September 25, 2026

The Proud Lion of Judah Spoke To An Emptying Chamber of Mice And Men

 

Netanyahu delivered a defying speech at the United Nations yesterday, reminding sheepish diplomats and trembling heads of states that, should they get any funny ideas à la Nasrallah and Kirk, Israel has penetrated their security and will not hesitate to pull the trigger.

"Okay. All right. I'm putting cases on all of you bitches! Huh? You think you can do this shit? Jake! You think you can do this to me?! You motherfuckers will be playin' basketball in Pelican Bay when I get finished with you! SHU program, nigga! 23 hour lockdown! I'm the man up in this piece! You'll never see the light of-- Who the fuck do you think you fuckin' with?! I'm the police! I run shit here! You just live here! Yeah, that's right, you better walk away! Go on and walk away, 'cause I'm gonna burn this motherfucker down! King Kong ain't got shit on me! That's right, that's right. Shit, I don't fuck. I'm winnin' anyway. I'm winnin'. I'm winnin' any motherfuckin' way, I can't lose. Shit, you can shoot me, but you can't kill me." 
- Training Day (2001).


An excerpt from, "Great Britain, Palestine and The Jews - Jewry's Celebration of its National Charter" 1918, published by George H. Doran Company, Pg. 37 - 48:

The greatest and most imposing public meeting ever held in the history of British Jewry was that which took place on Sunday, December 2, 1917, at the London Opera House, for the purpose of thanking the British Government for its declaration in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. The building was crowded with an enthusiastic audience representative of all sections of the Anglo-Jewish community. Delegates were present from nearly all Jewish congregations, organisations, institutions, and societies in the United Kingdom. The chair was taken by Lord Rothschild.

Lord Rothschild said they were met on the most momentous occasion in the history of Judaism for the last 1800 years. They were there to return thanks to His Majesty’s Government for a Declaration which marked an epoch in Jewish history of outstanding importance. For the first time since the Dispersion the Jewish people had received its proper status by the Declaration of one of the Great Powers. The Declaration, while acknowledging and approving of the aspirations of the Jewish people for a national home, at the same time placed Jews on their honour to respect the rights and privileges not only of their prospective non-Jewish neighbours in Palestine, but also of those of their own people who did not see eye to eye with the Zionist cause. Feeling as he did that the aims of Zionism were in no way incompatible with the highest patriotism and loyal citizenship of the Jews in the various countries in which they were dwelling, he would like the meeting in passing the resolution which would be submitted to them to assure the Government that they would, one and all, faithfully observe both the spirit and the letter of their gracious Declaration. (Cheers.) He felt sure that the principal aim of the Zionists was to provide a national home for those portions of the Jewish people who wished to escape the possibilities in the future of such oppression and ill-treatment as they had endured in the past and he therefore held that all and every section of opinion in the Jewish people could work together for the establishment in Palestine of such a home, so as to make it a triumphant success.

Lord Rothschild then moved the following resolution :

“That this mass meeting, representing all sections of the Jewish community in the United Kingdom, conveys to His Majesty’s Government an expression of heartfelt gratitude for their Declaration in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. It assures His Majesty’s Government that their historic action in support of the national aspirations of the Jewish people has evoked among Jews the most profound sentiments of joy. This meeting further pledges its utmost endeavours to give its whole-hearted support to the Zionist cause.”

Lord Robert Cecil, K.C., M.P., who was received with loud cheering, said:

I have come here with the greatest possible pleasure at the request of those who represent, or who have led the representation of the Zionist movement of this country, to offer to you and to all Zionists my hearty congratulations on the event which you are celebrating to-day. (Cheers.) And perhaps you will allow me to mention in connection with these congratulations, not only your Chairman, but also M. Nahum Sokolow and Dr. C. Weizmann, who have done so much for the cause that we all have at heart this afternoon. Surely all of us must feel what a very striking gathering the present one is. The keynote of our meeting this afternoon is liberation. (Cheers.) We welcome among us not only the many thousands of Jews that I see, but also representatives of the Arabian and Armenian races who are also in this great struggle struggling to be free. (Hear, hear.) Our wish is that Arabian countries shall be for the Arabs, Armenia for the Armenians, and Judaea for the Jews. (Applause.) Yes, and let us add, if it can be so, let Turkey, real Turkey, be for the Turks.

