Judge John Walker, George Walker Bush's cousin, judges April Gallop's suit

Judge John Walker, George Walker Bush's cousin, judges April Gallop's suit

By TruthMakesPeace
9/11Blogger.com
Published: April 6, 2011

Background: Army Specialist April Gallop, was in the wing of the Pentagon that was hit on 9/11, with her small boy, and injured in the rubble. She was instructed by her commanding officers to speak the Official Story, but bravely spoke her true observations. In 2008, she sued Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers for not evacuating the Pentagon, when they knew it was a potential target. Her case was dismissed on March 15, 2010, but appealed that decision.
www.CenterFor911Justice.org
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-03-25/895-germans-doubt-oct-army-spc-apr...

Status: On April 5, 2011 the appeal of the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers was heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit at 11 a.m. at New Haven, Connecticut. But one of the 3 judges turned out to be George Walker Bush's cousin, Judge John M. Walker Jr., an obvious conflict of interest.

Update: Press Release from William Veale of the Center for 911 Justice, April 6, 2011

April's attorney William Veale gave a radio interview with Kevin Barrett after the hearing on his No Lies Radio Show:
http://noliesradio.org/archives/32320
(Turn live RADIO: OFF in the upper right. Then click the arrow next to "It is now archived here -- Use Player")

Summary: William Veale can be heard about 23 minutes into the interview. He discusses his suspicion that Judge John M. Walker, one of the three on the panel is potentially related to George Walker Bush. During the hearing, Veale did not have access to Wikipedia* to check, but thought "You take a look at him, and he's a Bush."

He filed a motion to disqualify Walker, but the Court denied it. He moved for a Continuance (postponement) to review that denial, but it was denied. He then made his prepared arguments for the appeal. "There it is, we did the best we could." He says the Court asked him a lot of "impertinent and demeaning questions" such as whether he is authorized to practice law in the area.

Continued. . .