Trump Taking Ls After Ls

 

The new currency is blood, not dollars, you old baby.

"Allegedly, Trump, acting like a mafia boss in international relations ... and thinking that Iran is the same as Venezuela, tried through backchannels in Iraqi Kurdistan to bribe the leader of the Revolutionary Guards of Iran (IRGC)!!"https://t.co/wGhqQerlvw pic.twitter.com/eNnblEYrVu

— the Lemniscat (@theLemniscat) August 22, 2026

An excerpt from, "Did Trump Try to Bribe the Iranian Generals With Billions?" By Nick Stamatakis, Helleniscope, August 20, 2026:

An extraordinary story has emerged from the secret diplomacy surrounding the U.S.-Iran confrontation: Allegedly, Trump, acting like a mafia boss in international relations as he is constantly behaving in his second term, and thinking that Iran is the same as Venezuela, tried through backchannels in Iraqi Kurdistan to bribe the leader of the Revolutionary Guards of Iran (IRGC)!!

What is substantially documented is that the Trump administration opened an unusual backchannel to senior figures in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, reportedly using Iraqi Kurdish President Nechirvan Barzani as an intermediary to reach IRGC commander General Ahmad Vahidi.

What allegedly happened inside that channel is far more explosive.

According to Larry Johnson and Pepe Escobar, their sources cited by the Transition Protocol YouTube program insist that Washington tried to persuade senior IRGC figures to distance themselves from, or potentially turn against, Iran’s political leadership. The alleged inducement reportedly involved enormous financial incentives.

 . . .Their sources allegedly claim that senior IRGC figures were approached with financial incentives potentially worth billions of dollars in exchange for breaking with Iran’s leadership or facilitating a political realignment in Tehran. They describe the strategy as resembling a “Venezuela playbook” — trying to separate a government’s security elite from its political leadership.

Vahidi allegedly rejected the approach and allegedly informed Iran’s senior leadership. The same sources also claim that Pakistani Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir was approached as a possible intermediary and allegedly refused to participate in any effort to destabilize Tehran.

Those specific allegations have not been independently confirmed.

Putin's Old Brain, The New Ukraine, And Russia After NATO

After Russia chews up Ukraine and digests it slowly its appetite will only grow. 

Where will the Bear feast on next? Constantinople? Berlin? Tehran? Warsaw? Time will tell. 

As geopolitical plates shake and old alliances fade, the ones who have the stomach will be at the new table.

And as always there will be spoilers who will seek to turn over the table so that no one eats. 

I think a country like Poland and the Eastern European nations fall into this camp. They've already publicly endorsed the terrorist bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline in 2022. With the full backing of Washington and London they're fully capable of committing even bigger sabotage bombings in the future.

Hopefully, some of the more sensible Europeans wake up from their long coma - the Spanish and Germans in particular, - and team up with Russia against the terrorists in London and Eastern Europe. Otherwise it will get painful and hellish. 

Terrorism must never be tolerated.

II.

An excerpt from, "Russia’s Imperial Mindset Hasn’t Changed" by Ilan I. Berman, American Foreign Policy Council, April 11, 2025:

Once upon a time, Vladislav Surkov was a key architect of Russia’s political system and a close adviser to its long-serving strongman president, Vladimir Putin. More recently, however, the man who was once known as “Putin’s brain” fell out of favor in the Kremlin’s corridors of power, eventually departing the Russian political scene altogether.

Yet Surkov remains a figure of considerable controversy, with some observers crediting him with exerting continued influence over the Kremlin’s worldview. So when he recently sat down for an interview with France’s L’Express newspaper—his first since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2023—it was inevitably a subject of intense interest for Russia-watchers in the West.

They were not disappointed. Surkov used the occasion to expound upon the current state and future dimensions of the so-called “Russian World” (Russkiy Mir)—a concept which he himself helped to popularize. In the process, he gave the international community a glimpse into what Moscow is thinking about its geopolitical fortunes, and where the Kremlin might be headed next.

