U.S. and ISIS Are Set To Deal The Death Blow To The Assad Regime

Forget ISIS, this is the true face of terror.

Both the United States and the Islamic State of Israel and the States seek to overthrow the Syrian government. So far they have been unsuccessful, but, as they say, if at first you don't succeed, try, and try again. Persistence and patience are what ultimately lead to victory.

And just because ISIS beheaded a few American and British nationals that doesn't make them strategic enemies of their criminal governments. Journalists and aid workers are expendable assets for evil  agencies such as the CIA, MI6, and Mossad. They use them up and spit them out. That's how all authoritarian regimes do things.

In the fantasy media universe, the U.S. and ISIS are indeed bitter enemies, just as the U.S. and Al-Qaeda were supposedly after the false flag 9/11 attacks, but on the ground, in the war zones, where action matters and talk is meaningless, the U.S. government has been allied with ISIS against the Syrian government for over three years. And no amount of boisterous rhetoric and fancy footwork around the facts from President Obama can erase that history.

Obama is a clever son of a bitch. He is twisting reality and turning logic on its head by saying that Assad would be committing aggression against American forces, who are set to attack ISIS positions in Syrian territory, if he defends his sovereign country against their attacks.

U.S. planes do not have the permission of the Syrian government or Syrian people to be in the country, so it is obvious they are the uninvited aggressors. Obama somehow believes the world will buy his fairytale that Assad is the aggressor and not him. But people are not as gullible as Obama and the criminal U.S. government thinks.

Whether or not U.S. planes will actually hit ISIS in Syria remains to be seen, but in such an ambiguous and shifty war, military objectives can change really quickly. Obama will probably change priorities midstream, ordering U.S. planes to direct their firepower towards the Syrian army and leaving ISIS alone to consolidate more territory on the ground.

Obama has already created the justification in his own mind that he is in the right and Assad is in the wrong. He has taken diplomacy and peace off the table.

For Obama and the utterly demonic U.S. government, ISIS is a media distraction in the airwaves, and a useful nuisance on the ground. They don't care if they gain more support as a result of their intervention because their real target has always been Assad and the Syrian government.

After they take down Assad, Israel will get the go-ahead to attack southern Lebanon and finish off Hezbollah. They have already employed ISIS to soften up the Lebanese army, tie down Hezbollah in areas away from the immediate vicinity of Israel, and restart the civil war in Lebanon.

II.

An excerpt from, "The New "Regime Change" Plan - Attack Damascus From The South" by 'b' of Moon of Alabama, September 15, 2014:

The U.S. military in the joint Arab-American operations room for the Syrian insurgency in Amman Jordan may well plan to use the murky new "war on ISIS" as pretext for attacks on the Syrian army divisions protecting Damascus from the south. Coordinated with a ground attack by Jabhat al-Nusra and others from Quneitra such air attacks would seriously degrade the Syrian forces and enable a destructive push into Damascus.

(update) Obama already announced the escalation path for such air attacks:

He made clear the intricacy of the situation, though, as he contemplated the possibility that Mr. Assad might order his forces to fire at American planes entering Syrian airspace. If he dared to do that, Mr. Obama said he would order American forces to wipe out Syria’s air defense system, which he noted would be easier than striking ISIS because its locations are better known. He went on to say that such an action by Mr. Assad would lead to his overthrow, according to one account.

The stampede to attack ISIS may have been pure maskirovka to hide this violent regime change attack plan against Syria under some "anti-terrorism" label. This at the same time as the plan is coordinated with and actively supported by Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Qaeda's affiliate in Syria, and made possible through truce agreements with ISIS.

An excerpt from, "Hillary Mann Leverett On Obama, The Islamic State, And America's Never-ending War In The Middle East" by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, September 13, 2014:

"Obama’s speech on the Islamic State provides damning testimony as to how little he has done to challenge the foreign policy orthodoxies embodied in the “bipartisan commitment to dominance” described by Hillary. In his initial presidential campaign, Obama seemed, to some extent, to run against those orthodoxies, which have done so much to weaken America’s international position since it came out of the Cold War as the most powerful state in history. Now, the public presentation of his Islamic State “strategy” makes all too clear just how thoroughly Obama has embraced them." 

An excerpt from, "Obama: If Assad Defends Against US Attack, US Will Attack" by Brandon Turbeville, Activist Post, September 15, 2014:

In the end, Barack Obama's statements of aggression and duplicity should come as no surprise to informed observers. The Western-backed terrorist organization known as ISIS is being used as an excuse to continue American Imperialism in the Middle East and to justify a military strike on Syria.