December 21, 2012

Going On A Hiatus Until The New Year

Sufjan Stevens - Joy To The World

It Doesn't Matter Who They Are, What Matters Is Their Plan

Was getting caught part of their plan?

Bizarro World: NRA Gets Compared To Al-Qaeda

"NRA Has More Blood on Its Hands Than al-Qaeda: What Do We Do?"

The CIA has more blood on its hands than both the NRA and Al-Qaeda put together, but you'll never hear the controlled progressive opposition voices criticize the CIA or Mossad for their false flag mass murders in America. No, that's considered "conspiratorial" and "fringe." 

Obama's brainwashed true believers are more concerned about the imaginary threat of Gun-Qaeda than stopping government tyranny and the financial rape of America by the big banks.

An Opportunity for a U.S.–Iran Paradigm Shift - Winter 2013

Read, "An Opportunity for a U.S.–Iran Paradigm Shift - Winter 2013," by By Hossein Mousavian.

Source - Center for Strategic and International Studies and The Washington Quarterly:
The former Iranian ambassador argues that the Arab Awakenings have opened an opportunity for Washington and Tehran to seek common interests, but warns that mutual perceptions that the other is weakening could once again lead that opportunity to be missed.
An excerpt from the paper:
"The Arab region today is drenched in chaos and instability: Palestine is bleeding, Iraq burning, Syria erupting, Persian Gulf oil countries are trembling, Lebanon simmering, Afghanistan devastated, and Iran under adversarial focus. An array of unaddressed historical grievances and unresolved disputes add to this chaos. Starting with Tunisia last year, the Arab Street has virtually been under popular siege to break away from long-/brewing political morbidity and authoritarian culture.

America as a superpower has had a longstanding interest in the Middle East, and thus is no stranger to the region. Unfortunately, the continuing U.S. domination in the Middle East /with its flawed policies /is creating strategic imbalances in the region and fueling intra-/regional tensions with serious implications for the overall peace and security of the region. The flawed U.S. polices in the Middle East are already leading to its total alienation from the region’s people. A recent poll /the first of its kind in the region, conducted in twelve Arab countries covering 84 percent of the population of the Arab world /shows 93.75 percent of the people look at the Unites States and Israel as the major threat to their interests.1 Growing anti-/Americanism in the Arab world is no secret.

One historic lesson that the United States must not ‘‘unlearn’’ is that its excessive reliance on undemocratic regimes and authoritarian dictators of the Arab world will not serve its long-/term interests nor promote regional and global stability. The political and social changes now taking shape in the Arab world are an opportunity for the United States to re-/examine its policies and build a new approach toward the region, including Iran. To ensure a successful strategy, Washington needs to divert its investments from the ‘‘palaces’’ to the ‘‘streets’’ of the Middle East. Washington’s paradigm shift would require establishing new relations with ‘‘moderate Islamists’’ within Muslim countries who would facilitate sustainable democracy and a regional security structure. Dialogue and engagement is the only way to build bridges toward a path of peace and tranquility.

The current upheavals in the region, if not managed properly, could erupt into regional chaos of unforeseen proportions and throw the area into perpetual instability. To avert such a scenario, it is essential for the United States and Iran, as the major powerbrokers in the region, to play a constructive role through mutual engagement and cooperation. This will not only serve the respective national interests of both nations but also ameliorate the regional environment. To realize this objective, Washington needs to recognize the legitimate role and interests of Iran in the region. This step would facilitate the United States and Iran to engage in a broader strategy which would address each other’s security objectives and concerns. That would, in turn, ultimately result in a higher probability for Iran and the United States to reach a ‘‘big deal’’ on outstanding bilateral issues, including the nuclear question."

Israel and Iran: A love story?

The global 9/11 truth and justice movement has awakened the world to the evil conspiracy to start a new world war.

Must Watch Video: Israel and Iran: A love story? YouTube video description [Channel - TEDtalksDirector]:
When war between Israel and Iran seemed imminent, Israeli graphic designer Ronny Edry shared a poster on Facebook of himself and his daughter with a bold message: "Iranians ... we [heart] you." Other Israelis quickly created their own posters with the same message -- and Iranians responded in kind. The simple act of communication inspired surprising Facebook communities like "Israel loves Iran," "Iran loves Israel" and even "Palestine loves Israel."


America: Ban False Flags, Not Guns

The best way to get rid of terrorists and mass shooters is to ban false flags. But very few people are calling for this reasonable solution. Government violence doesn't bother them, it seems. It's much easier to scream at Al Qaeda and the NRA than the CIA, Pentagon, Mossad, and White House.

Instead of looking at the situation logically and with an open mind people are getting hysterical just like they did after the 9/11 false flag. There is now a media inspired witch-hunt against gun owners. They're the new terrorists. Obama is copying Bush's war on terror crusade and applying it to guns and gun owners. And the left loves to hate gun owners because they're white Christians and not brown Muslims which means they're not racists (mainstream liberal pseudo-morality).

I'm not a fan of guns, by the way, but as long as bullies and genocidal mass murderers have power in America it does not make sense to talk about gun control. Gun control would only be a wise idea under new authority and political management. The current totalitarian regime can't be trusted. It has the blood of millions on its hands and has made plans to depopulate 90% of humanity. They're more insane than Adam Lanza. They kill schools of kids in their mass murder operations in the M.E.

I agree with the author of this article, "I Fear the Government and the Obedient Sheeple, More Than I Fear Guns."

Here is my advice: Don't join the stampede against guns. Don't get hysterical. Let the facts speak for themselves.

Apocalyptic Neocons Fear That Hagel As Chief of Pentagon Will Mark End of Israel's Special Status

Apocalyptic neocons are paranoid. They believe their world will end if Chuck Hagel becomes the chief of the Pentagon.

Apocalyptic neoconservatives who aggressively pushed the United States into war in Iraq following the false flag September 11 events are fighting President Obama's nomination of Vietnam veteran and former Senator Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense.

Appointing Hagel as Pentagon chief would be a total renouncement of the neoconservative ideology. Hagel's ascendancy signals the end of Israel's special status in Washington's schizophrenic foreign policy establishment, and sets the stage for the official coming out party of the new world order.

But the foreign policy direction of the United States in a second Obama term is still an open question. The administration is currently stuck in Syria, having unwisely committed itself to backing Islamic extremist groups that have no love for Americans. The situation there could explode beyond control and lead to a wider war in the Middle East. The biggest flashpoint is the Syrian-Turkish border.

Even more importantly, what path is the White House going to take vis-à-vis Iran? There are serious foreign policy experts who believe that an American-Iranian rapprochement is very doable and would both benefit both countries as well as the region as a whole.

Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, two former senior members of the National Security Council, have consistently argued that President Obama should follow in the courageous footsteps of Nixon and establish ties with the regime in Iran. They say the change in policy will be in America's own best interests.

In a recent interview with Scott Horton, Leverett said that he is not optimistic that the Obama administration will take the path of diplomacy. Read quotes from the interview in, "America’s “War Party” and the Myth of Iranian “Irrationality”." Also, read the article, "The Mad Mullah Myth: The Dangers of Misunderstanding Iran’s Strategy."

Will Secretary of Defense Hagel reinforce the "Mad Mullah" myth, or will he break long-standing stereotypes and taboos? Will he take serious steps towards reforming America's image in the Middle East? Would his presence in the Pentagon mean the end of the world for the neocons?

It is hard to predict the future, but based on past actions and statements we can see that Hagel will champion a new pragmatism and rationality in America's policy towards the Middle East.

Unlike most of his former colleagues, Hagel does not have the fear of talking to Islamist groups. He says America should talk to Hamas for Israel's sake and he's right. Mark Perry, an author and former co-director of Conflicts Forum, said the following about Hamas in an interview with Paul Woodward of the website 'War in Context':
Hamas has made its choice. It had to choose between Assad and the Syrian people, and it chose the Syrian people. It had to choose Iran’s money or its own principles, and it chose its principles. It did this long before Qatar came to its aid. This is not the hallmark of a radical group bent on violence and terror. It is the sign of a mature political movement that represents the best interests of the Palestinian people.

We need to recognize what has happened in the Arab world — both within Arab governments as well as inside its most important political movements. The Arab Spring has taken hold, top to bottom, through all of these societies. Hamas’s leadership, to their credit, has responded to these changes by adopting policies in line with the views of the vast majority of their people: for accountability and transparency. This is not a perfect organization led by charm school graduates, but it is capable of making rational and politically mature decisions.
Hamas's pragmatism may expire if America does not put a check on Israel's irrational behaviour. Israel's leaders have not hid their intention to start a catastrophic third world war and carve out a Greater Israel.

Can the United States muster the willpower to say no to the extremist, right-wing government in Israel? If President Obama is courageous enough to nominate Hagel, and defend him during the confirmation process against the haters, then the answer is yes.

The anti-American smear machine that labels American patriots and veterans "anti-Semites" has reached the limits of tolerance. Paul R. Pillar writes in an article called, "Stand Up to the Intimidators":
It is hard to imagine any future issues offering a conspicuously better place to draw a line in the sand and to start pushing back than this one. Based on what has already been said, there is reason to hope that the tawdriness—as James Fallows puts it in an insightful piece on this subject—“has finally gone so far that it will impeach itself.” It impeaches itself with arguments such as that a United States senator or cabinet member putting U.S. interests ahead of the interests of a foreign country or the wishes of a foreign government is somehow a bad thing.
There is a petition on the White House website to nominate Hagel for Secretary of Defense. So far, there are 855 signatures. editor Justin Raimondo writes:
So get over to that White House petition, and bring your friends – because we can’t let those neoconservative Orcs have to the field all to themselves. To heck with the "Emergency Committee for Israel." What we need – and must have – is an Emergency Committee for America.
I'm declaring my support for the Emergency Committee for America and for Chuck Hagel as Pentagon Chief. Here's why. We live in an imperfect world of bad options. This world is so dark and insane that a former Republican senator being appointed to head the Pentagon represents the breakthrough of light and reason. It's gotten that bad and depressing.

I usually don't write pro-U.S. government articles because I would much rather spend my time excavating dark truths and exposing crimes against humanity. Supporting the next potential leader of the Pentagon is not comfortable intellectual territory for me. But if a Secretary of Defense Hagel means the end of the world for the neocons then that's a good enough reason for me to swallow my pride and use my intellect and energy to support Hagel.

You Believe In The End of The World? Whoaaaa That's So Radical Dude

December 20, 2012

The Great Terence McKenna: Final Thoughts On 2012

"John Hazard: We have 14 years until this event, measured on the calendar—and a really common, ordinary way to describe the times that we're living in is that they're very, very chaotic, filled with acts of unspeakable evil, um, and at the same time there's this sort buzz and thrust of optimism: everything from a guy like Peter Swartz talking about the long wave, the big booming economy, breakthroughs in educational levels and qualities of life but it's definitely a dynamic where you've got extremes of good and evil in that way. Would you talk a little bit about the relationship between that dynamic as we go forward and the novelty continues to climax?

Terence McKenna: Well, novelty is not necessarily good or nice. Novelty is complex, that's what it is. So I see, really, a concatenation of tendencies and forces here at the end. It's only going to get weirder. The level of contradiction is going to rise excruciatingly, even beyond the excruciating present levels of contradiction. (laughs) So, I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder, and weirder, and finally it's going to be so weird that people are going to have to talk about how weird it is. And at that point novelty theory can come out of the woods, ah, because eventually people are going to say, “What the hell is going on?” It's just too nuts, it's not enough to say it's nuts, you have to explain why it's so nuts. So, between now and 2012, the next 14 years, I look for: the invention of artificial life, the cloning of human beings, possible contact with extraterrestrials, possible human immortality, and at the same time, appalling acts of brutality, genocide, race baiting, homophobia, famine, starvation; because the systems which are in place to keep the world sane are utterly inadequate to the forces that have been unleashed. The collapse of the socialist world, the rise of the internet. These are changes so immense nobody could imagine them ever happening, and now that they have happened nobody even bothers to mention what a big deal it is. Ah, the fact that there is no such thing as the Soviet Union, people never talk about it anymore—but when I was a kid the notion that that would ever change was beyond conceiving. Ah, so the good news is, that as primates we are incredibly adaptable to change. Put us in the desert, we survive, put us the jungle, we survive, under Hitler we survive, under Nixon we survive. We can put up with about anything and it's a good thing because we are going to be tested to the limits. The breakdown of anything—and this is why the rightwing is so alarmed—because what they see going on is the breakdown of all tradition, all order, all sanctioned norms of behaviour. And they're quite right that it's happening, but they're quite wrong to conclude that it should be resisted or is somehow evil. The mushroom said to me once, it said: “This is what it's like when a species prepares to depart for the stars.” You don't depart for the stars under calm and orderly conditions; it's a fire in a madhouse, and that's what we have, the fire in the madhouse at the end of time. This is what it's like when a species prepares to move on to the next dimension. The entire destiny of all life on the planet is tied up in this; we are not acting for ourselves, or from ourselves; we happen to be the point species on a transformation that will affect every living organism on this planet at its conclusion." Source: Terence McKenna's Final Earthbound Interview.

