August 23, 2026

David Lutzweiler — Edward Irving on Napoleon, Zionism and the Restoration of the Church + Will the Dome of the Rock be destroyed?

 

"The Praise Of Folly: The Enigmatic Life & Theology Of C.I. Scofield" by David Lutzweiler.

Related: 

An excerpt from, "Promised Lands: The British and the Ottoman Middle East" by Jonathan Parry, Princeton University Press, 2022, Pg. 219 - 220:

One additional complexity of Jerusalem was that between five and seven thousand Jews lived there. Many had travelled from Russia or Poland to die in Palestine, either in Jerusalem or in other favoured settlements such as Safed or Tiberias. The presence of Jews was a major part of Jerusalem's appeal to missionaries. In 1809, a separate society had been founded for Protestant mission work among the Jews, the London Society for Promoting Christianity among the Jews, usually known as the London Jews' Society. It relied on the enthusiasm of former Jews, mostly from northern continental Europe, who had converted to Christianity and wished to persuade others to accept the New Testament and the divinity of Jesus; eleven of the first fifteen LJS missionaries were Germans. In the 1820s, the movement's profile was helped by the publicity generated by the former Jewish (and former Catholic) Anglican missionary Joseph Wolff, another German. He travelled extensively, flamboyantly, and foolhardy in the Middle East and Asia, keen to argue theologically with anyone who rose to his bait. Wolff was an eclectic eccentric who was drawn to the Middle East for many reasons: to prove the accuracy of the Bible, to find the scattered tribes of Abraham, to challenge the grip of the papacy and the mosques, and to encourage local Christians to commune with the Anglican Church.

. . .In the 1820s, the LJS benefited from financial support from a few very wealthy Englishmen, such as Henry Drummond, Sir Thomas Baring, and Lewis Way. Such men read biblical prophecy literally, as forecasting the return of the children of Israel to their homeland, leading the way for the Second Coming of Christ. Their influence focused LJS activities on Jerusalem---rather than, say, Damascus, where there were at least as many Jews. Biblical literature was on the rise in the early nineteenth century, and expectations of Ottoman collapse after 1821 fed apocalyptic hopes for the sudden, dramatic fall of Islam in the Holy Land. Nonetheless, their hopes for the return of the Jews to Palestine and their conversion to Christianity were always a minority enthusiasm in Britain---the biblical references to Jews returning to their homeland were more generally assumed to be allegorical allusions to Christians. Most of those who toyed with such hopes did not emphasise them much in public, appreciating that they appeared far-fetched and were easily satirised.

Video Title: David Lutzweiler — Edward Irving on Napoleon, Zionism and the Restoration of the Church. Source: The Forerunner. Date Published: September 22, 2025.

 

Video Title: David Lutzweiler – Will the Dome of the Rock be destroyed? Source: The Forerunner. Date Published: September 24, 2025.

Donald Mileikowsky And America's Jewish Wars Since 9/11

 

He has more than the President's ear.


When the true history books are written about the 9/11 wars, which began with Afghanistan and will end in Iran, the key figure in the drama will be Benjamin Mileikowsky, not any American or Islamic leader.

Frankly, America and the world of Islam have looked like utter fools and simpletons, without a strategic brain and lacking in respect for one's history, traditions, and peoples.

The Jewish state has put them all to shame. And the face of that state has been Netanyahu.

Netanyahu will also be the face of 9/11 and the wars that came after, not Bin Laden, Bush, Obama or Trump. Not Hamas, Al-Qaeda, Saddam, Hezbollah, or the Taliban.

Ben was there with Clinton when the Al-Qaeda myth was being built up through the press in the 1990s, and he's still here almost three decades later with the most Israeli-friendly American President in history.

And that only makes sense. As the most powerful politician in Israel, Netanyahu owns not just the Knesset but the Congress and the White House as well.

Netanyahu leads, American Presidents follow. 

What must always be remembered is that these are Jewish wars, not Islamic or American. 9/11 was a Masonic and Jewish event, not a triumph for Islam or terrorism.

It's also worth noting that Donald Trump was interviewed on the day of the attacks on television. I always found that interview puzzling. What knowledge could Trump impart about a terrorist attack? Was he a statesman? A military mind? A journalist who covered global terrorism? A politician? A political strategist?

