"We have broken from reality--a psychotic Nation." - Dr. Ron Paul, from his speech in Congress on May 19, 2009 called "Current Conditions or Just a Bad Dream."On Wednesday, October 5, Reuters's Mark Hosenball reported that the assassination of CIA asset Anwar al-Awlaki was a decision made by the National Security Council, not the President. In fact, President Obama was informed of the operation after it was completed. He was kept out of the loop on this matter, and most likely on other important matters as well.
"Anyone in the United States today who isn't paranoid must be crazy." - Robert Anton Wilson.
This revelation reinforces the suspicion held by many that Obama's function as President is merely to serve as a public spokesman for the American shadow government and nothing more.
The Reuters article stated:
There is no public record of the operations or decisions of the panel, which is a subset of the White House's National Security Council, several current and former officials said. Neither is there any law establishing its existence or setting out the rules by which it is supposed to operate.The power of the National Security Council and the National Security State is beyond description because of the secret nature of its existence and its secret agenda for America and the world. A significant amount of people believe that the National Security State is in possession of alien technology and highly advanced weaponry. This is a completely rational belief and probably true.
The high priests of national security in Washington depend upon a culture of lies, fear, disinformation, total secrecy, and endless war to keep their high paying jobs and maintain their special status. They killed 3,000 innocent people on 9/11, invented the sacred 9/11 myth and started the criminal war on terror to acquire greater power, prestige, and profit, all at the American people's expense.
Security priests are not in the business of keeping America safe and strong, but keeping America ignorant and afraid so they can better defend the interests of the financial oligarchy that hijacked the American government in 1913. They sit above the President, and act above the constitution and international law.
They exercise totalitarian power in the dark and possess the power of life and death over the American people and humanity. To me they resemble a Council of High Priests or Iran's dictatorial Guardian Council, since they make transformative decisions regardless of the President's input or the wishes of the American people.
From the first day the CIA and National Security State was created its top members plotted against the American constitution and the American people. Today, the top members of the National Security State like Cofer Black are traitors and thieves who have maliciously betrayed the rights of the American people and destroyed the U.S. Constitution. They are in the process of creating a global dictatorial government that will replace the American republic and Western democracies.
Far from being the guardians of America, officials of the treacherous National Security State are the watchmen who stand on the watchtowers of tyranny, behind the gates of hell, protecting the beasts of power that are enslaving America and humanity.
One of the most important jobs that these murderous watchmen have is surveying the wilderness of truth and shooting arrows of fire at the knights of liberty like President John F. Kennedy, journalist Gary Webb, Congressman Larry McDonald, Senator Paul Wellstone, Pat Tillman, and many others.
The assassination of an American citizen by the shadow American government in the modern era didn't begin with Anwar al-Awlaki, it began with JFK. The debate about the legality of assassinating an American citizen should begin with the National Security State's assassination of JFK on November 22, 1963. A public debate about U.S. government assassinations that doesn't acknowledge this historical fact is a farce.
A lot of people are worried that President Obama may get assassinated, but that's unlikely. Why would the oligarchs assassinate such a servile creature who has done everything they've asked of him? Obama has played his part as President to perfection.
Photographer and writer George Bailey compared President JFK's heroic nature with President Obama's sheepish nature in his article, "A Tale Of Two Presidents." Bailey writes:
David Talbot in Brothers, describes John Kennedy’s behind the scenes battles with the CIA, the Pentagon and its Generals. Where Kennedy was his own man standing up to strongmen such as the cigar chomping General Curtis Lemay, the duplicitous CIA Director Allen Dulles, or even the head of the Federal Reserve, William McChesney Martin, Jr., when he issued the silver certificate notes which ate into the central bank’s profits, Obama doesn’t seem to have the spine for such heroics. He seems content in his ever expanding role of a puppet to them, as he parades around as a Roman Emperor to the rest of the world. One can almost see the strings attached to him. He knows that if he steps too far out of line what will become of him. He made a lot of promises as they all do to get elected, but with Obama, I don’t think he lied by not fulfilling many of them. His interaction with the machinery of government is tightly managed and all of the centers of power Kennedy wrestled with are still there, more numerous and as powerful as ever.The media made a lot of fuss about President Obama's first 100 days. I want to know about his first 100 hours. Was he informed about the 9/11 black op by his CIA handlers or did Obama already know the truth before stepping into office?
