April 30, 2011

The Power of The Bank

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." - Thomas Jefferson
In previous centuries the people of the West struggled for freedom against an abusive and arrogant Church, and tyrannical Kings. The American Founding Fathers dealt a blow to both institutions, and provided humankind with an example of an independent nation free from ugly prejudices and executive tyranny.

But there is a power that rules the West which is greater than the Church and the King put together, and that is the Bank. Private financiers have often boasted that while kings can create laws they can create money out of nothing and buy up nations and kingdoms and use them for sport and their own private gain.

Private banking oligarchs are guilty of the greatest vice known to mankind; usury. They are unbounded by law and morality, and free from loyalty to any nation. They are a scourge to civilization, culture, and humanity. In every nation that they set up a private central bank poverty and slavery take precedence over wealth and freedom. The greater good is put aside, and the national interest is sacrificed for the private interest of a few rotten traitors and elitists who become mice when the power of their moneyed masters is mentioned.

The American Revolutionaries challenged the power of the Bank even more than the power of the Church and the power of the King. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, George Washington, and the rest of the founding fathers were all enlightened on this issue. They knew that the power to create and lend money to the government is the greatest power any institution or any group of men can have in their hands. Such power can literally make or break a nation. The circulation of credit in a nation is more important than the circulation of blood in the leader of that nation. It is the right of all nations and peoples to establish their own national banks to create their own money and use this power for the good of the nation and for the economic benefit of the people as a whole. The Constitution states this principle plainly.

America's private central bank, the Federal Reserve, was created in 1913 when the Federal Reserve Act was passed through Congress in the dark of night. Republican Congressman Louis Thomas McFadden, who served as the Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee from 1920-1931, said this about the Federal Reserve Bank in 1932:
"When the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that... the United States were to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw materials and heavy goods for export; that Russia [China, India...] was destined to supply the man power and that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate -- a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure."
McFadden's observations about the Federal Reserve and its real purpose in the global economy were echoed by other congressmen and senators.

Come 2013 it would be a sign of great hope and great progress if the Federal Reserve is completely abolished. America has lived through a hundred years of financial and political tyranny, as well as many parts of the world that have been conquered by the international bankers and corporate titans who control America.

Our generation must end the power of the private global banksters and win perhaps the last battle in the struggle for human freedom and human enlightenment. If we can't do it, then who can? The slaves of the future who will be microchipped and ruled electronically and scientifically will not be able to resist the emerging global technocratic leviathan that is being set up by global oligarchs. The time to put an end to their power to create money is now or never. It is our responsibility to resist financial tyranny in this age, and restore freedom throughout the world, starting in America, Canada, England, and the West.

We can transform the world through the spread of knowledge and by the force of consent. Anything is possible once people know the whole truth about the corrupt Western banking system, and come to believe that they can change the world. What is at stake is the destiny of mankind.

April 29, 2011

Justice is Relative: Bush Cousin Judge John Walker Will Decide 9/11 Lawsuit Against Cheney, Rumsfeld, & Myers

In America, the miscarriage of justice for the victims of 9/11 and the war on terror has reached comical proportions.

Judge John M. Walker, Jr., a cousin of George W. Bush, is one of three judges who will decide the case brought by Retired Army Officer April Gallop against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Richard Myers in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Not even the deaf, dumb and blind members of the corporate-state media can overlook the obvious conflict of interest in this case, so they have decided to completely ignore it and focus instead on the question of military tribunals, which is a huge political sideshow because the tortured and scapegoated Muslims did not commit the 9/11 crime. The compliant and complicit media is too afraid to interview the brave and heroic April Gallop.

You can read about the details of the case here, and here.

This is just the latest scandal that should make anyone with average intelligence question the official 9/11 story and demand a new scientific investigation. Without a doubt, the Bush administration was 100 percent behind the September 11 attacks. It doesn't get any more obvious than this. The Bush family is throwing dirt in the face of the American people as well as the victims of 9/11 and the false and diabolical war of terror.

If you still believe in the official story about 9/11 then you are a fool. If you still have faith in the American justice system then you are gullible and blind. Please, please, just stop denying reality. It is really getting pathetic. It's no wonder why the Bushes and other elitist benefactors of the criminal National Security State hold the people in contempt, and mock the rule of law. They are showing their hand, and still the people deny what is in front of their eyes. It is not even tragic anymore. This is totally comical. Shakespeare couldn't write this.

Journalist and blogger Craig McKee, publisher of the website Truth and Shadows, wrote on April 10, 2011:

Walker was chief justice of the Court of Appeals from 2000-2006 and has been serving as a senior member of the court since then. Many researchers into 9/11 will also point out that another Bush cousin, Wirt D. Walker III, was CEO of Securacom from 1999-2002 – the company that handled security for the World Trade Center. The company installed a new $8.3-million security system in the towers between 1996 and 2000.

The sheer arrogance of the perpetrators of 9/11 continues to amaze me. These people clearly believe they can get away with anything. And until enough of us get mad, then they’re probably right.

I think the people who did the 9/11 crime are beyond arrogant. They are so bold. To be honest, I'm impressed. If I was evil I would say it's a job well done.

Maybe they want to be caught and brought to justice, but not without a fight. Maybe the criminals in Washington and the Bushes are throwing it in the people's face not just because they enjoy cheating and mocking the law but because they want the American people to rise up and take back their government. Of course, lying to the public, killing innocent people, robbing America, and getting away with it for so long remains a never ending source of pleasure for them, but could it be that they want to be overthrown?

What else explains their arrogance? Why not select a different judge instead of selecting a member of the Bush family to handle an explosive 9/11 case? Why be so obvious? Are they crazy, or just rotten bastards who are having a lot of fun? They obviously have a dark sense of humour. The Bushes act more like the Joker from The Dark Knight than like the Corleone family from The Godfather. They could be discreet about the whole thing, but they're not. They're not hiding their criminality and cruelty, they're smirking and boasting, and saying to the awakened public: "We are in charge. We rule. What we say goes. And you can't do anything about it."

Are they right? So far, yes. But there is a limit to arrogance and cunning. Once that point is reached there will be a big fall down.

Carl Jung - Matters of Heart

Carl Jung - Matters of Heart - Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

April 28, 2011

The Triumph of Myth and Government Lies Over Truth, Common Sense, and Science

The shadow history of the United States of America and also of the world is a history of murders and massacres that are done by cynical and arrogant men in the seats of authority who have an overbearing thirst for power and wealth. They invent enemies and threats in order to manufacture large-scale wars to gain even more power and wealth than they had before, while thinking nothing of mass human suffering and bloodshed, even the blood of the people they were elected to represent. The welfare of the people is not their concern.

If the people become educated and informed about the real reasons for why there is war in the first place then the entire enterprise of war will be finished, and no longer will profit-driven and power-enhancing wars stain the pages of history. There will never be a peaceful age when there is public confusion and public ignorance instead of public enlightenment. Wars can only be fought by America as long as ludicrous stories and beliefs are continually invented to keep the business of war going and to keep the people in a perpetual state of historical amnesia.

American historian David McCullough speaks about the dangers to human liberty when the people of a nation are trapped in a state of ignorance and historical amnesia in this interview with Bruce Cole, the chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities. McCullough says that "it’s in our human nature to want to know about the past," and know it intimately, and deeply. People who don't know history are spiritually and mentally deprived. They are less human for not knowing the true history of human events. McCullough connects the importance of history to the progress of liberty, and says that the preservation of freedom is not possible without an educated and informed public. He quotes John Adams, who said that "Wisdom and knowledge, as well as virtue, diffused generally among the body of the people, being necessary for the preservation of their rights and liberties."

McCullough praises John Adams's Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which was "radical in its day" because "it's saying not just that it would be a good idea to educate people, it’s saying it’s the duty of the government. We “cherish” these interests, that the good society, the good life, is the life of the mind, and the life of the mind is the life of the spirit."

