The fact that Neocons like to politicize the death of Americans is nothing new. Remember 9/11.
The attack on the American ambassador in Benghazi on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11 has also been politicized by the Neocons.
Neocon con artist William Kristol attacks President Obama in this ridiculous article, asking at the end, "did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?"
Is he implying that Obama is responsible for the deaths of Americans? Yes he is. Kristol is exploiting a tragedy, a human error, or worse (a false flag attack by the shadow CIA and the shadow Mossad), to bring down Obama. This is sickening and shameful stuff.
Why is the media not telling Kristol and the neocons to stand down on this Libyan issue? This is over the line rhetoric. You can't be implying that Obama's inaction resulted in the death of the American ambassador. If there is any blame, it is institutional, not personal.
I'm not defending Obama, but let's not pretend that he actually makes public policy and gives orders. Obama wasn't responsible for the death of Bin Laden and he wasn't responsible for the death of the American ambassador in Libya.
