There's nothing wrong with powerful countries commanding their spheres of influence.
This is why Russia was right to step into Ukraine and prevent NATO from placing nukes on its doorstep. After the criminal takeover in Kiev in 2014 that was a serious possibility and the danger still remains.
Russia had legitimate national security concerns. European officials have gone on record saying they want to break up Russia into little pieces. Russia was acting out of genuine fear for its long-term existence as a state and responded as any cornered nation would in that situation.
It's difficult to support America seizing the head of state of Venezuela because it seems to be motivated not by legitimate national security interests but ideological ones. Washington wants to make an example of Maduro for speaking ill of Israel and championing the Palestinian cause.
If Washington just wanted the oil and gold then great, have at it. Take it. That's fine. But the elitist pedophiles and Zionists who control Washington could care less about any of that. They want to rape Venezuelan children and sell their organs on the black market like they're doing in Ukraine and Gaza. This is what the war against Venezuela is about. That's the heart of it. The oil, minerals, resources, that's all secondary.
Greenland is a different case than Venezuela. Geopolitically speaking it is fair game.
Greenland been misruled by Denmark for decades. They're in no position to morally grandstand and put up a fight at the UN or wherever else.
