The War of The Losers

 

I've been trying to come up with a title to comprehensively describe the USrael-Iran war. 

We had the Great War in 1914. Then the Good War in 1939. Following that trend this must be the Bad War.

Since both sides are agents of Satan, and Satan is the biggest loser spiritually speaking according to the Abrahamic tradition, there will be no winners in this war.

What we have here is two evil sides waging war against each other to advance the depopulation of the world, the destruction of the American empire, the break up of Iran, and the transformation of the world economy.

The treasonous occult practitioners leading the governments of America and Iran are enemies of their own countries and peoples. They know they are tyrants who can only sustain their tyranny via a state of endless war. So they don't consider fighting to a standstill and wasting tens of billions of dollars in a big war as a loss for their countries.

Israel is another matter. Jewish patriots are leading that country. They are doing right by their people. So Israeli leaders have to be commended. Their actions and policies reflect the will of the Israeli people. Israeli society wants war. They want to conquer Gaza, Southern Lebanon, and Syria. Netanyahu is delivering on his promises. He is a good leader for his people.

The same can't be said for the losers in Washington and Tehran.

II.

An excerpt from, "The New Underworld Order: Triumph of Criminalism the Global Hegemony of Masonic Intelligence" by Christopher Story, Stranger Journalism, 2006, Pg. 2 - 7:

As if to anticipate this book, a so-called 'former' US intelligence operative has openly acknowledged that US intelligence is engaged in Works of Darkness. Of course, we all know this - the whole world, since Abu Ghraib, now knows it, although even today few have any grasp of the scale of the reprobate US intelligence community's involvement in such works; but for a 'former' US intelligence operative to admit as much, is certainly a most interesting development. It would be comforting to believe that the remark was made in a contrite spirit of humility and tenderness towards those whom the intelligence community has wronged. No such luck, unfortunately.

The 'former' operative's admission surfaced in an article by the veteran US investigative reporter (with the closest of intelligence community links), Seymour Hersh, in the aftermath of the atrocities committed in Abu Ghraib, with which the US intelligence-linked corporations CACI and Titan 'were' associated (and for which they were largely responsible). Hersh was describing what he had learned about a 'Special-Access Program' (SAP), or clandestine 'Black' operation subject to the US Defense Department's most stringent level of security, which was itself blown' by Hersh's revelations in The New Yorker. Under the SAP, Hersh reported, 'commandos crossed borders without visas and could interrogate terrorism suspects deemed too important for transfer to the military's facilities at Guantanamo, Cuba'. US commandos, operatives and other specialists 'carried out instant interrogations - using force if necessary -at secret CIA detention centers scattered all around the world'. The (resulting) intelligence 'would be relayed to the SAP command center in the Pentagon in real time, and sifted for those pieces of information critical to the 'White', or overt, world' [see pages 6 and 8 et seq. for the significance of this differentiation from the 'Black', or 'covert' world]. This is the paragraph in which the unprecedented official admission in question was made:

'Fewer than two hundred operatives and officials, including [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were "completely read into the program", the former intelligence official said. The goal was to keep the operation protected. "We're not going to read more people than necessary into our heart of darkness", he said. "The rules are: 'Grab whom you must. Do what you want"".

For any US intelligence official to acknowledge publicly that his or her intelligence community has a 'heart of darkness' is probably unprecedented. All national intelligence communities, being essentially ocultically-oriented secret societies riddled with Freemasonry, have hearts of darkness'; but they scarcely ever admit this central reality, other than via symbology, such as MI5's revealingly esoteric triangle-symbol shown in Figure 1 below. Two possible explanations for this open admission of collective demonic possession, which emerged in the aftermath of the maelstrom of revelations and reports surrounding the Satanic abuse perpetrated inter alia by those 'cutout' US intelligence operatives at the notorious Abu Ghraib detention facility in the Baghdad area and elsewhere, sprang to mind.

One possibility was that the official intelligence 'owners' of the 'heart of darkness' are so Satanised and indifferent to the sufferings they inflict that they couldn't care less any more, especially now that they have been 'rumbled', what the rest of the world thinks. Such an attitude would be consistent with the arrogant protestation, heard repeatedly from some Americans, that it doesn't matter what conclusions the rest of the world has reached concerning the dangers that this revolutionary United States now presents to humanity: what matters is that America should be feared.

The second possibility is that the intelligence source who briefed Hersh was somewhat ashamed of the blackness of the CIA/DIA's collective 'heart of darkness', and was dismayed by the appalling international publicity as well as by the fact that this SAP had gone so badly wrong: 'We've never had a case where a Special-Access Program went sour - and this goes back to the Cold War'.