I should like to be allowed to say that the part that this country is taking in this movement is not a new thing. (Hear, hear.) I venture to claim for this country that in supporting Zionism it has been merely carrying out its traditional policy. To me, at any rate, it seems that there are two great foundations upon which the policy of this country has always been based. I believe they are often described by the two words “Liberty” and “Justice.” Perhaps more accurately they may be called the supremacy of the Law and Liberty, for, be well assured, if we are ever to obtain that security which we have been recently told is so important to us, if we are ever to lift European civilisation and national relations in Europe out of the anarchy in which they at present are, it must be by the same means by which we have secured liberty and happiness in each country, namely, by the supremacy of Law.

As for the second foundation of which I have spoken, and which has more practical bearing on our proceedings this afternoon, may I say this: We hear a great deal of a new word, “Self-determination.” Well, I don’t know that it is a new thing. It certainly is not new in the British Empire. The Empire has always striven to give to all the peoples that make it up the fullest measure of self-government of which they are capable. (Hear, hear.) We have always striven to give to all peoples within our bounds complete liberty and equality before the Law.

(Hear, hear.) We are adjured to respect the principle of self-determination; but I say that the British Empire was the first organisation to teach that principle to the world, and one of the great causes for which we are in this war is to secure to all peoples the right to govern themselves and to work out their own destiny, irrespective of the threats and menaces of their greater neighbour. (Hear, hear.)

One of the great steps—in my judgment, in some ways the greatest step—we have taken in carrying out this principle is the recognition of Zionism. This is the first constructive effort that we have made in what I hope will be the new settlement of the world after the war. (Cheers.) I do not say that that is the only thing involved. It is not only the recognition of a nationality—it is much more than that. It has great underlying ideals of which you will hear this afternoon and of which it would be impertinent of me to speak. It is, indeed, not the birth of a nation, for the Jewish nation through centuries of oppression and captivity have preserved their sentiment of nationality as few people could; but if it is not the birth of a nation, I believe we may say it is the re-birth of a nation. (Applause.) I don’t like to prophesy what ultimate results that great event may have, but for myself I believe it will have a far-reaching influence on the history of the world and consequences which none can foresee on the future history of the human race. (Loud cheers.)

Mr. Herbert Samuel, M.P., who received an enthusiastic welcome, said:

I rejoice wholeheartedly in the pronouncement that has been made by the British Government with respect to Palestine. It is a policy which for nearly three years I have urged in the Cabinet and out of the Cabinet at every opportunity that arose. (Cheers.) The fears and the doubts which this policy has evoked are, I firmly believe, unfounded. Three conditions must indeed be observed in any new developments that may take place in Palestine. In the first place, there must be full, just recognition of the rights of the Arabs, who now constitute the majority of the population of that country. Secondly, there must be a reverent respect for the Christian and Mohammedan holy places, which in all eventualities should always remain in the control and charge of representatives of those faiths. (Cheers.) In the third place, there must be no attempt now or in the future to establish anything in the nature of political authority from Palestine over the Jews scattered in other countries of the world, who must probably always remain the great majority of the Jewish race. There should be no disturbance, large or small, direct or indirect, in their national status or in their national rights and duties in the countries of which they are, or should be, full and equal citizens. On all these matters there is no divergence of opinion in any quarter, and the controversies that have taken place, I venture to think, are disputes over differences that do not exist.

The reason why, for my own part, I support the policy which we are here to-day to approve and celebrate are chiefly these. First, it may be that the genius of the Jewish race will again be able to give to the world a brilliant and distinctive civilisation. (Cheers.) The richness of mankind lies in its diversity. We do not want the world to be like some great library, consisting of nothing but innumerable copies of one and the same book. The Jewish mind is a distinctive thing. It combines in remarkable degree the imaginative and the practical, the ideal and the positive. This combination of qualities enabled it for 1500 years in Palestine to produce an almost unbroken series of statesmen and soldiers, judges and poets, prophets and seers—thinkers and leaders who have left for all time their impress upon the world. The Jewish mind is tenacious and persists, and now, when all the powerful Empires that overran that land have been overthrown and almost forgotten, the Jewish people exists and is more numerous to-day than it ever has been at any period of its history. Who knows, I say, but that if again it finds a spiritual centre of its own, soundly based on an industrious population, untrammelled, self-contained, inspired by the memories of a splendid past, it may again produce golden fruits in the fields of intellect for the enrichment of the whole world. (Cheers.)

