I've been trying to come up with a title to comprehensively describe the USrael-Iran war.
We had the Great War in 1914. Then the Good War in 1939. Following that trend this must be the Bad War.
Since both sides are agents of Satan, and Satan is the biggest loser spiritually speaking according to the Abrahamic tradition, there will be no winners in this war.
What we have here is two evil sides waging war against each other to advance the depopulation of the world, the destruction of the American empire, the break up of Iran, and the transformation of the world economy.
The treasonous occult practitioners leading the governments of America and Iran are enemies of their own countries and peoples. They know they are tyrants who can only sustain their tyranny via a state of endless war. So they don't consider fighting to a standstill and wasting tens of billions of dollars in a big war as a loss for their countries.
Israel is another matter. Jewish patriots are leading that country. They are doing right by their people. So Israeli leaders have to be commended. Their actions and policies reflect the will of the Israeli people. Israeli society wants war. They want to conquer Gaza, Southern Lebanon, and Syria. Netanyahu is delivering on his promises. He is a good leader for his people.
The same can't be said for the losers in Washington and Tehran.
As if to anticipate this book, a so-called 'former' US intelligence operative has openly acknowledged that US intelligence is engaged in Works of Darkness. Of course, we all know this - the whole world, since Abu Ghraib, now knows it, although even today few have any grasp of the scale of the reprobate US intelligence community's involvement in such works; but for a 'former' US intelligence operative to admit as much, is certainly a most interesting development. It would be comforting to believe that the remark was made in a contrite spirit of humility and tenderness towards those whom the intelligence community has wronged. No such luck, unfortunately.
The 'former' operative's admission surfaced in an article by the veteran US investigative reporter (with the closest of intelligence community links), Seymour Hersh, in the aftermath of the atrocities committed in Abu Ghraib, with which the US intelligence-linked corporations CACI and Titan 'were' associated (and for which they were largely responsible). Hersh was describing what he had learned about a 'Special-Access Program' (SAP), or clandestine 'Black' operation subject to the US Defense Department's most stringent level of security, which was itself blown' by Hersh's revelations in The New Yorker. Under the SAP, Hersh reported, 'commandos crossed borders without visas and could interrogate terrorism suspects deemed too important for transfer to the military's facilities at Guantanamo, Cuba'. US commandos, operatives and other specialists 'carried out instant interrogations - using force if necessary -at secret CIA detention centers scattered all around the world'. The (resulting) intelligence 'would be relayed to the SAP command center in the Pentagon in real time, and sifted for those pieces of information critical to the 'White', or overt, world' [see pages 6 and 8 et seq. for the significance of this differentiation from the 'Black', or 'covert' world]. This is the paragraph in which the unprecedented official admission in question was made:
'Fewer than two hundred operatives and officials, including [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were "completely read into the program", the former intelligence official said. The goal was to keep the operation protected. "We're not going to read more people than necessary into our heart of darkness", he said. "The rules are: 'Grab whom you must. Do what you want"".
For any US intelligence official to acknowledge publicly that his or her intelligence community has a 'heart of darkness' is probably unprecedented. All national intelligence communities, being essentially ocultically-oriented secret societies riddled with Freemasonry, have hearts of darkness'; but they scarcely ever admit this central reality, other than via symbology, such as MI5's revealingly esoteric triangle-symbol shown in Figure 1 below. Two possible explanations for this open admission of collective demonic possession, which emerged in the aftermath of the maelstrom of revelations and reports surrounding the Satanic abuse perpetrated inter alia by those 'cutout' US intelligence operatives at the notorious Abu Ghraib detention facility in the Baghdad area and elsewhere, sprang to mind.
One possibility was that the official intelligence 'owners' of the 'heart of darkness' are so Satanised and indifferent to the sufferings they inflict that they couldn't care less any more, especially now that they have been 'rumbled', what the rest of the world thinks. Such an attitude would be consistent with the arrogant protestation, heard repeatedly from some Americans, that it doesn't matter what conclusions the rest of the world has reached concerning the dangers that this revolutionary United States now presents to humanity: what matters is that America should be feared.
The second possibility is that the intelligence source who briefed Hersh was somewhat ashamed of the blackness of the CIA/DIA's collective 'heart of darkness', and was dismayed by the appalling international publicity as well as by the fact that this SAP had gone so badly wrong: 'We've never had a case where a Special-Access Program went sour - and this goes back to the Cold War'.
He complained that the intelligence officer to whom Mr Rumsfeld had delegated the SAP, Stephen Cambone, an operative with an allegedly murky past, had decided to bring the SAP rules (i.e., the absence of all residual morality) into the prisons; in other words, the regular military personnel operating in the prisons were told that what went on there now formed part of the covert operation, where no civilised rules applied.