The Ayatollah-In-Chief: Obama Plays Role of Wise Priest In Aftermath of Sandy Hook False Flag

"All the world’s religions — so many of them represented here today — start with a simple question:  Why are we here?  What gives our life meaning?  What gives our acts purpose?  We know our time on this Earth is fleeting.  We know that we will each have our share of pleasure and pain; that even after we chase after some earthly goal, whether it’s wealth or power or fame, or just simple comfort, we will, in some fashion, fall short of what we had hoped.  We know that no matter how good our intentions, we will all stumble sometimes, in some way.  We will make mistakes, we will experience hardships.  And even when we’re trying to do the right thing, we know that much of our time will be spent groping through the darkness, so often unable to discern God’s heavenly plans." - Ayatollah-in-Chief Barack Obama, "Transcript: Obama's Speech at Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil."
At the Sandy Hook interfaith prayer vigil for victims of the mass shooting in Newtown, Ayatollah Obama spoke about the failure to "discern God's heavenly plans." What does God have to do with a mass shooting? Why does a secular president talk like a priest after every national tragedy? The only obvious reason why is that the president is not a secular figure but a religious one. And since the state religion of America is not Christianity then what is it?

Tyranny of Talking Heads: The Establishment Media Declares War On Quiet Introverts

All the evidence points to the reality that the tragic mass shooting in Newtown was a black op and magic ritual, which begs the question: Why is the patsy being described as quiet, lonely, shy, and depressed? Is there a reason?

What is it about these personality characteristics and psychological traits that the establishment hates? Do the talking heads in the media have something against quiet and shy people? Why hype these characteristics of the patsy?

Do they want to demonize quiet youth? Do they want every young person to be a crazy party animal?

Maybe I'm exaggerating, but I think the establishment talking heads are waging a psychological war on quiet, shy, and lonely people by connecting these attributes to an evil mass shooter. Do they mean to imply that all killers are quiet types and that society should fear people who take their own path in life?

In my opinion, media talking heads pose a greater threat to civilized society than quiet loners. Look at the trash that comes out the mouths of corporate news anchors every day. They spread hate and fear, lie to their brain dead viewers, and cover up the crimes of the powerful.

Quiet people have done more to improve society, help people, and advance civilization than loud mouth know-it-alls who really don't know anything. So why is there stigmatization against people who don't follow trends but rather choose to take different paths?

Every prophet was a hermit at some point in his path to spiritual growth. Every saint has faced the crisis of loneliness. But in this culture, quietness and loneliness are the marks of a crazy killer, not a holy man. And that is a shame.

The Two Dumbest Animals In The Human Kingdom

The two dumbest animals in the human kingdom are Christian Zionists and Sunni Jihadist terrorists. 

In a recent interview on Tunisian TV, a Jihadist from Tunisia said he regrets fighting in Syria and that he and his pals were treated like cannon fodder by his commanders in a cause without righteousness. 

The problem is they listened to their imams. And Christian Zionists have the same problem. They've been brainwashed by mega church preachers and fake Christian broadcasters.

December 19, 2012

Sandy Hook Script - Robbie Parker: Grieving Father, or Horrible Actor?

This looks like a staged shooting more and more. This is sick stuff. President Obama was caught fake crying, and now a video surfaced that shows an actor pretending to be a grieving father.

He laughs and smiles before he gets into character. When the cameras go live he quickly forces himself into a new personality. He goes from an upbeat mood to a state of grief in a split second. He does so in such an unnatural manner that it is obvious to all who watch the video that this guy is an actor and not a grieving father. And this is all caught on camera. This is 100 percent perception management. Go here to read the definition of mass perception management.

If you remember, there were actors on the streets of New York near Ground Zero when September 11 happened who were interviewed by television crews saying things that they couldn't have known unless they were informed to say it. They were reading off of a government-provided script. The same thing is happening with this staged shooting in Newtown.

Father of Sandy Hook Victim Asks ‘Read the Card?’ Seconds Before Tear-jerking Press Conference
December 19, 2012

As unexplained factors in the tragic Sandy Hook school shooting continue to surface, independent researchers have pointed to an odd clip where Robbie Parker, father of slain 6-year-old Emilie Parker, asks if he should read off of a card, and is told that he should, during a press conference that took place the day after Friday’s shooting.

The Huffington Post described Parker’s heartfelt statement as “fighting back tears and struggling to catch his breath,” though he can be seen cracking a smile and brief laugh just before approaching the microphone. The full press conference can be viewed here.

Continued. . . 
Robbie Parker Fake Actor Sandy Hook Shooting

Zero Guns: Washington's New Big Threat Is Gun-Qaeda

Washington has changed its enemy from a tactic to a tool.

Terror is a tactic. It was the old enemy. Al-Qaeda is a dying external threat. With the death of Bin Laden it became a faceless menace. Internal dissent is the new enemy. The gun is the big threat now.

Gun-Qaeda is the new Al-Qaeda.

The pro-Obama Left is happy to hunt down Gun-Qaeda at home. Gun-rights groups like the NRA are being labeled "terrorists." You know what's next, right? Illegal detention of gun owners aka "domestic terrorists." The government will use guns against gun owners, and with that action they will reveal that their gun control agenda has nothing to do with stopping gun violence but with politics, worldview, and philosophy.

The brainwashed Democratic Left, which supports the indefinite detention provisions in the NDAA, has no problem with the authoritarian globalist government in Washington locking up American dissidents for rebelling against unconstitutional government orders. They only support armed-rebels in foreign countries.

A decade from now, CIA-Hollywood will make an Oscar-nominated film called "Zero Guns," about the Great Gun Purge in America.

Reality Check: Are calls for stricter gun laws really about guns

Shocking Denial Of Reality: Sen. McCain Says, "I know of no Jewish lobby"

A man can make a fool of himself in more ways than one.

An excerpt from, "McCain hits Hagel over 'Jewish lobby' comments":
Sen. John McCain said Tuesday he “strongly disagrees” with past remarks made by former Sen. Chuck Hagel, but that he would wait until potential confirmation hearings before taking a position on whether to vote for Hagel if he were nominated to become secretary of Defense.

“Well, of course I strongly disagree with such comments and I know of no such ‘Jewish lobby.’ I know that there’s strong support for Israel here, but I know of no Jewish lobby. I hope he would identify who that is,” McCain told reporters.

Syria's Jihadist Terrorists - Shining White Knights?

It's a bird. . It's a plane. . No, It's a Jihadist terrorist saving an American journalist.

The need for a good story about the Jihadist terrorists who are fighting the Assad government has been evident for quite some time.