And my other reason is this: If this comes to be, what a helpful effect it would have upon the Jewish proletariat that will still remain scattered in other countries of the world! I see in my mind’s eye those millions in Eastern Europe all through the centuries, crowded, cramped, proscribed, bent with oppression, suffering all the miseries of active minds denied scope, of talent not allowed to speak, of genius that cannot act. I see them enduring, suffering everything, sacrificing everything in order to keep alight the flame of which they knew themselves to be the lamp, to keep alive the idea of which they knew themselves to be the vessel, to preserve the soul of which they knew themselves to be the body; their eyes always set upon one distant point, always believing that somehow, some day, the ancient greatness would be restored; always saying when they met in their families on Passover Night, “Next year in Jerusalem.” Year after year, generation following generation, century succeeding century, till the time that has elapsed is counted in thousands of years, still they said, “Next year in Jerusalem.” If that cherished vision is at last to be realised, if on the Hills of Zion a Jewish civilisation is restored with something of its old intellectual and moral force, then among those left in the other countries of the world I can see growing a new confidence and a new greatness. There will be a fresh light in those eyes, those bent backs will at last stand erect, there will be a greater dignity in the Jew throughout the world. (Cheers.)

That is why we meet to-day to thank the British Government, our own Government—(cheers)—that has made all this possible, that we shall be able to say, not as a pious and distant wish, but as a near and confident hope, “Next year in Jerusalem”---(Loud and prolonged cheers).

Colonel Sir Mark Sykes said:

When one thinks of the years that have passed, of the immense spaces of history which stand between what was and now is promised to-day, truly one is dazzled—one is dazzled by the possibility of the prospects which open before us. I say I am speaking to you as a watcher, but you in a sense perhaps also are watchers; perhaps you see as I see an Asia stricken with plagues and cumbered with ruins and a Europe a welter of blood. Perhaps you too see those two things, and I pray that you realise that it may be your destiny to be the bridge between Asia and Europe; to bring the spirituality of Asia to Europe and the vitality of Europe to Asia. I firmly believe that is the mission of Zionism. I see here something which is greater than the dream even of a League of Nations, which is a dream of a League of Races and finally a League of Ideals. There is the great vision; that is what may, that is what does, I believe, lie before you.

But no person realises more than I do—I know the ground, some of it, and boldly I dare to say that there lie before you dangers, difficulties, and possible obstructions; but, ladies and gentlemen, your time of probation has been long. You are schooled in adversity; you can look on difficulties with calm, and you will overcome them. I do not look for a sudden magic transformation. No; but I believe that you are beginning a great and beneficial and irresistible transition. That is what you are beginning.

Now, I believe, you are going to set up a power which is not a domination of blood or a domination of gold, but a domination of intellectual force. I believe you will see in Palestine a great centre of ideals radiating out to every country in the world where your people are. And if there is one thing that gives me great pleasure here to-day it is to feel that you—at this turning-point in your history, when the Government made its Declaration—you thought not only of yourselves, but you thought also—and afterwards you will look back with joy on the fact—when the hope of redemption was held out to you, you thought not only of yourselves but also of your fellows in adversity, the Armenians and the Arabs. (Loud cheers.)