Knowing history is not just important because it helps the people to keep their freedoms intact and alive, but it is a condition for human survival and human civilization. McCullough says:
I think it probably has something to do with our survival as a species. For nine-tenths of the time that human beings have been on earth, knowledge that was essential to survival was transmitted from one generation to the next by the vehicle of story.

My strong feeling is that we must learn more about how we learn. How do we really learn something so that we don’t forget it? I’m convinced that we learn by struggling to find the solution to a problem on our own--with some guidance, but doing, getting in and getting our hands dirty and working it.
It matters what kind of stories we tell ourselves. Do we believe 9/11 was done by Islamic extremists or by people in the highest positions of authority in Washington? If we follow logic and practice common sense then we must choose the later story because it is the true history of who was behind the September 11 attacks.

How we understand the past enables us to confront the problems of the present with a good sense of how these problems evolved, and how they can be solved with a clear eye. We can't put to bed the forces of war and chaos who have gained control of the Pentagon and the CIA if we don't have any idea about why they are awake in the first place. What motivates the big guys inside the CIA and White House who were behind 9/11 is not the security of the United States, or the health of the American republic, but the acquisition of power and the continuation of their treasonous control over America.

The composition of a world-historical story like the one about terrorism and 9/11 is a big project. Smart minds were needed to create the architecture of a false reality and a false history that the people really believe to be true. One of the principal minds that helped to craft the story about 9/11 and influenced how the public perceives and understands that event is Philip D. Zelikow, the director of the 9/11 commission. I have written twice about Zelikow before so I won't discuss his role in the 9/11 crime in much detail here. Zelikow decided early on in his academic career to serve the interests of the powerful and wealthy in Washington, and that's natural. Once a system of corruption and evil is in place and its gears are in motion then it will attract men and women of talent and genius to put grease on the gears. Karl Rove is another brilliant propagandistic mind behind the construction of the pseudo-realities of the American empire.

In the present era history is managed and constructed by a group of dominant and predatory men in America and the West. But they are not gods who can tell myths as if they're sitting on Mount Olympus and get away with their crimes forever. Once their version of history is no longer believed in by the people, they are finished. They will literally be done and put away, in a heads chopped-off kind of way. When you aim big, you fall big. People who have treason and large crimes in mind are not under the delusion that they will be let off the hook once the people find out about their evil deeds. All tyrants aim to erase the memory of the people, paper over history, and repress free thought and free speech because the preservation of memory and real history along with the exercise of uncensored speech can generate a revolt and empower the people to destroy the diabolical plans of their rulers.

Aleida Assmann, a researcher of literature and culture at the Goethe-Institut, has written extensively about collective memory, and the fusion between memory and history, power and myth. In her 2008 paper, "Transformations between History and Memory," she writes that, "Historians can play contrary roles: they can either support the play of political power or challenge it; they can act as architects or critics of national memory constructions," (1). Assmann says that under authoritarian regimes a false history is constructed and manufactured to serve the interests of the regime, which is then presented to the public as real history.

In a democracy, politicians in key positions of power have to be gifted actors because they have to perform their appointed roles in front of the public in order to keep the public out of the loop and make sure that real history is never leaked. It is a tough job to tell fake stories to the public and pretend that it is the truth, and some politicians like George Bush are not as gifted rhetorically as others. Also, a little cold-bloodedness helps a great deal for a person who takes on the job of selling monstrous lies to the people.

After the fall of a totalitarian regime there is also a fall of history, that is, the regime's history. Once that happens, the people experience the rebirth of truth and discover the real history of their lives and their world that was denied to them by their political leaders. Assmann writes:
A new awareness of the interactions between history and memory was triggered by the profound political changes of the 1980s and 1990s, when new memories emerged and old ones were seen in a different light. After 1989, with the thawing of frozen memories and the opening of archives, both memory and history took on a new force that carried them into the center of the public arena. Historians were baffled by the enormous impact of living memories that they had hitherto considered to be a negligible entity. A historical caesura always introduces the chance to narrate the past in a different way. Such a moment of retrospection can become a moment of revelation; then it suddenly becomes obvious that what had been presented and passed as objective history turns out to have been a biased construction of political memory. The experience of a fundamental change of values exposed the contingence of earlier accounts of the past. In such situations both history and memory become self-reflexive; a sense is developed of their constructedness by discovering that memory has a history and that history is itself a form of memory. (2).
The totalitarian regime in America is in a unique position because unlike the Soviet or Nazi regime, America is a global superpower, which means its version of history automatically becomes global history. Never before has such a state existed in any period of human civilization. We are truly living in crazy and exciting times. The only state that has challenged the official story of 9/11 is the regime in Iran, and preparations have been made to make war on that nation, so it is not wise for states to speak the truth about Washington's designs. Those who don't go along with the new global political paradigm will not survive. But, of course, nothing in history is guaranteed.

According to Assmann, the media under totalitarian regimes plays a big role in crafting and maintaining an official version of history which serves the regime. It has been well documented that the CIA has a great influence in the U.S. corporate media, and continually spreads disinformation and lies through the media about crimes that are committed both inside the U.S. and abroad. Assmann:
Authoritarian institutions such as the church and totalitarian states aim at a monopoly over truth and the past. Whereas in premodern culture, there were neither media nor institutions of writing independent of power and authority that could back up independent accounts of the past, the institution of censorship served the function to destroy rival media and carriers of counterhistories that threatened the stability of a uniform view and an authoritarian view of history. Totalitarianism can therefore be described as an attempt to restore the premodern state monopoly over history under modern circumstances and with modern means. (3).
Assmann's writing deserves to be better known because her understanding can help people to come to terms with the present course of history and confidently challenge the hegemonic lies of the empire in Washington. It should be a good thing to speak the truth about 9/11, especially if such talk leads to the collapse of the bankster-owned regime in Washington because it is engaged in monumental acts of evil and deception. Such regimes must collapse for human civilization to move forward and for people to live freely and safely.

Other writers like Karl Jaspers and Hannah Arendt have also broadened our understanding about totalitarian regimes. The American people, as well as the people of other Western countries, can learn a lot from the experience of the German people after the Second World War as well as the people who lived through the collapse of the Soviet Union.

There is no reason to be afraid of the truth. The worse it can do is trigger a rethinking of the past. Why is that so difficult? What is holding people back? Is it the feeling of guilt or shame? Nobody who bought the official propaganda about 9/11 and the war on terror should feel guilty about what has happened since then or be ashamed of their conduct, especially the soldiers who are fighting and dying in the wars in the Middle East. Soldiers are the victims of the corrupt war machine in Washington. The guilty are the war criminals in power who constructed a false narrative that justified the killing of hundreds of thousands of people, who knowingly lied about 9/11 and who continue to knowingly send men and women to their undeserved and untimely deaths.

The tyrants in Washington can tiptoe around the truth for now, but sooner or later they will fall over their twisted words and collapse under the growing weight of facts because, as Benjamin Franklin said, "A lie stands on one leg, truth on two."

1. Assmann, Aleida. "Transformations between History and Memory." Social Research 75.1 (Spring 2008): 49-72. Print. Pg. 59.

2. Ibid. Pg. 61-62.

3. Ibid. Pg. 63-64.

Former CIA Analyst Ray McGovern: Petraeus Will Expand Pro-War Agenda as New CIA Director

President Obama picked Lieutenant General John Allen to replace General Betrayus as the commander in Afghanistan. Allen was "the first Marine Corps officer inducted as a Term Member of the Council on Foreign Relations." What a surprise.

April 27, 2011

Investigative Journalist Wayne Madsen Exposes President Obama As A CIA Puppet

"I'm going to be so much better a president for having been at the CIA that you're not going to believe it." - George H. W. Bush

"In examining the CIA's past and present use of the U.S. media, the Committee finds two reasons for concern. The first is the potential, inherent in covert media operations, for manipulating or incidentally misleading the American public." - Senator Frank Church

"It is the function of the CIA to keep the world unstable, and to propagandize and teach the American people to hate and fear, so we will let the Establishment spend any amount of money on arms." - Former CIA Officer John Stockwell

"I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in ’47, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo." - Harry S. Truman
According to Wayne Madsen, an investigative journalist, a former NSA officer, and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report, the controversy surrounding President Barack Obama's birthplace is nowhere near as scandalous and spooky as the cover-up of his background in the CIA.

