I locate the idea of privacy—what Louis Brandeis called “the right to be
let alone”—in our creaturely resistance to being interfered with, used,
or penetrated against our will. For me, the roots of privacy are as
much in our physical bodies as in our legal traditions, and I see those
roots intertwined with the human capacity to resist. The fiercest kinds
of resistance, be they personal or national, are always in response to
forced occupation. It is no surprise that all imperial projects, be
they totalitarian regimes, abusive households, or authoritarian
institutions, strive to reduce the privacy of their subordinate members.
Hand me that diary right now, missy! Bend from the waist and spread your cheeks, prisoner!
Such demands are not made solely to discover an intention to resist;
they are also made to destroy the will to resist. Strip someone of all
his privacy and you have as good as stripped him of his sense of agency.
As for your question of “how” our willingness to resist the invasion of
our privacy is being worn down, I would say first of all that the
erosion encompasses more than our loss of privacy. The erosion of
private life (your boss requires you to have your cell phone on at all
times), the erosion of the legacy of organized labor—these are parts of
the same whole. The “how” is perhaps best understood by contemplating
how one tames an animal: through a mixture of fear and irresistible
convenience. Here is the whip, and here is all this nice grain in the
trough. For fear, we have the threat of terrorism, the shaky
economy—all real enough. For convenience, we have an array of gadgets
that offer a fussy kind of privacy (no need to ask directions of lowly
gas-station attendants if you have a GPS) even as they make surveillance
of us easier. For absurdity, we have the notion that the best way to
combat “terrorist threats from within and without” is to turn citizens
into sheep.
Video Title: Conference: Can We Have Some Privacy? Source: ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry. Date Published: June 10, 2015. Description:
Conference
Can We Have Some Privacy?
Scott Horton and Tom Keenan
May 7, 2015
Privacy,
as its English usage suggests, is a place and a possession as much as
an idea or abstract right—a physical realm supposedly separate from
public view. In a world in which technology permeates the personal, the
everyday, the intimate, what meaning does this value have? Where privacy
is voluntarily surrendered, what is it worth to individuals? And where
the internet makes possible mass surveillance, what protections are
there for the space, and the experience, of privacy? This conference
examines not only the legal arrangements affecting privacy—and the
time-lag between law and technological advance—but privacy as a
philosophical concept and a cultural tenet. What divisions of activity
and status created the idea of “privacy” in the first instance? Is it a
disappearing value, or is its erosion a source of crisis? Does the sheer
extensiveness of the surveillance enabled by technologies of
communication cancel the significance of such monitoring, or generate
new forms of persecution?
The international conference was a
cooperation between Bard College Berlin - A Liberal Arts University, the
Center for Civic Engagement, the ICI Berlin, and the Hannah Arendt
Center at Bard College in New York. With support from the Zeit-Stiftung.