandeur that is at least analogous to what Cyrus the Great achieved for ancient Persia." Bankers joked that when the Shah sneezed, Wall Street caught cold. Iran's astonishing 33 percent economic growth rate for 1973 was outpaced by 40 percent the following year, and gross national product was set to expand at the rate of 50 percent in twelve months. The economy took off like an Apollo rocket to the moon. "We have no real limit on money," boasted the government's senior economist. "None." The Shah interpreted this remark in the most literal sense. He ordered billions in new military equipment and made all elementary school education free and compulsory. Iran was not a major dairy producer, but he decreed that every schoolchild was entitled to a free glass of milk each day. He purchased a 25 percent stake in the West German steel company Krupp and spent $16 billion in the fiscal year 1974 -1975 "on projects ranging from schools to hospitals." Eager to buy international prestige and influence, the Shah contributed $700 million to the International Monetary Fund and another $1 million to the University of Southern California to endow a professorial chair in engineering. U.S. intelligence analysts were confounded by the Shah's oil coup against his former patrons. "He was our baby, but now he has grown up," complained a CIA official whose admission signaled that the United States had finally lost the ability to influence Iranian foreign and economic policy.

There is nothing wrong with waging war in self-defense. This is a natural right and even an obligation. But there are limits to exercising that right in the modern world. 

As we saw in the two World Wars in the last century, modern wars are limitless in geographical scope and economic consequences.

Europe was set ablaze after the Zionists and their Masonic allies in the Western world prepared the stage. No European nation won that war. It was a total bloodbath. It was human sacrifice disguised as a world war. A similar scenario has been prepared for West Asia by the very same devils.

But times have changed. Mass conscript armies are politically untenable and the volunteer professional armies aren't willing to sacrifice endlessly for wars they see no good reason fighting in.

War has moved from the battlefield to the pocketbook. And the elites know this better than anyone else. Th economic warfare that's been waged by the United States and Israel against numerous Middle Eastern states for decades has achieved what military invasions never could.

Now that Iran has sprung itself out of its artificial isolation from the world economy and exercised its ability to deliver economic pain to its enemies it must not fall into the trap of arrogance and overreach.

By closing the Strait of Hormuz and subsequently charging a toll to non-hostile ships with its re-opening the Iranian government injected itself in the fate of the world economy, for better or worse. 

Just as OPEC and its ability to manipulate oil prices was a levy of power, closing and opening the Strait of Hormuz on a whim is a great weapon that, if overused and abused, will blunt its effectiveness and become counter-productive in advancing Iran's national interests.

With great power comes greater responsibility.

Iran's leaders bear a responsibility to the world to keep the world moving forward, economies afloat, and the lights on, so to speak.

To be engaged in a secret global conspiracy to initiate the so-called Great Reset wherein advanced nations in the West and developed economies are fully transitioned to post-apocalyptic hellscapes would be a black mark on the nation of Iran. 

Iran must not allow itself to be used as an instrument to collapse the world economy.

The genocidal cannibals in Washington, Tel Aviv, and London who want to depopulate the world through famine, population control, and war, must not be assisted, unknowingly or not. 

April 21, 2026

Why the Jews Resisted Rome | Barry Strauss on the Tikvah Podcast

Wikipedia: 

Barry S. Strauss (born November 27, 1953) is an American historian. He is a professor of history and humanistic studies at Cornell University, and a visiting Corliss Page Dean Fellow at the Hoover Institution.

Strauss holds a B.A. from Cornell and a Ph.D. from Yale (advised by Donald Kagan) and has been awarded fellowships by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, the American Academy in Rome, the MacDowell Colony for the Arts, the Korea Foundation, and the Killam Foundation of Canada. He is an honorary citizen of Salamis, Greece. Strauss is Director of Cornell's Program on Freedom and Free Societies and past Director of its Peace Studies Program. At Cornell, he teaches courses on the history of ancient Greece, war and peace in the ancient world, history of battle, introduction to military history, and specialized topics in ancient history.

Video Title: Why the Jews Resisted Rome | Barry Strauss on the Tikvah Podcast. Source: Tikvah. Date Published: August 18, 2025.

Trump Milks Cash Cows With Tariffs

A presidential trip to Dallas would be a good idea right about now.


Trump's tariff scandal shows that he and his handlers view the American people as nothing but cash cows. 

Anyone with any economic sense knew that tariffs are a hidden tax on the average taxpayer and common person.

An excerpt from, "Trump Secretary Silent as Sons Poised to Make Bank From End of Tariffs" by Hafiz Rashid, The New Republic, February 20, 2026:

The Supreme Court decision striking down Donald Trump’s many tariffs may prove to be a windfall for the family of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a key architect of Trump’s signature economic policy.

In July, Wired reported that Cantor Fitzgerald, which Lutnick chaired until he was appointed to Trump’s Cabinet, was allowing its traders to purchase the rights to hundreds of millions of dollars of refunds in the event the tariffs were struck down in court. The firm now happens to be headed by Lutnick’s sons Kyle and Brandon.

The magazine cited a letter from the firm explaining how Cantor Fitzgerald was willing to exchange refund rights for 20 to 30 percent of what the companies paid.

“So for a company that paid $10 million, they could expect to receive $2-$3 million in a trade,” a Cantor Fitzgerald representative wrote. “We have the capacity to trade up to several hundred million of these presently and can likely upsize that in the future to meet potential demand.”

An excerpt from, "Trump tariff refunds begin but consumers likely to miss out" by Archie Mitchell, BBC, April 20, 2026:

In what is to be the biggest repayment programme in history, companies can apply online for money they were charged under the so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs - plus interest - to be returned.

The US Court of International Trade in March ordered customs officials to refund the more than $160bn (£121bn) the government had collected, putting roughly 330,000 importers in a position to potentially win back some money.

But some individual consumers, who were hit by the tariffs indirectly through higher prices, are not expected to be compensated.

The refunds relate to levies charged by US President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).