He complained that the intelligence officer to whom Mr Rumsfeld had delegated the SAP, Stephen Cambone, an operative with an allegedly murky past, had decided to bring the SAP rules (i.e., the absence of all residual morality) into the prisons; in other words, the regular military personnel operating in the prisons were told that what went on there now formed part of the covert operation, where no civilised rules applied.

By the time the official's 'heart of darkness' admission appeared in print, the whole world had been reminded that the United States' regard for human life and dignity was as depraved as that of the Hitler and Stalin regimes; that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely; and that the United States' protestations that it was engaged in 'spreading democracy' in a region where it is non-existent, was indeed, as had always been widely assumed, a disreputably fraudulent prospectus. This was the case not least because the United States is itself in the habit of rigging its own electoral process, as the extensively documented fiddling of the November 2004 General Election demonstrated [see Addendum 1, page 662].

The shamefacedness of the Bush II Administration on this score was repeatedly in evidence following that election, as top officials from the President down reiterated the official 'line' that the United States is the guardian angel of that wondrous gift called 'democracy'. For example, on 16th June 2005, President G. W Bush denounced the Iranian election as a sham designed to ensure that power was to be retained in the hands of an undemocratic, repressive elite. The Iranian people', Mr Bush said, 'deserve a genuinely democratic system in which elections are honest, and in which their leaders answer to them instead of the other way around'. This hypocritical statement - one of many of its kind coming from a US President who, whatever may have been thought of the heavily Soviet-penetrated US Democratic Party, is shown to have presided over a political machine that stole both the election of 2004 and the preceding election typical of lies perpetrated by the head of a regime engaged in the exercise of 'democratism' (a Soviet-era word meaning 'the creation and maintenance of the illusion of democracy') who, by ingrained habit, chooses to be unable and unwilling to distinguish between truth and falsehood. For Iranians, who are no fools, to be told by a US President who claimed to be sustaining 'freedom' while openly depriving the American people of it, and who bragged about democracy after having usurped power which is supposed to flow from the people, was further proof of the accuracy of their slogan describing the United States as 'the Great Satan'. Mr Bush then tried to distinguish between the Iranian regime and the people of Iran by hurriedly elaborating that 'today, the Iranian regime denies' the Iranian people their rights. It brutalises its people and denies their liberty'. And Washington wondered why the Iranian people are so manifestly equivocal about American official professions of 'friendship' towards them, as opposed to their regime. It is because the level of hypocrisy pouring out of Washington's intelligence-controlled regime stinks in their nostrils.

Take the President's assertion on that occasion that the Iranian regime 'brutalises' its people', a true statement that is overwhelmingly supported by the historical record. The US regime does likewise. For instance, from late 2004 onwards, US journalists have been sent to jail for refusing to divulge their sources to the authorities, which is exactly what happens in brutalised states like, say, Zimbabwe. In 2005, Andrew Stephenson, who worked tirelessly pro bono publico to expose the fraudulence of the 2004 General Election [see Appendix 1], made the serious mistake of seeking employment in Washington DC as a lobbyist, having exhausted his financial resources. On the plane back to his home city, Seattle, he was taken violently ill, and was later diagnosed with cancer of the pancreas. After patriotic Americans rallied round and raised, in extremely short order, no less than $70,000 to finance a very serious surgical operation at Johns Hopkins Hospital, carried out by the nation's top surgeon in this discipline, attempts were made by one of the US Government's several hyperactive disinformation and discrediting teams to spread lies to the effect that Stephenson had raised the funds for his own benefit, i.e. fraudulently. When activists exposed these lies and their perpetrators, the hospital authorities professed to have been unable to locate the $70,000, which had been despatched to them by Fedex (it was suddenly 'found' lying unopened in an office). After Stephenson's return to Seattle, another branch of the evil US intelligence disinformation team (based in Toronto) intervened unilaterally with the Seattle authorities, who were to have provided Andy Stephenson with urgently necessary chemotherapy, so that his insurance cover was suddenly cancelled. On 9th June, a very senior US intelligence official (one of the few with any integrity) informed this Author that the virus that will have caused Stephenson's cancer was most likely injected via syringe into a toothpaste tube in his hotel room: "That's how they do it', he added. A few days later, a colleague (of this Author) who was attending a political reception, raised the subject of the Government's repressive policies with a person known to be an intelligence officer as well as a political operator. He 'snapped his fingers', whereupon two operatives approached our friend and entered into a conversation, dealing with certain issues that our friend had raised. One of these, a Transportation Security Agency (TSA) operative, said gratuitously, on the subject of poisonings, that 'a lot of these are happening' [sic] - meaning that the US Government is engaged, 'as we speak', in the standard Illuminist practice of poisoning its enemies.