Videos coming out of Syria show the terrorists beheading pro-government civilians, executing prisoners, instructing child soldiers to commit murder, burning houses of worship, looting abandoned homes, destroying state infrastructure like police stations, etc. The content has been overwhelmingly negative.

But lo and behold, we finally have a good story about this band of devils.

Mainstream news articles, such as this one from called, "Islamic Extremists Rescue NBC Reporter Held in Syria," portray the Jihadist terrorists as shining white knights who saved NBC correspondent Richard Engel and others who were taken captive by a pro-Assad militia.

But there are holes in the story. The writer of Moon of Alabama wrote an article called, "Another Indication That Richard Engel's Kidnapping Story Stinks." An excerpt:
Richard Engel of NBC News had been kidnapped in Syria and was somehow rescued by some FSA terrorist gang. He claims about his kidnappers:
"They were talking openly about their loyalty to the government," said Engel. "This was … the Shabiha. This is a government militia. These are people who are loyal to President Bashar Assad."
Professor As'ad AbuKhalil, the Angry Arab, has reason to not believe that story and has indications that these were not Assad loyalists but FSA insurgents playing the role of Assad loyalists for a fake media stunt.

There is now new evidence that this was indeed a fake event and that, whatever Richard Engel may believe, he and the people with him (which included one ever unnamed "British engineer" who is more likely some special operations guy) were not in the hands of Shabiha but in the hand of well known experienced video fakers.
The Angry Arab says this was a propaganda ploy by the FSA gang, writing in a post called, "The adventures of Richard Engel":
Let me go on the record and state: this story is as believable to me as the story of Christopher Hitchens when he ran into Abu Nidal at a street cafe in Baghdad. 
In another post, the Angry Arab wrote:
So according to the story that is being circulated by Western media: Engel was kidnapped by Shabbihah, but his captors were not even `Alawites but Shi`ites. And those Shi`ites (unlike the sectarian gangs of the FSA who are at pains to disguise their sectarianism) while they were moving their hostages regularly, they insisted on shooting a video of their hostages with freshly painted Shi`ite sectarian slogans on the wall because they are at pains to showcase their sectarianism. Oh, and they were roaming freelly in the stronghold area of the Free Syrian Army right next to the Turkish border, where Engel and his crew were kidnapped. When I read this the story of Christopher Hitchens' encounter with Abu Nidal at a Baghdad cafe becomes more believable.
This story does appear to be a fairy tale. Somehow, the thought that known terrorists, who openly express their hatred for "infidels" from the West and are mad at the U.S. government for labeling Al Nusra Front a terrorist group, would risk their lives to save kidnapped infidels just doesn't make much sense.

The people that kidnap foreign journalists in Syria are affiliated with the FSA and Al-Qaeda linked groups.

Sandy Hook Father Remembers Fallen Hero

I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Barry

"Oddly, Walt’s endorsement of the Hagel nomination is proof enough for Bill Kristol and his band of neoconservative Orcs that Hagel is the second coming of Adolf Hitler — but never mind. Trying to discern an internal consistency in the hysterical ululations of this crowd is like searching for meaning in the squeals and squawks of chickens in the barnyard: it’s just a lot of noise, signifying nothing." - Justin Raimondo, "The Paranoid Style of the Israel Lobby."

"In Washington today, Hagel’s views are mostly associated with those of Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Hagel calls himself a “principled realist.” He remains skeptical of American attempts to foster democracy through unilateral intervention. He calls for the United States to create a “new world order” by reforming and reshaping international organizations to take account of the rise of countries like China, India, and Brazil. He wants the United States to understand the limits of its power to unilaterally effect events, whether in Syria or Iran. He backed the Obama administration’s decisions to leave Iraq and to withdraw from Afghanistan in 2014. He has energetically backed the “peace process” and a two-state solution in Israel and Palestine." - John B. Judis, "Don't Let Chuck Hagel's Hardline Israel Critics Sink His Nomination."
Vietnam veteran and former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, a politician with an independent streak who values diplomacy and international cooperation, has been picked by President Obama to lead the Pentagon. This is a cause for celebration.

Any political leader in Washington that has made enemies out of Neocons is definitely one of the good guys. It takes guts to stand up to these bullies who exploit the collective trauma of the Jewish people to justify the criminal and counter-productive policies of the current Israeli government.

The neocons are going ballistic about Hagel's nomination, knowing that their dream of starting a world war against the forces of radical Islam will end in ashes if sanity is restored in the Pentagon. But they are firing blanks in their repulsive attacks on Hagel. People who resort to name-calling to win arguments have reached the end of the line.

The biggest complaint neocons have of Hagel is that he had the audacity to tell the truth about the power and behaviour of the Israel Lobby. In 2008, Hagel said, "The Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people up here."

Hagel is far from alone in his description of the Israel Lobby. AIPAC is usually picked out as the most anti-American lobby in Washington. It spies on U.S. officials and politicians. Anybody that defends AIPAC is by definition a traitor against America. In September, the fierce truth-teller MJ Rosenberg tweeted, "Neocons are traitors."

Why else do the Neocons hate Hagel? He thinks it is smarter to talk to a nation rather than annihilating it. What a radical thought.

Neocons think that talking to the other side is what weak men and nations do. But psychologists and true warriors disagree. As Dutch-American psychoanalyst Joost A. M. Meerloo wrote in his book, Conversation and Communication, "Let us talk now, so that we do not become mad animals!"

There is nothing weak about engaging in diplomacy. It takes great psychological strength and inner spiritual maturity to listen to the other side's perspective as opposed to rigidly remaining in your truth-proof fortress and constantly assuming the worst of the other.

Reuel L. Howe, a professor of pastoral theology at Philadelphia Divinity School and the Protestant Episcopal Theological Seminary in Virginia, explained the value and importance of dialogue in his book, "The Miracle of Dialogue." Howe wrote:
"Indeed, the human race stands in danger of being destroyed, because of the deliberate effort of parties and nations to advance their own case by falsifying the aims and character of their opponents. With this frequently goes an ignoring of one's own sin and responsibility, a representation of the self as being better than it is, and a sense of injury at the hands of the other, as if the fiction created about them was true. The abuse of dialogue has gone on so long that politicians find it difficult to break out of their monological fantasies and move toward a dialogical meeting. What is needed is the coming together of men of conviction from their respective camps who are willing to talk honestly with one another in the face of mutual criticism and loyalty to their own views. If these men would speak with one another not as pawns on a chessboard but as themselves in the sanctuary of truth, the sphere of public life would be transformed by the miracle of dialogue." [Howe, R. L. "The Miracle of Dialogue." From the 1967 book, "The Human Dialogue: Perspectives on Communication," edited by Floyd W. Matson and Ashley Montagu. Pg. 152-153.]
Taking the course of diplomacy over war is more important than ever. President Obama's decision to nominate Hagel for Secretary of Defense is a sign that the Pentagon is getting the insanity of the neocons totally out of its system.