The Chief Rabbi said it was indeed a rare privilege to take part in that wonderful meeting called together to express the heartfelt thanks of British Jewry for the striking sympathy of His Majesty’s Government with Jewish aspirations. The epoch-making Declaration on Palestine was an assurance given by the mightiest of empires that the new order which the Allies are now creating at such sacrifice of life and treasure shall be rooted in righteousness, and broad-based on the liberty of and reverence for every oppressed nationality. It was a solemn pledge that the oldest of national tragedies shall be ended in the coming re-adjustment of the nations which shall console mankind for the slaughter and waste and torment of this terrible world-war. In the face of an event of such infinite importance to the Jewish people, ordinary words of appreciation or the usual phrases of gratitude were hopelessly weak and inadequate. For the interpretation of their true feelings to-day they must turn to Scripture. Twenty-five hundred years ago Cyrus issued his edict of liberation to the Jewish exiles in Babylon; and an eye-witness of that glorious day had left them in the 126th Psalm a record of how their fathers received the announcement of their deliverance. "When the Lord brought back those that returned! to Zion”—we were like unto them that dream. Then said they among the nations: ‘The Lord hath done great things for them. The Lord hath done great things for us; whereof we are glad.” Theirs was a similar feeling of joy and wonder. With them likewise it was the astonishment of the nations, the reassuring approbation of statesmen and rulers that caused them to exclaim: “We will see it done, and done consummately, the thing so many have thought could never be done!” (Cheers.) The spirit of the Declaration was that of absolute justice, whether to Jews out of Palestine or to non-Jews in Palestine. They especially welcomed in it the reference to the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine. That was but a translation of the basic principle of the Mosaic legislation. (Cheers.) But it was the substance of the Declaration—the promise of a national home for the Jewish people—that filled their souls with gladness. For only on its own soil could the Jewish people live itsown life and make, as in the past it had made, its characteristic and specific contributions to the spiritual treasure of humanity. After the proclamation issued by Cyrus, the mass of the Jewish people still remained in Babylon. All told, only 42,000 men, women, and children took advantage of the King’s proclamation and followed Ezra back to Zion, the land of their fathers. But that handful of Zionists and their descendants, because living on their own soil, changed the entire future of mankind. They edited and collected the Prophets, wrote some of the fairest portions of the Scriptures, formed the canon of the Bible, and fave the world its monotheistic religions. (Cheers.) Now, as then, only “a remnant shall return” But now, as then, it was the national rejuvenation of that remnant that is to open a new chapter in the annals of the human spirit. Difficulties? Of course there were difficulties. The task of laying the foundations of a new Israel must be one of long toil and severe trial. But a people that for twenty-five centuries had stood victoriously against the storm of time possessed vitality enough, patience enough, idealism enough, with the help of God, to rise to the level of this unique, world-historic opportunity. (Loud cheers.)

September 24, 2026

The Assassination of European Monarchs And The Masonic War On Christendom And Civilization

King George I of Greece was assassinated on March 18, 1913, after a popular and happy fifty year reign.


Related: Freemasonry And Judaism By Vicomte Leon De Poncins.


An excerpt from, "Freemasonry And Judaism" By Vicomte Leon De Poncins, 1928, Chapter - Freemasonry and the War:

Certain authors have asserted that the war of 1914 was in reality a Jewish and Masonic war, perhaps provoked, and in any case utilized by them for the accomplishment of their aims and that they were in fact the great gainers by the peace of Versailles, by the fall of European monarchies, the demoralization of Europe, the destruction of Catholic Austria, the transfer to Jewish hands of financial supremacy.

To discuss this opinion is beyond the scope of this study but, although perhaps exaggerated, it has certainly a great part of truth. We will put into the hands of the reader a few masonic documents which ought to enable him to form an opinion.

On the 15th September 1912 the Revue International des Societes secretes, edited by Monseigneur Jouin, published the following lines:

Perhaps light will be shed one day on these words of a high Swiss Freemason on the subject of the Heir to the throne of Austria: "He is a remarkable man; it is a pity that he is condemned, he will die on the steps of the throne."

On the 28th June 1914 the Archduke, heir to the crown of the Austrian monarchy, and his wife succumbed to the bullets of Serbian Freemasons.

On the 12th October one of the assassins, Cabrinovic unconcernedly said to the judges of the military court: "In Freemasonry it is allowed to kill."

Such are in short the disquieting elements underneath the political crime which let loose the war.

. . .At the international congress of Freemasonry at Paris, in April 1917, one of the subjects of the deliberation was: How can a strong movement be provoked in Germany against the monarchy, since the basis of peace must be the deposition of William II and Charles I. All the papers at once expressed this idea in every shape and form: Peace cannot he concluded before William II and Charles I are deposed.

In his declaration of war the Freemason Wilson solemnly announced to the American congress that the war was against the German government only and not against the German people. All this agrees with the line of conduct formulated at the masonic conference at Lisbon the 13th May 1917 by the grand master Magalhaes Lima:

"The victory of the allies must be the triumph of masonic principles".

Masonic newspapers said several times that the war was a masonic war having for its aim the triumph of the masonic ideas. According to Wichtl, the Freemason contained the following passage:

"Already during the first weeks of the war a great masonic meeting held in the United States passed a resolution to give to great Britain and her allies all possible, support in the present war (May 1917, p. 601).