I harken back to comedian Bill Hicks’ routine on how a new President is handled. He’s taken into a darkened room, a screen comes down and he’s shown a film of the Kennedy assassination but from an angle no one has seen before. It’s the angle from the grassy knoll. When it’s finished, the lights come on, the screen goes up and the men there, the real power brokers, say to him, “Any questions?” And the President elect says, “What’s my agenda going to be?” A wisecrack, but I wonder if it really happens that way. I’m sure the speculation of it lingers like an unwelcome guest in every new President’s mind.
Historian Garry Wills, author of the recent book, "Bomb Power: The Modern Presidency and the National Security State," addressed the permanence of the National Security State and the continuity of policies from one president to another at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs in New York on February 1, 2010. Wills touched on the subject of the President's initiation phase into the mysterious cult of the National Security State, saying:
Candidate Obama talked about getting rid of some of the constitutional flaws—renditions and detention without representation and things like that. But the minute he came in, his CIA chief said, "Well, you know, we'll have to consider it. We might need renditions down the road. And we probably do need military tribunals. We won't try everybody in them, but we've got to keep them around. It's going to be hard to close Guantanamo in a year."The President has a reduced role in the elaborate technocratic and secret system that has been built in Washington since the end of World War II. John F. Kennedy tried to reassert the power of the President and defend the U.S. constitution but he was defeated.
We can't really release pictures of torture. In fact, Secretary of State Clinton told the British they couldn't release torture pictures in a procedure in their courts.
The president said, "Let's not investigate torture in the past. We shouldn't look at the past. We should look forward."
What happens to a president? He comes in and he finds out things he didn't know, what this huge apparatus is that he controls, and how his hands are tied in many ways.
They come to him—the CIA, the NSC [National Security Council], the NSA [National Security Agency], and others—and say: "Wait a minute. It took us a long time to build this up. You're probably going to need it at some point. Don't destroy it. And don't destroy the morale of the people who have to stay loyal to you, because if you do that they'll start telling secrets, they'll start talking about the operations they've been involved in which cut the corners of the law."
JFK's noble sacrifice proved that the evil monster in Washington cannot be destroyed by one man, however powerful he is. It will take all the strength, wisdom and power of the American people to take back their country.
Placing hope in a messianic President like an Obama is foolish and stupid, especially since the President is a puppet and the Presidency is play-acting. What the President says is scripted to the T. He is selected by the invisible government to fulfill the role of the psychotherapist in chief and instruct the world what is a truthful statement and what is a conspiratorial or paranoid statement.
President Obama acts like a robot because he is the product of the Pavlovian Presidency. But he knew what he was getting into. Like Bush and Clinton, Obama is a willing voice for the Beast and the Gospel of the New Corporate World Order.
Dutch-American psychoanalyst Joost A. M. Meerloo wrote about the value of the Pavlovian conditioning of the people by rulers in totalitarian societies in his 1956 book, "The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing." Meerloo said:
In the Pavlovian strategy, terrorizing force can finally be replaced by a new organization of the means of communication. Ready made opinions can be distributed day by day through press, radio, and so on, again and again, till they reach the nerve cell and implant a fixed pattern of thought in the brain. Consequently, guided public opinion is the result, according to Pavlovian theoreticians, of good propaganda technique, and the polls a verification of the temporary successful action of the Pavlovian machinations on the mind. Yet, the polls may only count what people pretend to think and believe, because it is dangerous for them to do otherwise.Resistance to this type of tyranny is not easy at first because the lies of Washington's invisible system of terror have been accepted as the truth of history and as the sacred base of our current civilization.
Such is the Pavlovian device: repeat mechanically your assumptions and suggestions, diminish the opportunity of communicating dissent and opposition. This is the simple formula for political conditioning of the masses. This is also the actual ideal of some of our public relation machines, who thus hope to manipulate the public into buying a special soap or voting for a special party.
The Pavlovian strategy in public relations has people conditioned more and more to ask themselves, "What do other people think?" As a result, a common delusion is created: people are incited to think what other people think, and thus public opinion may mushroom out into a mass prejudice.
Expressed in psychoanalytic terms, through daily propagandistic noise backed up by forceful verbal cues, people can more and more be forced to identify with the powerful noisemaker. Big Brother's voice resounds in all the little brothers.
But resistance becomes easier once you understand the inner mechanics of the National Security State and the esoteric agenda of its insane owners.
And resistance becomes a duty with the knowledge and understanding of the evil beast that has hijacked America and declared war on all of humanity.
