They Still Live

"They Live" was a documentary. Idiocracy was prophecy. The Hunger Games was reality TV. Eyes Wide Shut was anthropology with archival footage.

What the Epstein files have revealed in black and white for all to see is the reality of a secret elite world that engages in pedophilia, human hunting parties, cannibalism, the rape and torture of children, mystery cult rites, organ trafficking, sex slavery, etc. If you a made a movie about this world you'd be laughed at, sued into bankruptcy, and killed.

The curtain has been pulled back on not just your run of the mill conspiracies and deep state plotting but ritualistic human sacrifice. 9/11 was child's play. The real sacrifices and magic rituals were happening behind the scenes. 

Epstein, whether he's dead or still at large, is a nobody. He was a front man. He inherited the global blackmail enterprise, he didn't lay the groundwork. He's the least interesting aspect of this whole story. He comes across as a charlatan and a retard in his emails and in his polished interview with Bannon. Most criminals and con men are that way. Slick talkers, but not much substance. 

The Hunter S. Thompson Enigma (with Henry Vinson & Zach Glenn)

 

An excerpt from, "Hunter S Thompson's death to be reviewed 20 years on" By Madeline Halpert, BBC, October 1, 2025: 

Colorado officials are reviewing the death of journalist Hunter S Thompson, 20 years after it was ruled a suicide, at the request of his widow.

Thompson died at the age of 67 at his home in Woody Creek, Colorado, a small town north of Aspen, in February 2005.

The Colorado Bureau of Investigation said on Tuesday that it was conducting a "case review" of the 2005 investigation into his death, though the agency said this was not as a result of new evidence.

Video Title: The Hunter S. Thompson Enigma (with Henry Vinson & Zach Glenn). Source: Commendable Commotion. Date Published: February 20, 2025. Description: 

A new side of renowned writer Hunter S. Thompson is presented here exclusively. We talk to Henry Vinson, convicted in 1990 for running a large “male escort service” in Washington D.C. For the first time, he describes his interactions with Thompson, & the late Gonzo journalist’s close friendship with disgraced lobbyist (& purported CIA asset) Craig J. Spence.

Afterwards, we talk to Zach Glenn of the Predictive Programming podcast. Zach will walk us through the murkier sides of Hunter Thompson’s life, including possible links to the U.S. intelligence community.

At the start of this episode, you’ll also hear about the strange, scandalous events unfolding in D.C. during the month of Thompson’s death. The father of Gonzo journalism may have been much closer to these events than has previously been known.

The Nazis At 106

Movements, cults, secret societies, sects, and persecuted religions don't die, they go underground and get more powerful. Judaism is perhaps the best example of this in history. The different sects in Christianity and Islam also share the same trajectory. 

If left to fester below mainstream society they inevitably raise their heads in periods of political upheaval and societal crisis to seek political power.

America, Europe, and the West are heading into such a crisis scenario. 

We are entering the endgame. 

The post-WWII political order is falling apart, and with it, foundational stories like the Holocaust are being questioned across all levels of society.

Modern history has to be rewritten for a new and more stable order to emerge.

With the fable of the Holocaust collapsing, Zionists won't be able to emotionally blackmail humanity any longer. 

They have to stop making up stories and learn to join the human race and leave their supremacist religious ideology behind for good.

We're in 2025 and these motherfuckers are still talking about Edom and other biblical nonsense. It's crazy.

But that's what happens when empires end. Craziness takes over. 

And those who have grown used to abusing their power rarely give up peacefully.

We are witnessing that today. In Iran. In America. In Europe with the EU. 

Zionist billionaires in America have lost touch with reality. They're making commercials about anti-Semitism, passing legislation, lecturing as if they're the spokesmen for God. 

The desperation is funny as hell. They either don't know the jig is up or they don't want to accept it. 

There's slave revolt in the mental sphere, and the masters of modern thought can't handle it. The whip of anti-Semitism isn't working anymore. 