The same newspaper said further:

"Freemasonry comprises more than two millions members. Every American mason knows very well what that means for the safety and duration of the Republic. The world war is the struggle of democracy against autocracy, and the future, of the world will be democratic, whether the German Kaiser knows it or not."

These two quotations coming from a German writer may be accepted cautiously but they are fully corroborated by the following one. A. Lebey, a French masonic authority, said in Paris:

"The question is to know which is right, good faith or falsehood, good or evil, liberty or autocracy. The present struggle is the continuation of that which began in 1789; one of the two principles must triumph or perish. The very life of the world is at stake. Is humanity able and worthy to live free, or, on the contrary does its destiny condemn it to servitude?

"That is the dilemma which the catastrophe has brought us to solve, and all democrats have given their reply. There is only one way, neither to retreat, nor to come to terms. During a war so clearly defined and so plain, no one can hesitate as to his duty.

"Not to defend the motherland would be to surrender the Republic. Motherland, Republic, the revolutionary spirit and socialism are indissolubly joined.

"It is time then that the rights of peoples should consummate the rights of man, and in the heart of the battle it is indeed the living idea of the free union of human beings which is striving against the dead idea of a feudal, murderous and sterile despotism."

Towards the end of the war, the revolution in the interior of Germany was being actively prepared. The social democrat Vater, speaking at Magdeburg during a meeting of a workman's and soldier's council made clear the manner in which that preparation was effected:

"Since 25th January 1918 we have methodically prepared the revolution. It was a difficult task and full of danger; we paid for it by many years of prison. The social democratic party had seen that great strikes do not lead to revolution and that it is necessary to use other means to that end. The labor has brought its fruit. We organized desertions at the front; we provided the deserters with false papers, money and propaganda leaflets inciting to desertion. We sent our agents in all directions, principally to the front, in order that they might work upon the soldiers and disintegrate the army. They advised soldiers to desert to the enemy and it is thus that the downfall was brought about, little by little, but with certainty.

To sum up then, under the fiery proclamations about the war "of Right of Liberty and of Civilization", the true aim was the overthrow of monarchies, the degradation of the Catholic powers and the triumph of the revolution. Now that this triumph seems at hand it is useless to conceal it and Mr. Coolidge, late president of the United States of America, publicly recognized it in a speech at Hammond in the 14th June 1927 when he said:

"The chief question at stake in this formidable conflict was to decide which form of government was to predominate among the great nations of the world: the autocratic form or the republican form. Victory remained finally on the side of the people." (Reuter-London, 14th June 1927).

Russia's Responsibility To End The Ukrainian Genocide

 

Israel, England, and the United States delivered Ukranians and Syrians into the hands of terrorists.


The United Nations is the biggest farce on the planet. What is said on that podium is of no consequence whatsoever. The battlefield decides everything in world affairs and the Ukrainian battlefield is littered with the dead. It is a dying country. Russia must quickly wrap this war up and help revive it or Ukraine will be history.

I don't know why Zelensky is still alive. Either Russia is prosecuting this war very naively or it is part of the conspiracy to depopulate Ukraine of its native inhabitants. 

Putin needs to explain himself. The days of "special military operations" are over. This is war. Ukraine is held hostage and must be set free. It hasn't had free elections in a generation. 

And this is not a problem that can be localized to Eastern Europe and forgotten. Ukraine is an open wound that will destroy the world if it is not addressed. The entire corrupt leadership of that so-called country who have stolen billions of dollars should be executed. They are not fit to govern. 

Putin and Russia must stop waging war in slow motion. 

Ukraine and the world can't afford it anymore.

Canada's Place In The New World Order


"In early times, it was easier to control a million people than to kill a million. Today, it is infinitely easier to to kill a million people than to control a million." - Zbigniew Brzezinski.


There's a truism in city planning and urban politics that "people vote with their feet." High-tax cities and regions rarely do well in the long run. Low tax cities attract better talent, more companies, etc. The same is true for countries.

The exodus of talent, skilled labour, and technical expertise out of Canada and into the United States in the last decade has gone largely underreported, but its long-term consequences cannot be underestimated. The numbers aren't sustainable. 

Canada will have no choice but to officially join the Union in the future because Canadians have already de facto made the choice with their feet.