In this past week Madsen has appeared several times on the Alex Jones show to discuss his research into Obama's roots in the CIA, his family's ties to the CIA which goes all the way back to the 1960s and the Cold War, and how Obama's political rise in Chicago and later as a Senator would not have been possible without special help from the CIA.

It is not important where Obama was born. That type of information is only useful for political fodder and political grandstanding by republican politicians. Besides, it's not like Obama is really in charge in the White House. Even if he was born on Mars it wouldn't matter because it wouldn't change the fact that the CIA, the U.S. National Security State, the private Federal Reserve, and the military-industrial complex control presidents and tell them what to do.

Just as the Egyptian vice president Omar Suleiman is "the CIA’s Man in Cairo," Barack Obama is the CIA's man in the White House, and he is most likely not the only one. It should be obvious that the CIA wields its dark influence in the White House, after all, it is their backyard. If the CIA can overthrow presidents overseas and put in place CIA friendly dictators in hostile countries then of course they can use their power at home to select one of their guys to be the commander-in-chief. If a small cadre of CIA officials can assassinate a U.S. President (John F. Kennedy) and use the political and media machinery to cover it up for fifty years then obviously they can install a U.S. President and cover-up his background in the media. It is self-evident that the CIA is more powerful than the Congress and the Senate put together.

Getting Beyond The Puppet President

The bigger question is not who controls President Obama, but who controls the CIA, and who controls America. The answer is a small financial elite who own the privately run Federal Reserve Bank, and unjustly collect a huge portion of the wealth produced annually by the American people to enrich themselves and maintain their private global corporate empire. To put it simply, a small financial elite hijacked the American government, and used their power to profit off of the labor of the American people like parasites who mindfuck their host.

The CIA, which is a creature of the bankers who manage the Fed, is in the mindfucking business, and business has been booming in America since the end of World War II. The controllers of the Fed and CIA pose as rational and peaceable guardians of America while in reality they are insane and war-like masters of America, and the world. These tyrants and state terrorists are holding a knife over America's dying body. America is perpetually at risk of being attacked from above by them, not afar by Islamic extremists. It is easy to combat stateless terrorists, but when the state is the terrorist as it is in America there is no safety, no freedom, no future. What lies ahead is a continuation of a state of war waged against America and other nations by tyrants and criminals who have gained absolute power in Washington.

The danger to freedom and security in America comes not from an Islamic monster under the bed, or from right-wing militias around the corner, but from government monsters on top of the chimney who are suffocating the house of truth and poisoning the minds of the American people with lies and disinformation.

Freedom is outlawed when government outlaws have the freedom to pursue their passions and exercise power behind closed doors. Since the CIA officially took over America after they got rid of President Kennedy America has quietly suffered through a long and stormy season of tyranny, during which lies rained down on human minds. In this period, people who held up an umbrella to protect themselves against the lies that were pouring down were considered kooks and conspiracy theorists. Umbrellas were considered out of fashion and kooky by the mind slaves. And why were umbrellas kooky? Because it never officially rained, not according to the CIA and the White House. What the mind manipulators at the CIA say becomes an unquestioned fact. It wasn't raining, the government wasn't flooding lies into the public consciousness. It was all sunshine and rainbows. Such is the CIA's power to bend nature and the laws of observation. People who are poor and wet think they are rich and dry because the government said so.

The power mad traitors at the CIA and White House killed nearly 3,000 people in the light of day on September 11 like it was nothing. War is a game to them, and the American people are not holy and sacred, but easy targets. All violence is justified in their eyes. And the CIA will continue to mindfuck America as long as the American people let it. Clinton mindfucked America, and yet he was only impeached. Bush mindfucked America, and nothing happened to him. And now, Obama is mindfucking America.

But, the market for the mindfucking industry in America is drying up, and it looks like there will be hell to pay. The mindfuckers are running out of business because the American people are waking up to the fact that they have been psychologically raped. But the government mindfuckers are not done. They are transitioning from fucking the public mind to fucking the entire body politic. The next step is to completely fuck America over, bankrupt it and collapse it, and leave her raped body in the back alley of globalism.

Awakened American patriots have known as far as back as World War II, and even before, that the greatest threat to American liberty and the American constitution is from within - from the concentration of economic and political power in the hands of a few. The financial elite that captured the United States in 1913 through the establishment of their own private central bank are no longer dependent on America for their well-being and enrichment. They have America in the palm of their hands and they can drop it in a flash and their wealth and power would not be negatively affected. In fact, if America collapses and dies, they win, because a strong, independent and reborn America is a threat to their dictatorial global government that they have secretly established in recent decades.

America was originally hijacked for a special purpose - to use its wealth and power to take over the world, and invade countries for the benefit of a small elite, but that age of plunder and empire is coming to an end, and the purpose and goals of the elite have changed. The new project is to set up a private and dictatorial world government and force it down the throat of the people in the name of international cooperation and saving the planet.

Under this new world order America is being sacrificed. Her throat is being cut. America is carcass meat. The banksters decided to go on a diet after eating a big dinner. They don't want to plunder the world anymore, instead, they want to "manage" it, so America is no longer needed as it was in the past. America is purposely being crashed and imploded, just like the twin towers were crashed and imploded by design. The American economy was rigged to collapse, as well as its political system. Many people are awake to this reality, but it is also true that many people have no idea what is going on. A lot of people can't believe that Washington was taken over by a criminal elite because the media has been used to keep them ignorant and stupid. The people have no historical memory because the elite want it that way. They have slave consciousness, and they will worship their masters in Washington because that is what slaves do. The CIA and the banksters are counting on the slaves to not see Obama for the fraud that he is. But they are fooling themselves because the truth cannot be suppressed.

April 26, 2011

Louis CK Donald Rumsfeld Lizard O and A

This is comedy gold.

April 24, 2011

Scott Horton - James Madison, Corporations, and The National Security State

Harper's Scott Horton delivered a lecture at the University of Alabama Law School on April 14, 2011 called "James Madison, Corporations, and The National Security State." It is a must-read.

Brandon Roy Leads 4th Quarter Comeback

Brandon Roy was amazing tonight. He led the Portland Trail Blazers to defeat the Dallas Mavericks after trailing for most of the game. Roy scored 18 points in the last quarter. Click here to watch the great comeback.

April 23, 2011

Jesse Ventura: The Emperor Has No Clothes

Who would have thought twenty years ago that a wrestler would become one of the heroes of our age? Then again, it shouldn't be so surprising because wrestlers are special men. They can both face the ridicule of a crowd and raise them out of their seats. They don't just entertain, they inspire and elevate. The fights are fixed but the passion is real. The 2008 film 'The Wrestler' showed that it takes a lot of guts and heart to wrestle.

I was happy when I Iearned that Kane, one of my favorite wrestlers, is a supporter of Ron Paul. Jesse Ventura dedicated his most recent book to Dr. Paul. It seems that a lot of wrestlers are also thinkers. Ventura is a well-read thinker, a model citizen and a true patriot who is not afraid to speak his mind and tell the truth.

It takes a lot of courage to tell the truth in America today. The media has demonized critical thinking and suppressed freedom of thought. The result is a mainstream culture that is oppressive and even totalitarian in its character. Anybody who questions the official 9/11 lie is unfairly judged as crazy and paranoid. When Ventura was promoting his new book on CNN and ABC the hosts treated him like a loose mental patient who didn't deserve to be taken seriously. It was sad to watch but it reinforced the truth that the establishment media in America is morally, intellectually and politically bankrupt. Very soon it will be financially bankrupt, and America will be better for it. America will be liberated from media and cultural oppression.

