Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
September 24, 2011
"You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security." - Gladio terrorist Vincenzo Vinciguerra.A lie that is commonly repeated in the political debate about the causes and roots of the 9/11 attacks is that America was attacked as a consequence of its occupation of Arab lands and its one-sided support for Israel.
This "blowback" theory limits critical questioning of U.S. covert operations, government drills, and false flag events. Author and researcher Webster Tarpley says that the 46 government drills that were taking place on September 11, 2001 explain the systematic undermining of the U.S. military which allowed the cold-blooded traitors to move forward with their plan to mass murder 3,000 American citizens.
But anti-war libertarians like Ron Paul and many liberals avoid the unspeakable nature of 9/11. Instead, they unthinkingly cling to the false theory of blowback despite all the evidence to the contrary.
I am convinced that this false theory was deliberately injected in the media and academia by U.S. and Israeli intelligence officials to divert left-wing and libertarian intellectuals from examining the evidence for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Towers and coming to a more sinister conclusion about the U.S. government's role in the atrocity.
Ron Paul has popularized the blowback theory in television interviews and the many Republican presidential debates that he has participated in since 2007. He is sincere about his belief and believes the blowback theory is the correct one. But while it is more sophisticated than the ludicrous claim that 19 Arab terrorists attacked America because they hate freedom and democracy, that does not make it true.
A week and a half ago, Paul was asked in an interview on CNN about the blowback thesis. I thought it was interesting that Paul said that "the CIA is actually the one that introduced the term blowback." This got my head thinking. Why would the leading terrorist organization in the world try to educate and enlighten people about the consequences of its covert military actions? Why did the CIA introduce a theory into the American people's heads that will make them more suspicious of CIA activities and U.S. foreign policy?
Does the CIA want to help explain the phenomena of counter-terror attacks on the U.S. homeland so the American people can better understand the motives and strategy of anti-American terrorists? Of course not. The CIA is not interested in enlightening the American people in any way. Their aim is to confuse, dumb-down, distract, and divert public attention so they can continue killing people and dominating the world in the American people's name.
If it is true that the CIA did in fact introduce the theory of blowback into the popular lexicon, then the reasons for doing so are nefarious. The theory of blowback explains nothing about the 9/11 attacks. It is a smoke screen, a diversion tactic, a false sign post that leads the searcher of truth down a dead end road.
People who espouse this theory are following a cold trail. They ignore the facts because their pride is wounded when they learn they are wrong. Their basic assumption is that the CIA and Mossad are not evil or competent enough to kill three thousand innocent Americans to advance an imperialist political agenda in the Middle East.
More than any other group, libertarians fall into the trap of thinking the U.S. government is not capable of conspiring against the American people because they naively assume that it is too incompetent to systematically kill American citizens and destroy their rights. It's a stupid belief because killing, lying, and keeping secrets are three things that every government excels at.
Libertarians and liberals also feel smart by voicing the blowback theory. "Oh look at me. I have the theory to explain 9/11. I am so smart. I am never wrong. I read Ayn Rand every day. I know everything about how the world works. Conservatives are government loving fools. And the ones who say the government did it are crazy conspiracy theorists who have no logic and no understanding."
Is the blowback theory completely and always false? No. It sheds light on the fact that people in the Middle East are angered by the injustice of U.S. foreign policy and want to take revenge on America. This is common sense 101. A child can understand this. But the theory doesn't explain the 9/11 attacks, which was as much directed against Muslims as against Americans and the American system of checks and balances.
It takes intellectual courage to get beyond the theory of blowback and really start hunting for the truth in the post-9/11 wilderness. Libertarians, conservatives and progressives need to search the term "false flag," look up government drills on 9/11, and learn about the unspoken structure of the U.S. shadow government, which has its own destructive goals, motives, and methods.
There is so much evidence out there. Where should people start in the field of 9/11 facts? Begin with the controlled collapse of Building 7. Or listen to Webster Tarpley's explanation about the 46 government drills and exercises on the day of 9/11 that were intended to fool and distract honest American military officers.
