January 26, 2026

A Second Reconquista: The End of Islam And The Future of The West

 

Pelagius of Asturias.


It's not that Islam is incompatible with the West.

Islam is incompatible with life, with the modern world, with the future. Islam doesn't have spiritual answers for the crises that are coming and that are already here.

The anti-growth global elites, who want to kill off ninety-five percent of the planet, are using Islam to smash the West. Islam is not a religion in their eyes but a battering ram, a weapon of mass destruction. And that's what happening with Europe today. It is being culturally, socially, and economically destroyed. The Ukraine war and anti-Russian hysteria have also drained its resources, distracted its attention, and weakened its defences.

Make no mistake. The survival of Europe is at stake. It is a continent that's bleeding out from all the over-immigration.

America and Canada are successful immigrant societies because in both countries assimilation has always been prioritized. The construction of American and Canadian identities were fluid, and an ongoing historical process. The founders of America were history's only true nation builders. They created America out of nothing. They're still worshipped like gods in some ways because what they accomplished was no ordinary feat. 

The unification wars and wars of national independence in Europe in the 19th century did not require a philosophical elite as great and as visionary as the founding fathers of America. They had something to work with. The ingredients were already there to cook a fine meal. 

Jefferson and Madison had to scavenge in the woods. Washington had to get in the mud. 

They had an empty canvas. But Europe does not. So it's not surprising that absorbing immigrants and refugees by the millions in the span of a generation has turned out badly. Anybody could have told you that. Any farmer. Any scientist. Literally the guy in the street. We learn in environmental science 101 that the invasion of foreign species into another environment has adverse effects on the local population.

When Europeans arrived to the shores of North America they didn't assimilate, they conquered. If they all had gone native none of us would be here today. 

Likewise, Islam is not interested in assimilating but in conquering. The only problem is that it is not a superior religion or culture. It is not a worthy conqueror. Europe, and history will not be better for it. 

To be conquered by Islam means the end of everything Europeans and Western man has held dear since the time of Socrates, and before. Islam at its core is a retarded religion for retarded people.

And this is not an empty fear. Twenty years ago I thought the problem was overblown, that anti-Islam fanatics were just mouthpieces for the state of Israel. I was more interested in exposing 9/11 more than anything else because that event created the popular consensus for all the wars in the Middle East.

But demographic reality hits you in the face. The construction of mosques has grown exponentially. Islamic preaching has become more incendiary. 

And I have nothing against ordinary Muslims. They are very good, law-abiding people. But when you have millions of refugees, most of them without families, pour into a town or a city at once, what you'll get is chaos and destruction. 

And they should not be blamed. Their countries have no future. In the case of Syria and Afghanistan, they were destroyed by Western governments and their regional Muslim allies. They bombed them, put sanctions on them, made the lives of ordinary citizens hell for several generations, and on the way out they put throat slashing terrorists in power. Who the hell wants to go back to that? So I have nothing but sympathy.

The anger should be directed at the Western elites and their Zionist overlords.

Paris and London should stop showing so much interest in the borders of Syria and Afghanistan, and focus more on their own borders. If they want to see a stable and prosperous Middle East, and incentivize people to stay in those countries, then they should stop meddling. Let the region evolve on its own. 

Backing the forces of Islam clearly hasn't worked so why keep doubling down? 

Which idiots thought an Al-Qaeda operative would bring stability to Syria? Or that leaving the Taliban in charge of U.S. military hardware was a great idea? 

I bet it was the same geniuses who decided it was a good idea to give the Muslims of India a state of their own at the end of WWII.

January 25, 2026

Islam & Geopolitics: The History & Western Intelligence, Etc with Orthodox Shahada

Video Title: Islam & Geopolitics: The History & Western Intelligence, Etc with Orthodox Shahada. Source: Jay Dyer. Date Published: January 24, 2026.

To Defeat ISIS For Good, Muslims And Jews Must Wipe Qatar Off The Map

 

Qatar won't be missed.


Syria under the leadership of the terrorist Jolani and his masters in Turkey and Qatar won't stop at killing Kurds, Alawites, Druze, and Christians. It will invade Iraq sooner or later. 

And the Iraqis understand this threat better than anyone because they're very familiar with Jolani. In recent days they've made preparations for an eventual confrontation. 