December 18, 2012

The Illuminati Rises: Enlightened Initiators of Change Practice Human Sacrifice To Mobilize Public Opinion For Gun Control

The Illuminati Rises: Are They Enlightened Initiators of Change or Devil-Worshipping Authoritarians? You Be The Judge. 

Masters of enlightenment point to their ritual work in art and architecture. Those who have eyes to see and believe that there is a conspiracy at work are dismissed as crazy conspiracy theorists. But while the conspiracy is real, some argue that the nature of the conspiracy is not known.

Although there are no confessions from the conspirators, who value secrecy and silence to fulfill the master plan, they speak symbolically through films, music videos, public buildings, and the artifice of human culture.

The critically acclaimed film Zero Dark Thirty is one among many Illuminati films that manipulate the public with propaganda. After watching the film, the hypnotized public is even more apt to believe the artificial story about Osama Bin Laden's death because images are more powerful than facts.

Manipulating and guiding the public psyche is what the Illuminati is all about. The summer blockbuster The Dark Knight Rises, the much anticipated sequel to 2008's The Dark Knight, has affected the popular consciousness in more ways than one. In some unsettling scenes, the film makes direct references to the mass shootings in Aurora, Colorado, and Newtown, Connecticut, suggesting foreknowledge. For more information, check out this, this, and this.

On the surface, these mass shootings appear to be random acts of senseless violence committed by crazy, lonely, and depressed young men. But there is more going on here. They are in fact rituals that are done by the Illuminati-controlled deep state to ignite public opinion against guns. The false flag September 11 events was also a magic ritual, which was done to mobilize public opinion in the United States against Arabs, Muslims, and Terrorists.

II. The Art of Necessary Evil
"There are several circumstances in which good leaders are likely to have to enter into evil: whenever the very existence of the nation is threatened; when the state is first created or revolutionary change is to be accomplished." - Political theorist Michael Ledeen, from his book, "Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli’s Iron Rules Are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago." [Source].
"John Daggett: What are you?
Bane: I'm Gotham's reckoning. Here to end the borrowed time you've all been living on!
John Daggett: You're pure evil!
Bane: I'm necessary evil!" -  IMDb, The Dark Knight Rises (2012).
The heated gun control debate in America has existed for what seems like generations, but nothing ever gets done. Both sides are ideologically and politically wedded to their opinions and refuse to budge. This is an unsustainable situation.

Enter the Illuminati-controlled deep state. They shine in these types of situations. They practice the art of necessary evil. In this case, they staged a massacre involving little children in a town that could be anywhere in America.

Such an event can transform public opinion and move the gun control debate forward. It can also be exploited to shame anti-gun control proponents, along with a variety of other people that the deep state doesn't want around such as preppers. Preppers are being demonized because when catastrophes arrive the Illuminati-deep state wants people to die rather than survive. They hate anyone who escapes their death traps.

III. Don't Fall For Misdirections 

The availability of guns is really a side issue in this cultural and political debate. It is really about political power and differences in the philosophy of government. The rulers of America hate the Bill of Rights. They believe citizens must obey the government and follow orders like sheep. A gun is a symbol of independence, so it must be taken away.

20th century history showed that government gun-grabbers are genocidal mass murderers. To fully achieve their political, cultural, and religious revolution, totalitarian revolutionaries have to disarm the population. And this is what is happening in America.

People who have the facts about gun control know that gun-free areas are more prone to crime and violence. They recognize the basic truth that guns are not bad in and of themselves. The most disastrous situation is when bad men with guns take advantage of the helplessness of good men without them.

What's get forgotten by the mindless pro-gun control crowd is that evil people will get their hands on guns regardless of their legal status. Also, an evil government with a monopoly of force is infinitely more dangerous to society than asocial whackos with guns and drugs.

If the totalitarian gun-grabbers really cared about stopping gun violence then they would address the roots, which are poverty, lack of education, social chaos, the failed Drug War, and the mass use of psychotropic drugs.

Moreover, in the intellectual chaos surrounding this latest mass shooting ritual, numerous theories have emerged from various sites that connect the shooter's father to the Libor scandal. But in the opinion of many informed though skeptical people, the fraud-plagued financial industry is not connected to these suspicious mass shootings. This is a clever misdirection that serves to take hard-working researchers down a blind alley.

As Susanne Posel writes in the article, "No Viable Connection Between Peter Lanza & US Senate LIBOR Hearings":
"And while alternative media is spinning their wheels on disinformation and unsubstantiated allegations between Lanza and LIBOR, the Obama administration is setting the stage and implementing the necessary legislation to finally destroy our Constitutional right to bear arms and protect ourselves from this tyrannical government."
As information-hungry researchers in a chaotic global alternative media, taking our eye off of the trail is tempting but we must focus on the facts and inform the public about the documented history of false flags by the deep state.

Whenever politicians in Washington want to pass new controversial and radical laws that transforms American society they turn to the false flag trick to mobilize public opinion. The Illuminati-deep state did 9/11 before ramming the Patriot Act down the American public's throat. And the evidence suggests that the same conspirators committed the massacre in Newtown to steamroll public opinion and pass revolutionary gun control legislation.

Video: FSA Scum Kidnap Richard Engel & Other Journalists

Update: The journalists have been released.

FSA terrorists posing as a pro-government Shiite militia kidnap NBC correspondent Richard Engel and other journalists. For more on this story, read the Angry Arab's post, "On the captors of Richard Engel: the plot thickens." He writes:
I looked at the video and it is so clearly a set up and the slogans are so clearly fake and they intend to show that they were clearly Shi`ites and that they are savages.  If this one is believable, I am posing as a dentist.

PPPS Of course, I am not saying that Engel was on this plot.  I think that they were really kidnapped but that the kidnappers of the Free Syrian Army typically lied to them about their identity, which has happened before.  

Obama Shed More Tears After Winning Election Than After Shooting Tragedy

Obama cries in front of his followers after beating Mitt Romney. Tears are pouring out like a waterfall.

Obama can barely force a tear out after the shooting tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut.

Conclusion: Obama cares more about winning an election than innocent dead children falling victim to a madman. Proof: pictures speak louder than words.

Two Takes On The Gun Control Debate

I don't agree with total gun confiscation, which is the White House's plan, but it's important to understand where the gun controllers are coming from and what kind of vision they have for the future of America.