Most immediately, of course, this concerns Ukraine. In an echo of Putin, Surkov argues that Ukraine is not a real state, but rather an “artificial political entity.” He also posits that Russian victory—or, as he puts it, the “military or military and diplomatic crushing of Ukraine”—is inevitable.

An excerpt from, "Revising History and ‘Gathering the Russian Lands’: Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian Nationhood" by Björn Alexander Düben, London School of Economics Public Policy Review, 2023:

At a conference in Kyiv in July 2013, Putin spoke about Ukraine’s ‘reunification with Russia’ from the 17th century onwards and referred to Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians as ‘a single people’.

While Putin’s public denial of Ukraine’s historical statehood was initially subtle and implicit, it became increasingly explicit in later years, particularly following the ouster of Viktor Yanukovych’s pro-Russian government in Kyiv in early 2014 and Russia’s subsequent annexation of Crimea. In his speech marking the annexation on 18 March 2014, Putin proclaimed that Russians and Ukrainians

are not simply close neighbours but, as I have said many times already, we are one people. Kiev is the mother of Russian cities. Ancient Rus is our common source and we cannot live without each other.

In subsequent years, Putin went on to make similar assertions. In February 2020, for instance, he stated in an interview that Ukrainians and Russians ‘are one and the same people’, and he insinuated that Ukrainian national identity had only emerged as a product of foreign interference – claims which he repeated in his annual marathon press conference in June 2021.

Meanwhile, some of Putin’s closest associates went considerably further in their public derision and denial of Ukrainian state- and nationhood. Vladislav Surkov, for instance, formerly one of Putin’s top advisers and his point man on Ukraine prior to 2020, stated in February of that year that

there is no Ukraine. There is Ukrainian-ness. That is, a specific disorder of the mind. An astonishing enthusiasm for ethnography, driven to the extreme. … But there is no nation. 

Throughout the last decade, Putin has shown a remarkable interest in historical themes, taking time out of his presidential schedule to write lengthy treatises on historical topics. In June 2020, he published an article in The National Interest which tried to revise the academic narrative about the outbreak of the Second World War by justifying the 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and its secret protocol [9]. The article was roundly dismissed by foreign historians as unprofessional and poorly researched. But few historical topics appear to have preoccupied Putin as much as the history of Ukraine. This became particularly evident in July 2021, when he published a 6900-word article titled ‘On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians’. Providing a sweeping (but extremely selective) account of Ukrainian history stretching back to the early Middle Ages, Putin tried to make the case that Ukrainians and Russians – along with Belarusians – form ‘a single large nation, a triune nation’, and that they are essentially ‘one people – a single whole. … It is what I have said on numerous occasions and what I firmly believe.’ According to Putin, it has been Moscow’s historical mission to be ‘the center of reunification, continuing the tradition of ancient Russian statehood [and] gathering the Russian lands’.

In Putin’s historical account, Ukrainians always thrived most when they were under Moscow’s rule, and the common people in Ukraine consistently wished to remain close to Russia. By contrast, whenever there had been manifestations of ‘the idea of Ukrainian people as a nation separate from the Russians’ (an idea for which ‘there was no historical basis’), these were merely the aberrant schemes of self-serving, detached elites, usually acting at the behest of manipulative foreign powers that wished ‘to divide and then to pit the parts of a single people against one another’. These historical villains ranged from 18th-century anti-Muscovy Cossack leader Ivan Mazepa, ‘who betrayed everyone’ to Lenin’s Bolsheviks, who, according to Putin, instigated the consolidation of the Ukrainian language and identity in the early 20th century. The ultimate result of these misguided policies was that ‘in 1991, all those territories, and, which is more important, people, found themselves abroad overnight, taken away … from their historical motherland’ [10]. In his article, Putin also repeatedly claimed that, historically, ‘people both in the western and eastern Russian lands spoke the same language’. While not explicitly denying the development of a separate Ukrainian language, he implied that it was a mere outgrowth of ‘regional language peculiarities, resulting in the emergence of dialects’ which remained virtually indistinguishable from Russian. To Putin, the works of Ukrainian writers ‘are our common literary and cultural heritage’ which must not ‘be divided between Russia and Ukraine’.