But to fight the foot soldiers of ISIS again without targeting the head of the snake would be extremely stupid and a huge disservice to every Iraqi, Kurd, and Syrian.

The time of playing word games, misinterpreting threats, misnaming enemies, should be over. If Iraq is serious about defeating terrorism, if the Kurds are serious about claiming their rights, then liberating cities and towns militarily is not enough. 

They must attack the head of the snake of the ISIS cult which is in Qatar. Every day and night Al Jazeera pumps out ISIS propaganda. 

Qatar feels it is safe to export terrorism, spread lies, create the social and political conditions for ethnic cleansing and religious sectarianism. 

The question is why? Qatar has no army. It has no allies. America and England will abandon it in its hour of need. If a regional alliance brings the wrath of God upon it, believe me, it will fold within weeks, if not days.

Such a small and despicable "country" should not be allowed to spread harm to Iraqis, Syrians, Kurds, Israelis, whomever. 

Qatar must learn to live in the 21st century, with respect for the rights of others, or be wiped off the map.

The Age of Cowardly Mad Men: Don Diaper, Ben Nitay, And Ayatollah Pol Pot


"War is a matter not so much of arms as of money" - Thucydides.

"It is a common mistake in going to war to begin at the wrong end, to act first, and wait for disaster to discuss the matter." - Thucydides.


Ages of the following leaders:

Don Diaper: 79.

Ben Nitay: 76.

Ayatollah Pol Pot: 86.


Leaders who call for war should be in the prime of life and fighting on the frontlines alongside their soldiers, not decrepit old men barely hanging on with diapers on.

Kings and conquerors of previous ages deserved everything they got because they bled and fought for it. The politicians and leaders of today don't serve in wars, and if they do they rarely fight. 

Why do people admire Napoleon and even Hitler to this day? Because they were soldiers first and foremost. They led from the front, and took the arrows. You can start all the wars you want if you lay your life on the line and practice what you preach.

The United States is not led by such leaders today. Eisenhower was their last General turned President and he was a well known faggot so he doesn't count.

Israel and Iran are led by criminals and cowards, so take them off the board. Putin was an intelligence officer, not a soldier, you can cross his name off, too. And Zelensky, I mean, come on, he's an abomination. 

The point is that leaders of modern nation states, whether they are billionaires, revolutionaries, theocrats, terrorists, globalist bureaucrats, bankers, intel officers, actors, what have you, would never lay their own lives on the line and yet they expect taxpayers and common citizens to. They can't inspire. That's why modern governments rely on fear and propaganda to build consensus for wars.

That would never fly in the Middle Ages or in ancient times. A king had to be symbolically present on the battlefield. And a great king would lead the charge.

A Jesuit in the Forbidden City: Matteo Ricci

"A Jesuit in the Forbidden City: Matteo Ricci" By Ronnie Po-Chia Hsia (Oxford University Press, 2010).

Related: The Jesuits In China.


Wikipedia:

Ronnie Po-Chia Hsia (夏伯嘉; born November 15, 1955) is an American historian and the Edwin Erle Sparks Professor at Pennsylvania State University, where he teaches history and religious studies. His research interests are Catholic Renewal, anti-Semitism and Protestant Reformation.

Wikipedia:

Matteo Ricci SJ (Italian: [matˈtɛːo ˈrittʃi]; Latin: Matthaeus Riccius; 6 October 1552 – 11 May 1610) was an Italian Jesuit priest and one of the founding figures of the Jesuit China missions. He created the Kunyu Wanguo Quantu, a 1602 map of the world written in Chinese characters. In 2022, the Apostolic See declared its recognition of Ricci's heroic virtues, thereby bestowing upon him the honorific of Venerable.

. . .Ricci could speak Chinese as well as read and write classical Chinese, the literary language of scholars and officials. He was known for his appreciation of Chinese culture in general but condemned the prostitution which was widespread in Beijing at the time. He also called the Chinese "barbarians" in letters back home to his friends, and opposed what he considered to be anti-Black prejudice among the populace. He noted this, however, in the context of his function as a slave catcher for the Portuguese. (Ricci himself also owned African slaves.

Video Title: A Jesuit in the Forbidden City: Interview with Ronnie Hsia. Source: romancesphere. Date Published: January 13, 2012.