It therefore, self-evidently 'ill behoves' the President of the United States to lecture the Iranians (and other foreigners whose governments are equally the servants of Lucifer) on the abominations of their governments, and the repressive policies against their own people that they perpetrate, when the US Government is itself engaged in the same kind of Satanic behaviour while professing that it is the guardian angel of freedom and democracy. No wonder such official hypocrisy stinks in the nostrils of members of the human race who have not yet succumbed to the orchestrated dumbing-down processes being perpetrated against them by their own Illuminised governments.

Manifestly such behaviour, and any association with it or condoning of it, is incompatible with the Way, the Truth and the Life. A certain kindly American intell-igence officer known to the Author has touchingly protested that he loves the Lord first, and his country next - which, being interpreted, and in the context in which this statement was made - meant that he saw no incompatibility between his lifelong association with the CIA, and thus with its 'heart of darkness', and his 'commitment' to Jesus Christ. Unfortunately, such a convenient compromise is out of the question for those who profess to believe, and therefore hope for salvation. In Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 10, verse 21, Paul warns:

'Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils; ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils'.

A choice has to be made. Shall I remain associated with this intelligence organisation and its now openly self-acknowledged 'heart of darkness'? Or shall I renounce, once and for all, the 'Works of Darkness', so that I shall, by the Grace of the Holy Sprit, be available to be saved?

'Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall' [I Corinthians Chapter 10, verse 12]. And in Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, Chapter 5, verse 11, Paul commands:

'And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them...'... which is what this work humbly seeks, to the very best of the Author's ability and resources, to do. Note crucially that Paul describes all Works of Darkness as 'unfruitful' - something of an understatement, perhaps, given that, since the Devil is the author of confusion, all Works of Darkness (and therefore all intelligence operations and activity) are characterised by endless strife, contentiousness, bitterness, false witness, deception, lies and generally reprobate behaviour. The Author has himself been a witness to, and a victim of, of this routine pattern of official delinquency, in the course of research inter alia for this book.

Indeed, in the intelligence community context, such institutionalised delinquency in the name of national security soon becomes quite obvious to the targeted observer who is not sitting on his or her brains. One reason for this is that the same techniques are always redeployed, since the Devil knows of no new tricks. The preoccupations, for instance, of the US intelligence community typically revolve around launching fresh deception or scamming operations in order to cover up past 'botches' - operations which have gone badly wrong and have unravelled. Indeed it is characteristic of the CIA and its internal subsidiaries and rivals that they specialise in operations that go wrong. So there is a constant imperative to develop fresh initiatives to cover up previous botches, or to provide 'diversionary services'. This behaviour is akin to that of a gambler at a casino who has lost more than he possesses and who seeks ever more desperately to recoup his losses by taking risks against unbeatable odds, in the pathetic hope that he will 'get lucky' and will not only recoup all his losses, but will earn a profit, too. Of course, this never happens.

Hersh's article on the circumstances surrounding Abu Ghraib made it crystal clear that what the 'former' intelligence official who admitted that the CIA (et al) has 'a heart of darkness' was most concerned about was that the secret SAP or 'Black' operation, which he said at one point 'is still active', would never be exposed (even though, as indicated, he was himself helping to expose it). The 'Black' programme had to be kept in the darkness and not revealed to the 'White' world, according to an intelligence 'consultant' also interviewed by Hersh - not only for security reasons, but also 'because the process is unpleasant. It's like making sausage: you like the result but you don't want to know how it was made'. A European version of this syndrome reads: 'When you put your shoes outside your hotel room at night for polishing, you don't want or need to know who cleaned them'.

'Also', the 'former' intelligence officer told Hersh, 'you don't want the Iraqi public and the Arab world, to know' (what utterly depraved barbarians we are Ed.). 'Remember, we went to Iraq to democratise the Middle East [sic!]. The last thing you want to do is let the Arab world know how you treat Arab males in prison'.

But so 'botched' was this accursed Work of Darkness, that not just the Arab world, but every corner of the globe, today knows how certain brutalised Americans treat Arab males in prison: with total indifference to suffering, with depraved sexual lust and with Nazi-like contempt. Reports of imprecise British atrocities perpetrated in Iraq appear to have been disseminated in part so as to take the spotlight off the aberrations of the offending American personnel, although it appears that the collapse of morality which underlies the US abominations has infected the British as well. This behaviour is consistent with the indoctrination format espoused and perpetrated by the Illuminati, which seeks to procure that selected victims, operatives and implementers of its nefarious plans must be brought to inflict pain without flinching, to kill if necessary without ever looking back afterwards, and to maximise the potential of the use of fire. In his last interview before his sudden death during an exorcism of a young girl in July 1999, the Author's late friend Fr Malachi Martin explicitly confirmed that Luciferians (who are worshippers of, and are possessed by, Lucifer) 'have all passed through [initiation] and that involves three things: the infliction of pain without flinching, the infliction of death without flinching, and the use of fire'.

