March 23, 2012

Sarkrazy Uses Terror To Kill Free Speech And Democracy, Will Obama Follow Suit?

Sarkozy is koo-koo krazy.

Sarkrazy is so predictable.

First, the totalitarian fascist State kills kids and innocents, and then it uses their deaths to kill free speech and democracy.

Below are two reports from Russia Today and about Sarkrazy's attack on free speech and free thought. Remember: the bodies of the victims of the latest state terror incident in France have not even been buried yet. This is sick and disturbing. This is political exploitation of murder and tragedy at its most vile.

RT: "Sarkozy: Visiting hate and terror websites will be punished," March 22, 2012:
The Toulouse murders and the operation of the alleged killer might bring additional political scores to Nicolas Sarkozy ahead of the future presidential elections, writer Diana Johnstone told RT.

“He [Sarkozy] has completely dominated the television screens for a couple of days as a result of this and shoved the other candidates into the shadows at the time when it was supposed to be the beginning of the campaign,” she said. “So as a matter of fact, Sarkozy just by being present everywhere has already profited from this.”
Kurt Nimmo: "Sarkozy: Prosecute and Imprison Readers of “Extremist” Websites," March 23, 2012:
French president Nicolas Sarkozy didn’t wait long to exploit the terror rampage of Mohammed Merah. Soon after Merah’s death in a stand-off with police, Sarkozy said French citizens who visit “extremist” websites should be treated the same way as those who look at child pornography.
“Trying to criminalize a visit — a simple visit — to a website, that’s something that seems disproportionate,” Lucie Morillon of Reporters Without Borders told the Associated Press.

Morillon noted that in order for Sarkozy’s law to be enforced, the internet would require new surveillance technology. “What’s especially worrying for us is how you are going to know who’s looking at what site. Does this announcement mean the installation of a global Internet surveillance system in France?” Morillon said.
Sarkrazy, Cameron, and Obama are following the same foreign policy and domestic agendas. They were together in the war against Libya, and they'll be together on popularizing and legitimizing Internet censorship. So we should expect President Obama to make the same type of anti-free speech statements in the wake of a tragic state terror attack in America in the near future.

The national security terrorists behind the Obama administration will stage another terror attack in America to make the American people rally around the President. In July of 2011, Paul Joseph Watson reported that, "Democratic strategists have said the only thing that will save his presidency is a domestic terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11."

Watson quoted Democratic strategist Mark Penn, who told MSNBC's Chris Matthews in 2010: "Remember, President Clinton reconnected through Oklahoma, right? And the president right now seems removed. It wasn’t until that speech [after the bombing] that [Clinton] really clicked with the American public. Obama needs a similar defining moment."

So far, the Obama administration hasn't used the tactic of state terrorism to galvanize the American people, but it is an option that remains on the table, ready for use at any time. The state terrorists in Washington are always looking for the right moment to strike. And, as we learned from the 9/11 experience, they move super quickly after an explosive staged event, passing laws that were previously unpopular and unacceptable.

When the state terrorists strike again in America they will immediately pass new anti-social media and anti-free speech laws. Last summer, in the midst of the London riots, Cameron proposed legislation to censor social media websites under the guise of fighting looters and criminals. That crisis was a shadow of what is to come.

Imagine what will happen in the wake of a new state terror attack in America. Martial Law will become a reality. Obama will officially declare that America is in a state of emergency, and his partners in crime in England and France will follow his example. Or events towards the public declaration of Martial Law may unfold from the other side of the Atlantic.

On the face of it, the censorship of terrorist websites and crackdown on the use of social media by looters and criminals seems justified and appropriate. But the whole thing becomes a farce when we learn that Western governments helped to create the terrorists in the first place, and are responsible for the dismal economic conditions which give rise to looters and criminals.

As you and I know, their war isn't really against terrorists and looters. Their war is against free speech and free thought. Western governments are cracking down on dissent and justifying their thuggery by equating dissent with hate speech. They can't stand democratic criticism of their criminal policies that have been legitimized by the Global War on Terrorism.

There is the fear that alternative news websites will be classified as hate speech and categorized as terrorism websites, and subsequently banned by government censors. In fact, that has already happened to some degree in some places. In numerous hotels in the United States you can't access It is very likely that this policy will be implemented system-wide across the West against anti-government and pro-freedom websites.

But we shouldn't give in to this fear. Only criminals fear the law and the government. Alternative news websites are the last bastion of free speech and free thought in the West. The universities and the press have failed to inform the public about false flag terrorism and crimes of conspiracy against Western democracy and human rights.

So we shouldn't watch what we say. Telling the truth is not a sign of extremism or hate speech. The insane crooks in governments that commit terrorism against their own populations should watch what they do, and prepare to face the legal consequences for their crimes against humanity.