An Empire Reborn: How To Rebuild Canada And North America To Compete With China - The Seven Point Plan

 

To face a Dragon one must become a Dragon. Fire creates steel. It is good to have a strong enemy. China's rise is a blessing. 

 

1. Ban all drugs. And I'm talking weed, too, not just cocaine, heroin, and the so-called heavy drugs. I've seen marijuana rot my brother's brain, disturb his emotional state, and ruin his breath. I know firsthand how deadly and poisonous this drug can be. It is not a harmless passtime. It is death, just like any other addiction. 

Then, commend a legal process leading to the executions of all high-level bankers on Wall Street and across other major trading centers who are involved in the international drug trade. 

If North America wants to win the war on the evil Mexican cartels and other global drug pushers the first and most important step in that global domino is on Wall Street. 

The CIA needs to look elsewhere for money for its black budgets and fun time. Matter of fact, it shouldn't exist at all, at least not in its current form. On to step two.

2. Execute all top level CIA executives who have been part of the international drug trade, from Vietnam to Latin America and Afghanistan. Those spies who cherish their lives and their country must first prove their innocence. As of today the CIA is a threat to the health, collective security, and well-being of North America because of their decades-long drug pushing culture. They must repent and reform or face the sword.

3. Reset the food supply so as to take out every poison and ounce of chemical retardation in our foods, fruits, vegetables, and meats. Similar to Russia and Europe, all GMOs should be banned. A healthy and strong society begins with healthy and strong bodies, and that means healthy food. 

I'm talking more raw milk in our grocery stores than we know what to do with. Let raw milk pour out of public fountains. Every cornerstore should offer fresh steaks straight from the farms at dirt cheap prices. We need to create a culture of meat eaters and milk drinkers. We need more cows, more raw milk, more farms. The government should assist every new farmer with interest-free loans, and give them even more loans with every ounce of healthy and poison-free beef they produce. 

4. Ban all pornographic material on the Internet and make those who produce and distribute them liable for the death penalty. This will be hard to accomplish. But a society without moral and sexual standards quickly falls within a generation or two. The pornogragphy that's being produced is not your grandfather's innocent magazine. This is on the level of psychological warfare now. It has reached such extreme levels that its harmful effects on society can't be put into words. It is the silent epidemic and it must be resisted on a societal level.

5.  Reinstitute military service and make it mandatory for every 18 year old to serve two years in the military before joining university with free tuition to pursue their studies. A twenty year old can decide their future and career more clearly than an eighteen year old can.

Also, say what you want about the military and its record of abuses, but it instills values like self-discipline that no other institution is capable of. It creates strong personalities and employable workers. The military trade is one of mankind's most noble professions since time immemorial. It has survived this long because we all need it and couldn't live without it. A strong military and a strong society are interlinked. It is a crucible for leadership. The best leaders are military men. That's a fact. If Trump didn't dodge the draft like a coward he'd be a way better President today.

6. End money printing. Money printing and coin clipping are the customs of weak empires and weak rulers. Strong rulers rely only on gold and silver. As Goethe said, paper money is the devil's work. Its profits are illusory. Its gains are fleeting. And when the bill finally comes due it isn't pretty. Hyperinflation is the stuff of nightmares.

7. Shut down all secret societies and occult religious orders so that an occult event like 9/11 never happens again. 

Why are the Freemasons still around? The Catholic Church been dead. The Pope is a tourist attraction. This isn't the 1700s. There's no need to gather in secret meetings and wear dresses like faggots. Have Freemasons contributed anything good and beneficial to Western societies during their long reign? 

With 9/11 they conjured a global war of terror out of thin air. 