Revenge of The Goys: Remembering Kirk, Kennedy, And The Martyrs Fallen To The Zionist Blade

Speech is a powerful weapon. So is the act of remembering.

Israel is more afraid of America than of Iran or anyone else in the Middle East. 

The U.S. is the cash cow and the sugar daddy. Without it Israel would shrink six feet. 

The Zionists have bullied and pressured American Presidents for multiple generations. They send mail bombs to President Truman in the late 1940s to get him to comply to their demands. 

Threats and acts of violence are all they can muster to advance their strategic case in the Middle East. 

Israeli leaders got away with bullying and killing so they kept doing it. Over time, Washington became the Golden Goose, and Trump is the golden egg it laid. He is the Zionists' crown jewel, the Trojan pig whom they fattened, and will roast at the right opportunity in the near future. 

They will try to milk his death as they've milked his life, and just as they've milked the savings and wealth of the American people. 

They know who their real enemies are, and it is not Muslims or Palestinians. 

I'm confident that Netanyahu celebrated Charlie Kirk's death more than even the death of Hassan Nasrallah of Hezbollah or of that Hamas leader that I've forgotten the name of. 

We're almost nearing the one year anniversary of Kirk's assassination and his murderers are still at large, occupying the White House. 

There's no need to have silly debates about who killed Kirk. Donald Trump killed him because he endorsed the conspiracy at the highest level. The corpse wasn't even buried and that fat motherfucker was dancing on his grave. 

I didn't know who Kirk was until the day he died. They made him famous. He was obviously having an effect, otherwise they wouldn't have killed him. Once he started to sing from a different song sheet they cut the cord. Him going off script pissed them off.

And they chose the time and place to kill him very deliberately. Attacking his neck was a symbolic act. These aren't ordinary killers and thugs. Everything they do is steeped in symbolism. We saw that most brazenly on 9/11.

Killing the Iranian schoolchildren during the first days of the war against Iran was also symbolic of how they wanted the war to proceed. Their aim was to blacken America's name, cut it off at the knees, and demoralize its fighting troops, because Zionism's ultimate goal is to destroy the American empire and rule the world in its stead. 

Whether Trump knows this or not, I do not know. I don't think he cares. It's the people around him and the politicians in Washington who deserve the blame. A man who has to wear a diaper shouldn't be leading a lemonade stand, let alone an empire. They must know that. But I doubt any of them are patriots who care about America. The ones who did were killed or chased out of Washington long ago.

Towards The End of NATO: Why Russia And Spain Must Shape A New Alliance For European Security

"The Strait of Gibraltar has historically been the Western world’s iron gate, a fourteen-kilometer choke point where the rules of the international order were enforced by the sheer weight of NATO’s southern flank. For decades, the assumption was that this gate was manned by Madrid. That assumption died this winter. While the Spanish government has spent the last year expending its diplomatic capital on performative anti-Israel posturing, the waters off its southern coast have quietly transformed into a permissive superhighway for the Russian war machine.

The warning signs have been blinking red for months, but the events of this past New Year’s weekend confirmed the collapse of deterrence. Between December 30 and January 1, a “swarm” of Russian vessels surged through the Strait in a travel pattern that experts have described as highly unusual. This was not innocent commerce. Among the convoy was the MV Lady Mariia, an arms carrier sanctioned by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, and the MV Pluton, a tanker blacklisted for funding the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine. These vessels, integral to Moscow’s shadow economy and logistics network, navigated the most strategic waterway in Europe with impunity.

This surge is not merely a failure of policing; it is a symptom of a NATO ally that has lost its strategic compass. Under Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Madrid has effectively abdicated its role as the guardian of the Strait. Naval historians and local observers have noted a disturbing trend: Spain is “silently yielding control” of the Strait’s southern bank, content to monitor only the northern shore and the Atlantic exit. This retreat has created a maritime void in the southern sector, a lawless corridor where the Russian shadow fleet now operates free from the prying eyes of European inspectors.

