April 13, 2026

Operation Desert Storm II: The Christian Reconquest of Jerusalem

 

Give the order Leo.


For the longest time I was emotionally supportive of the State of Israel because I believe every people deserves a homeland. The Jewish people, scattered and tormented across Europe for centuries, finally going back to their spiritual birthplace and establishing a state of their own, is a very appealing story.

But the reality is Israel is an expansionist and genocidal monster that encourages chaos, civil wars, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and state destruction all around it. It is a messianic cult, not a rational state.

Israel wants to rule as the undisputed power not just in the Middle East but in the world. The persecuted race wants to be the master race.

Its grip on America is now naked and unashamed. Netanyahu struts around the White House like he owns the place. The entire Trump presidency has been one long humiliation ritual. 

Israel is a threat to the entire world. Any nation or political figure that speaks out against it is killed or severely reprimanded, whether it be the President, the Ayatollah, the Caliph, or the Pope.

Israel's ire is limitless. Recently, Spain's rebuke of Israel's war crimes found it the target of another migrant wave into its cities. This was no doubt a message from Israel that Spain is vulnerable to demographic warfare and should mind its business. 

But it is its business. Spain will not be safe, and Europe will not be free, unless the Holy Land comes once again under Christian dominion. 

It is now common knowledge that the NGOs that direct Muslim and African refugees into Europe are Jewish-run. They kill two birds with one stone - functioning Middle Eastern states, and European polities.

But Israel is not responsible for all the conflicts and sources of trouble in the Middle East. It did not put the radical Ayatollahs in power in Iran. That was the work of America and England. It is not at fault for the lingering Kurdish question. The West and the regional states are to blame for not resolving that issue fairly and humanely.

But Israel is responsible for initiating unnecessary wars, spreading Jihadist terrorism, and directing the U.S. military machine like its playtoy. 

As long as Israel is allowed to survive it will cause trouble both for Muslims and Christians. It is a global issue, and primarily an European one.

Its dismemberment should not solely be a Palestinian or Islamic aim. Frankly, Christians have more right to that real estate. A new crusade would be more within reason and have greater religious standing than the establishment of a Palestinian state or a liberation by Shiite Muslims.

The Pope must answer Trump's insult and the Christian-bashing by the lunatics around him not with polite messages and soft rhetoric but a declaration of war.

Let the self-righteous fools in Washington understand that the Zio-American empire has done enough damage to the world. Their time is finished.

April 12, 2026

On Iran's Geography And Iranian-Jewish History


Ezra.

An excerpt from, "The Fall of Heaven: The Pahlavis And The Final Days of Imperial Iran" by Andrew Scott Cooper, Picador, 2018, Pg. 48-51:

In the 1920s the land he was destined to rule nudged the southern border of the newly established Soviet Union for more than a thousand miles, skirting the shoreline of the Caspian Sea, plentiful in sturgeon, whose fine caviar graced tables around the world. The spongy storm clouds that sailed down from southern Russia were squeezed dry trying to clear the mountainous rock face of the Alborz Mountains range, ensuring that Persia's northern coast remained perpetually drenched while the kingdom's interior was almost always parched. "Water is the chief concern of the Persian peasant," an American traveler wrote in the early twentieth century. "Wherever he can find the flow of a mountain stream or build a crude canal from a well or spring, a small portion of the desert becomes a paradise and he prospers. Certain of these regions are said to be among the most fertile in the world, producing in abundance not only the finest of wheat and barley, but grapes, peaches, nectarines, pomegranates, figs and melons which are unsurpassed among the fruits of the Temperate Zone."