There's nothing wrong with war, but when one invites it and manufactures it, that's where the evil begins. And on 9/11 they unleashed a great evil that we're still suffering from 25 years later.

Wars must be fought on a rational and logical level, with a defined enemy, not against ghosts and abstract concepts like terrorism. That's not war, that is war profiteering. That's profaning the most holy of holies: war.

It's Now China’s World

What China has accomplished in the last fifty years is a remarkable social and economic achievement. They're making the rest of humanity look like absolute chumps and fools. 

Compared to China everyone is now the third world. The former 1st/3rd world classification no longer holds any meaning. There are parts of the U.S., and Europe that resemble Africa and India. 

China is the standard bearer now. It alone has the power to sanction and move markets. Japan needs to bow down and stop playing games like it's 1937. All of East Asia needs to bow down to the Dragon.

Someone needs to tell the fools in Washington their empire of pedos is finished. The American century lasted about a quarter century. It is a rotting corpse that smells of shit. And it looks like the Jews will lick off the carcass for the next quarter century until it is bone dry.

While they feast on the dead and pretend to care about freedom and democracy, China will continue to build for the living. Do not imagine it can be dictated to like it's conquered European nations or shameless South Asian nations that can't even feed their own people.

The West must humble itself. It was Chinese technology that took them out of the Dark Ages once. 

China is not a threat. It is civilization itself. 

The War of The Losers

 

I've been trying to come up with a title to comprehensively describe the USrael-Iran war. 

We had the Great War in 1914. Then the Good War in 1939. Following that trend this must be the Bad War.

Since both sides are agents of Satan, and Satan is the biggest loser spiritually speaking according to the Abrahamic tradition, there will be no winners in this war.

What we have here is two evil sides waging war against each other to advance the depopulation of the world, the destruction of the American empire, the break up of Iran, and the transformation of the world economy.

The treasonous occult practitioners leading the governments of America and Iran are enemies of their own countries and peoples. They know they are tyrants who can only sustain their tyranny via a state of endless war. So they don't consider fighting to a standstill and wasting tens of billions of dollars in a big war as a loss for their countries.

Israel is another matter. Jewish patriots are leading that country. They are doing right by their people. So Israeli leaders have to be commended. Their actions and policies reflect the will of the Israeli people. Israeli society wants war. They want to conquer Gaza, Southern Lebanon, and Syria. Netanyahu is delivering on his promises. He is a good leader for his people.

The same can't be said for the losers in Washington and Tehran.

II.

An excerpt from, "The New Underworld Order: Triumph of Criminalism the Global Hegemony of Masonic Intelligence" by Christopher Story, Stranger Journalism, 2006, Pg. 2 - 7:

As if to anticipate this book, a so-called 'former' US intelligence operative has openly acknowledged that US intelligence is engaged in Works of Darkness. Of course, we all know this - the whole world, since Abu Ghraib, now knows it, although even today few have any grasp of the scale of the reprobate US intelligence community's involvement in such works; but for a 'former' US intelligence operative to admit as much, is certainly a most interesting development. It would be comforting to believe that the remark was made in a contrite spirit of humility and tenderness towards those whom the intelligence community has wronged. No such luck, unfortunately.

The 'former' operative's admission surfaced in an article by the veteran US investigative reporter (with the closest of intelligence community links), Seymour Hersh, in the aftermath of the atrocities committed in Abu Ghraib, with which the US intelligence-linked corporations CACI and Titan 'were' associated (and for which they were largely responsible). Hersh was describing what he had learned about a 'Special-Access Program' (SAP), or clandestine 'Black' operation subject to the US Defense Department's most stringent level of security, which was itself blown' by Hersh's revelations in The New Yorker. Under the SAP, Hersh reported, 'commandos crossed borders without visas and could interrogate terrorism suspects deemed too important for transfer to the military's facilities at Guantanamo, Cuba'. US commandos, operatives and other specialists 'carried out instant interrogations - using force if necessary -at secret CIA detention centers scattered all around the world'. The (resulting) intelligence 'would be relayed to the SAP command center in the Pentagon in real time, and sifted for those pieces of information critical to the 'White', or overt, world' [see pages 6 and 8 et seq. for the significance of this differentiation from the 'Black', or 'covert' world]. This is the paragraph in which the unprecedented official admission in question was made:

'Fewer than two hundred operatives and officials, including [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were "completely read into the program", the former intelligence official said. The goal was to keep the operation protected. "We're not going to read more people than necessary into our heart of darkness", he said. "The rules are: 'Grab whom you must. Do what you want"".

For any US intelligence official to acknowledge publicly that his or her intelligence community has a 'heart of darkness' is probably unprecedented. All national intelligence communities, being essentially ocultically-oriented secret societies riddled with Freemasonry, have hearts of darkness'; but they scarcely ever admit this central reality, other than via symbology, such as MI5's revealingly esoteric triangle-symbol shown in Figure 1 below. Two possible explanations for this open admission of collective demonic possession, which emerged in the aftermath of the maelstrom of revelations and reports surrounding the Satanic abuse perpetrated inter alia by those 'cutout' US intelligence operatives at the notorious Abu Ghraib detention facility in the Baghdad area and elsewhere, sprang to mind.

One possibility was that the official intelligence 'owners' of the 'heart of darkness' are so Satanised and indifferent to the sufferings they inflict that they couldn't care less any more, especially now that they have been 'rumbled', what the rest of the world thinks. Such an attitude would be consistent with the arrogant protestation, heard repeatedly from some Americans, that it doesn't matter what conclusions the rest of the world has reached concerning the dangers that this revolutionary United States now presents to humanity: what matters is that America should be feared.

The second possibility is that the intelligence source who briefed Hersh was somewhat ashamed of the blackness of the CIA/DIA's collective 'heart of darkness', and was dismayed by the appalling international publicity as well as by the fact that this SAP had gone so badly wrong: 'We've never had a case where a Special-Access Program went sour - and this goes back to the Cold War'.

He complained that the intelligence officer to whom Mr Rumsfeld had delegated the SAP, Stephen Cambone, an operative with an allegedly murky past, had decided to bring the SAP rules (i.e., the absence of all residual morality) into the prisons; in other words, the regular military personnel operating in the prisons were told that what went on there now formed part of the covert operation, where no civilised rules applied.

By the time the official's 'heart of darkness' admission appeared in print, the whole world had been reminded that the United States' regard for human life and dignity was as depraved as that of the Hitler and Stalin regimes; that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely; and that the United States' protestations that it was engaged in 'spreading democracy' in a region where it is non-existent, was indeed, as had always been widely assumed, a disreputably fraudulent prospectus. This was the case not least because the United States is itself in the habit of rigging its own electoral process, as the extensively documented fiddling of the November 2004 General Election demonstrated [see Addendum 1, page 662].

The shamefacedness of the Bush II Administration on this score was repeatedly in evidence following that election, as top officials from the President down reiterated the official 'line' that the United States is the guardian angel of that wondrous gift called 'democracy'. For example, on 16th June 2005, President G. W Bush denounced the Iranian election as a sham designed to ensure that power was to be retained in the hands of an undemocratic, repressive elite. The Iranian people', Mr Bush said, 'deserve a genuinely democratic system in which elections are honest, and in which their leaders answer to them instead of the other way around'. This hypocritical statement - one of many of its kind coming from a US President who, whatever may have been thought of the heavily Soviet-penetrated US Democratic Party, is shown to have presided over a political machine that stole both the election of 2004 and the preceding election typical of lies perpetrated by the head of a regime engaged in the exercise of 'democratism' (a Soviet-era word meaning 'the creation and maintenance of the illusion of democracy') who, by ingrained habit, chooses to be unable and unwilling to distinguish between truth and falsehood. For Iranians, who are no fools, to be told by a US President who claimed to be sustaining 'freedom' while openly depriving the American people of it, and who bragged about democracy after having usurped power which is supposed to flow from the people, was further proof of the accuracy of their slogan describing the United States as 'the Great Satan'. Mr Bush then tried to distinguish between the Iranian regime and the people of Iran by hurriedly elaborating that 'today, the Iranian regime denies' the Iranian people their rights. It brutalises its people and denies their liberty'. And Washington wondered why the Iranian people are so manifestly equivocal about American official professions of 'friendship' towards them, as opposed to their regime. It is because the level of hypocrisy pouring out of Washington's intelligence-controlled regime stinks in their nostrils.