Ventura is doing his best to wake up and educate his countrymen. His influence is great. Humanity will be eternally grateful for Ventura's truth-telling spirit. He is a rare man. It is good to admire such men. It takes people with large egos to tell the truth and buck the popular opinion. The crowd is rarely right. Individuals who follow public opinion put themselves behind the times. In some ages, like ours, popular beliefs and popular myths must be questioned and broken down to restore sanity in the culture and justice in the society.

Questioning our governments and political leaders about 9/11 and the war on terror is a matter of survival, not just of justice and of democracy. It is necessary to point out the fact that the emperor in Washington has no clothes. Obama has no legitimacy to rule. The Federal Reserve Bank has no legitimacy to make economic decisions. The Pentagon has no right to claim that it is protecting America by invading, bombing and occupying innocent nations. The entire war on terrorism is an evil and criminal war.

Ventura is a hero for going on television, inside the heart of the beast, and boldly say that the emperor has no clothes. It is not an easy thing to speak the whole truth in America today, as well as other countries in the West, so we should praise, thank, and applaud Ventura for his courage.

Thank you Jesse Ventura. And thank you America for producing another heroic truth-teller during this time of moral and political crisis.

April 22, 2011

U.S. Massacre In Afghanistan

The only thing that sets the U.S. empire apart from despots like Libya's Gaddafi, Iraq's Saddam and Syria's Assad is the amount of power Washington has, including the power over truth and the power to create grand world narratives that enable the Pentagon to commit massacres in Afghanistan and Iraq and file them under "counter-terrorism" activities. Washington's grand narrative about international terrorism and Islamic extremism allows it to conquer and occupy innocent nations without such actions being perceived by the American people and members of the American military as wholly illegitimate and criminal. So when Gaddafi says he is going to go house to house to kill his opposition the world rightly condemns him as a madman and a threat to humanity, but when a U.S. officer voices the same threat to the people of Afghanistan the U.S. and global media look away.

What the U.S. is doing in Afghanistan and Iraq is far more worse than what Assad is doing in Syria and what Gaddafi is doing in Libya because the U.S. is a foreign tyrant. The bankster-owned Pentagon is the father of modern terrorism, which makes the entire counter-terrorism mission a gigantic fraud. Brian Becker, the National Coordinator of the ANSWER Coalition, rightly calls the U.S. war in Afghanistan a "terrorist enterprise." There is no other way to explain the actions of the CIA and Pentagon. And this is not an extremist interpretation of the Pentagon's real mission in the Middle East. The tyrant's way of crushing resistance is by terrorizing and killing the people. America can not secure Afghan oil fields and maintain it's strategic foothold in the region by building schools and giving lip service to human rights and democracy. When submission is the end, terrorism is the means to reach that goal.

Instead of a global village we live in a global jungle. The biggest superpower is also the biggest lawbreaker and terrorist state. Global public opinion affirms that the biggest terrorist regimes on Earth are in Washington, and Israel. Both regimes are destined to collapse if the people living under those regimes don't resist and change course. In America there is a very real possibility that the traitors in Washington will attack and kill the American people if they resist. Conservatives and dissidents have already been classified as terrorists and anti-government extremists for not believing the official 9/11 story and other government fairytales. The next step in the tyrants' program is to stage a terrorist attack and blame it on domestic extremists to discredit resistance to Washington and justify further government crackdown on freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. I am afraid that the madmen in Washington will commit massacres in America in the name of domestic security. Farmers in Virginia and farmers in Afghanistan face the same threat: Washington's tyrants and state terrorists.

April 21, 2011

Zionist Trashes Arab Democracy on Capitol Hill & Refers To War As "Blessed"

Zionists love war and hate peace because they can only get away with their crimes and deception under the umbrella of war.

Caroline Glick, a whore for war and a senior fellow for Middle East Affairs at the Center for Security Policy spoke at a National Security event in Washington recently, condemning the popular uprisings in Egypt and elsewhere in the region.

She calls the rising tensions in Syria "a good news story." She advocates that the U.S. and Israel make war on Syria and "make life difficult" for the regime there as much as possible. At one point in her diatribe she referred to the Iran-Iraq war as "the blessed war" that should have gone on for a hundred years. The craziness and inhumanity of this perspective is clear to everybody except diehard Zionists and their neocon cousins in America who have hijacked U.S. foreign policy according to General Wesley Clark and Col. Wilkerson who served under Colin Powell in the Bush Administration.

Listening to Glick and others of her ilk is listening to madness. Zionists, like their Islamic counterparts, are possessed by the demon of war. They are almost suicidal, they won't compromise with their enemies and they will use nukes if it came to that.

Hearing a fellow human being call any war "blessed" is chilling and frightening. Hundreds of thousands of people died in that stupid Iran-Iraq war. Imagine if someone referred to the second world war as blessed. We would rightly condemn him/her as insane and inhuman. And that is exactly what hardcore Zionists have become after decades of war: insane and inhuman. There are also insane Islamists in the Middle East but they didn't start the war and cycle of hatred in the region, they are a reactionary force. Israel and America started the transnational and generational conflict by invading and occupying people's lands, subverting democracy, staging coups and installing dictators, unjustly
imprisoning and torturing people, and insulting their dignity.

If the insane and inhuman leaders of the U.S. and Israel have their way, the entire Middle East will be up in flames and they will smile as it burns.

Not A Drone War, But A Real War

Investigative journalist Gareth Porter explains the genesis and growth of the U.S. role in Pakistan to Antiwar.com's Scott Horton.

April 19, 2011

Saigon - The Greatest Story Never Told

Jesse Ventura Speech in Philadelphia

Jesse Ventura gave a speech in Philadelphia on April 9, 2011 about his new book, co-authored with Dick Russell, called "63 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read."

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Letter To The Ruling Class

Letter To The Ruling Class
By Jesse Ventura
Published: April 1, 2011

You control our world. You’ve poisoned the air we breathe, contaminated the water we drink, and copyrighted the food we eat. We fight in your wars, die for your causes, and sacrifice our freedoms to protect you. You’ve liquidated our savings, destroyed our middle class, and used our tax dollars to bailout your unending greed. We are slaves to your corporations, zombies to your airwaves, servants to your decadence. You’ve stolen our elections, assassinated our leaders, and abolished our basic rights as human beings. You own our property, shipped away our jobs, and shredded our unions. You’ve profited off of disaster, destabilized our currencies, and raised our cost of living. You’ve monopolized our freedom, stripped away our education, and have almost extinguished our flame. We are hit… we are bleeding… but we ain’t got time to bleed. We will bring the giants to their knees and you will witness our revolution!


The Serfs.

April 18, 2011

History Was Hijacked By War Criminals And Predatory Banksters

“History is a guide to navigation in perilous times. History is who we are and why we are the way we are.” - David McCullough
The history we were taught in school is not real history. We assume we are free in Western nations, and that we are led by good and noble men, but we are the most mentally enslaved people on Earth.

If your American history textbook does not cover the banking overthrow of America in 1913 when the private Federal Reserve Bank was dishonestly established and a tyrannical income tax was introduced then throw away that textbook. If your textbook does not say that the September 11 attacks were engineered and orchestrated by government officials in the Bush administration, the U.S. National Security State, and Israel then throw away that textbook.

The history we learned in school about America in the 20th century is a pack of lies. America was overthrown in the early 20th century, and its free constitutional republic was corrupted from within by a hidden transnational coalition of banking, corporate, and political thieves whose secret agenda is to destabilize America and the world and set up upon the ruins of an old political order a private-corporate global government that parasitically feeds off of the labor and wealth of nations.

This global ruling class is a band of thieves and war criminals who are a threat to free people everywhere. They hijacked America when they established an unconstitutional money system in 1913 and used their ill-gained power to expand their private-corporate global empire through the American government. When they fail at taking control of nations by staging coup d'états through the CIA, they use the media to fool the people and send American soldiers to illegally invade and conquer sacred lands.