If it's a choice between joining the USA or the EU, I'd encourage our politicians to open a map before making any more public commitments. 

Canadian politicians are the most confused of any country on Earth. I read the other day that Canada is leading the support for the terrorist regime in Ukraine in terms of tax dollars. I think the number is $26 billion. Just an outrageous amount of money.

Is that supposed to be a bribe to be accepted to the European Union?

As of now, Canada cannot presume the EU will even survive. It is collapsing. But so is Canada.

Canada is a failing globalist socialist multicultural experiment with high taxes and a bleak future. They're rolling out euthanasia here to gauge the public resistance, but make no mistake, America, Europe, and other parts of the world aren't far behind. 

The health care system in the U.S. is basically euthanasia for the poor, but the genocidal globalists want to kill off the middle class as well, whatever is left of it anyway. As Zbigniew Brzezinski said in a famous speech he gave, it is easier for governments to kill people than to control them.

It is easier for Israel to kill off the Palestinians in Gaza than to lock them up indefinitely. And the same is true for us.

That is where we are in world history. The people are prey and our governments are led by jackals and hyenas.

The occult globalists who lead our governments are genocidal killers. Covid proved that. It was government terrorism on a global scale. People were injected with bioweapons while being bribed with the basic necessities of life.

But that was only a taste.

They want more. 

They want to rob our parents of their pensions and life-long savings and then kill them in their retirement. That is the plan. And Canada has been chosen as one of the nations to first roll out this global mass murder program. 

September 23, 2026

Wellington House, Sir Gilbert Parker, And The Highbrow Origins of Wartime Propaganda

 

Sir Gilbert Parker.

"[T]he secret of propaganda [is to] permeate the person it aims to grasp, without his even noticing that he is being permeated. Of course propaganda has a purpose, but the purpose must be concealed with such cleverness and virtuosity that the person on whom this purpose is to be carried out doesn't notice it at all." - Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister for Nazi Germany.

It is a mistake to assume that wartime propaganda is directed primarily at the masses. 

The majority of inspired and sophisticated propaganda literature is produced for the elite of any given society. Those who have influence over the levers of power, decision-making, and currents of public thought, are deserving of greater attention than regular voters.

The masses can be swayed in any direction fairly easily, but with the elite it takes more persuasive power and poetic subtlety.

In modern times the British perfected the art of wartime propaganda. They are the masters of thought and cultural persuasion. The Nazis learned everything from them. They were schoolchildren compared to them. The Germans possess little sophistication in the realm of propaganda. 

And whereas the Jews, Russians, and Americans use crude techniques like blackmail, money, and sexual espionage to intimidate their political targets, the Brits rely on good old-fashioned charm and upper class grace to persuade their prey to their side.

Who charmed the bedouins in the Arabian desert? Who has enlisted the elites of Islamic countries, and those of many other societies to do their bidding?

The Nazis, Americans, Russians, and Jews cannot hold a candle to these people.

The persuasive powers of the British ruling class are unmatched.

II.

An excerpt from, "An Overview of British Propaganda Efforts in the First World War" By Robert St John Smith, April 18, 2024:

While an official propaganda organisation might not have existed in Britain, neither was it starting from an entirely blank state. Pre-war thinking had foreseen the need to control information in a modern war, evidenced by one of Britain's very first official acts of war, which was to order the Post Office ship, HMTS Alert, to cut the Germans' transatlantic telegraph cables that passed through the English Channel, severing Germany's ability to communicate across the globe. In addition, The Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) was passed, which, among other things, gave the government a statutory right to limit the freedom of the press, though it was rarely used in this manner. Control of the press until this point had been a voluntary matter, which had its roots in 1899 where it was agreed there needed to be a mutual agreement between press and government, and it was precedented in 1912 when the press was asked not to report on work being undertaken by the Ordinance Board — this was an agreement which seemed to have worked well for both parties. Thus, responsibility for censorship was to fall under the War Office. Convention dictated that senior officers were permitted informal contact with the press, however, reflecting the thinking of the day, Lord Kitchener instituted tighter controls. As well as controlling the flow of information, the War Office would become responsible for the censorship of mail, cables and wireless under the moniker of MO5 (military operations). While pre-war planning had predicted this need — and much is intrinsically tied into the origins of the Security and Secret Services (MI5 and MI6) — it was unprepared to meet the demand for information. The War Office hastily formed the Official Press Bureau (OPB) as a point-of-contact, but given no specific aims or duties, its first weeks were marred by poor administration. Despite Churchill's declaration that the OPB would provide a 'steady stream of information', it censored more than it released, earning the nickname 'the Suppress Bureau'. While their strategy was to be one of control, a sub-section of MO5 — MO5(h) — was set up for 'frontline propaganda', in response to German efforts, which had seen leaflets dropped over the French town of Nancy in August. Leaflet drops aimed to lower enemy morale, but how much work of this nature was undertaken in this wave is hard to establish, given its links to intelligence and this being an under-studied field, but it was low in comparison to later activity discussed below.