The reasons for this abdication are as political as they are operational. The Sánchez government has prioritized ideological crusades over hard security, focusing its foreign policy energy on delegitimizing Israel’s war against Hamas rather than securing its own backyard. It is a bitter irony that while Madrid was busy canceling ammunition contracts with Jerusalem and calling for sports boycotts against the Jewish state, it was allowing sanctioned Russian arms carriers to transit its sovereign waters unmolested. The obsession with the Levant has blinded Spain to the fire rising at its own doorstep." - Amine Ayoub, "Spain Sleeps, Russia Swarms: The Gibraltar Void" The Times of Israel, January 6, 2026.

"It is often argued that, owing to its geographical location, Spain does not view the Russian threat with the same intensity as Eastern countries. Its priorities lie in the South and in more diffuse problems that are not strictly military. This would explain why it is so difficult to anchor the debate in matters concerning national defence.

That said, there is also a broad consensus that Spain’s prosperity, stability and security depend on European stability. According to the most recent findings of the Elcano Royal Institute Barometer (BRIE) released in July 2025, three quarters of the interviewees (75%) believe that Europe should continue sending military aid to Ukraine and more than half (52%) are in favour of Spain sending troops to ensure security in Ukraine. This is an extremely high percentage in light of the fact that Spaniards are typically averse to the deployment of military force in any circumstances. The notion that Ukraine represents the first line of resistance against Russian revisionism seems therefore to have taken root in Spanish public opinion. This fact would seem to justify Spain’s commitment to Ukraine and the East. However, when asked which country could pose a threat to Spain the majority of interviewees pinpoint Morocco (55%), easily outranking Russia (33%), which is especially striking bearing in mind the stability of relations with the former and the belligerence of the latter. This traditional fixation on the southern neighbourhood –where the security challenges tend to be perceived in terms of hybrid rather than military threats– tends to limit Spain’s room for political manoeuvre when it comes to prioritising defence." - Luis Simón, "Finding the balance: Russia, the South and the future of Spain’s defence" Elcano Royal Institute, November 26, 2025.

"A Russian cargo ship that suffered a series of mysterious explosions before eventually sinking off the south-east coast of Spain 17 months ago may have been carrying nuclear submarine reactors destined for North Korea, according to reports." - Sam Jones, "Russian ship that sank near Spain may have been carrying nuclear reactors to North Korea" The Guardian, May 12, 2026.

"Great Britain was the main beneficiary; Utrecht marked the point at which it became the primary European commercial power. In Article X, Spain ceded the strategic ports of Gibraltar and Menorca." - Wikipedia.

 

The U.S.-Israeli sponsored Moroccan invasion of Spanish territory earlier this month did not happen out of the blue.

The Anglo-Americans and Israel wanted to punish Spain for its stance on Palestine and its lukewarm anti-Russia position.

Spain, as a traditional Catholic power, has more in common with Christian Orthodox Russia than the United Kingdom, which is becoming increasingly Islamic and totalitarian. It is jailing priests for fun. It might as well drop the pretenses and declare itself the enemy of all Christendom.

London was always a hotbed for all kinds of political extremism which it exported to Europe and the rest of the world. Socialism, Islamism, Zionism, Transgenderism, Atheism, all these satanic movements began in that rotten capital.

London has always been the main threat to Europe's freedom and security. That was true in 1914. And it is true in 2026. 

What happened in Ceuta, Spain must not be seen as an isolated incident or an event that can be dismissed as simply a Spanish-Moroccan problem. That attack is part of a larger Judeo-Islamic-Masonic threat to Europe's security and world peace. 

The Anglo-Americans and Israel are waging war on Russia and Spain via Ukraine and Morocco. They're using Ukrainian Nazis and Islamic terrorists to bring down both Europe and Russia. 

I have no doubt that the U.S., UK, and Israel transferred their ISIS and Al-Qaeda assets in Morocco's invasion of Spain to use them later on. They will set off bombs in Spain in false flag operations and try to steer Spain fully towards their camp.

Spain must be vigilant and reject this political manipulation. It should get out of NATO, evict the United Kingdom from its territory, and seek a military alliance with Russia. 

The Judeo-Masonic terrorists in London, Washington, and Jerusalem must be punished, not rewarded. They've done enough damage in Ukraine, trying to cause World War III with Russia. They must not be allowed to cause similar chaos in Spain and across Europe. 

It must always be remembered that these creatures do not consider themselves European and seek to do Europe harm.

Make Aelia Capitolina Great Again

The Christians, Jews, and Muslims messed up a good thing. Rome had the right idea with Jerusalem. 

Jerusalem needs to be governed on the basis of religious harmony. Many Gods and Goddesses should be worshipped there, not just one.

It is as true now as it was then. 