Here are two takes on the gun control debate.

Young Turks: Gun Massacre Forces Change in Australia, Why Not in the U.S.?

StormCloudsGathering - Connecticut Shootings What No One Dares Say

The Israel Lobby Wants To Disarm Their Patrons, The American People

Alex Jones speaks about the growing calls for gun control coming from the morally bankrupt mainstream media and people connected to the Israel Lobby like Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Go to the 21:45 mark in this video.

The Neocon, Neoliberal, and Zionist terrorists want Americans to arm Israel and the Syrian rebels,  but they are calling for the disarming of Americans in their own home. Hypocrisy? Yep.

Why are they afraid of the American people? What are they afraid of?

Preppers in Obama's Crosshairs

They don't want people to prepare for catastrophes. That is the government's job. They want people to die.

Syrian "Rebels" Are Retards, Mentally Defective Deviants

40 Syrian "rebels" accidentally blew themselves up in a car bombing gone horribly wrong. It's more than okay to laugh.

What are these "rebels" rebelling against, exactly? Intelligence?

LOL @ the fact that the CIA is depending on these half-baked idiots to topple Assad. Good luck.

Maybe they should pick and train guys who can tie their own shoelaces. Just a suggestion. Drugged out retards do not make the best fighters.

Then again, the CIA knows exactly what kind of guys it wants to create chaos in Syria: clueless terrorists, not serious and mentally capable fighters.

An excerpt from the article, "Report: 40 Rebels Killed in Failed Aleppo Car Bombing":
Car bombings causing massive casualties are common enough in the ongoing Syrian Civil War. Today’s incident in Aleppo’s Bustan al-Qaser neighborhood, however, is something entirely different.

That’s because this time, at least according to reports, the unnamed rebel faction rigging the car with explosives accidentally detonated it before it was set up, killing an estimated 40 fighters loyal to the faction.

Rebels have been claiming major gains in Aleppo in recent days and are predicting they will soon take over the city. They have been predicting imminent victory for months, however.

December 17, 2012

Creepy Illuminati Message in Batman Movie Hints at Sandy Hook School

The Illuminati are basically putting their messages on giant billboards called blockbuster films. Are they psychopathic? Sick? Enlightened? What? Why do they make references to occult sacrifice rituals in movies beforehand? They did the same thing with 9/11. Do they find enjoyment by doing this? Do they want to wake people up and make them aware of what's coming? If you have an answer, please let me know through email. Thanks.

Background: The Dark Knight Rises Prophesied Sandy Hook Shooting.

Alex Jones - Creepy Illuminati Message in Batman Movie Hints at Sandy Hook School

Constitutional Vote Polarizes Egypt

Egyptians are engaged in a lively and interesting debate about the direction of their politics and the future of their country. You get a glimpse of it in the video below.

Video: Constitutional Vote Polarizes Egypt. Source: The Real News.

The Dark Knight Rises Prophesied Sandy Hook Shooting

Check out the article, "Sandy Hook Reference In Batman: Dark Knight Rises Movie," and blow up the following pictures.



The name of the school where the recent mass shooting took place is called Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The hurricane in New York was called Sandy for a reason.

These are not coincidences. The filmmakers behind The Dark Knight Rises deliberately had the actor point to "Sandy Hook" on the map. This is beyond spooky and disturbing.

Also, at the 1:05:44 mark in the film, Bruce Wayne/Batman tells the Robin character named Blake while in the car, "You know what? Drop me in Old Town." Go here for the source. This line is a direct reference to the name of the town that was the victim of the latest mass shooting, Newtown.

I was denying to myself that this shooting was staged by the deep state and the Illuminati just like the last one in the movie theatre in Colorado. But not anymore. It's impossible to deny now. These are huge red flags. The filmmakers of The Dark Knight Rises must answer why they dropped these hints in their film. Is this a sick game their playing with the public? Are they dropping hints to themselves?

I will write a more in-depth article about this disturbing new information tomorrow and connect it to my previous articles about the shooting in Colorado and the patsy James Eagan Holmes. Read them below:

The Deep State Rises: End of The Lone Gunman Legend.
Murder Under Hypnosis: The James Holmes Story Takes A Familiar Turn.
The Shadow Patsy Rises Again: How Mind Control Is Connected To Gun Control.
A Deeper Look At "The Dark Knight Rises" Shooting: A CIA Black Op? 
Dark Rites: Mass Shootings As Rituals That Trigger Calls For Gun Control.
The Long Night of Deep State Terror And The Rise of The Total Security State.

Spread this post far and wide. Inform the public.

Update, December 19. Check out: "The Illuminati Rises: Enlightened Initiators of Change Practice Human Sacrifice To Mobilize Public Opinion For Gun Control."

To Prevent Negative Thoughts Among Depressed Loners, Heroic Legislators Propose Radical Thought Control Legislation

"I want to mention, but only very briefly, a closely related aspect of this awful business. Stories have already appeared depicting Adam Lanza in the terms typically employed in the wake of such tragedies: he was a "loner," he was "painfully shy and awkward" (the Daily Mail); he was generally weird, and he "seemed not to feel physical or psychological pain in the same way as classmates" (Yahoo News). And of course, the New York Times will never permit itself to be outdone on this score. The NYT leads with the obviously terrifying and ominous fact that Lanza "carried a black briefcase to his 10th-grade honors English class" (!!), goes on to note that he was "nervous and fidgety" -- and offers what is apparently damning in the extreme: "[His former classmates] said he always seemed like he was someone who was capable of that because he just didn’t really connect with our high school, and didn’t really connect with our town.” And all the stories include the general catchall "explanation": he was "mentally ill" in some form.

You may think all of that is unexceptional in this case -- but I point you to another NYT story from over two years ago. That story described another "loner" in remarkably similar ways -- but the subject of the earlier story was Bradley Manning.

Now, that's more than slightly interesting, wouldn't you agree? I have a great deal to say about it, and it will have to wait for a separate article. But the fact that a murderer and someone who sought to expose the monumental crimes of the United States government are portrayed in largely identical ways is a powerful indication of how profoundly diseased this culture is." - Arthur Silber.

This article is "fiction."

In response to the horrible tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut, lawmakers are proposing aggressive gun control laws to stop the epidemic of mass shootings. This latest mass shooting has focused national attention on the controversial issue of gun control and could serve as an impetus for much-needed legal action to prevent further tragedies.

In addition to instituting a new gun control regime in the United States, some more radical lawmakers are saying that the country needs to set up a national agency dedicated to thought control.

