April 15, 2026

Liberating The White House




A radical, genocidal, anti-religious, anti-human, anti-freedom, anti-Semitic, and anti-American regime currently occupies the White House. 

Some are convinced this regime came into power in 1913 with the secret establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank by the Rothschilds dynasty and its subordinates in the United States. 

Those in the American banking establishment who opposed this financial coup for patriotic reasons were removed from the picture by the deliberate sinking of the Titanic 114 years ago today, many of whom were on board.

The two World Wars that followed the creation of this evil bank led to the destruction of European power, the end of multiple European empires, the subjugation of Christendom, and the creation of the messianic Jewish state in the heart of the Middle East.

We now know with absolute certainty that the justification for the State of Israel - the so-called Holocaust - was a complete lie. The Nazi regime in Germany committed no such crime. 

Zionists and Nazis shared a common aim in dispossessing European Jews and settling them in Palestine. They were practically allies. The Israeli regime is secretly the biggest fan of the Nazis. 

They learned from the best. 

It was a Nazi tactic to tell a big lie often enough until it became historical gospel.

Defaming the Nazis and garnering world sympathy for the Jews' plight with one big lie was an act of evil genius. That tactic was repeated on 9/11 against a new global enemy---Islam.

By the turn of the 21st century the United States was well within the Zionist bosom. The murder of President Kennedy in 1963 send a warning shot to the American political system that even Presidents are considered fair game if they grow a mind of their own and step out of line. No one is immune from the Zionist' wrath. 

The traitors and collaborators who worked with the Zionists were rewarded with political power and wealth. The Bush Family played it beautifully, and received multiple terms in the Oval Office. 

Over time, the parasite took on the body of the host. 

Previous Presidents had the tact and political acumen to hide the true allegiance of the White House and disguise the real purpose of its foreign policy.

But then came Trump. In many ways he's a gift from God, for he has exposed just how occupied the White House really is. 

He clumsily tries to hide his loyalty to Israel over America by wearing that cheap MAGA hat, but he's too stupid to pull off the act. And his team, from the FBI head to his Vice President and War Secretary, are full of retards. We have watched Idiocracy come to life in the past few years. 

But it's not all a joke. 

We must always remember evil crimes have been committed by occupants in the White House and their masters. Cannibalism. The rape of minors. Mass murder. State terrorism. Genocide.

They offer the world nothing but death, disease, and destruction. And they expect to be thanked for it.

This sinking ship hit an iceberg in the Persian Gulf and now demands lifeboats from every nation and sub-nation on Earth, even going so far as to dictate to the Vatican its Near East policy.

They have lost the plot. 

Instead of returning the White House to the American people the Zionists seek its complete destruction. The way they see it is if they can't have it then nobody can. 

I anticipate the Zionists will attack the White House in a false flag operation in the future and kill Trump if they have to. Yes, they are that brazen.

But they will not get away with it.

The White House will be liberated.

April 14, 2026

Catholic Teaching On Nuclear Weapons



An excerpt from, "Nuclear Weapons And Our Catholic Response" United States Conference of Catholic Bishops:

The Catholic Church’s teaching requires that any use of force be proportionate and discriminate. It must not produce more harm than good and must respect noncombatant immunity and protect civilians. The Church has long opposed the use of nuclear weapons, especially against non-nuclear threats, and the development of new nuclear weapons. The Church urges that nuclear deterrence be replaced with concrete measures of disarmament based on dialogue and multilateral negotiations. 

. . .

“What can be said, too, about those governments which count on nuclear arms as a means of ensuring the security of their countries? Along with countless persons of good will, one can state that this point of view is not only baneful but also completely fallacious. In a nuclear war there would be no victors, only victims. The truth of peace requires that all —whether those governments which openly or secretly possess nuclear arms, or those planning to acquire them— agree to change their course by clear and firm decisions, and strive for a progressive and concerted nuclear disarmament. The resources which would be saved could then be employed in projects of development capable of benefiting all their people, especially the poor.” - Pope Benedict XVI, 2009 World Day of Peace Message, no. 13.

An excerpt from, "What the Catholic Church Teaches on Nuclear Weapons" Catholic Peace Action: 

The Catholic Church has always been consistent that there can be no moral case for the actual use of a weapon of mass destruction as it is indiscriminate. On this basis the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Catholic teaching are indefensible.

These writings however did not close the discussion as it was argued by many leading Catholics that the concept of nuclear deterrence would not only prevent the use of nuclear weapons but even prevent war itself. A balance of terror they argued would at the height of the Cold War preserve peace if both sides had nuclear arsenals. Pope St.John Paul II gave some support for this position when he wrote in 1982 to the United Nations,

“in current conditions deterrence based on balance, certainly not as an end in itself but as a step on the way toward a progressive disarmament, may still be judged morally acceptable.”

