Hitler's Moral Stance On The Use of Chemical Weapons

"One of the most intriguing mysteries of World War II is why Germany and the Allies did not use chemical and biological weapons against each other. As the Third Reich crumbled, it seemed ever more likely that Hitler would employ weapons of mass destruction.

The reason he didn’t was deterrence. Both sides feared that, as in World War I, once one side used chemical weapons, so would their opponents. It turned out that German nerve gases like sarin were far more effective than Allied chemical weapons, such as mustard gas, but the Germans didn’t know that." - Michael Peck, "What If Hitler Used Chemical Weapons Against the Allies on D-Day?" The National Interest, June 14, 2020.

A question that has perplexed Western historiography on WWII, which is dominated by Jewish voices, is why Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against the Allied invasion of Normandy considering his regime had no qualms about using gas on Jewish civilians.

Was he simply afraid that his enemy would return the favour in spades?

Or did he have more noble intentions?

This question is fatal to the Holocaust narrative and exposes it as a total lie.

A likely explanation is that Hitler prohibited the use of chemical weapons on moral grounds against both military and civilian targets.

Hitler personally experienced gas warfare in the trenches of WWI and that painful memory undoubtedly influenced his decision to not repeat the errors of his military superiors.

The black and white mind is incapable of giving the benefit of the doubt to Hitler because in that myopic worldview he's the epitome of the Devil. Facts do not sway. Once you are convinced of something on an emotional level it's hard to dislodge that belief.

The fact is the Nazi war machine was more moral than its adversaries, especially the Soviets. 

There's no question repugnant characters made their way up the ranks of the Nazi regime. Government power always attracts the worst cretins and murderers in all societies. But, as a matter of state policy, which fell under the final authority of Hitler, chemical weapons and other weapons of mass destruction were prohibited from military and civilian use for moral reasons.

Liberating The White House

A radical, genocidal, anti-religious, anti-human, anti-freedom, anti-Semitic, and anti-American regime currently occupies the White House. 

Some are convinced this regime came into power in 1913 with the secret establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank by the Rothschilds dynasty and its subordinates in the United States. 

Those in the American banking establishment who opposed this financial coup for patriotic reasons were removed from the picture by the deliberate sinking of the Titanic 114 years ago today, many of whom were on board.

The two World Wars that followed the creation of this evil bank led to the destruction of European power, the end of multiple European empires, the subjugation of Christendom, and the creation of the messianic Jewish state in the heart of the Middle East.

We now know with absolute certainty that the justification for the State of Israel - the so-called Holocaust - was a complete lie. The Nazi regime in Germany committed no such crime. 

Zionists and Nazis shared a common aim in dispossessing European Jews and settling them in Palestine. They were practically allies. The Israeli regime is secretly the biggest fan of the Nazis. 

They learned from the best. 

It was a Nazi tactic to tell a big lie often enough until it became historical gospel.

Defaming the Nazis and garnering world sympathy for the Jews' plight with one big lie was an act of evil genius. That tactic was repeated on 9/11 against a new global enemy---Islam.

By the turn of the 21st century the United States was well within the Zionist bosom. The murder of President Kennedy in 1963 send a warning shot to the American political system that even Presidents are considered fair game if they grow a mind of their own and step out of line. No one is immune from the Zionist' wrath. 

The traitors and collaborators who worked with the Zionists were rewarded with political power and wealth. The Bush Family played it beautifully, and received multiple terms in the Oval Office. 

Over time, the parasite took on the body of the host. 

Previous Presidents had the tact and political acumen to hide the true allegiance of the White House and disguise the real purpose of its foreign policy.

But then came Trump. In many ways he's a gift from God, for he has exposed just how occupied the White House really is. 

He clumsily tries to hide his loyalty to Israel over America by wearing that cheap MAGA hat, but he's too stupid to pull off the act. And his team, from the FBI head to his Vice President and War Secretary, are full of retards. We have watched Idiocracy come to life in the past few years. 

But it's not all a joke. 

We must always remember evil crimes have been committed by occupants in the White House and their masters. Cannibalism. The rape of minors. Mass murder. State terrorism. Genocide.

They offer the world nothing but death, disease, and destruction. And they expect to be thanked for it.

This sinking ship hit an iceberg in the Persian Gulf and now demands lifeboats from every nation and sub-nation on Earth, even going so far as to dictate to the Vatican its Near East policy.

They have lost the plot. 

Instead of returning the White House to the American people the Zionists seek its complete destruction. The way they see it is if they can't have it then nobody can. 

I anticipate the Zionists will attack the White House in a false flag operation in the future and kill Trump if they have to. Yes, they are that brazen.

But they will not get away with it.

The White House will be liberated.

Catholic Teaching On Nuclear Weapons

An excerpt from, "Nuclear Weapons And Our Catholic Response" United States Conference of Catholic Bishops:

The Catholic Church’s teaching requires that any use of force be proportionate and discriminate. It must not produce more harm than good and must respect noncombatant immunity and protect civilians. The Church has long opposed the use of nuclear weapons, especially against non-nuclear threats, and the development of new nuclear weapons. The Church urges that nuclear deterrence be replaced with concrete measures of disarmament based on dialogue and multilateral negotiations. 

. . .

“What can be said, too, about those governments which count on nuclear arms as a means of ensuring the security of their countries? Along with countless persons of good will, one can state that this point of view is not only baneful but also completely fallacious. In a nuclear war there would be no victors, only victims. The truth of peace requires that all —whether those governments which openly or secretly possess nuclear arms, or those planning to acquire them— agree to change their course by clear and firm decisions, and strive for a progressive and concerted nuclear disarmament. The resources which would be saved could then be employed in projects of development capable of benefiting all their people, especially the poor.” - Pope Benedict XVI, 2009 World Day of Peace Message, no. 13.