When the noble John F. Kennedy president resisted their power and acted against their interests in 1963 they killed him and told the American people a big lie in order to quell their anger, subdue their intellect, and tame their passion to right a horrible wrong.

The global banksters speak through America, and they manipulate America to rule and conquer other nations, but America is nowhere in their master plan for the future. After America's wealth and power is used to fully destabilize and destroy the Middle East, the corporate and financial traitors will throw America under the bus, and finalize their plan to centralize private political and economic power at the global level.

It is impossible to resist these transnational tyrants and restore freedom in America and the West when you accept their grand narrative of history and current events as the truth. Once they hijacked the American government they made sure to rewrite American history, and tell fanciful stories that don't implicate them in acts of high treason against the American people and against mankind.

JFK, MLK, RFK, and 9/11: Myth as History

Political and imperial power is most successfully wielded in modern authoritarian societies when officials in government, academia, and the media collaborate together to generate myths and misconceptions about certain issues and world events and present them to people as the factual accounts of reality. As soon as people are programmed into thinking that official myths and falsehoods are real truths by societal, governmental and cultural institutions, government officials are free to do any number of crimes they want and to whomever they want. In such a society, people resist by demythologizing official myths, revealing official falsehoods, and stop believing the government and media.

To question the official narrative of 9/11 is to question not just a few Bush administration officials or Mossad agents who manufactured a false story about their political enemies, but to put in doubt the current trajectory of our entire global civilization, and put on trial the leadership of America and other governments that are complicit in war crimes.

The most basic building blocks of a free society such as the press and academia have failed do expose and correct criminal government behavior. This is major stuff. By questioning 9/11 we challenge every segment in the current power structure, the global political economy, the war establishment in America and the West and the national security classes who serve this great beast, the press, academia, and the state.

People accept the official 9/11 story with religious devotion, and anybody who questions it is viewed as crazy and paranoid, which is the stuff of mass mental illness. But the real crazies, as most of us know by now, are in power. That is the craziest thing of our era. A century ago states and empires were free to flex their power, it was political sport, but in the nuclear age and the era of global crises it is madness to wield power the way it is wielded by the U.S. and Israel. These states have no regard for the truth or human life. Nobody is safe from the maniacs in Washington, especially not the American people.

The common counter-consensus about 9/11 has emerged and grown, and it will most likely overtake the government manufactured myth about the tragic events of that day and be recognized as the real history of 9/11 in the future. We should not be discouraged that truth-tellers are described as crazy and kooky today. The public resistance to the truth is so great because the truth is so great and enormous, and there is nothing more difficult than admitting that you were fooled and conned by government storytellers. When your trust is betrayed on such a grand scale it is hard to take control and move forward. But, eventually, people will revisit the past, and view history through an objective and truthful narrative, not the false narrative of power.

Accepting the truth about 9/11, and the assassinations of JFK, MLK, and RFK means rethinking human destiny, and modern American history, so it is natural that such a profound psychological change can't happen in a year or even a decade.

September 11, 2001 will either be remembered as the date when America's constitution was completely destroyed and the new world order went into its final phase, or the date that marked a new global era of political awakening and the start of a long process to reclaim Western civilization from a criminal technocratic elite.

A Slave or A Free Citizen: What Do You Choose To Be?
"The herd is destined for the meat market, and the sheep are not consulted by the shepherd when he decides their time has come. The lesson the Greeks drew from the shepherd analogy is that the sheep cannot trust their shepherd, nor a community entrust itself to one man's absolute will, however benevolent he claims his purpose to be. They preferred to become a polis rather than be treated as a herd." - I.F. Stone (The Trial of Socrates; pg. 17-18).

"Basic to a free city was the right to speak back to the state, to criticize its actions in the assembly, the courts, the theater, or conversation. If the state suddenly interfered with that right, it was breaking its part of the contract. It was becoming a tyranny." - I.F. Stone (The Trial of Socrates; pg. 225).
Millions of people have woken up and stopped believing the official lies and myths about the murder of JFK, MLK, RFK, and the September 11 attacks, and although restoring truth to its rightful place in history is an uphill struggle, it is not an impossible task. The technocratic tyrants won't be able to enslave humanity because the truth that they crucified is slowly being resurrected through the internet and through voices like Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura, and other truth-tellers.

The truth about 9/11 raises the question of whether we want to remain slaves or become free citizens. I believe we all have the judgment and ability to perform laborious tasks, work together regardless of our political beliefs, and social standing, and form a worldwide coalition to solve gigantic global crises while still preserving the integrity, independence, and uniqueness of our countries. It is this generation's task to restore freedom, build a strong and just global civil society based on an understanding of a global general interest, and reestablish the contract between the citizen and the state in the West.

Getting Off The Globalist Chessboard: An Introduction

Getting Off The Globalist Chessboard: An Introduction
By Stewart Rhodes and Brandon Smith
Published: April 17, 2011

To put it simply, America is nearing a checkmate scenario. Like the final torrid maneuvers of a rigged chess match, we have been pressed, manipulated, and attacked into the last remaining corner of the “grand global chessboard” left to us; centralized control of all social and economic power into the hands of an unworthy elite. If we continue playing the game by their rules, we will lose. There is no doubt. There have been many solutions presented to us in the past to combat this development, but nearly all of them function within the constraints of Federal politics. Working within the system has earned us no quarter, and frankly, no results. Our only recourse (and, frankly, the best recourse all along) is to STOP relying on the rules of their game, and to walk away from the chess board completely.

Continued. . .

Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers: Getting off The Globalists Chessboard - Alex Jones Tv




Kanye West - Dark Fantasy - Coachella 2011

Kanye West - Dark Fantasy - Coachella 2011

April 17, 2011

R.I.P. Aimé Césaire

"But the work of man is only just beginning, and it remains to conquer all the violence entrenched in the recesses of our passion, for no race possesses the monopoly of beauty, of intelligence, of force. And there is a place for all at the rendezvous of victory." - Aimé Césaire (26 June 1913 – 17 April 2008)

Edward Said - The Myth of The Clash Of Civilizations

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

David McCullough on History

April 15, 2011

Scott Horton Interviews Ali Gharib

Ali Gharib, New York-based journalist on U.S. foreign policy and LobeLog writer, discusses the neocon effort to keep war with Iran on the front burner, while the news cycle overwhelms their tired talking points; the old propaganda line that Iranianswant us to bomb them, to give them a chance for regime change; the WikiLeaks documents that show Israel’s threats to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites (if the US doesn’t) are just hot air; and how observing the fates of N. Korea and Libya could lead Iran to conclude the best defensive strategy is building nuclear weapons and ceasing negotiations with the West.

April 14, 2011

Obama Administration Threatens To Assassinate American Journalist Wayne Madsen

"Some of us are unwilling to keep silent about anything. What makes us sick to our stomachs is our political society in its entirety. There will be no salvation, moreover, until everyone who is still worth anything has totally repudiated it in order to begin looking for a path to renewal somewhere other than in its insuperable contradictions. Until then we must fight." - Albert Camus, November 25, 1948

Yesterday, investigative reporter Wayne Madsen informed the Alex Jones audience that a source inside a foreign intelligence agency that is an ally of the Unites States told him that the Obama administration is seriously considering the option of killing him. Madsen writes:
What particular stories have inflamed the White House are not known but the warning conveyed by the source, who has connections within the White House, was stark in its directness: “They want to kill you.”
It is obvious that Madsen is being targeted by the Obama White House because of his groundbreaking reporting on Obama's family background, his training in the dark side of politics in Chicago, and his political and familial roots in the Central Intelligence Agency. Madsen's work and research is giving the American and global public a better understanding of Barack Hussein Obama, the man and the myth. He is breaking down the Obama idol that was carefully created by the state-corporate media and Barack Hussein Obama himself through his books, speeches, and interviews.