But they're not listening. Hubris has gripped Zio-America. They can't see straight. Rage has blinded them. Hate has made them stupid. Every other day they are screaming about anti-Semitism as if that term still has any meaning left.

This isn't the Middle Ages. The Pope is irrelevant. Throwing around the slur anti-Semite today is retarded. Half the population don't know what a Semite is and the other half don't even want to know. We live in a post-racist society. But people with victim mentalities can't seem to let go. They want to hold onto the past and the villains of a bygone era.

But the past does have some relevant lessons for us.

What makes the memory of the Nazis so menacing for the current Jewish-owned, compromised Western ruling class is their track record of economic success when they were in power.

The Nazis set a powerful example of economic progress. Germany's success under the Nazis can be emulated by other countries. Its memory had to be tainted. An alternative and successful economic model to the current usury-based international monetary system is a dangerous idea. 

And the Nazis didn't come up with this idea. The idea that public banking creates national wealth and prosperity preceded them. America itself offers the best historical example of this fact.

I have not read enough of the Nazis to form a strong opinion on them. It's not been a subject I've taken any serious interest in. The few books on Germany I've read have focused on the 1920s, Bismarck, Goethe, and Frederick the Great. You learn more from history through biographies. 

But I know Hitler had spirit because he was a frontline soldier in WWI. What modern politician can say that? He was not a monster who genocided the Jews. That's obvious. But he wasn't a saint either. He was racist towards the Eastern Europeans, the Russians, Ukrainians, Czechs, Poles, etc. He also said some nasty stuff about the Armenians. So obviously he wasn't a good guy. 

But good guys don't make history. It just doesn't happen. Rogues, traitors, and killers make history. That's the sad truth about our species. 

What matters is Hitler was a nationalist and a fighter. And apparently that funny little mustache had a practical purpose. It was not a fashion statement. It allowed soldiers in WWI to put on gas masks. So he deserves a pass there. I guess keeping that hideous thing served as a reminder to him of his wartime sacrifices and the memory of his fellow soldiers. 

And it must be kept in mind that the Nazis didn't appear out of nowhere. They had occult roots. Initial funding for the Nazi movement came from Wall Street banks and London firms. This has been well documented.

At the time the Communists were rightly viewed as the biggest threat to Europe. England and France were in a bind, because they demanded endless reparations from Germany for WWI but also needed the country to be a bulwark against the emerging Soviet Union. 

They needed Germany strong enough to protect Central and Western Europe from the Soviets but not too strong to threaten their interests and borders. That was a tough balance to strike.

And rebuilding Germany was no easy feat.

While Germany was on its knees throughout the 1920s the Soviets were busy building up Russia thanks to expertise from American companies and Jewish money. They were ahead of the game. Germany had to play catch up. It needed to be rebuilt quickly, and Hitler made it happen.

If Germany had stayed on the mat throughout the 1930s who knows how history would have unfolded. 

If it weren't for the Nazis France and England would probably be speaking Russian today and still hanging portraits of Stalin in London pubs and Parisian cafes. So they deserve gratitude. They stopped the Communists from taking over Europe completely, at least for a generation. 

The real Berlin Wall was the Nazi war machine. Putin can claim all he wants that Russia saved the world from fascism but history will be kinder to the Nazis than the Soviets. Russia, itself enslaved by the Communists, couldn't liberate anything. 

II.

An excerpt from, "The Occult In National Socialism" By Stephen E. Flowers, Ph.D., Inner Traditions, 2022, Pg. 223 - 224:

For years, controversy has raged over the questions of Hitler and his religion, his position toward religion and the occult. So many agendas are being fed by these speculations that they have come to form a whole modern mythology of their own. These range from Hitler being a pagan Wotan-worshipper or a Satanist---the most far-fetched of the myths---to him simply doing the Lord's work in a completely Christian sense, to him being an atheist, to him being in league with various occult groups, and so on. Each of these various paradigms of interpretation have some grain of truth to them, perhaps. The best sources for gaining any real insight into these questions can be found in his own words, such as in Mein Kampf, his speeches, and his "Table Talk" and other utterances where he touches on religious matters. These quotes have been conveniently collected in the 1977 book Hitlers "Religion" by Manfred Ach (with a collection of original sources by Clemens Pentrop). The authors of this book put the word "religion" in quotes because their analysis shows that the aspect of Hitler's thinking that might be called "religious" could not be categorized under the heading of any known and established faith or church. As with most men in history with similar stories, their religion seems to have been understood in terms of their individual selves----a steadfast belief in their own personal meaning, purpose, and mission in the world. Hitler's religion is summed up in the formulaic mantra uttered by one of his greatest disciples, Rudolf Hess, when he introduced his Fuhrer with the words: "The Party is Hitler! But Hitler is Germany, just as Germany is Hitler!" Thus, three entities are equated: the NSDAP = Hitler = Germany. This, and this alone, was probably the essence of Hitler's religion. There was simply no room in his being for any other. This Trinitarian formula is reminiscent of another which was used at the time: Ein Volk---Ein Reich---Ein Fuhrer (One People---One Empire----One Leader), which was directly inspired by the medieval Catholic formula "One God, One Pope, One Church" (Lat. unus Deus, unus Papa, una Ecclesia). One does not need to go beyond this formula to realize the depth to which Hitler would reject any actual sense of authentic Germanic spirituality with its emphasis on tribal loyalty and individual liberty.

Certainly, one of the most important books on the topic of Hitler and religion is Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich (2003). This book clearly demonstrates the two religious strains present in the Third Reich: the Christian (Positive or orthodox) and the neopagan (which we have clearly seen was not the traditional worship of mythic Germanic gods and goddesses, but rather a pseudoscientific nationalism). Both were equally seen as being volkisch. As Hitler was the Party, these same tendencies were present in his worldview. Steigmamn-Gall comes to the conclusion that the Christian component was dominant, but it has been ignored and underplayed in the postwar political and cultural climate. The idea that Nazism was an anti-Christian movement is seen as a non-factual but useful truism for Christians and the liberal elite in the post-war climate (Steigmann-Gall 2003, 266).

Islam At 1447

Epstein probably took a shit on one of Islam's holiest items. I wouldn't put any act of depravity past him. Regardless, it's a wrap. Ok. It's over. Muslims can't recover from this. The last century was rough, but Islam had a good run.

Related: Why the Foundations of Islam Are Now Crumbling with Dr. Jay Smith.

Whether Islam was invented over a span of three or four centuries, in a deliberate and calculated way by sophisticated theologians, or in an ad hoc manner to suit the whims of the rulers of the new Arab empire, is still to be determined. 

I think it's a mix of both because man-made religions are productions of the powerful, who are capable long-term planning but also whimsical changes in outlook.

A righteous Islamic king would probably instruct his priestly scribes to pen righteous words in the mouth of a divine figure, a prophet, or a saint to inspire his subjects to do good. Then a greedy and murderous king would come along in the next generation and order the same priests to revise some statements in the new holy book to reflect his aims, appetites, and ambitions.

Islam is not unique in this regard. Didn't a King of England establish a new church because he wanted to remarry? 

Royal courts and imperial dynasties have always had the motive and the means to cultivate popular worship and change religious opinions to reflect their desires. 

The creation of a new religion isn't really that hard. You feed the dumb poor fairytales to keep them obedient and fearful, and tell the rich and powerful that none of the rules and restrictions apply to them. 

From an outside perspective this is how Islam likely developed over the centuries. 

But this is a murky field. Skepticism is forbidden in Islamic countries. Islamic scholarship isn't really scholarship. Muslim scholars would be put to the sword if they question the validity of the Quran. And Western scholars rightly fear for their lives as well should they probe the subject too deeply, so whatever Western academia has produced about Islam can't be taken seriously. 

At its most fundamental level Islam is a copycat religion. The Quran, like all religious texts, is not a historical document. Islam is not grounded in fact. 