For Catholics in a nuclear weapons state this was a very interesting time with debate for and against the possession of nuclear weapons. These debates and exchanges continued for many years with respect shown on all sides.

The Scottish Catholic Bishops in 1982 also made a statement,

“If it is immoral to use these (nuclear) weapons it is immoral to threaten their use”

For many years the official position of the Catholic Church remained that of Pope St.John Paul II but the discussions continued and as time progressed the conditional acceptance of nuclear deterrence became more difficult to sustain as it became more evident the condition of progressive disarmament was not happening.

In 2005 Archbishop Migliore, the then observer of the Holy See to the United Nations wrote,

“The time has gone for finding ways to a balance in terror, the time has come to re-examine the whole strategy of nuclear deterrence…it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.”

Why The World Needs A Catholic Nuke, An African Nuke, And A Shia Nuke


List of nations with nuclear weapons:

Russia (Christian Orthodox)

United States of America (Freemason Republic)

China (Communism)

France (Freemason Republic)

United Kingdom (Protestant Monarchy)

Pakistan (Sunni Islam)

India (Hinduism)

Israel (Judaism)

North Korea (Communism)


The policy of nuclear prohibition has been a disastrous and misguided error. It has made the world less safe, less free, and less stable. 

It's also curious that of the nine nations that officially have nuclear weapons, not one of them is a Catholic country. 

Brazil, Mexico, and the Philippines are the countries with the biggest Catholic populations and not one of them has acquired nuclear weapons. 

Why is that? 

Is there a Vatican fatwa against the possession of nukes?

Why is there a Masonic bomb, a Jewish bomb, a Sunni bomb, a Hindu bomb, a Communist bomb, a Protestant bomb, a Christian Orthodox bomb, but not a Catholic bomb?

The continent of Asia has five countries with nukes. That's the most. 

Africa has zero.

Gaddafi tried to get one but he gave up. If Libya had acquired nukes it probably would not have fallen, and Europe would be safer today.

Nukes are nothing to be afraid of. They bring safety, comfort, and dignity to a nation, like a gun does for a household. It keeps trespassers and thieves away.

My advice to the Pope and the Ayatollah is don't wait. End the misguided religious prohibition against nuclear weapons. Protect your flock. Get nukes now. Build as many as you can. 

The same goes for countries like Brazil and South Africa. 

South America and Africa need the nuclear blanket.

Let the Catholics, the Africans, and the Shia feel the same sense of security as the Jews, Hindus, Masons, Protestants, and Communists do.

April 13, 2026

Operation Desert Storm II: The Christian Reconquest of Jerusalem

 

Give the order Leo.


For the longest time I was emotionally supportive of the State of Israel because I believe every people deserves a homeland. The Jewish people, scattered and tormented across Europe for centuries, finally going back to their spiritual birthplace and establishing a state of their own, is a very appealing story.

But the reality is Israel is an expansionist and genocidal monster that encourages chaos, civil wars, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and state destruction all around it. It is a messianic cult, not a rational state.

Israel wants to rule as the undisputed power not just in the Middle East but in the world. The persecuted race wants to be the master race.

Its grip on America is now naked and unashamed. Netanyahu struts around the White House like he owns the place. The entire Trump presidency has been one long humiliation ritual. 

Israel is a threat to the entire world. Any nation or political figure that speaks out against it is killed or severely reprimanded, whether it be the President, the Ayatollah, the Caliph, or the Pope.

Israel's ire is limitless. Recently, Spain's rebuke of Israel's war crimes found it the target of another migrant wave into its cities. This was no doubt a message from Israel that Spain is vulnerable to demographic warfare and should mind its business. 

But it is its business. Spain will not be safe, and Europe will not be free, unless the Holy Land comes once again under Christian dominion. 

It is now common knowledge that the NGOs that direct Muslim and African refugees into Europe are Jewish-run. They kill two birds with one stone - functioning Middle Eastern states, and European polities.

But Israel is not responsible for all the conflicts and sources of trouble in the Middle East. It did not put the radical Ayatollahs in power in Iran. That was the work of America and England. It is not at fault for the lingering Kurdish question. The West and the regional states are to blame for not resolving that issue fairly and humanely.

But Israel is responsible for initiating unnecessary wars, spreading Jihadist terrorism, and directing the U.S. military machine like its playtoy. 

As long as Israel is allowed to survive it will cause trouble both for Muslims and Christians. It is a global issue, and primarily an European one.