Israelis and Palestinians should be evicted to surrounding areas, like Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan, with Palestine itself becoming repopulated with Africans, Egyptians, Syrians, Afghans, Pakistanis, Ukrainians, East Asians, and Indians. Let Israel become a land for all immigrants.

Jerusalem and Palestine should become a symbol of global multiculturalism and religious co-existence under a new Rome. The Rabbi, the Pope and the Ayatollah should take a seat. Let the pagan gods handle this mess.

And this process has already begun. The emigration of Jews from Israel and the genocide of Palestinians are well under away and show no signs of stopping. 

Israelis are moving to places like Cyprus, Greece, Albania, Ukraine, and Argentina, coastal areas and rich, promising lands. These guys know how to pick their spots. Nobody can accuse them of being stupid.

But they miscalculated geopolitically. The mess they've created in Palestine, one of the most sensitive and geostrategic areas of the world, hasn't been a self-contained disaster. This small pocket of land has exported religious terrorism, revolutionary mass politics, and now a global war edging towards a nuclear conflagration to the far ends of the earth, from Argentina to the Korean peninsula. 

This isn't sustainable.

II.

Wikipedia - Aelia Capitolina:

Aelia Capitolina was a Roman colony founded during the Roman emperor Hadrian's visit to Judaea in 129/130 CE. It was founded on the ruins of Jerusalem, which had been almost totally razed after the siege of 70 CE. This act marked a significant transformation of the city from a Jewish metropolis to a small pagan settlement dedicated to the cult of Capitoline Jupiter.

The population of Aelia Capitolina consisted primarily of Roman legionaries, veterans, and other non-Jewish settlers. Jews were forbidden entrance to the city. The city's urban layout was redesigned with broad colonnaded streets, arched gateways, and forums that served as commercial and social hubs. The religious landscape also shifted, with the worship of Roman deities replacing the Jewish religious practices that had been centered around the Temple in Jerusalem. Aelia Capitolina remained a relatively minor city within the Roman Empire, with an estimated population of around 4,000, significantly lower than the population during the late Second Temple period.

The modest colony would change dramatically starting in the early 4th century, when Constantine the Great granted Christianity legal status within the Roman Empire. This led to the construction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, laying the groundwork for its eventual transformation into a prominent Christian center during the Byzantine period. The ban on Jews was maintained until the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem in 636. The Aelia part of the name was used in Arabic as Īlyāʾ during the Umayyad Caliphate.

The Roman-Jewish Wars + The Political Purpose of The Gospels

Soldiers loot holy relics and religious treasures because it's fun and demoralizes the enemy, at least in the moment. Long-term, the looting backfires. The Vikings and Crusaders had a grand old time looting Catholic monasteries and Byzantine churches. But looters always become losers. 

Growing up we weren't taught Jewish history in school, apart from the Holocaust, which we now know was a scandalous hoax. And it wasn't a subject that I was interested in. I liked reading about conquerors. Men like Napoleon, George Washington, Julius Caesar, Frederick the Great, not particular races and religions. Plus, I never read the Bible or any Abrahamic literature, so Judaism was and still is foreign territory. 

But I want to understand why the Jews are the way they are. What made them so race centric and so warlike? Why are they always angry? Why do they divide the world between Jew and Gentile? Why label non-Jews Goyim? Why pull off something like 9/11 and specifically warn Jews to not enter those buildings on that day? Why are Jews so special?

And when did this religious madness begin?

The Roman-Jewish Wars seem like a good place to start. 

I've been listening to Joseph Atwill's interviews on this subject. The way he tells it, Christianity was Rome's official answer to messianic Judaism, not a grassroots religion that developed from the teachings of a man named Jesus.

Rome had a big problem on their hands when it came to the rebellious Jews. In the 1st century B.C. the Jewish religion was becoming extremely violent and unpredictable. They did not take Roman conquests lying down. Other cults and peoples found a way to assimilate to the Roman empire and pay lip service to the Caesars. But not them.

Not only would the most extremist Jews not do that, they also started periodic rebellions that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of citizens in the empire. 

Rome had to find a way to keep the peace. They had wars to fight. They figured if violence couldn't do the trick then maybe religion could. So they invented a peaceful rebel who espoused the tenets of Judaism but would also turn the other cheek when the Emperor demanded taxes and obedience.

With Christianity the goal was to declaw Judaism and turn it into just another cult without all the military baggage and messianic fervour.

This makes a lot of sense to me because if we take Christianity for just another astrotheocratic religious system and mystery cult then why did it appear at this point in time---at the height of the Roman-Jewish wars? 