No, he was none of these things. He was a New York real estate mogul. He couldn't even explain how or why the towers fell. That's how little expertise he brought to the table. His interview was intellectualy and scientifically worthless, but not politically, for he got in front of the story and toed the official line, perhaps knowing the Jews would put him in power in the future. 

And they did. 

He played ball like a good little goy. And he was handed two terms in return.

Two years into his second term and his government is almost indistinguishable from Netanyahu's. The parasite has become the host. Trump might be the only guy to change his last name to Mileikowsky instead of the other way around. That's how pot committed he is to the Jewish state. If he could change his DNA to Hebrew DNA he would. 

He's a true believer.

Israel: From Military Burden To Political Pariah

 

George Scratchley Brown (17 August 1918 – 5 December 1978), Air Force general and the eighth chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, labeled Israel a "military burden."


There is deep suspicion within the American military of the Israeli state, and this is nothing new. As one of the few institutions without the presence of Jews, and that still operates somewhat on the principle of meritocracy, the military produces the most reasoned and professional assessments of Israel in the American state.

They know what Israel is and what it is not.

Israel is not the shield of the West or a mighty dagger in the dark lands of Islam. It is a cripple and a dependent militarily speaking. Its power comes from its global spy networks, and its financial and political intimidation of influential people. 

It is not and never will be a military power. Not in a million years.

Jews have it in their minds that they're the center of the world, that God chose them to rule all the other nations, but geography, demography, and military reality all beg to differ. 

God has always favoured military conquerors, and they are not that. 

At a certain point, military reality will come to bear upon Israel. You can't wish it away. You can't label it anti-semitic and call it a day.

At a certain point, all the theocrats, Kabbalists, Talmudists, Christian Zionists, Freemasons, Twelver Shia, Jewish mystics, and occult weirdos in Washington and elsewhere need to be pushed out and replaced by sensible military men who first and foremost make judgements based on military realities, not apocalyptic theology, eschatological dreams, and political fantasies. 

The Israeli project will eventually reach a dead end because of its radical nature and its inflexibility to adjust to military realities. Ditto for the American empire and the Islamic Republic.

These regimes are pariahs, not victors. 

II.

George Scratchley Brown (17 August 1918 – 5 December 1978) was a United States Air Force general who served as the eighth chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In this capacity, he served as the senior military adviser to the president of the United States, the National Security Council and the secretary of defense. Through the commanders of the unified and specified commands, he was also responsible for executing the decisions of the National Command Authorities regarding worldwide readiness and employment of combat forces of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps.

. . .Brown had a reputation for speaking frankly and forthright, as indicated by some of his statements getting heavily criticized during his term as chairman. The event happened when Brown commented on two occasions—firstly to a Duke University audience in October 1974, and then to a French reporter in 1976—that Israel was becoming a burden to the Pentagon and that he believed the reason for continued military aid was due to Jews having control over America's banks, newspapers and elected officials. His exact words were:
It's so strong you wouldn't believe now. We have the Israelis coming to us for equipment. We say we can't possibly get the Congress to support that. They say, 'Don't worry about the Congress. We will take care of the Congress.' Now this is somebody from another country, but they can do it. They own, you know, the banks in this country, the newspapers. Just look at where the Jewish money is.
Brown's comments at Duke and subsequent reprimand by President Gerald Ford were reported on the front page of The Washington Post on 13 and 14 November 1974. There was speculation that Brown would be asked to resign, or at least not be nominated for a second two-year term; but he was re-nominated and went on to serve under the new president, Jimmy Carter.

In April 1976 during an interview with Ranan Lurie, a cartoonist for Newsweek, Brown was asked to comment on his opinion of the British Armed Forces, Brown replied, "They're no longer a world power. All they've got are generals, admirals and bands." Reaction in Britain was mixed. Some, like Lord Allenby condemned Brown's remarks, while others, like Lord Monckton acknowledged the truth of the remarks.
An excerpt from, "Gen. George Scratchley Brown August 1, 1973–June 30, 1974" U.S. Department of War: 
On August 1, 1973, President Richard M. Nixon appointed Brown to be chief of staff of the Air Force. As chief, General Brown worked to enhance the Air Force strategic bomber program and to replace the aging B–52s with B–1s, which could carry larger payloads and penetrate deeper into the USSR.

