Evil Attracts Ugly

 

There's a reason why the top echelons of the Soviet and Nazi regimes were are all ugly, weird looking, and abnormal people. It's a fundamental principle of politics and statecraft that evil attracts ugly people. And political power is fundamentally evil.

I remember always pointing out to my parents whenever the topic came up that the Islamic Republic in Iran is filled with the ugliest Iranians and all the people they kill and maim are athletes, beautiful girls, and handsome youth.

The Italian magazine controversy is another hilarious reminder that in politics, as in life, image is everything. 

That stone-age looking soldier-settler couldn't help himself laughing like a hyena in that photo. He is the face of Zionist rape. And the Zionists don't want Western audiences to be shown the true face of their evil movement.

And he's not unique. The type of people who get off on torture, killing, and bullying are usually hideous looking creatures. Terrorist groups are not peopled by models. There's a reason why cops who abuse power are called pigs. On an instinctive level we all know sin is ugly. And to do sin makes one ugly.

Hitler's Moral Stance On The Use of Chemical Weapons

"One of the most intriguing mysteries of World War II is why Germany and the Allies did not use chemical and biological weapons against each other. As the Third Reich crumbled, it seemed ever more likely that Hitler would employ weapons of mass destruction.

The reason he didn’t was deterrence. Both sides feared that, as in World War I, once one side used chemical weapons, so would their opponents. It turned out that German nerve gases like sarin were far more effective than Allied chemical weapons, such as mustard gas, but the Germans didn’t know that." - Michael Peck, "What If Hitler Used Chemical Weapons Against the Allies on D-Day?" The National Interest, June 14, 2020.

A question that has perplexed Western historiography on WWII, which is dominated by Jewish voices, is why Hitler didn't use chemical weapons against the Allied invasion of Normandy considering his regime had no qualms about using gas on Jewish civilians.

Was he simply afraid that his enemy would return the favour in spades?

Or did he have more noble intentions?

This question is fatal to the Holocaust narrative and exposes it as a total lie.

A likely explanation is that Hitler prohibited the use of chemical weapons on moral grounds against both military and civilian targets.

Hitler personally experienced gas warfare in the trenches of WWI and that painful memory undoubtedly influenced his decision to not repeat the errors of his military superiors.

The black and white mind is incapable of giving the benefit of the doubt to Hitler because in that myopic worldview he's the epitome of the Devil. Facts do not sway. Once you are convinced of something on an emotional level it's hard to dislodge that belief.

The fact is the Nazi war machine was more moral than its adversaries, especially the Soviets. 

There's no question repugnant characters made their way up the ranks of the Nazi regime. Government power always attracts the worst cretins and murderers in all societies. But, as a matter of state policy, which fell under the final authority of Hitler, chemical weapons and other weapons of mass destruction were prohibited from military and civilian use for moral reasons.

Liberating The White House

A radical, genocidal, anti-religious, anti-human, anti-freedom, anti-Semitic, and anti-American regime currently occupies the White House. 

Some are convinced this regime came into power in 1913 with the secret establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank by the Rothschilds dynasty and its subordinates in the United States. 

Those in the American banking establishment who opposed this financial coup for patriotic reasons were removed from the picture by the deliberate sinking of the Titanic 114 years ago today, many of whom were on board.

The two World Wars that followed the creation of this evil bank led to the destruction of European power, the end of multiple European empires, the subjugation of Christendom, and the creation of the messianic Jewish state in the heart of the Middle East.

We now know with absolute certainty that the justification for the State of Israel - the so-called Holocaust - was a complete lie. The Nazi regime in Germany committed no such crime. 

Zionists and Nazis shared a common aim in dispossessing European Jews and settling them in Palestine. They were practically allies. The Israeli regime is secretly the biggest fan of the Nazis. 

They learned from the best. 

It was a Nazi tactic to tell a big lie often enough until it became historical gospel.

Defaming the Nazis and garnering world sympathy for the Jews' plight with one big lie was an act of evil genius. That tactic was repeated on 9/11 against a new global enemy---Islam.

By the turn of the 21st century the United States was well within the Zionist bosom. The murder of President Kennedy in 1963 send a warning shot to the American political system that even Presidents are considered fair game if they grow a mind of their own and step out of line. No one is immune from the Zionist' wrath. 

The traitors and collaborators who worked with the Zionists were rewarded with political power and wealth. The Bush Family played it beautifully, and received multiple terms in the Oval Office. 

Over time, the parasite took on the body of the host. 

Previous Presidents had the tact and political acumen to hide the true allegiance of the White House and disguise the real purpose of its foreign policy.

But then came Trump. In many ways he's a gift from God, for he has exposed just how occupied the White House really is. 

He clumsily tries to hide his loyalty to Israel over America by wearing that cheap MAGA hat, but he's too stupid to pull off the act. And his team, from the FBI head to his Vice President and War Secretary, are full of retards. We have watched Idiocracy come to life in the past few years. 

But it's not all a joke. 

