The movement that exists in certain spheres online to rehabilitate Adolf Hitler's image is deeply troublesome because it is ahistorical. It overlooks the fact that Hitler was a socialist occultist who didn't believe in individual liberties and worshipped the state as God.
Hitler was a green fascist long before the globalist environmentalists took up the mantle later in the 20th century. His racism was clear not only in his statements about Jews, but Poles, Russians, Armenians, basically anyone who wasn't German.
Now, was he a defender of Germany and Western Europe at large? Undoubtedly. Nobody can deny that. He was a soldier who faced the bullets in the trenches like a madman. He risked his life for his country. He had many positive and life-affirming qualities. Upon seizing power he rebuilt the German economy within a short span of time, transformed many industries, and mentally liberated a nation that was falsely scapegoated for the First World War.
The impetus for that war, as it has been documented by amateur historians and independent researchers, originated in London, not Berlin. The English King wanted to stop an ascendant Germany with war instead of diplomacy. He successfully convinced Russia, France, and later America to join his anti-German crusade.
After the disastrous war for the fate of Europe the loser was unfairly painted with a dark brush, singled out like a black sheep of the European family, and punished mercilessly throughout the 20s. Hitler came on the scene at the end of that decade as a rescuer of a nation choking on economic pain. He provided answers. He promised to make Germany great again and actually came through on that promise.
But he was also guilty of mass propaganda, false flag terrorism, and acts of aggression. He hypnotized an entire nation with simple words. His party attracted torturers, thugs, and murderers, as well as philosophers, architects, and poets, both the worst and the best of German society. He took a nation off its knees only to take it to war and blaze a new path of destruction.
But was he wholly responsible for the Second World War? No.
The Second World War was born the moment the Tsar was overthrown in 1917 in an act that was facilitated by German leaders at the time, Jewish American bankers, and their Masonic co-conspirators in London. So it's wrong to blame Hitler for WW2 when the Soviets introduced themselves on the historical scene as a menace to world peace and Europe long before Hitler took power.
We must remember that while Stalin was robbing trains and terrorizing civilians Hitler was in the trenches taking bullets for his country. One began as a common thief without a country or a king, the other as a foot soldier fighting for king and country. Neither were good men, but let's be honest about their levels of villainy. The Soviets were king killers and nation destroyers. They were not heroes or liberators. And it turned out in the end that neither was Hitler.