The new agency would have many responsibilities such as tracking down emotionally withdrawn students from a young age and prescribing them psychotropic medications to help them deal with their mental and emotional problems. It is known that the shooter responsible for the Newtown massacre had mental issues and was very distant from society.

The most outspoken proponents of the new thought control legislation are psychologists, doctors, and people connected with the mental health profession. They argue that preventative action in the areas of mental health and childhood development would help create a more cohesive society in which young people are not so isolated that they are willing to kill children as a way to vent their ill feelings towards the world.

The thought control administrators won't only target students and children for thought training and emotional development, but also unemployed people, seniors, and young males. Its main task is to manage the emotions and thoughts of people so that they are not radicalized and estranged from their fellow citizens.

"In these tough economic times we need people to think happy thoughts," said one lawmaker who asked not be identified. "We have to try these new revolutionary solutions, even if the actions taken by the government goes against the will of individuals. There is no ill will on our part. We just want people to have positive thoughts even as they see the collapse of the world economy around them plus all the daily horrors of existence." he added.

Critics of the new law charge the thought control administrators of using brainwashing methods to remake American society. They say that they are using dangerous pharmaceutical drugs to both stigmatize and medicate individuals who wish not to be coerced into living in this new collectivist society.

"They are killing the human spirit by treating everyone as automaton robots with no souls. The thought control advocates deem anyone who has a different thought that deviates from mainstream opinion to be weird and paranoid. Such description of a difference of opinion is a dangerous step to a full-blown totalitarian society," said an opponent of the new law.

The steps towards constructing a thought control regime have already been taken by public officials and psychological professionals. Children as young as six are given drugs by doctors on the payroll of pharmaceutical companies, which are oddly enough the same drugs that were found in the possession of the twenty year old shooter in Newtown. These drugs are known to cause "psychosis, illness, and death."

The reaction to the new thought control legislation in the media has been overwhelming positive because it emphasizes their role. Under the new law, the mainstream media would be given new responsibilities and a new name, the "Truth Prevention Unit." Lawmakers say that the media has a responsibility to the public in its presentation of reality and its outlook on the near future.

A psychologist involved in producing the legislation said in a conversation with reporters, "We can't have people panicking and reaching for their guns in response to every disaster. We must tackle these complex cultural and social problems at their roots, which are in the mind. The mind organizes reality according to the information it receives. If we can control the information that reaches people then we can better prevent anti-social thoughts and behaviour, especially among young isolated individuals. Also, the media has a thought-shaping power that is undeniable so it has a great responsibility. We are asking media professionals to use their power to prevent the truth about the collapse of the economy and its causes from getting out to the public, as well as the truth about many other issues that will raise damaging questions about government policies and the future of our society."

According to this view, the truth is a disease that must be contained, so, naturally, people who tell the truth and report the facts are considered mentally ill. The implications for a democratic society are thought-provoking. America and the West as a whole prides itself on being different from totalitarian countries like China, where people are fed government-controlled information every day. But the differences are only in appearance.

This author encourages the citizens of the United States and other Western countries to raise public awareness about thought control and the use of classical brainwashing methods by public officials, psychologists, and media professionals.

Neocons Go After Hagel With An Outdated Smear Campaign

Here is more proof that Neocons are delusional and crazy. They think it's still 2003 and that they can smear veterans like Chuck Hagel, who is said to be the next Secretary of Defense.

Read: ‘We will make sure every American knows he is an anti-Semite’ — anonymous neocon threat to Hagel.

These Neocon Zionists have totally lost it. Their smear campaigns are outdated and repulsive. They see everything through the prism of race and ideology rather than logic and facts. If you criticize their policies and views they call you an anti-Semite as if this term has any relevance in the current U.S. foreign policy debate. These idiotic ideologues think that anti-Semites are hiding under every bed in the United States. They need a reality check.

Political conditions have changed. The climate of opinion about the U.S. role in the Middle East and its unconditional support for the extremist government in Israel has changed. But rather than face up to this reality neocons are acting out like little children and screaming "anti-Semite" at their critics. They can't persuade people why they're right so they're shutting down the debate by bullying people into silence. But this isn't working. They have lost the debate.

Justin Raimondo writes in his article, "Chuck Hagel: An Unconventional Realist":
The knives are out:  

“Send us Hagel and we will make sure every American knows he is an anti-Semite.”

That’s what a top Republican Senate aide told the Weekly Standard in response to the news that President Obama is likely to nominate former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel as his new Secretary of Defense. Normally, the Israel lobby would try to hide such viciousness, acting behind the scenes to go after their perceived enemies in ways that might repel bystanders: not this time, however.

It’s an indication of their diminished stature and power that they are openly going in for the kill, perhaps hoping they can pull a Bobby Ray Inman. Inman, you’ll recall, took himself out of the running for SecDef during the Clinton administration when Bill Safire, then Likudnik-in-chief among newspaper columnists, went after the respected former admiral and intelligence maven because he had sought to limit our sharing of intelligence with Israel. No sooner had the Inman appointment been announced then it was suddenly discovered he had failed to pay Social Security taxes to a baby sitter, among other “crimes.” Hagel, however, is made of tougher stuff, so it will have to be the President who blinks.

Why the hate directed at Hagel? Bill Kristol, the neocons’ little Lenin, has provided us with a handy list of reasons, all of which involve Hagel’s adamant refusal to take his marching orders from Tel Aviv.

Yann Martel On The Illustrated Version Of Life Of Pi

YouTube video description [Channel - AllanGregg]:
Canada's Yann Martel shot to international fame with his novel "Life of Pi". He won the prestigious Booker Prize and his novel went on to sell six-million copies worldwide and a movie version was made with director Ang Lee. Now Martel has come out with a special illustrated edition of "Life of Pi". Originally aired February 2008.

The Syrian-Turkish Border Is A Flashpoint For WWIII

There are many regional flashpoints in the Middle East, but military experts believe that the Syrian-Turkish border is the most volatile. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said in November that, "The militarization of the Syrian-Turkish border is a dismal signal."

At the moment, there is a low-level conflict on the Syrian-Turkish border. There have been clashes throughout the past year, often times stoked by the FSA, the NATO-backed Jihadist insurgency that is fighting Assad.

But if the United States government has anything to say about it this conflict will get much larger. Washington has deployed Patriot missiles and soldiers to the Turkish border to send a message to Syria that it is serious about its threat to overthrow its regime.

On the risk of a wider war on the Syrian-Turkish border:
"The risk is heightening almost by the day. What we see happening is an increased militarization certainly of the conflict between Syria and Turkey." - Hillary Mann Leverett on Al Jazeera, unknown air date. Clip is below.
Video: Tensions between Syria and Turkey 'increasingly militarised'

December 16, 2012

567 Grams: Avicenna's Floating Man Argument And The Newtown Massacre

Abraham Lincoln believed in life after death, possessed psychic abilities, and famously dreamed about his own demise shortly before it happened. He is not alone. Philosophers, mystics, poets, and prophets all speak about the eternal life of the soul and the existence of a world beyond this one. 