Its emergence couldn't have been a spontaneous event but the result of a political decision by Rome to respond to the Jewish rebellions with something other than brute force, something that would endure, and permanently alter the nature of the relationship. 

At this time Rome planned on staying around for a thousand years. All empires look ahead into the distant future. The idea of fighting rebellious Jews inside the empire every fifty years just wasn't economically or militarily feasible. Empires can fight other empires for generations without feeling the political cost, but suppressing rebellion after rebellion is another matter. That chips away at authority and makes ruling a large empire impossible.

The Roman-Jewish conflict wasn't a story of small and good underdogs vs. the big bad wolves. It was a story of a vast empire with many diverse religions and cults trying to co-exist with a small but powerful religion that could not tolerate the politco-religious symbols of a foreign ruler on its ancient, ancestral lands. 

And that's totally understandable. I'm sure that if Trump built a tower with his name on it on the ruins of the Kaaba millions of Muslims would be fighting America for the next century. There's some things you just don't do, even if you're the most powerful man in the world. The Roman Caesars did not understand that. They were too arrogant. They were too vain. 

Imagine how history would have unfolded if they just let that stupid temple stand and allowed the Jews to practice their religion in peace.

II.

An excerpt from, "Responding to Comments Part 1 with Joseph Atwill" Source: Neo-Imperial Cult, July 25, 2026, [from the 33: 26 mark in the video]:

Joseph Atwill: I don't think that the Gospels were ever really intended for Zealots. I think that the messianic Zealots, many of whom were brought to Rome following the war, it would have been impossible to convert them. They were steadfast in their religion. They had been defeated militarily but they weren't open to any kind of Roman changing of their scripture. 

I think that just to recognize the zealotry of the Jews, look at the Kitos rebellion. This would have been like fifteen years after the Gospels were written, and I think this was what they were trying to head off with the Gospels. At least not with the Gospels, but with the story of Jesus Christ that they would have brought out. It would have been verbal. They were trying to stop the political spread of messianic Judaism. And Josephus records this, so it's not like I'm conjecturing this. This was the political purpose of the Gospels. It wasn't to convert Zealots. They didn't think they could do that. It would have just stopped the Zealots from getting at the Diaspora Jews and setting off little rebellions all through the empire. 

So they brought out the story of Jesus. It would have been told in the Imperial Cults. And it would have contested any missionaries from the militaristic side of Judaism so that they could have an easier time. However, it was a total flop, because the Kitos rebellion, which is a rebellion of Diaspora Jews, it was the most bloodthirsty thing imaginable. And the Jews got control of Cyprus and they killed all of the Gentiles, 250,000 Gentiles. They rounded them up and slaughtered everyone. This was what Rome was basically trying to effect, that racial hatred. It was warfare. It was warfare between Jews and Gentiles. And religions were just big parts of it. 

Wikipedia:

In 115 CE, a wave of large-scale Jewish uprisings, known as the "Diaspora Revolt", erupted almost simultaneously across several provinces in the Eastern Mediterranean. The uprisings took place while Emperor Trajan was waging a military campaign against the Parthian Empire further east. The revolts appear to have been influenced by long-standing ethnic tensions, the destruction of the Second Temple and revolutionary ideas spread by insurgents from Judaea. Additional factors fueling the unrest included the humiliating Jewish Tax imposed by Rome and widespread messianic expectations of divine redemption. Scholars believe that the rebels may have aimed at a return to Judaea, the re-establishment of Jewish sovereignty, and the rebuilding of the Temple.

In Libya, Jewish forces launched attacks against Greek and Roman populations under the leadership of either Andreas or Lukuas – possibly the same individual known by both names. In Egypt, the uprising reportedly began with clashes between Jewish communities and their Greek neighbors, which escalated when Lukuas and his followers arrived from Cyrenaica. They plundered the countryside and overcame local resistance. The Greeks, supported by Egyptian peasants and Romans, retaliated, massacring the Jews of Alexandria. In Cyprus, Jewish rebels under Artemion's leadership reportedly devastated the island and the city of Salamis.

The Roman response was severe. Marcius Turbo, initially deployed against the Parthians, was redirected to suppress the revolts in Egypt and Libya with a large military force. His campaigns were marked by extreme brutality, leading to the near-extermination of Jewish populations in Cyrenaica, Cyprus, and Egypt. By late 117, the revolts had been largely quelled, though some disturbances in Egypt may have continued into early 118. In the aftermath, Jewish communities in the affected regions suffered immense losses, with archaeological evidence indicating severe destruction, particularly in Cyrene, which required reconstruction under Hadrian.