Even delusional liberals are starting to accept the fact that Obama is not the anti-war reformer that he presented himself to be during the 2008 election. The truth is that Obama is a political con artist and a two-faced traitor who is protecting the criminal Bush administration and the criminal banks on Wall Street, continuing America's illegal wars of occupation in the Middle East, and persecuting whistleblowers and reporters who stand up to the government.

The Obama administration is willing to do anything to get rid of government whistleblowers like Bradley Manning and reporters like Wayne Madsen. They have imprisoned and tortured Manning for exposing government crimes, and they may assassinate Madsen because of his political reporting.

More whistleblowers have been persecuted and imprisoned by the Obama gang besides Manning, including former CIA agent Jeffrey Sterling, former NSA official Thomas Drake, former FBI official Shamai Leibowitz, and a former State Department analyst. FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds wrote in January:
You thought the Bush-Cheney administration was bad? Think again; especially if you happen to be a whistleblower. Despite its awful record, the current administration witch-hunt like pursuit of whistleblowers and truth-tellers has many whistleblowers and truth-telling advocates longing for the Bush era climate. After all, everything is relevant, right? There was the bad, now it is the worse, or probably worst ever. Despite all the threats and muscle-flexing not a single whistleblower, including myself, got arrested or even pursued criminally under the previous regime. With Obama the era of threats has changed into an era of Punishment-Imprisonment and in some cases even torture.
The situation of the press in America is beyond repair. CNN, Fox News, and the New York Times and other institutions have sided against Manning, truth, and justice. The power of money and the power of the state have purged the press in America of investigative reporters and journalists. The fight for truth and freedom is being waged on the internet. Those of us with even the smallest of platforms must use it to spread the word about the government threat to Madsen. Every journalist is under attack. The Obama administration is waging a war on truth by threatening reporters, imprisoning whistleblowers, and denying the world important information that can change the outcome of the wars in the Middle East, the destiny of America, and the course of history.

The thugs and barbarians in the White House must be resisted and defeated. We must support and defend Wayne Madsen and pray that he remains safe. This is not the era of Nixon and Johnson. Killing a truth-teller like Madsen will backfire. The gangsters in the U.S. government will only turn Madsen into a martyr of journalism if they kill him, as they did with Gary Webb. Plus, people understand the value of critical journalism and truth-telling in these times. Justice and freedom can't be achieved if the public is kept in the dark about government crimes and government cover-ups. The task of each of us is to spread the word, and enlighten the public as best as we can. The freedom of the press is at stake, and every other freedom under the sun. We cannot let the dark lords of power win the war against truth, and silence every heroic journalist who gets too close to the truth.

April 13, 2011

Adam Vs The Man - Military Policy, Iraq Detainees, Conflict Reduction, Martial Law, Oath Keepers

Adam Vs The Man - Military Policy, Iraq Detainees, Conflict Reduction, Martial Law, Oath Keepers

April 12, 2011

The 150th Anniversary of The American Civil War - Reflections By Bruce Catton

Today, April 12, 2011, marks the 150th anniversary of the start of the American Civil War. Below are some random excerpts from the book 'Reflections on the Civil War' by Pulitzer-Prize winning historian Bruce Catton.

"We tend today to write the Civil War off rather blithely as the great war to end slavery. It was, of course, the war that did end slavery, but it did not begin that way at all. It began on a very different basis and, as a matter of fact, in the month of July 1861, after the war had gotten well started and both sides were nerving themselves for a long fight, the Congress of the United States, with Abraham Lincoln's approval, passed a Resolution saying flatly that the war was not being fought to interfere with slavery in any way at all. It was being fought, said this Resolution, solely to restore the Union, and it would cease when the people who were trying to break up the Union stopped fighting." - Bruce Catton, 'Reflections on the Civil War'; pg. 4.

"Training camp, in the days of Julius Caesar and at the present moment, is a place where raw recruits are worked over until they are fit to go out and be killed with proper military formality. At certain times and places it is done much better than at others, but the story is more or less the same everywhere. You learn to do things by the numbers, you keep your mouth shut because you get into trouble if you don't, and before the business is over, you are thoroughly indoctrinated in the army's way of doing things. It is extremely important that you get thus indoctrinated because if you don't, you will probably behave disgracefully when it is time to go out and get killed. And as a matter of fact, you are much more likely to survive that dreadful day if you have had the army way drilled into you. There is no more vulnerable creature on earth than the untaught innocent on a battlefield." - Bruce Catton, 'Reflections on the Civil War'; pg. 48-49.

"The prison camps in the Civil War were inhuman. They killed a great many young men, and yet the trouble was not the malevolence of the people who ran the camps at all. With very few exceptions, like perhaps Wirz at Andersonville, the men in charge of the camps did the best they could. They tried to take care of the men who were sent to them. The big trouble was that in North and South alike, as far as the authorities were concerned, the prison camps came last. They got what was left over when all of the other needs had been met. They were last on the line for food supplies, for medical supplies, for doctors, for housing, for clothing, for guards, for all of the things that are needed to run a prison camp. It was a matter of inattention, inefficiency, and apparently an inability on the part of either government to understand that these prison camps really made a serious demand on their energies and their resources. The prisoner of war got the dirty end of the stick not because anybody wanted to mistreat him, but simply because it worked out that way. As a matter of fact, even Wirz himself probably got a much sharper punishment that he deserved. He had been wounded in action, soldiering. His wound apparently never healed; it tormented him a great deal. His health was generally bad, and he was not the kind of man to administer a large place like Andersonville Prison. The guards they gave him were home-guard types who simply weren't up to service in the regular Confederate army. Wirz was worse than most, but I think that even he was punished unduly. For the rest, it was not a question of punishing anybody. It just worked that way. It was that kind of war." - Bruce Catton, 'Reflections on the Civil War'; pg. 69-70.

"In any war, the armies and navies are only part of it. The people back home finally decide what is going to happen. In the Civil War, in the summer of 1862, the prospects in the North did not look very good. There had been tremendous losses both in the East and in the West. There had been staggering defeats. The cost of the war looked unendurable, and it was getting higher every day.

A great many people in the North were beginning to question the wisdom of going on with this fight. There was a school of thought, to which many Northerners subscribed, that the South would be glad to make peace if the North would stop using aggression; that somehow it would be possible to cement the country together again if only the people in the North would stop fighting and would curb the Abolitionists. Actually, in the Congressional elections in the fall of 1862, a great many Republicans were defeated, and while the Lincoln administration retained control of Congress, its majority was greatly reduced. Whether the people of the North would continue to carry the load that the war placed upon them seemed a question open to debate.

It was probably that fact, as much as anything, which led Lincoln more and more to the conviction that this would have to be an antislavery war. He needed to harness some new source of enthusiasm; he needed a new moral issue; he needed the immense vitality and vigor that the Abolitionists had displayed, and he needed all of these energies firmly harnessed in support of the Union war effort. If he could not find some new source of determination and enthusiasm, the war was very likely to be lost." - Bruce Catton, 'Reflections on the Civil War'; pg. 84-85.

"One of the oddest things about the American Civil War was the fact that the two countries that were trying their best to destroy each other--the Southern Confederacy and the Federal Union--discovered very soon that they couldn't possibly get along without each other. They were bound together by economic ties that were too strong to be broken even by the stress of war. This showed itself most visibly in the matter of trading with the enemy, as we would now call it, and the war probably would have ended a year or two sooner if there had been no mutual trade with the enemy on either side.

Even while trying to suppress the Confederacy, the people of the North still needed some of the products the Confederacy supplied: cotton, chiefly, but also sugar, rice, and tobacco. The Confederacy, trying to pull away and prove its own independence, found itself entirely unable to do that without the help of things it could get from the North; all kinds of manufactured goods, and above all, machinery, leather goods, clothing, medicines, surgical instruments, pork, and corn." - Bruce Catton, 'Reflections on the Civil War'; pg. 143.