The sweeping view from the top of the Alborz ridge was of a "magnificent plateau which seems to stretch to eternity," a visitor to Persia once said. Eighteen thousand feet below, clinging to its mountainous hemline, Tehran basked in the sun like a smug cat whose muddy brick tail extended to the edge of the great salt desert. To the east, beyond Yazd with its lyrical skyline of wind chimneys, travelers entered "the great lifeless desert, shaped like a huge hour-glass, 900 miles in length, from the foothills of the Alborz range, in the north, almost to the Indian Ocean, in the south, and ranging in width from 300 to 100 miles." The sprawling Dasht-e Kavit desert held tight its mysteries and miracles. Mighty dust storms roared through like locomotives. Locals in Sistan Province dreaded the annual Wind of One-Hundred-Twenty Days, when broiling gales lashed the region from June to September, and locals still spoke of the time a shepherd and his flock of sheep were dug out alive after a week buried under a sand drift. "Some sections in their utter bleakness resembled landscapes on the moon," was how one American described Dasht-e Kavir in 1950. "At wide intervals walled adobe villages, with green fields and slender poplar trees, or an upthrust of jagged, rocky hills broke the monotony. . . .A haze wrapped the horizon in mystery. Eastward, seemingly limitless, stretched the great salt desert, shimmering in the heat. To the west, gaunt rock hills, pastel-shaped, made a grotesque skyline. A caravan of camels plodded by carrion birds glided above a burro's carcass." 

The main centers of urban life hovered at the desert edge, each a reflection of Persia's dazzling cultural and ethnic diversity. The capital, Tehran, had always been a rough town. Laid waste by the Afghans in 1723, Tehran was a mere cluster of three thousand mud and brick hovels when the Qajar Dynasty appointed it the new Imperial seat. This made strategic sense---the village occupied the gateway to the heights of the Alborz, which overlooked the plateau---but Tehran lacked the elegant artistry and sophistication of the former capital, Isfahan, and most visitors regarded the locals as uncouth and too focused on turning a profit. About seventy-five miles to Tehran's south sat Qom, where the ayatollahs, the country's religious leaders, resided and where important religious schools known as the hawza were located. The second major center of clerical power was Mashad, to the northeast, nestled against the border with Afghanistan. Each year pilgrims trekked to Mashad to pay their respects at the stupendous Holy Shrine of Imam Reza, resting place of the Prophet Mohammad's eighth disciple. Isfahan, always elegant, dominated the central provinces, and tourists from around the world admired the Shah Abbas Mosque, one of the finest examples of Isla mic architecture in the world, which opened out onto the splendid Naghsh-e Jahan Square, where Persian monarchs watched polo matches from a high pavilion, and also the picturesque "Bridge of Thirty-Three Arches," which spanned the Zayande River. Dominating the southwest was the city of Shiraz, "an oasis situated on a high plateau ringed by barren hills. It is a city of gardens and has never been known as a center of trade and industry. Its fame is due to its poets, its gardens, its wine, and its almost mythical position in the Iranian mind." Persia's greatest poets, Hafez and Saadi, wrote of the Shirazi love of songbirds, sweet wine and scent of rose.

The southern provinces were Iran's economic lifeline. In the breadbasket province of Khuzestan, which straddled the Iraqi border, the port city of Abadan boasted the world's largest oil refinery. Running along the southern coastline were the Zagros Mountains, rocky sentinels overlooking the Persian Gulf, where mighty tankers crept through the Strait of Hormuz, only twenty-one miles wide at its narrowest tip, on their way to market. In the sixties the Shah poured more than $1 billion into Persian Gulf oil facilities and at a stroke trebled Iran's oil production and established the foundations for the country's spectacular economic takeoff. The Persian Gulf was Iran's "jugular vein," and he brushed aside foreign critics who accused him of harboring territorial ambitions. When an American journalist asked the Shah whether "Iran's entry into the Persian Gulf would affect the country's relations with the Arabs and Israelis," he offered a stiff retort: "We are in the Persian Gulf. What we are demanding is what has always belonged to our country throughout history."

The Shah's people embodied the contradictions of life along the highway of history. They retained a distinct identity that set them apart from their neighbors and reflected their unique passage through space and time. Life on the high plateau was a constant game of survival, with ever-changing rules. Persians had endured centuries of foreign occupation by absorbing the ways of their overlords to the point where the Greeks, Arabs, and Mongols mirrored them back in return. They were Persians first but also Arabs, Baluchis, Armenians, Kurds, and Turks. More than 90 percent were Muslim, but they shared the land with Jewish, Christian, Bahai, and Zoroastrian minorities. Renowned for their hospitality, artistry, and individualism, the Persians were also inveterate grumblers, too easily slighted and with a capacity to exaggerate and embellish. For a people who prided themselves on their knowledge of science, philosophy, and literature, Persians saw their world as one shaped by elaborate conspiracies that allowed them to shift the blame for their own mistakes and misfortunes onto the shoulders of others. These ultimate survivors were adept at showing different faces to outsiders but also to their own rulers, whom they had a habit of raising up and turning out with bewildering speed---an old saying had it that the people did not often turn, but when they did, it was usually fatal. Persians thrived in adversity only to slacken in good times, so that even when their borders stoved in under relentless pressure from the Russians, Turks, and British in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Persian art, culture, and literature flourished under the Safavid and Qajar Dynasties.