An excerpt from, "What the Catholic Church Teaches on Nuclear Weapons" Catholic Peace Action: 

The Catholic Church has always been consistent that there can be no moral case for the actual use of a weapon of mass destruction as it is indiscriminate. On this basis the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Catholic teaching are indefensible.

These writings however did not close the discussion as it was argued by many leading Catholics that the concept of nuclear deterrence would not only prevent the use of nuclear weapons but even prevent war itself. A balance of terror they argued would at the height of the Cold War preserve peace if both sides had nuclear arsenals. Pope St.John Paul II gave some support for this position when he wrote in 1982 to the United Nations,

“in current conditions deterrence based on balance, certainly not as an end in itself but as a step on the way toward a progressive disarmament, may still be judged morally acceptable.”

For Catholics in a nuclear weapons state this was a very interesting time with debate for and against the possession of nuclear weapons. These debates and exchanges continued for many years with respect shown on all sides.

The Scottish Catholic Bishops in 1982 also made a statement,

“If it is immoral to use these (nuclear) weapons it is immoral to threaten their use”

For many years the official position of the Catholic Church remained that of Pope St.John Paul II but the discussions continued and as time progressed the conditional acceptance of nuclear deterrence became more difficult to sustain as it became more evident the condition of progressive disarmament was not happening.

In 2005 Archbishop Migliore, the then observer of the Holy See to the United Nations wrote,

“The time has gone for finding ways to a balance in terror, the time has come to re-examine the whole strategy of nuclear deterrence…it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.”

Why The World Needs A Catholic Nuke, An African Nuke, And A Shia Nuke

List of nations with nuclear weapons:

Russia (Christian Orthodox)

United States of America (Freemason Republic)

China (Communism)

France (Freemason Republic)

United Kingdom (Protestant Monarchy)

Pakistan (Sunni Islam)

India (Hinduism)

Israel (Judaism)

North Korea (Communism)

The policy of nuclear prohibition has been a disastrous and misguided error. It has made the world less safe, less free, and less stable. 

It's also curious that of the nine nations that officially have nuclear weapons, not one of them is a Catholic country. 

Brazil, Mexico, and the Philippines are the countries with the biggest Catholic populations and not one of them has acquired nuclear weapons. 

Why is that? 

Is there a Vatican fatwa against the possession of nukes?

Why is there a Masonic bomb, a Jewish bomb, a Sunni bomb, a Hindu bomb, a Communist bomb, a Protestant bomb, a Christian Orthodox bomb, but not a Catholic bomb?

The continent of Asia has five countries with nukes. That's the most. 

Africa has zero.

Gaddafi tried to get one but he gave up. If Libya had acquired nukes it probably would not have fallen, and Europe would be safer today.

Nukes are nothing to be afraid of. They bring safety, comfort, and dignity to a nation, like a gun does for a household. It keeps trespassers and thieves away.

My advice to the Pope and the Ayatollah is don't wait. End the misguided religious prohibition against nuclear weapons. Protect your flock. Get nukes now. Build as many as you can. 

The same goes for countries like Brazil and South Africa. 

South America and Africa need the nuclear blanket.

Let the Catholics, the Africans, and the Shia feel the same sense of security as the Jews, Hindus, Masons, Protestants, and Communists do.

Operation Desert Storm II: The Christian Reconquest of Jerusalem

 

Give the order Leo.

For the longest time I was emotionally supportive of the State of Israel because I believe every people deserves a homeland. The Jewish people, scattered and tormented across Europe for centuries, finally going back to their spiritual birthplace and establishing a state of their own, is a very appealing story.

But the reality is Israel is an expansionist and genocidal monster that encourages chaos, civil wars, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and state destruction all around it. It is a messianic cult, not a rational state.

Israel wants to rule as the undisputed power not just in the Middle East but in the world. The persecuted race wants to be the master race.

Its grip on America is now naked and unashamed. Netanyahu struts around the White House like he owns the place. The entire Trump presidency has been one long humiliation ritual. 

Israel is a threat to the entire world. Any nation or political figure that speaks out against it is killed or severely reprimanded, whether it be the President, the Ayatollah, the Caliph, or the Pope.

Israel's ire is limitless. Recently, Spain's rebuke of Israel's war crimes found it the target of another migrant wave into its cities. This was no doubt a message from Israel that Spain is vulnerable to demographic warfare and should mind its business. 

But it is its business. Spain will not be safe, and Europe will not be free, unless the Holy Land comes once again under Christian dominion. 

It is now common knowledge that the NGOs that direct Muslim and African refugees into Europe are Jewish-run. They kill two birds with one stone - functioning Middle Eastern states, and European polities.

But Israel is not responsible for all the conflicts and sources of trouble in the Middle East. It did not put the radical Ayatollahs in power in Iran. That was the work of America and England. It is not at fault for the lingering Kurdish question. The West and the regional states are to blame for not resolving that issue fairly and humanely.

But Israel is responsible for initiating unnecessary wars, spreading Jihadist terrorism, and directing the U.S. military machine like its playtoy. 

As long as Israel is allowed to survive it will cause trouble both for Muslims and Christians. It is a global issue, and primarily an European one.

Its dismemberment should not solely be a Palestinian or Islamic aim. Frankly, Christians have more right to that real estate. A new crusade would be more within reason and have greater religious standing than the establishment of a Palestinian state or a liberation by Shiite Muslims.

The Pope must answer Trump's insult and the Christian-bashing by the lunatics around him not with polite messages and soft rhetoric but a declaration of war.

Let the self-righteous fools in Washington understand that the Zio-American empire has done enough damage to the world. Their time is finished.