From the outbreak, it was Allied policy that war would be waged economically, as well as on the battlefields, and that the Royal Navy would play the principal role, by using its might to enact a blockade of Germany. For this blockade to be effective, it was vital the government shored up support of neutral countries like the Netherlands and Sweden, who would be economically impacted by the blockade.22 Britain also needed to respond to the growing surge of anti-British propaganda produced by Germany in both neutral and allied countries, as well as show its allies that it was capable of pulling its weight, and in the hope of attracting further allies. This led to the Foreign Office creating the News Department of the Foreign Office (NDFO), which acted as the source for all statements issued by the government relating to foreign policy, as well as maintaining relationships with foreign journalists and H.M representatives in embassies across the world. Without input from the Foreign Office, but in connection with the OPB, around the same time the Home Office set up the Neutral Press Committee (NPC), which would monitor press in neutral countries, promote English newspaper sales overseas, oppose enemy propaganda overseas, and distribute information via cable and wireless. Both new organisations, like the OPB, were set up with little in the way of practical aims, and the fact that there were now three overlapping organisations was the start of many tensions within Whitehall and beyond.

In terms of neutral countries, the most important target was the US, not only to compensate for economic losses (Britain and Germany had been each other's 'best' customers), but to secure the resources it could bring as an ally. This matter had been raised by cabinet, and it was rumoured that the following exchange did not take place in the confines of Parliament, or Downing Street, but at a Sunday luncheon at a golf club, where Lloyd George asked his cabinet college Charles Frederick Gurney Masterman (1873-1927) to 'look into it'. The result was the formation of a fourth organisation, Wellington House, named after the building it was based in, but officially known as the War Propaganda Bureau, with Masterman at its head.

Criminally, as he is a character worthy of further analysis, only one biography exists of Masterman, written by his wife in 1939. His career before becoming an MP involved being the literary editor of the Daily Chronicle but his political career got off to a promising start, being associated with the Young Radical Liberals, which centred around Bertrand Russell. He was elected to the seat of Dulwich West in 1906 and undertook a number of junior ministerial posts — possibly the most interesting in relation to propaganda was his involvement with the 1912 introduction of Lloyd George's National Insurance scheme when he was undersecretary for the Home Office. This was a role that saw him oversee an until-then unprecedented and innovative public relations drive, where he was hands on in organising material, leading some commentators to say that he was the most experienced propagandist at the start of the war.

Masterman could be described as 'The Thinker's Propagandist' — especially compared to other individuals discussed here. His approach and vision was influenced by psychological works on crowd behaviour of the time, a topic he took much interest in, and he believed persons without much education or worldly experience were more likely 'not to be in charge of their own fates and open to manipulation'. As such, Wellington House propaganda was to target the elites, not the masses.30 With the aid of Sir Gilbert Parker (1862-1932), a Canadian novelist and anglophile, who was to be made Director of American Propaganda at Wellington House, a targeted list of some 260,000 influential individuals within the US was created.31 Masterman also believed that for the propaganda to be successful its origin would need to be secret: works should appear as if the authors had produced them under their own steam — what would now be called 'black propaganda'. In September 1914, Masterman held two conferences, the first with some 35 influential writers and academics — including many professional and social friends, including H.G. Wells, Arnold Bennett, Rudyard Kipling, and Arthur Conan-Doyle. Attendees were invited to produce work based on accurate information and measured argument through private publishing houses that hid their governmental source. By May 1915, Wellington House had produced 'over seven million copies of books and pamphlets, translated into sixteen languages'. Notably, given the popularity of some of the authors, it is worth highlighting that any of the work they produced during the war is most likely to be propaganda, but how much encouragement they needed is debatable, certainly in the case of Arthur Conan-Doyle, who pre-war had written much on the topic, concerning the rise in German militarism and the threat it presented.