Take the President's assertion on that occasion that the Iranian regime 'brutalises' its people', a true statement that is overwhelmingly supported by the historical record. The US regime does likewise. For instance, from late 2004 onwards, US journalists have been sent to jail for refusing to divulge their sources to the authorities, which is exactly what happens in brutalised states like, say, Zimbabwe. In 2005, Andrew Stephenson, who worked tirelessly pro bono publico to expose the fraudulence of the 2004 General Election [see Appendix 1], made the serious mistake of seeking employment in Washington DC as a lobbyist, having exhausted his financial resources. On the plane back to his home city, Seattle, he was taken violently ill, and was later diagnosed with cancer of the pancreas. After patriotic Americans rallied round and raised, in extremely short order, no less than $70,000 to finance a very serious surgical operation at Johns Hopkins Hospital, carried out by the nation's top surgeon in this discipline, attempts were made by one of the US Government's several hyperactive disinformation and discrediting teams to spread lies to the effect that Stephenson had raised the funds for his own benefit, i.e. fraudulently. When activists exposed these lies and their perpetrators, the hospital authorities professed to have been unable to locate the $70,000, which had been despatched to them by Fedex (it was suddenly 'found' lying unopened in an office). After Stephenson's return to Seattle, another branch of the evil US intelligence disinformation team (based in Toronto) intervened unilaterally with the Seattle authorities, who were to have provided Andy Stephenson with urgently necessary chemotherapy, so that his insurance cover was suddenly cancelled. On 9th June, a very senior US intelligence official (one of the few with any integrity) informed this Author that the virus that will have caused Stephenson's cancer was most likely injected via syringe into a toothpaste tube in his hotel room: "That's how they do it', he added. A few days later, a colleague (of this Author) who was attending a political reception, raised the subject of the Government's repressive policies with a person known to be an intelligence officer as well as a political operator. He 'snapped his fingers', whereupon two operatives approached our friend and entered into a conversation, dealing with certain issues that our friend had raised. One of these, a Transportation Security Agency (TSA) operative, said gratuitously, on the subject of poisonings, that 'a lot of these are happening' [sic] - meaning that the US Government is engaged, 'as we speak', in the standard Illuminist practice of poisoning its enemies.

It therefore, self-evidently 'ill behoves' the President of the United States to lecture the Iranians (and other foreigners whose governments are equally the servants of Lucifer) on the abominations of their governments, and the repressive policies against their own people that they perpetrate, when the US Government is itself engaged in the same kind of Satanic behaviour while professing that it is the guardian angel of freedom and democracy. No wonder such official hypocrisy stinks in the nostrils of members of the human race who have not yet succumbed to the orchestrated dumbing-down processes being perpetrated against them by their own Illuminised governments.

Manifestly such behaviour, and any association with it or condoning of it, is incompatible with the Way, the Truth and the Life. A certain kindly American intell-igence officer known to the Author has touchingly protested that he loves the Lord first, and his country next - which, being interpreted, and in the context in which this statement was made - meant that he saw no incompatibility between his lifelong association with the CIA, and thus with its 'heart of darkness', and his 'commitment' to Jesus Christ. Unfortunately, such a convenient compromise is out of the question for those who profess to believe, and therefore hope for salvation. In Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 10, verse 21, Paul warns:

'Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils; ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils'.