Its dismemberment should not solely be a Palestinian or Islamic aim. Frankly, Christians have more right to that real estate. A new crusade would be more within reason and have greater religious standing than the establishment of a Palestinian state or a liberation by Shiite Muslims.

The Pope must answer Trump's insult and the Christian-bashing by the lunatics around him not with polite messages and soft rhetoric but a declaration of war.

Let the self-righteous fools in Washington understand that the Zio-American empire has done enough damage to the world. Their time is finished.

April 12, 2026

On Iran's Geography And Iranian-Jewish History


Ezra.

An excerpt from, "The Fall of Heaven: The Pahlavis And The Final Days of Imperial Iran" by Andrew Scott Cooper, Picador, 2018, Pg. 48-51:

In the 1920s the land he was destined to rule nudged the southern border of the newly established Soviet Union for more than a thousand miles, skirting the shoreline of the Caspian Sea, plentiful in sturgeon, whose fine caviar graced tables around the world. The spongy storm clouds that sailed down from southern Russia were squeezed dry trying to clear the mountainous rock face of the Alborz Mountains range, ensuring that Persia's northern coast remained perpetually drenched while the kingdom's interior was almost always parched. "Water is the chief concern of the Persian peasant," an American traveler wrote in the early twentieth century. "Wherever he can find the flow of a mountain stream or build a crude canal from a well or spring, a small portion of the desert becomes a paradise and he prospers. Certain of these regions are said to be among the most fertile in the world, producing in abundance not only the finest of wheat and barley, but grapes, peaches, nectarines, pomegranates, figs and melons which are unsurpassed among the fruits of the Temperate Zone."

The sweeping view from the top of the Alborz ridge was of a "magnificent plateau which seems to stretch to eternity," a visitor to Persia once said. Eighteen thousand feet below, clinging to its mountainous hemline, Tehran basked in the sun like a smug cat whose muddy brick tail extended to the edge of the great salt desert. To the east, beyond Yazd with its lyrical skyline of wind chimneys, travelers entered "the great lifeless desert, shaped like a huge hour-glass, 900 miles in length, from the foothills of the Alborz range, in the north, almost to the Indian Ocean, in the south, and ranging in width from 300 to 100 miles." The sprawling Dasht-e Kavit desert held tight its mysteries and miracles. Mighty dust storms roared through like locomotives. Locals in Sistan Province dreaded the annual Wind of One-Hundred-Twenty Days, when broiling gales lashed the region from June to September, and locals still spoke of the time a shepherd and his flock of sheep were dug out alive after a week buried under a sand drift. "Some sections in their utter bleakness resembled landscapes on the moon," was how one American described Dasht-e Kavir in 1950. "At wide intervals walled adobe villages, with green fields and slender poplar trees, or an upthrust of jagged, rocky hills broke the monotony. . . .A haze wrapped the horizon in mystery. Eastward, seemingly limitless, stretched the great salt desert, shimmering in the heat. To the west, gaunt rock hills, pastel-shaped, made a grotesque skyline. A caravan of camels plodded by carrion birds glided above a burro's carcass." 

The main centers of urban life hovered at the desert edge, each a reflection of Persia's dazzling cultural and ethnic diversity. The capital, Tehran, had always been a rough town. Laid waste by the Afghans in 1723, Tehran was a mere cluster of three thousand mud and brick hovels when the Qajar Dynasty appointed it the new Imperial seat. This made strategic sense---the village occupied the gateway to the heights of the Alborz, which overlooked the plateau---but Tehran lacked the elegant artistry and sophistication of the former capital, Isfahan, and most visitors regarded the locals as uncouth and too focused on turning a profit. About seventy-five miles to Tehran's south sat Qom, where the ayatollahs, the country's religious leaders, resided and where important religious schools known as the hawza were located. The second major center of clerical power was Mashad, to the northeast, nestled against the border with Afghanistan. Each year pilgrims trekked to Mashad to pay their respects at the stupendous Holy Shrine of Imam Reza, resting place of the Prophet Mohammad's eighth disciple. Isfahan, always elegant, dominated the central provinces, and tourists from around the world admired the Shah Abbas Mosque, one of the finest examples of Isla mic architecture in the world, which opened out onto the splendid Naghsh-e Jahan Square, where Persian monarchs watched polo matches from a high pavilion, and also the picturesque "Bridge of Thirty-Three Arches," which spanned the Zayande River. Dominating the southwest was the city of Shiraz, "an oasis situated on a high plateau ringed by barren hills. It is a city of gardens and has never been known as a center of trade and industry. Its fame is due to its poets, its gardens, its wine, and its almost mythical position in the Iranian mind." Persia's greatest poets, Hafez and Saadi, wrote of the Shirazi love of songbirds, sweet wine and scent of rose.