We must always remember evil crimes have been committed by occupants in the White House and their masters. Cannibalism. The rape of minors. Mass murder. State terrorism. Genocide.

They offer the world nothing but death, disease, and destruction. And they expect to be thanked for it.

This sinking ship hit an iceberg in the Persian Gulf and now demands lifeboats from every nation and sub-nation on Earth, even going so far as to dictate to the Vatican its Near East policy.

They have lost the plot. 

Instead of returning the White House to the American people the Zionists seek its complete destruction. The way they see it is if they can't have it then nobody can. 

I anticipate the Zionists will attack the White House in a false flag operation in the future and kill Trump if they have to. Yes, they are that brazen.

But they will not get away with it.

The White House will be liberated.

Catholic Teaching On Nuclear Weapons

An excerpt from, "Nuclear Weapons And Our Catholic Response" United States Conference of Catholic Bishops:

The Catholic Church’s teaching requires that any use of force be proportionate and discriminate. It must not produce more harm than good and must respect noncombatant immunity and protect civilians. The Church has long opposed the use of nuclear weapons, especially against non-nuclear threats, and the development of new nuclear weapons. The Church urges that nuclear deterrence be replaced with concrete measures of disarmament based on dialogue and multilateral negotiations. 

. . .

“What can be said, too, about those governments which count on nuclear arms as a means of ensuring the security of their countries? Along with countless persons of good will, one can state that this point of view is not only baneful but also completely fallacious. In a nuclear war there would be no victors, only victims. The truth of peace requires that all —whether those governments which openly or secretly possess nuclear arms, or those planning to acquire them— agree to change their course by clear and firm decisions, and strive for a progressive and concerted nuclear disarmament. The resources which would be saved could then be employed in projects of development capable of benefiting all their people, especially the poor.” - Pope Benedict XVI, 2009 World Day of Peace Message, no. 13.

An excerpt from, "What the Catholic Church Teaches on Nuclear Weapons" Catholic Peace Action: 

The Catholic Church has always been consistent that there can be no moral case for the actual use of a weapon of mass destruction as it is indiscriminate. On this basis the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Catholic teaching are indefensible.

These writings however did not close the discussion as it was argued by many leading Catholics that the concept of nuclear deterrence would not only prevent the use of nuclear weapons but even prevent war itself. A balance of terror they argued would at the height of the Cold War preserve peace if both sides had nuclear arsenals. Pope St.John Paul II gave some support for this position when he wrote in 1982 to the United Nations,

“in current conditions deterrence based on balance, certainly not as an end in itself but as a step on the way toward a progressive disarmament, may still be judged morally acceptable.”

For Catholics in a nuclear weapons state this was a very interesting time with debate for and against the possession of nuclear weapons. These debates and exchanges continued for many years with respect shown on all sides.

The Scottish Catholic Bishops in 1982 also made a statement,

“If it is immoral to use these (nuclear) weapons it is immoral to threaten their use”

For many years the official position of the Catholic Church remained that of Pope St.John Paul II but the discussions continued and as time progressed the conditional acceptance of nuclear deterrence became more difficult to sustain as it became more evident the condition of progressive disarmament was not happening.

In 2005 Archbishop Migliore, the then observer of the Holy See to the United Nations wrote,

“The time has gone for finding ways to a balance in terror, the time has come to re-examine the whole strategy of nuclear deterrence…it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.”

Why The World Needs A Catholic Nuke, An African Nuke, And A Shia Nuke

List of nations with nuclear weapons:

Russia (Christian Orthodox)

United States of America (Freemason Republic)

China (Communism)

France (Freemason Republic)

United Kingdom (Protestant Monarchy)

Pakistan (Sunni Islam)

India (Hinduism)

Israel (Judaism)

North Korea (Communism)

The policy of nuclear prohibition has been a disastrous and misguided error. It has made the world less safe, less free, and less stable. 

It's also curious that of the nine nations that officially have nuclear weapons, not one of them is a Catholic country. 

Brazil, Mexico, and the Philippines are the countries with the biggest Catholic populations and not one of them has acquired nuclear weapons. 

Why is that? 

Is there a Vatican fatwa against the possession of nukes?

Why is there a Masonic bomb, a Jewish bomb, a Sunni bomb, a Hindu bomb, a Communist bomb, a Protestant bomb, a Christian Orthodox bomb, but not a Catholic bomb?

The continent of Asia has five countries with nukes. That's the most. 

Africa has zero.

Gaddafi tried to get one but he gave up. If Libya had acquired nukes it probably would not have fallen, and Europe would be safer today.

Nukes are nothing to be afraid of. They bring safety, comfort, and dignity to a nation, like a gun does for a household. It keeps trespassers and thieves away.

My advice to the Pope and the Ayatollah is don't wait. End the misguided religious prohibition against nuclear weapons. Protect your flock. Get nukes now. Build as many as you can. 

The same goes for countries like Brazil and South Africa. 

South America and Africa need the nuclear blanket.

Let the Catholics, the Africans, and the Shia feel the same sense of security as the Jews, Hindus, Masons, Protestants, and Communists do.