On July 1, 1974, President Nixon appointed General Brown chairman of the JCS, the first Air Force officer since Gen. Nathan Twining to hold the position. As chairman, Brown served three presidents during an era of limited budgets and constrained force structure. In 1974 he provoked an international controversy by asserting that Jews “own the banks and the newspapers in this country.” After making these remarks at a gathering at Duke University Law School, he was called to the White House by President Gerald R. Ford and rebuked. General Brown issued an apology. Acknowledging that Brown had made a mistake, Ford opted to keep Brown on as JCS chairman because of his excellent record as an officer.

Two years later General Brown got into trouble again by saying that Israel had become a military burden to the United States and by making deprecatory remarks about Britain and Iran. Of Britain he said, “It’s pathetic now; it just wants to make you cry. They’re no longer a world power. All they have got are generals, admirals, and bands. They do things in great style . . . on the protocol side. But it makes you sick to see their forces.” On Iran: “Gosh, the (military) program the shah has coming. . . . It just makes you wonder whether he doesn’t some day have visions of the Persian Empire.” Later General Brown said his remark about Israel referred to a partial depletion of U.S. military equipment stocks to resupply Israel after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. He also praised the British for their gallantry and professionalism and said he had no reason to believe that the shah of Iran planned to do anything other than lead his country properly.

As chairman, much of his time was consumed with Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty talks that focused on finding a formula by which the U.S. lead in missile reentry vehicles would offset Soviet superiority in missile throw-weight. Brown led the Joint Chiefs in urging U.S. air and naval deployments to South Vietnam following the U.S. pullout. But public and congressional opposition to any further involvement in Vietnam precluded approval of any military action. General Brown also participated in decision making over the U.S. response to two confrontations in the Far East that were widely perceived as tests of U.S. will in the aftermath of the communist takeover of South Vietnam. These were the Mayaguez incident in May 1975 and the shooting of two U.S. officers and wounding of another by North Korean guards in August 1976 in the demilitarized zone that divided the two Koreas. He also played a significant role in the success of the 1977 negotiations transferring the Panama Canal to Panama.

August 22, 2026

A Conversation with Stephen Sizer



Video Title: A Conversation with Stephen Sizer. Source: BEHOLD. Date Published: February 27, 2026.

Trump Taking Ls After Ls

 

The new currency is blood, not dollars, you old baby.

An excerpt from, "Did Trump Try to Bribe the Iranian Generals With Billions?" By Nick Stamatakis, Helleniscope, August 20, 2026:

An extraordinary story has emerged from the secret diplomacy surrounding the U.S.-Iran confrontation: Allegedly, Trump, acting like a mafia boss in international relations as he is constantly behaving in his second term, and thinking that Iran is the same as Venezuela, tried through backchannels in Iraqi Kurdistan to bribe the leader of the Revolutionary Guards of Iran (IRGC)!!

What is substantially documented is that the Trump administration opened an unusual backchannel to senior figures in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, reportedly using Iraqi Kurdish President Nechirvan Barzani as an intermediary to reach IRGC commander General Ahmad Vahidi.

What allegedly happened inside that channel is far more explosive.

According to Larry Johnson and Pepe Escobar, their sources cited by the Transition Protocol YouTube program insist that Washington tried to persuade senior IRGC figures to distance themselves from, or potentially turn against, Iran’s political leadership. The alleged inducement reportedly involved enormous financial incentives.

 . . .Their sources allegedly claim that senior IRGC figures were approached with financial incentives potentially worth billions of dollars in exchange for breaking with Iran’s leadership or facilitating a political realignment in Tehran. They describe the strategy as resembling a “Venezuela playbook” — trying to separate a government’s security elite from its political leadership.

Vahidi allegedly rejected the approach and allegedly informed Iran’s senior leadership. The same sources also claim that Pakistani Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir was approached as a possible intermediary and allegedly refused to participate in any effort to destabilize Tehran.

Those specific allegations have not been independently confirmed.