The southern provinces were Iran's economic lifeline. In the breadbasket province of Khuzestan, which straddled the Iraqi border, the port city of Abadan boasted the world's largest oil refinery. Running along the southern coastline were the Zagros Mountains, rocky sentinels overlooking the Persian Gulf, where mighty tankers crept through the Strait of Hormuz, only twenty-one miles wide at its narrowest tip, on their way to market. In the sixties the Shah poured more than $1 billion into Persian Gulf oil facilities and at a stroke trebled Iran's oil production and established the foundations for the country's spectacular economic takeoff. The Persian Gulf was Iran's "jugular vein," and he brushed aside foreign critics who accused him of harboring territorial ambitions. When an American journalist asked the Shah whether "Iran's entry into the Persian Gulf would affect the country's relations with the Arabs and Israelis," he offered a stiff retort: "We are in the Persian Gulf. What we are demanding is what has always belonged to our country throughout history."

The Shah's people embodied the contradictions of life along the highway of history. They retained a distinct identity that set them apart from their neighbors and reflected their unique passage through space and time. Life on the high plateau was a constant game of survival, with ever-changing rules. Persians had endured centuries of foreign occupation by absorbing the ways of their overlords to the point where the Greeks, Arabs, and Mongols mirrored them back in return. They were Persians first but also Arabs, Baluchis, Armenians, Kurds, and Turks. More than 90 percent were Muslim, but they shared the land with Jewish, Christian, Bahai, and Zoroastrian minorities. Renowned for their hospitality, artistry, and individualism, the Persians were also inveterate grumblers, too easily slighted and with a capacity to exaggerate and embellish. For a people who prided themselves on their knowledge of science, philosophy, and literature, Persians saw their world as one shaped by elaborate conspiracies that allowed them to shift the blame for their own mistakes and misfortunes onto the shoulders of others. These ultimate survivors were adept at showing different faces to outsiders but also to their own rulers, whom they had a habit of raising up and turning out with bewildering speed---an old saying had it that the people did not often turn, but when they did, it was usually fatal. Persians thrived in adversity only to slacken in good times, so that even when their borders stoved in under relentless pressure from the Russians, Turks, and British in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Persian art, culture, and literature flourished under the Safavid and Qajar Dynasties.

Western visitors regarded the Persians as a brilliant and inscrutable people. The American journalist Frances Fitzgerald traveled to Iran in 1974 and wrote a penetrating account of life under the second Pahlavi king. "Iran is a country of walls and mirrors," she wrote. "Walls surround the villages as they surround every house in Tehran, dividing the public and private lives, creating distances where they do not exist. Behind walls that are mud-brown and anonymous, the rich conceal their fountains and gardens from the desert. . . the great families of Iran have covered the insides of their houses with murals and faceted mirrors so that each room is a visual maze of light and reflections of the real and painted figures. Turn the thought around and the mirrors are a complete defense system, turning away the truth. In Iran, nothing is exactly what it seems. A foreigner finds uncertainty behind arrogance, sadness behind euphoria. But ambiguity may be the only principle of nature in Iran."

An excerpt from, "In Search of Zarathustra: Across Iran and Central Asia To Find the World's First Prophet" by Paul Kriwaczek, Vintage Books, 2002, Pg. 194-95:

The suggestion that Darius was a committed Zoroastrian might shed some light on the otherwise mysterious process by which a number of Zarathustra's key concepts had already infiltrated the Jewish religion long before a belief in the imminent End of Time and the coming of the Messiah so altered the fate of the Roman world.

Unfortunately the only record we have of relations between the Judaean exiles and their Achaemenid rulers is contained in the biblical books of Ezra and Nehemiah, a rather tortured account of the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in Jerusalem, so badly confusing dates and names of kings that generations of scholars have argued about whether Ezra or Nehemiah came first and when and how the walls of Jerusalem were repaired and the Temple rebuilt. What does seem clear is that both Ezra and Nehemiah were important personages in the Persian royal court in the fifth century BC----Nehemiah was cup-bearer to the king----and that they received permission----and financial support----to return to the land of their fathers and carry out a religious revolution, forcibly imposing their version of true Judaism on an astonished population. From now on, only those who had been in exile were to be counted as true Jews. It would be surprising if they hadn't, even unconsciously, absorbed Iranian ideas while serving their Persian masters. The consequences were to be great, for Ezra is thought by most scholars to have been the one responsible for editing together the traditional texts preserved by the Judaean exiles, thus creating the Hebrew Bible.