By the time the official's 'heart of darkness' admission appeared in print, the whole world had been reminded that the United States' regard for human life and dignity was as depraved as that of the Hitler and Stalin regimes; that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely; and that the United States' protestations that it was engaged in 'spreading democracy' in a region where it is non-existent, was indeed, as had always been widely assumed, a disreputably fraudulent prospectus. This was the case not least because the United States is itself in the habit of rigging its own electoral process, as the extensively documented fiddling of the November 2004 General Election demonstrated [see Addendum 1, page 662].
The shamefacedness of the Bush II Administration on this score was repeatedly in evidence following that election, as top officials from the President down reiterated the official 'line' that the United States is the guardian angel of that wondrous gift called 'democracy'. For example, on 16th June 2005, President G. W Bush denounced the Iranian election as a sham designed to ensure that power was to be retained in the hands of an undemocratic, repressive elite. The Iranian people', Mr Bush said, 'deserve a genuinely democratic system in which elections are honest, and in which their leaders answer to them instead of the other way around'. This hypocritical statement - one of many of its kind coming from a US President who, whatever may have been thought of the heavily Soviet-penetrated US Democratic Party, is shown to have presided over a political machine that stole both the election of 2004 and the preceding election typical of lies perpetrated by the head of a regime engaged in the exercise of 'democratism' (a Soviet-era word meaning 'the creation and maintenance of the illusion of democracy') who, by ingrained habit, chooses to be unable and unwilling to distinguish between truth and falsehood. For Iranians, who are no fools, to be told by a US President who claimed to be sustaining 'freedom' while openly depriving the American people of it, and who bragged about democracy after having usurped power which is supposed to flow from the people, was further proof of the accuracy of their slogan describing the United States as 'the Great Satan'. Mr Bush then tried to distinguish between the Iranian regime and the people of Iran by hurriedly elaborating that 'today, the Iranian regime denies' the Iranian people their rights. It brutalises its people and denies their liberty'. And Washington wondered why the Iranian people are so manifestly equivocal about American official professions of 'friendship' towards them, as opposed to their regime. It is because the level of hypocrisy pouring out of Washington's intelligence-controlled regime stinks in their nostrils.
Take the President's assertion on that occasion that the Iranian regime 'brutalises' its people', a true statement that is overwhelmingly supported by the historical record. The US regime does likewise. For instance, from late 2004 onwards, US journalists have been sent to jail for refusing to divulge their sources to the authorities, which is exactly what happens in brutalised states like, say, Zimbabwe. In 2005, Andrew Stephenson, who worked tirelessly pro bono publico to expose the fraudulence of the 2004 General Election [see Appendix 1], made the serious mistake of seeking employment in Washington DC as a lobbyist, having exhausted his financial resources. On the plane back to his home city, Seattle, he was taken violently ill, and was later diagnosed with cancer of the pancreas. After patriotic Americans rallied round and raised, in extremely short order, no less than $70,000 to finance a very serious surgical operation at Johns Hopkins Hospital, carried out by the nation's top surgeon in this discipline, attempts were made by one of the US Government's several hyperactive disinformation and discrediting teams to spread lies to the effect that Stephenson had raised the funds for his own benefit, i.e. fraudulently. When activists exposed these lies and their perpetrators, the hospital authorities professed to have been unable to locate the $70,000, which had been despatched to them by Fedex (it was suddenly 'found' lying unopened in an office). After Stephenson's return to Seattle, another branch of the evil US intelligence disinformation team (based in Toronto) intervened unilaterally with the Seattle authorities, who were to have provided Andy Stephenson with urgently necessary chemotherapy, so that his insurance cover was suddenly cancelled. On 9th June, a very senior US intelligence official (one of the few with any integrity) informed this Author that the virus that will have caused Stephenson's cancer was most likely injected via syringe into a toothpaste tube in his hotel room: "That's how they do it', he added. A few days later, a colleague (of this Author) who was attending a political reception, raised the subject of the Government's repressive policies with a person known to be an intelligence officer as well as a political operator. He 'snapped his fingers', whereupon two operatives approached our friend and entered into a conversation, dealing with certain issues that our friend had raised. One of these, a Transportation Security Agency (TSA) operative, said gratuitously, on the subject of poisonings, that 'a lot of these are happening' [sic] - meaning that the US Government is engaged, 'as we speak', in the standard Illuminist practice of poisoning its enemies.