"I began my work on the Civil War by trying to figure out what made the old veterans tick when they were young men. It was as simple as that. I was trying to turn the old men I had known into vigorous, young soldiers. That carried me quite a distance, but it could not have taken me through years of endeavor because, after all, that feeling you could satisfy quite easily.

The trouble is, as I got deeper and deeper into the war, there were more things I wanted to know. I wanted to know what motivated people on both sides; why both North and South carried such terribly heavy burdens throughout the war, with really a minimum of complaining. When you read about a battle like Spotsylvania Court House, for instance, with its perfectly appalling tales of suffering, bloodshed, and death on both sides, all concentrated into one rainy summer morning along the edge of a second-growth forest, you are bound to be stirred by certain questions: What motivated the men on both sides? What drove them into that? What kept them at it? What prevented them from running away? I'm not sure that I know the answers yet, but have come to the conclusion that the American man is a pretty good man, no matter what part of the country he comes from. When he sets himself to do something, he will stick with it as long as he can stand on his feet and breathe." - Bruce Catton, 'Reflections on the Civil War'; pg. 225.

Reason.com Interviews Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers

Constitutional Refuseniks
Stewart Rhodes on his controversial group the Oath Keepers and the orders they won't obey
By Radley Balko

When you run down the list of issues the Oath Keepers are worried about, it reads a lot like a bill of particulars from the American Civil Liberties Union. The Oath Keepers don't like warrantless searches. They're upset that the executive branch has claimed the power to classify American citizens as enemy combatants, detain them indefinitely, and try them before military tribunals. They worry that a large-scale terrorist attack similar to 9/11 could lead to the mass detention of Arabs or Muslims, just as Japanese Americans were detained during World War II. They worry about crackdowns on political speech, protest, and freedom of assembly. They are concerned about the Army 3rd Infantry's 1st Brigade Combat Team, a military unit that is training to deploy domestically in response to terrorist attacks or other national emergencies. And yet the group is a frequent target of the left.

Continued. . .

Adam Vs The Man: Episode 1 - Featuring Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio

Failure to Report : A Panel Discussion Among Journalists

Video posted by Radical Pragmatist.

Event: Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time.
Date:March 26 2011
Place: University of Hartford, Ct
Website: Investigatebuilding7.org

Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU
Leslie Griffith, Journalist
Craig Unger, Author
Dick Russell, Author

April 11, 2011

President Obama Broke The Law For Reasons of World State

Whatever your opinions and beliefs are about the war against Gaddafi, if you believe that popular consent, the social contract, and checks and balances in government are good ideas that should not be erased from history then you can not be a supporter of President Obama, other Western leaders, NATO, and the United Nations because they exercised arbitrary power and manipulated global public sympathy to advance their agenda in Libya.

There is no question that Gaddafi had to be overthrown, but it is not right for international coalitions to do the job of the Libyan people. The West would have reacted with indignation and scorn if the Libyan people had reached out to Russia or China or Iran to liberate them from their tyrant. It doesn't make it right just because the West is doing the overthrowing.

If Obama, Sarkozy, Harper, and Cameron were Putin, Ahmadinejad, Jintao, and Chavez you wouldn't hear so-called humanitarians like Samantha Power preaching about human rights and genocide in Libya. Instead, there would be talk of Chinese imperialism, Islamic fascism, Russian aggression, and a Communist coup.

If NATO's cause was as noble and pure as they like the Western public to believe then they would have crafted words to address our logical and rational side instead of using emotion-based propaganda to get us to support their mission to oust another dictator in the world. So-called international humanitarians and UN liberators who want to get rid of every tyrant they hate are the biggest tyrants in the world.

What the war in Libya shows is that the U.S. constitution is treated like a piece of paper by the White House, CIA, Pentagon, and Congress. The American people have no voice in their government. Neither do the Canadian people, the British people, and the people of every other nation whose troops are currently fighting in Libya, Afghanistan, and other "humanitarian" wars which are unjust and criminal.

Former Congressman Paul Findley, co-founder of the Council for the National Interests, says in his article 'Obama’s Fateful Abuse of War Powers' that President Obama is in violation of the law and the United States constitution. Findley writes:
From the start, Obama proceeded in a cavalier, almost casual manner. In announcing war measures in Libya, he mentioned neither Congress nor the U.S. Constitution. He did not even return to Washington from a visit in South America to make the announcement. He acted as if war-making is a routine privilege a president may undertake entirely at his option, like shaving or adjusting his necktie, without even a wink or nod toward the people’s branch of government. To this day Congress has not authorized acts of war in Libya.
Obama acted like a king but he too is a slave to higher-ups who pull his strings, and who have spent decades designing and implementing a new world order system under which people are treated as slaves, police have unlimited power to arrest and repress protests, and countries that resist like Iran are demonized, invaded, and conquered.

Many of us are not blind to these facts. Our countries have been subverted from within, and our national government institutions no longer represent the interests of the people, but, instead, the interests of a small global class of corporate looters, and financial thieves who preach free-market economics but in practice they are fascist monopolists and authoritarians.

The war against Libya followed the pattern of previous NATO-led wars. It was not accident that Obama didn't consult members of Congress. The message he wanted to sent to the American people is that Congress is not as necessary as it used to be, and that the President can act like a tyrant and a king towards other nations if they are led by tyrants and kings, too.

Thomas Jefferson said, "Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing [a people] to slavery."

We will all become permanent slaves to the new world order system if we do not collectively fight back, and bring the criminal banks and corporations and the politicians who defend them to justice. We cannot reclaim our nations through federal elections, not in Canada, or England, or the United States of America. Congress and Parliament are routinely misled, deceived, ignored, and prevented from entering important discussions involving major national commitments such as a war or trade agreements with regional partners. For all intents and purposes, democratic self-governance is dead in the West, at least in their current form. Congress and Parliament are viewed as defunct national bodies by the transnational elites who have designed a new global authoritarian system behind closed doors, without the knowledge and consent of the people and their representatives.

This new global authoritarian system, disguised behind vague academic language like "global governance," is here to stay so as long as we do not resist it with our minds, our pens, our voices, and our feet.

U.S.-Canada security and trade integration will move along regardless of which party wins in the upcoming Canadian federal election. As Dana Gabriel writes:
In Canada, whether it’s the Conservative or Liberal party holding the reigns of power and in the U.S., a Democrat or Republican in the White House, deep North American integration continues unabated.
It is not acceptable that in matters of war, security, and trade the people of America, Canada, and Europe have no say. If we do not resist the transnational thieves who masquerade as "elites", there will be an authoritarian North American Union, whether it is called by that name or not by our so-called elected leaders. It will follow the example of the European Union which has failed as a transnational body because it is tyrannical, and highly unpopular with the citizenry in Europe.

The struggle to reverse the slide into transnational despotism and prevent Third World-like conditions from becoming permanent in our countries will be a hard and long one, and require many sacrifices. But what choice do we have? Live as slaves? That is not how I want to live. It is a basic truth of history that no people can vote out a tyrant, or vote out a tyrannical system. It can't be done in Iran, and Libya, and it can't be done in America, Canada, and Europe. Non-violent civil disobedience is one of the tactics we can use to create genuine, democratic, and long lasting changes for the good. Freedom can't be won at the ballot box. It never has and it never will. Freedom can only be won on the streets of our cities, and in the minds of our neighbours. We will defeat the totalitarian plans of the transnational tyrants who like to think of themselves as global humanitarians and enlightened elites through education and peaceful collective action, not voting.

If we fail to reject and reverse our governments' push towards a corrupt and despotic world state then that would be a slap in the face to all the brave and honorable fighters and soldiers who thought they were fighting for freedom in World War II, World War I, the Vietnam War, and all the other wars in the last century. The United Nations was built on their blood and sacrifice, so it is only right that we honor their memory, sacrifice for freedom as they did, and make the "free world" really free.