A choice has to be made. Shall I remain associated with this intelligence organisation and its now openly self-acknowledged 'heart of darkness'? Or shall I renounce, once and for all, the 'Works of Darkness', so that I shall, by the Grace of the Holy Sprit, be available to be saved?

'Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall' [I Corinthians Chapter 10, verse 12]. And in Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, Chapter 5, verse 11, Paul commands:

'And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them...'... which is what this work humbly seeks, to the very best of the Author's ability and resources, to do. Note crucially that Paul describes all Works of Darkness as 'unfruitful' - something of an understatement, perhaps, given that, since the Devil is the author of confusion, all Works of Darkness (and therefore all intelligence operations and activity) are characterised by endless strife, contentiousness, bitterness, false witness, deception, lies and generally reprobate behaviour. The Author has himself been a witness to, and a victim of, of this routine pattern of official delinquency, in the course of research inter alia for this book.

Indeed, in the intelligence community context, such institutionalised delinquency in the name of national security soon becomes quite obvious to the targeted observer who is not sitting on his or her brains. One reason for this is that the same techniques are always redeployed, since the Devil knows of no new tricks. The preoccupations, for instance, of the US intelligence community typically revolve around launching fresh deception or scamming operations in order to cover up past 'botches' - operations which have gone badly wrong and have unravelled. Indeed it is characteristic of the CIA and its internal subsidiaries and rivals that they specialise in operations that go wrong. So there is a constant imperative to develop fresh initiatives to cover up previous botches, or to provide 'diversionary services'. This behaviour is akin to that of a gambler at a casino who has lost more than he possesses and who seeks ever more desperately to recoup his losses by taking risks against unbeatable odds, in the pathetic hope that he will 'get lucky' and will not only recoup all his losses, but will earn a profit, too. Of course, this never happens.

Hersh's article on the circumstances surrounding Abu Ghraib made it crystal clear that what the 'former' intelligence official who admitted that the CIA (et al) has 'a heart of darkness' was most concerned about was that the secret SAP or 'Black' operation, which he said at one point 'is still active', would never be exposed (even though, as indicated, he was himself helping to expose it). The 'Black' programme had to be kept in the darkness and not revealed to the 'White' world, according to an intelligence 'consultant' also interviewed by Hersh - not only for security reasons, but also 'because the process is unpleasant. It's like making sausage: you like the result but you don't want to know how it was made'. A European version of this syndrome reads: 'When you put your shoes outside your hotel room at night for polishing, you don't want or need to know who cleaned them'.

'Also', the 'former' intelligence officer told Hersh, 'you don't want the Iraqi public and the Arab world, to know' (what utterly depraved barbarians we are Ed.). 'Remember, we went to Iraq to democratise the Middle East [sic!]. The last thing you want to do is let the Arab world know how you treat Arab males in prison'.

But so 'botched' was this accursed Work of Darkness, that not just the Arab world, but every corner of the globe, today knows how certain brutalised Americans treat Arab males in prison: with total indifference to suffering, with depraved sexual lust and with Nazi-like contempt. Reports of imprecise British atrocities perpetrated in Iraq appear to have been disseminated in part so as to take the spotlight off the aberrations of the offending American personnel, although it appears that the collapse of morality which underlies the US abominations has infected the British as well. This behaviour is consistent with the indoctrination format espoused and perpetrated by the Illuminati, which seeks to procure that selected victims, operatives and implementers of its nefarious plans must be brought to inflict pain without flinching, to kill if necessary without ever looking back afterwards, and to maximise the potential of the use of fire. In his last interview before his sudden death during an exorcism of a young girl in July 1999, the Author's late friend Fr Malachi Martin explicitly confirmed that Luciferians (who are worshippers of, and are possessed by, Lucifer) 'have all passed through [initiation] and that involves three things: the infliction of pain without flinching, the infliction of death without flinching, and the use of fire'.