An excerpt from, "Revolt Against the Modern World" by Julius Evola, 1934, Chapter 29:

The failure of the attempt of the Chaldean hero Gilgamesh corresponds to the fall of Adam in the myth of another civilization within the Semitic cycle, the Hebrew civilization. Here we find a fundamental and characteristic motif: the transformation into sin of what in the Aryan version of the myth was regarded as a heroic, bold deed, often crowned by success, but that in Gilgamesh's myth had a negative outcome only because the hero was caught asleep. In the context of Hebrew Semitism, the one who attempts to take possession of the symbolic Tree is univocally transformed into a victim of woman’s seduction and a sinner. The curse he has to suffer and the punishment that has been meted out to him by a jealous, terrible, and omnipotent god, follow him; there is no better hope, in the end, than that for a “redeemer” who will provide a vicarious atonement. 

In the ancient Hebrew tradition there are also elements of a different type. Moses himself, though he owed his life to a woman of the royal family (i.e., pharaoh’s daughter, Exod. 2:5), was conceived of as having been “rescued from the waters”; likewise, the events described in the book of Exodus are capable of esoteric interpretation. Besides Elijah and Enoch, Jacob too was a heroic type, because he fought an angel and won; in relation to this, even the name “Israel,” which the angel gave him, conveys the idea of a “victory over the deity” (Gen. 32:29). 

These elements are still sporadic and reveal a curious oscillation, which is typical of the Jewish soul, between a sense of guilt, self-humiliation, deconsecration, and carnality and an almost Luciferian pride and rebelliousness. Maybe this could be explained by the fact that even the initiatory tradition, which is also found in Judaism (e.g., the Kabbalah) and which played an important role in the European Middle Ages, has some particularly involuted traits, which characterize it at times as an “accursed science.”

The Jews originally conceived the otherworld as the dark and mute Sheol, or as some kind of Hades without the counterpart of an “Island of Heroes”; not even sacred kings such as David could escape it. This is the theme of the “way of the ancestors” (pitŗ-yāna in Hinduism), which in this context has special relevance as the idea of an ever greater distance between man and God. Even on this plane, however, we find a double characteristic. On the one hand, according to the ancient Hebrews, Jehovah is the true king; thus, the Jews saw in the full and traditional understanding of regal dignity a disparagement of God is privilege (whether historical or not, Samuel is opposition to the establishment of a monarchy is very significant). On the other hand, the Jewish people considered themselves to be a “chosen people” and “God’s people,” who had been promised dominion over all the other peoples and possession of all the riches of the earth. They even derived from the Iranian tradition the theme of the hero Saoshyant, who in Judaism became the “Messiah,” retaining for some time the traits typical of a manifestation of the "Lord of Hosts."

Not without relation to all this, in ancient Judaism we find a very visible effort on the part of a priestly elite to dominate and coalesce a turbid, multiple, and turbulent ethnical substance by establishing the divine Law as the foundation of its “form,” and by making it the surrogate of what in other people was the unity of the common fatherland and the common origins. From this formative action, which was connected to sacred and ritualistic values and preserved from the first redactions of the ancient Torah to the elaboration of the Talmuds, the Jewish type arose as that of a spiritual rather than a physical race. But the original substratum was never totally eliminated, as ancient Jewish history shows in the form of the recurrent betrayals of God and his becoming reconciled with Israel. This dualism and the ensuing tension help to explain the negative forms that Judaism assumed in later times.

For Judaism, as in the case of other civilizations, the time frame between the seventh and the sixth century B.C. was characterized by upheaval. Once the military fortunes of Israel declined, defeat came to be understood as a punishment for “sins” committed, and thus an expectation developed that after a dutiful expiation Jehovah would once again assist his people and restore their power. This theme was dealt with in Jeremiah and in Isaiah. But since this did not happen, the prophetic expectations degenerated into an apocalyptic, messianic myth and in the fantastic eschatological vision of a Savior who will redeem Israel; this marked the beginning of a process of disintegration. What derived from the traditional component eventually turned into a ritualistic formalism and thus became increasingly abstract and separated from real life. To be aware of the role the Chaldean priestly sciences played in this cycle would allow one to connect to this source everything that was successively articulated in Judaism in the form of abstract thought and even of mathematical insights (up to and including Spinoza’s philosophy and the modern “formal” physics in which the Jewish component is very strong). Moreover, a connection was established with a human type, who in order to uphold values that he cannot realize and that thus appear to him increasingly abstract and utopian, eventually feels dissatisfied and frustrated before any existing positive order and any form of authority (especially when we find in him, though in an unconscious way, the old idea according to which the state of justice willed by God is only that in which Israel rules) so as to be a constant source of disorder and of revolution.