Western visitors regarded the Persians as a brilliant and inscrutable people. The American journalist Frances Fitzgerald traveled to Iran in 1974 and wrote a penetrating account of life under the second Pahlavi king. "Iran is a country of walls and mirrors," she wrote. "Walls surround the villages as they surround every house in Tehran, dividing the public and private lives, creating distances where they do not exist. Behind walls that are mud-brown and anonymous, the rich conceal their fountains and gardens from the desert. . . the great families of Iran have covered the insides of their houses with murals and faceted mirrors so that each room is a visual maze of light and reflections of the real and painted figures. Turn the thought around and the mirrors are a complete defense system, turning away the truth. In Iran, nothing is exactly what it seems. A foreigner finds uncertainty behind arrogance, sadness behind euphoria. But ambiguity may be the only principle of nature in Iran."

An excerpt from, "In Search of Zarathustra: Across Iran and Central Asia To Find the World's First Prophet" by Paul Kriwaczek, Vintage Books, 2002, Pg. 194-95:

The suggestion that Darius was a committed Zoroastrian might shed some light on the otherwise mysterious process by which a number of Zarathustra's key concepts had already infiltrated the Jewish religion long before a belief in the imminent End of Time and the coming of the Messiah so altered the fate of the Roman world.

Unfortunately the only record we have of relations between the Judaean exiles and their Achaemenid rulers is contained in the biblical books of Ezra and Nehemiah, a rather tortured account of the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in Jerusalem, so badly confusing dates and names of kings that generations of scholars have argued about whether Ezra or Nehemiah came first and when and how the walls of Jerusalem were repaired and the Temple rebuilt. What does seem clear is that both Ezra and Nehemiah were important personages in the Persian royal court in the fifth century BC----Nehemiah was cup-bearer to the king----and that they received permission----and financial support----to return to the land of their fathers and carry out a religious revolution, forcibly imposing their version of true Judaism on an astonished population. From now on, only those who had been in exile were to be counted as true Jews. It would be surprising if they hadn't, even unconsciously, absorbed Iranian ideas while serving their Persian masters. The consequences were to be great, for Ezra is thought by most scholars to have been the one responsible for editing together the traditional texts preserved by the Judaean exiles, thus creating the Hebrew Bible.

The Three Blind Mice Conduct "Diplomacy"

 

America did not send its best and brightest to negotiate a deal with Iran in Pakistan. If it wasn't all so tragic we would be able to laugh at this. 


The idea of talking for twenty one hours and failing to agree on even one issue of significance shows both sides were talking past and over each other. These were not serious negotiations. Washington did not send statesmen to conduct diplomacy but buffoons who were instructed to make unreasonable demands so talks can fail and war can resume.

And there's nothing wrong with that. War is good. Sometimes, war is needed. As I've written before, West Asia needs a cleansing and only war can provide that. 

If America wants to be a midwife to the chaos and kill its empire in the service of filthy Zionists then that's a choice it will have to live with for the rest of time. Pax Americana won't be missed, and Pax Judaica will be a miscarriage. Iran will abort the baby, even if it means its demise.

Israel will come to see reality the hard way. The world will not be a permanent hostage to the mythology of a B.C. Semitic tribe. If they think Iran is radical they haven't been paying attention because what's coming will make the Ayatollahs look like Ghandi. 

The Shi'ite are the peaceniks of Islam. They're the mystic ones, preoccupied with philosophy. The real warriors of Islam have always been the Sunnis. And they haven't entered the battle yet.

And I doubt they will because most of them are under lock and key. They are zombies. The main Sunni nations of today, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, are truly pathetic. They are American slaves.