Terence McKenna: The Lost Interview, November 1999

April 10, 2011

20th Century American History As Fable From Cradle To Grave

"The way the "Fourth Estate" functions with the Kennedy assassination has long been the fly in the ointment. It is a frustrating issue to examine. Where they should question, they accept without comment. Isn't one of the aims of journalism to research what the facts are? Research what you are told? After all, we are not living in Nazi state, right? In many ways the American press operates like a propaganda arm of the government. Joseph Goebbels never had it so good! One can view this behavior in the way they cover the official government investigations from JFK, to Watergate, to 9-11." - George Bailey, 'The Sum Of All Things,' April 3, 2011
George Bailey, publisher of the blog Oswald's Mother, says that the American press and the Nazi propaganda ministry operate almost exactly the same in regards to turning government falsehoods into official history, covering up government crimes and errors, and blocking any discussion about controversial historical events that have transformed history and justified government aggression like the Reichstag fire and 9/11.

If Joseph Goebbels was America's propaganda minister from 1945 up to now nothing in the mainstream corporate-state media would be reported differently to the American people. What Goebbels did for Totalitarian Germany, the CIA-Corporate-Mass Media has done for Totalitarian America.

Who needs Goebbels when you have Karl Rove, Fox News, CNN, and the New York Times? The CIA and the Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda are indistinguishable in their methods, and philosophy about truth, morality, power, and the voice of the people in world history. Under all empires, whether Nazi, Soviet, or American, the people are treated as slaves, the truth is twisted, and history is conceived by a small and organized class of managers and authoritarians to advance the interests of the empire at home and abroad.

The National Security Regime in America that was set up after World War II takes the same approach to history and truth as the Nazi Regime did when it reigned supreme and acted aggressively towards other nations, as well as the Soviet regime.

The formula to deceive the people into supporting false and evil wars and a powerful central government is simple. The goal is to rewrite history and call it the truth of time in the same breath. First, the imperial regime commits an act of terrorism or war and blames it on the people whose land is to be invaded and conquered, or persecuted and killed. Second, a false narrative is invented for the public, low-level government bureaucrats, and military grunts to serve the goals of the nation's power elite and justify government aggression abroad; third, eye-witnesses who tell a different narrative about the attack are dismissed out of hand by the press and government councils, and murdered by secret government agents if ignoring them doesn't work; finally, a concerted effort is made to obliterate free thought, and cover up the facts and evidence that disproves the official narrative. In this stage, critical public discussion about the government's narrative is banned, debate about the rationale for the wars and aggression is shut off, and critics who question the government are called unpatriotic, crazy, paranoid, and generally mocked and insulted.

The most important part is the bigness of the lie. The biggest lie has to be told in order to subdue critical thinking and foster automatic, unconscious reactions by people to contradictions in the official government narrative. The lie has to be so big that it stops people from asking even the most basic of questions such as how can a tall steel building collapse onto itself without resistance as a result of fire for the first time in history? Or why was Philip D. Zelikow, a political insider connected to the Bush administration and an admitted historical myth-maker, appointed to head the 9/11 commission when there were hundreds of other qualified candidates?

A big lie is targeted at an individual's psychological sanctity and reasoning abilities so that they automatically react emotionally to critics who espouse a different version of the narrative instead of addressing their questions in a rational, fair, and logical manner. The lie must so big that it overpowers logic and common sense, or else it won't be believed in by the majority of people.

If Goebbels was America's propaganda minister on November 22, 1963, August 2, 1964, and September 11, 2001, he would have endorsed and applauded the American empire's lie about the murder of JFK and the subsequent cover-up, the invention of the false story about the Gulf of Tonkin incident that led to the Vietnam war, and the tragic events on 9/11 which justified a massive imperialist agenda in the Middle East. If Goebbels was in charge of America's unofficial propaganda ministries like ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, the news programming would be the same. These media institutions and the entire Western press helped to indoctrinate the American people and the world about the 9/11 attacks, the dangers of non-state terrorism, and America's purpose in Afghanistan and larger the war on terrorism.

Bailey writes, "there is official history and there is what actually happened." The tyrants in Washington's National Security Regime "fear the truth and the public’s lack of confidence in them and their seat of power." Although they can invent history and create big lies, they cannot control people's thoughts and shape human destiny forever. They can frame the national debate around certain issues, and accuse critics of being conspiracy theorists, but sooner or later that con trick is figured out and the people realize that they were lied to on a grand scale. In truth, official myth-makers and government historians like Philip D. Zelikow are spiritual weaklings and intellectual dwarfs. They require a machinery of secrecy to protect their lies and crimes. When that machinery is broken down, they become powerless and revert back to being the sad and cowardly little creatures that they are inside.

The truth about 9/11 and the government assassinations of JFK, MLK, and RFK will see the light of day, and real history will be reclaimed. It is unhistorical to say otherwise. History is full of examples of the good triumphing over evil in the final hours. The tyrants in Washington have acted against the laws of nature, and the laws of God, so it is a certainty that they will lose the war for history and human destiny and perish from the Earth. As Bailey says, "They fail every time they have to resort to Nazi-style propaganda techniques in order to present their case, and by doing so, show us how weak their case really is."

George Bailey - The Sum Of All Things

The Sum Of All Things
By George Bailey
Oswald's Mother
Published: April 3, 2011

"The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy."

HSCA, Final Report, 1979

From the very beginning, the Powers that Be have treated the Warren Report as if it is the word of God, come down from on high, etched in stone. In the picture above, that big book almost looks like a stone tablet. Why, it might was well be Moses himself placing it in Lyndon Johnson’s awaiting hands. Later, he would tell Walter Cronkite that he never believed in the lone gunman theory. After second thoughts he asked CBS is delete the comment, under the grounds of National Security. A moment of candor we are not supposed to know about.

In a 1999 doctoral dissertation by Ross Frank Ralston, he relates an important concept in the study of the JFK. It is the principle of "hegemony" in the media. In other words, the ability of the certain players in the media to dominate others. According to Ralston, those main players are CBS and Time-Life in the way they presented the government’s case in the assassination. And early on, they set the standard as to how the assassination would be relayed to the public after the Warren Report was published in late 1964. The Warren Report, as Ralston summarizes is, "a man in a building shot a man in a car..."

Continued. . .

Foreknowledge of Building 7's Collapse : Dr. Graeme MacQueen

Judge John Walker, George Walker Bush's cousin, judges April Gallop's suit

Judge John Walker, George Walker Bush's cousin, judges April Gallop's suit
By TruthMakesPeace
Published: April 6, 2011

Background: Army Specialist April Gallop, was in the wing of the Pentagon that was hit on 9/11, with her small boy, and injured in the rubble. She was instructed by her commanding officers to speak the Official Story, but bravely spoke her true observations. In 2008, she sued Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers for not evacuating the Pentagon, when they knew it was a potential target. Her case was dismissed on March 15, 2010, but appealed that decision.

Status: On April 5, 2011 the appeal of the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers was heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit at 11 a.m. at New Haven, Connecticut. But one of the 3 judges turned out to be George Walker Bush's cousin, Judge John M. Walker Jr., an obvious conflict of interest.

Update: Press Release from William Veale of the Center for 911 Justice, April 6, 2011

April's attorney William Veale gave a radio interview with Kevin Barrett after the hearing on his No Lies Radio Show:
(Turn live RADIO: OFF in the upper right. Then click the arrow next to "It is now archived here -- Use Player")

Summary: William Veale can be heard about 23 minutes into the interview. He discusses his suspicion that Judge John M. Walker, one of the three on the panel is potentially related to George Walker Bush. During the hearing, Veale did not have access to Wikipedia* to check, but thought "You take a look at him, and he's a Bush."

He filed a motion to disqualify Walker, but the Court denied it. He moved for a Continuance (postponement) to review that denial, but it was denied. He then made his prepared arguments for the appeal. "There it is, we did the best we could." He says the Court asked him a lot of "impertinent and demeaning questions" such as whether he is authorized to practice law in the area.

Continued. . .