Wikipedia - Sir Gilbert Parker:

The British put forth a large effort to find an able and persuasive writer to effectively communicate with the Americans during World War I. Parker played a crucial and significant role in that propaganda. On 2 September 1914, Parker was chosen by Charles Masterman and the British government to head the subdivision of Wellington House that was responsible for American propaganda.[citation needed] He was unpaid and had no formal title for this role. The goal was to convince America to support the British cause in the war. Parker was supplied with a "large propaganda office" to plan, write, and distribute the new technique of British propaganda.

His main objective was to create new relationships and hold onto existing ones with American citizens.

To do this, Gilbert showered the American people with writings from people such as Rudyard Kipling, H. G. Wells, John Galsworthy, Arnold Bennett, and George Bernard Shaw. His own writings, known as the "White Papers," were sent into the New York Times in 1914. The subheading of one article read, "A Modest Appeal from Sir Gilbert Parker to read the British Side."

His strategic marriage to Amy VanTine, his reputation as a writer, and his social status among the American people, allowed him to establish friendships with many influential Americans in all professions. Using his fame and character, Sir Gilbert Parker flattered the American press with eloquent words and compliments. He called the Americans "fighting people". He also said that "this war will prove them to have everything that they have always had—courage, swiftness if conception, capacity to perform, and a lightning-like directness." His writings essentially "educated" the one source that he knew would reach the majority of Americans. However, he didn't stop there: he continued to spread his "knowledge" by distributing "propaganda material" to American libraries, educational institutions, and periodicals. While focusing on professional establishments he continued to create personal relationships with American elites such as college professors, scientists, doctors, politicians, etc. His method of establishing personal relationships was a landmark later used in other methods of propaganda, "it was the complete and skillful technique later to be developed by many other propagandists, lobbyists, and public relations council."

. . .Parker continued his propaganda efforts up until the year the United States entered the war, 1917. At the beginning of 1917, he visited the United States to meet with Americans he had been corresponding with. On 3 February 1917, President Woodrow Wilson made a speech during Parker's visit that severed diplomatic ties with Germany. The U.S. had almost declared war and Parker believed that he had fulfilled his responsibilities. Later that same day, he resigned from his position at Wellington House, due to failing health, he said.

All of Wellington House's activities were kept in complete secrecy. This increased the credibility of their publications, because they could not be traced back to any official sources. Parker's letters concealed their connection and origin with the British government, and his American contacts never realized they were being manipulated. Today his influence on the First World War and America's entry into it is often overlooked, even by seemingly comprehensive propaganda analysis.

Charles Frederick Gurney Masterman PC MP (24 October 1873 – 17 November 1927) was a British radical Liberal Party politician, intellectual and man of letters. He worked closely with such Liberal leaders as David Lloyd George and Winston Churchill in designing social welfare projects, including the National Insurance Act 1911. During the First World War, he played a central role in the main government propaganda agency.

. . .In the summer of 1914, Masterman strongly supported British entry into the First World War and was soon appointed as head of the War Propaganda Bureau (WPB), known as "Wellington House." His Bureau enlisted the eminent writers John Buchan, H. G. Wells, and Arthur Conan Doyle, as well as the painters Francis Dodd and Paul Nash. Before its abolition in 1917, the Bureau published some 300 books and pamphlets in 21 languages, distributed over 4,000 propaganda photographs every week, and circulated maps, cartoons and lantern slides to the media.

. . .A major objective of his department was to encourage the United States to enter the war on the British and French side. Lecture tours and exhibitions of paintings were organised in the US, drawing on an extensive network of the most important and influential figures in the London arts scene, Masterman devising the most comprehensive arts patronage schemes ever to be supported in the country. It was subsumed into Buchan's Department of Information. It became a template for the war art scheme in the Second World War, headed by Sir Kenneth Clark.[13] Lloyd George demoted Masterman in February 1917; he now reported to Buchan. The agency was peremptorily closed as soon as the war ended, and neither Masterman nor Buchan received the usual public honours. However, Masterman followed Lloyd George in his Liberal party maneuvers after 1918.