But every slave eventually turns on its master, especially when the sting of the whip doesn't inspire fear like it used to. And it's reaching that point.

April 11, 2026

Rise of The Planet of The Jews: The War at Hand And The Charade In Pakistan



America and Iran negotiating over the fate of the Middle East with Israel in the background is a bit like Batman and the mob negotiating over the fate of Gotham while the Joker grins with giddy in the corner, planning to burn it all down.

Until the problem of Zionist supremacy is faced directly by the world powers, and Middle Eastern states, do not speak of peace, negotiations, or ceasefires. 

Israel is more than a traditional spoiler in geopolitics that can be ignored because it has the world's superpower by the balls and isn't letting go. 

It has the power to threaten, not Trump.

Trump threatening China is like Carney threatening America. It's just silliness. 

As far as the world is concerned, Washington isn't really relevant anymore. It wasn't relevant in Syria, Afghanistan, or Iraq. Turkey, Pakistan, and Iran closed those files. 

America only served as the battering ram, the hammer of Thor, used to break things. Diplomatically it didn't initiate anything. It didn't bring democracy. It left behind Sunni and Shia terrorist groups in charge in all three countries. It even abandoned its makeshift allies, discarding them like trash.

World leaders, Iranian representatives included, must negotiate directly with Israel. It is the sole power in Washington. Why speak with Vance? It's a waste of time. He has no power. 

If America had any sovereignty left it would have hanged the traitor and Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard to set an example to the other Jewish traitors that treason won't be tolerated. Instead they let him go back to Israel because that's where the power is.

It is Israel we must set our focus and ire on. Jews in Israel and elsewhere believe they are the master race, above the law everywhere they go. This silly notion of theirs must be opposed and defeated. 

No single race or religion must be allowed to rule this planet. Both Jew and Muslim must come to understand that they are not morally superior to anyone else.

They either get with the program or get left behind.

Shakespeare's Father, His Catholicism, And The Catholic Persecution of Protestants

 

Was the real Shakespeare, Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, a catholic? His father's ties to Bloody Mary, the themes of his plays, and the historical evidence suggests so.

Related:


Wikipedia - John de Vere, 16th Earl of Oxford: 

John de Vere, 16th Earl of Oxford (1516 – 3 August 1562) was born to John de Vere, 15th Earl of Oxford, and Elizabeth Trussell, daughter of Edward Trussell. He was styled Lord Bolebec 1526 to 1540 before he succeeded to his father's title.

While never of consequence in the Tudor court, the 16th Earl's support for Queen Mary was instrumental in her accession to the throne in 1553, though he was given no preferment by her. During her reign he was active as the principal magnate in Essex. Under Mary, Essex men and women suspected of heresy against Catholicism were brought before Oxford to be charged, and thence conveyed to the Bishop of London for examination. Of his prisoners, at least sixteen were condemned and burnt, beginning with his former servant, Thomas Hawkes, who was burnt at Coggeshall on 10 June 1555.

Wikipedia - Religious views of William Shakespeare:

In 1611 the historian John Speed asserted Shakespeare's links with Catholicism, accusing him of satirising in Henry IV the Lollard (or proto-Protestant) martyr John Oldcastle (first portrayed by Shakespeare under his character's real name, then the alias John Falstaff after complaints from Oldcastle's descendants) and linking the playwright with the Jesuit Robert Persons, describing them together as "the Papist and his poet". 

. . .Literary scholar and Jesuit Father Peter Milward and the writer Clare Asquith are among those who have written that Catholic sympathies are detectable in Shakespeare's works. Asquith believed that Shakespeare uses terms such as "high" when referring to Catholic characters and "low" when referring to Protestants (the terms refer to their altars) and "light" or "fair" to refer to Catholic and "dark" to refer to Protestant, a reference to certain clerical garbs. 

. . .Although Shakespeare commonly adapted existing tales, typically myths or works in another language, Joseph Pearce claims that King John, King Lear and Hamlet were all works that had been done recently and in English with an anti-Catholic bias, and that Shakespeare's versions appear to be a refutation of the source plays. Pearce believes otherwise he would not have "reinvented the wheel", revisiting recent English plays.