The hands of the good cops in the U.S. military and government were tied because of the numerous government drills on 9/11, which created the opportunity for the bad cops, the globalists and zionists, to stab America in the back under the cover of darkness.
In an interview with Bonnie Faulkner of the KPFA radio program 'Guns and Butter' on September 7, 2011, Tarpley said:
"9/11 was of course an inside job. It was, very specifically, a state-sponsored, false flag, synthetic terror action. It was a war provocation designed to produce the war of civilization and the clash of civilizations in the form of the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war, and other wars that we've come close to or are now in.Tarpley emphasized the role of government drills and exercises in the cloak-and-dagger 9/11 operation, which were conducted by traitors and ringleaders inside the invisible government. "They made it happen," he says.
This was carried out by this rogue network or invisible government which has been infesting the U.S. federal government in the current form since about the middle of the 1890s, since the time of [President] Grover Cleveland.
So, rather than waste time with trying to blame this on Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Israel or anybody else, the attention has to be focused on the U.S. federal bureaucracy, and, above all, the interface between Wall Street and the intelligence community. If you can think of somebody like [Former CIA Director] Allen Dulles, the Wall Street bond lawyer, and the reputed Nazi sympathizer, who was one of the people to help create the CIA. If you think of his brother, John Foster Dulles, that sort of gives you the neck of the woods that we're talking about.
Where those Wall Street lawyer types meet the intelligence community, and that of course is the CIA preeminently, that's where you have to look for the problem. These other countries that get involved are at most very peripheral sub-contractors who deliver things that the U.S. invisible government wants."
Tarpley criticized the blowback theory as well as other theories that avoid the reality of the existence of an invisible government in Washington, saying:
"There is a much weaker version, completely different, really, which is let it happen on purpose. The "let it happen on purpose" essentially says that there really is a terrorist organization out there and they really want to attack, and they will if you let them. And the accusation against Bush and Cheney was that they let it happen, or somebody let it happen.Tarpley goes on to explain the purpose and rationale of the drills at the 18 minute mark in the interview. His essential point about 9/11 is, "It's the drills, stupid." The drills blindfolded the loyal soldiers and officers while enabling the traitors to cut America's throat.
I would just point out in passing that the official version of the 9/11 Commission; the unanswered questions, in other words, accepting the Kean-Hamilton Report with unanswered questions; the blowback version which says, "Yes it happened that way but you deserved it. It was good because finally the third world is fighting back." This is something a lot of left liberals have a very deep emotional need to believe; and the "lihop - let it happen on purpose"; all of these are ultimately the same. Their world picture is all the same.
Again, the official version, the unanswered questions, the blowback, and the lihop, it's all the same because it all says there really is a terrorist organization out there that wants to attack you and will attack you, and if you drop your guard they'll attack, so therefore you need to fight them in some better way. Maybe not with Bush-Cheney but maybe with Kerry or with Obama, right. That's more or less what it comes down to.
I'm arguing something different. Now, the drills that you mentioned, the air drills have three components. Some people have said these are "lihop" drills, in other words, that when you remove the air defense then the terrorists strike. Well, no, it's not that way at all. The air drills are to prevent loyal elements in the air force, in particular, from simply taking matters into their own hands and shooting down the planes before they can reach their targets. There's always this danger. So they had to prevent that from ever happening."
II. Definitions of False Flag
Here is Wikipedia's definition of false flag:
False flag (aka Black Flag) operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.[citation needed] The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time.Here is a definition by the writer Number Six, from his article, "Operation False Flag: A Modern Primer,":
Definition: When governments or organizations (usually connected to the former) stage highly sophisticated attacks on their own or foreign soil with the purpose of placing the blame on a desirable enemy foreign or domestic, one who has otherwise done no wrong. Essentially a setup, it provides the government entity with an excuse via fabricated evidence in complicity with media to fulfill its various agendas (i.e. war or law making).And here is a definition in my own words: A false flag is when the rulers of a country implement or instigate an attack on their own population to generate fear and hatred against outsiders and foreign countries that stand in the way of the objectives of the rulers. In a democracy the rulers' political and geopolitical objectives are unspoken and kept hidden from the people.