It therefore, self-evidently 'ill behoves' the President of the United States to lecture the Iranians (and other foreigners whose governments are equally the servants of Lucifer) on the abominations of their governments, and the repressive policies against their own people that they perpetrate, when the US Government is itself engaged in the same kind of Satanic behaviour while professing that it is the guardian angel of freedom and democracy. No wonder such official hypocrisy stinks in the nostrils of members of the human race who have not yet succumbed to the orchestrated dumbing-down processes being perpetrated against them by their own Illuminised governments.
Manifestly such behaviour, and any association with it or condoning of it, is incompatible with the Way, the Truth and the Life. A certain kindly American intell-igence officer known to the Author has touchingly protested that he loves the Lord first, and his country next - which, being interpreted, and in the context in which this statement was made - meant that he saw no incompatibility between his lifelong association with the CIA, and thus with its 'heart of darkness', and his 'commitment' to Jesus Christ. Unfortunately, such a convenient compromise is out of the question for those who profess to believe, and therefore hope for salvation. In Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 10, verse 21, Paul warns:
'Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils; ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils'.
A choice has to be made. Shall I remain associated with this intelligence organisation and its now openly self-acknowledged 'heart of darkness'? Or shall I renounce, once and for all, the 'Works of Darkness', so that I shall, by the Grace of the Holy Sprit, be available to be saved?
'Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall' [I Corinthians Chapter 10, verse 12]. And in Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, Chapter 5, verse 11, Paul commands:
'And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them...'... which is what this work humbly seeks, to the very best of the Author's ability and resources, to do. Note crucially that Paul describes all Works of Darkness as 'unfruitful' - something of an understatement, perhaps, given that, since the Devil is the author of confusion, all Works of Darkness (and therefore all intelligence operations and activity) are characterised by endless strife, contentiousness, bitterness, false witness, deception, lies and generally reprobate behaviour. The Author has himself been a witness to, and a victim of, of this routine pattern of official delinquency, in the course of research inter alia for this book.
Indeed, in the intelligence community context, such institutionalised delinquency in the name of national security soon becomes quite obvious to the targeted observer who is not sitting on his or her brains. One reason for this is that the same techniques are always redeployed, since the Devil knows of no new tricks. The preoccupations, for instance, of the US intelligence community typically revolve around launching fresh deception or scamming operations in order to cover up past 'botches' - operations which have gone badly wrong and have unravelled. Indeed it is characteristic of the CIA and its internal subsidiaries and rivals that they specialise in operations that go wrong. So there is a constant imperative to develop fresh initiatives to cover up previous botches, or to provide 'diversionary services'. This behaviour is akin to that of a gambler at a casino who has lost more than he possesses and who seeks ever more desperately to recoup his losses by taking risks against unbeatable odds, in the pathetic hope that he will 'get lucky' and will not only recoup all his losses, but will earn a profit, too. Of course, this never happens.
Hersh's article on the circumstances surrounding Abu Ghraib made it crystal clear that what the 'former' intelligence official who admitted that the CIA (et al) has 'a heart of darkness' was most concerned about was that the secret SAP or 'Black' operation, which he said at one point 'is still active', would never be exposed (even though, as indicated, he was himself helping to expose it). The 'Black' programme had to be kept in the darkness and not revealed to the 'White' world, according to an intelligence 'consultant' also interviewed by Hersh - not only for security reasons, but also 'because the process is unpleasant. It's like making sausage: you like the result but you don't want to know how it was made'. A European version of this syndrome reads: 'When you put your shoes outside your hotel room at night for polishing, you don't want or need to know who cleaned them'.
'Also', the 'former' intelligence officer told Hersh, 'you don't want the Iraqi public and the Arab world, to know' (what utterly depraved barbarians we are Ed.). 'Remember, we went to Iraq to democratise the Middle East [sic!]. The last thing you want to do is let the Arab world know how you treat Arab males in prison'.
But so 'botched' was this accursed Work of Darkness, that not just the Arab world, but every corner of the globe, today knows how certain brutalised Americans treat Arab males in prison: with total indifference to suffering, with depraved sexual lust and with Nazi-like contempt. Reports of imprecise British atrocities perpetrated in Iraq appear to have been disseminated in part so as to take the spotlight off the aberrations of the offending American personnel, although it appears that the collapse of morality which underlies the US abominations has infected the British as well. This behaviour is consistent with the indoctrination format espoused and perpetrated by the Illuminati, which seeks to procure that selected victims, operatives and implementers of its nefarious plans must be brought to inflict pain without flinching, to kill if necessary without ever looking back afterwards, and to maximise the potential of the use of fire. In his last interview before his sudden death during an exorcism of a young girl in July 1999, the Author's late friend Fr Malachi Martin explicitly confirmed that Luciferians (who are worshippers of, and are possessed by, Lucifer) 'have all passed through [initiation] and that involves three things: the infliction of pain without flinching, the infliction of death without flinching, and the use of fire'.