Kings and priests of all times and places write propaganda, not history. Even in our advanced age the most popular historians cover up real history as much as possible in the service of power. Imagine what kings got away with a millennia ago, and before. 

Kings and priests have had every reason to invent new religious doctrines and preserve old ones. Cults and religions have always been the toys and playthings of the mighty. 

According to author Joseph Atwill Christianity was an invention by the Roman rulers to curb the messianic zeal of Jewish radicals and more easily manage religious affairs in Judea. 

It's a plausible theory. Giving violent rebels a peaceful Messiah to worship is a brilliant tactic. You teach the slaves the values of MLK, not Malcolm X. The Romans were experts at psychological manipulation. They knew what they were doing. 

And they were fortunate to follow other empires. Like the Arabs they were the new kids on the block in their day so they inherited a lot of imperial knowledge, and tricks of the trade. 

Religion has always been a powerful tool to control vast swaths of people in a single political system. And the early Islamic rulers, inheriting diverse lands with different faiths, learned from the best, from the Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Greeks, Egyptians, Romans, Buddhists, etc. 

They knew that with a new order must come a new religion too. You can't just go around chopping heads off and still collect taxes. That's not how you preserve an empire. You have to establish far-reaching legitimacy in your realm, and for much of human history that meant religious legitimacy. 

Ruling in the name of God has always been the biggest game in town. 

Video Title: Muhammad Never Existed: The Four Caliphs Were Fabricated! Source: Var Valley. Date Published: March 29, 2025. Description:

In this episode Emmet Sweeney will examine the historicity of Muhammed and the Rashidun Caliphate by analyzing the Archaeological evidence of their conquests.

America At 250

"Israel's birth came as redemption in the wake of an unprecedented crime — the Holocaust of the Jewish people. The 60 years that followed were punctuated by moments of pride and peril: victories in several wars of national survival, but also by continuing uncertainty about the country's future. Will Israel survive another 60 years if the next decades are dominated by nuclear proliferation, growing violence in the Middle East, intensifying popular passions among the demographically prolific Palestinians, and eventually, the fading of America's regional domination?" 

- Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Israel at 60" Time.

The myths we tell ourselves on a civilizational level are political in nature. The Holocaust and 9/11 are the most famous modern examples. 

Both stories served to cast Israel and America as victims of the Nazis and Muslims. And they have continued to function in that way well into the quarter mark of the 21st century. 

I don't believe peace in the Holy Land and the greater Near East is possible until both stories are finally put to bed. 

Stories are incredibly powerful motivators of human behaviour. If we keep telling ourselves we are victims of terror, of imperialism, of colonialism, of Zionism, of anti-Semitism, of history, of whatever boogeyman of the day, then we will always be trapped in that story.

The story that Palestinians tell themselves hasn't served them well. Granted, they're a colonized people, and they have made honest attempts at peace only to be rebuked by the state of Israel. But calling for the destruction of Israel, as extremist Palestinians and their supporters have done, only invites more violence. 

And Israel is the master of violence. We know the October 7 attacks were largely its doing, not Hamas. But you don't charm a beast by blasting insults at it. 

Palestinians and Muslims have to learn to embrace this beast, and hope it civilizes over time as its irrational anger and politically constructed collective trauma dissipates. 

Where is the so-called Islamic hospitality for Jews?

Iran over the last fifty years has played a very negative role in this process. Under the Ayatollahs it has taken an irresponsible stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its leaders have ran over their own people with the Palestinian bus on their way to Jerusalem.

And American leaders are guilty of the same crime, putting the interests of Israel above their own people for more than half a century.

This summer America will turn 250, and it must change directions or it won't see 300. It is currently unrecognizable to the Founding Fathers. 

I think the leaders of both America and Iran are smart enough to realize that their peoples reject war for foreign interests. They may be monsters but they're still shrewd political animals.

A war over the Holy Land will not serve neither America nor Iran. The region can't handle it. And the world won't tolerate it. 

They need to find a path to peace and create a new story.