Read this excerpt from Tai Carmen's article, "The Human Soul and The Floating Man":
"The 11th century Persian philosopher Avicenna devised The Floating Man thought experiment to demonstrate human self-awareness and the substantiality of the soul: he directed readers to imagine themselves suspended in mid air, isolated from all sensation. One would still have self-awareness in this scenario, he argues, and thus concludes that the idea of the soul is not logically dependent on any physical thing.

"In 1907, the ambitious Dr. Duncan Macdougall undertook an experiment designed to prove the existence of the soul, weighing patients before and after death. His results (though never replicated, and held in debate due to their anecdotal nature,) indicated that moments after death the patient lost a relatively consistent amount of weight. From his research Dr. Macdougall concluded that generally the human soul weighs around 21 grams."
I don't know grief because I have never lost someone close to me, but I have relied on my faith in God at certain points in my life. It is very important to have a connection to your spiritual side in these dark times.

Although I dislike the politicization of personal trauma and collective tragedy by self-interested politicians and their paymasters I still tuned into CNN tonight and I was moved while watching the interfaith vigil. It revealed what America is all about: a country with spiritual genius that respects diverse faiths and all of the world's religions. It is a remarkable thing.

Discounting the shooter, 27 souls perished in the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, including 20 children. On Sunday night, President Barack Obama said:
"God has called them all home. For those of us who remain, let us find the strength to carry on and make our country worthy of their memory."
Obama's words were powerful. It looked like he had the weight of the world on his shoulders when he walked into the room and took a seat. This guy might be a human after all (I still have my doubts).

Obama vaguely called for change in his remarks. But what does he mean by change? What kind of change? Who will it profit? How will it be brought about - by law, by popular consent, or by state violence? And how long will it take? These questions are still up in the air.

It is still very disturbing that the media doesn't talk about Obama's past. Obama's documented ties to the CIA are well known on the Internet, though. It is hard to trust a leader who is so secretive and vague about what he wants, and who hides his records from the public. What is he hiding? And what does he want to change? He should speak fearlessly about his vision for America or else people will read bad intentions into him (and they might be right about their judgment). 


To learn more about Avicenna's Floating Man argument, listen to the short clip below. YouTube video description [Channel - Gottfried Leibniz]:
Peter Adamson explains the thought experiment of Avicenna known as the 'floating man.'

An Insane Age: When Patriotism Attracts The Charge of Insanity

An excerpt from, "Attainted: The Life and Afterlife of Ezra Pound in Italy," by Luciano Mangiafico.
Defense counsel Cornell, who had first met Pound on November 20, had an easy time with his insanity defense. The four psychiatrists had come back to the judge with a unanimous report calling Pound delusional. The prosecutor, Isaiah Matlack, next moved for a public “insanity hearing” before a jury. The hearing was held on February 13, 1946, and the jury heard from Dr. Winfred Overholser, a psychiatric authority, who summed up:
"[Pound] shows a remarkable grandiosity … believes he has been designated to save the Constitution of the United States for the people of the United States … has a feeling that he has the key to the peace of the world through the writings of Confucius … believes that with himself as a leader a group of intellectuals could work for world order …mentally unfit to advise properly with counsel or to participate reasonably and intelligently in his own defense. He is, in other words, insane.
Dr. Winfred Overholser's Wikipedia: "1892 – October 6, 1964, was a U.S. psychiatrist, president of the American Psychiatric Association, and for 25 years the superintendent of St. Elizabeths Hospital, a federal institution for the mentally ill in Washington, D.C."

Today, the mentally ill in Washington D.C. are housed in Congress.

Manly P. Hall - Turn off the TV

"They put an off button on the TV for a reason. Turn it off . . . I really don't watch much TV." -- President George W. Bush, C-SPAN interview, January 2005. Wise words. Did the "W" stand for wise?

Manly P. Hall - Turn off the TV

Patrick Cockburn: There Is A "False And Propagandistic Account of Events In Syria"

An excerpt from Patrick Cockburn's article, "Syria: The descent into Holy War":
This misperception of the reality on the ground in Syria is fuelled in part by propaganda, but more especially by inaccurate and misleading reporting by the media where bias towards the rebels and against the government is unsurpassed since the height of the Cold War. Exaggerated notions are given of rebel strength and popularity. The Syrian government is partially responsible for this. By excluding all but a few foreign journalists, the regime has created a vacuum of information that is naturally filled by its enemies. In the event, a basically false and propagandistic account of events in Syria has been created by a foreign media credulous in using pro-opposition sources as if they were objective reporting.

The execution video is a case in point. I have not met a Syrian in Damascus who has not seen it. It is having great influence on how Syrians judge their future, but the mainstream media outside Syria has scarcely mentioned it. Some may be repulsed by its casual savagery, but more probably it is not shown because it contradicts so much of what foreign leaders and reporters claim is happening here.
An excerpt from, "Syria: Insurgents On The Run?" by Moon of Alabama: 
The "western" and Gulf support of the insurgents continues even after nearly all insurgent groups pledged their continued support for the jihadist Nusra Front which the U.S. designated as a terrorist organization. Such insurgents also committed a sectarian massacre in the town of Aqrab. Only a few "western" media mention these embarrassing facts.

Mike Adams - Do guns kill people? Pistol, shotgun, assault rifle put to the test

Tyrants always have a plan and a vision. First they confiscate the guns then they confiscate and kill the humans.

America's tyrants are in love with China's tyrants because they control their slaves 100 percent. They treat humans like cattle over there. In America people are still free because they are armed and they can protect themselves from the oligarchical radicals in power who have used government coercion to steal the public's money (bank bailouts) and now want to use government power to kill dissidents and freedom fighters who are seeking justice.

The monstrous government in America tortured Bradley Manning like it's no big thing, and this is only a preview of what these monsters have in store for anyone else in and outside of government who speaks up in the name of human rights, the rule of law, and the public's right to know.

Do guns kill people? No, tyrants kill people. Maniacs kill people. Secret intelligence agencies kill people. Gangs kill people. Governments kill people. Thieves kill people. Genocidal elites kill people. That is what history shows. And not ancient history, but very recent history. Mass murderers and tyrants like Stalin and Mao disarmed their victims before massacring them. For people on the left to put themselves in the company of these monsters shows a complete absence of common sense and historical knowledge that is truly scary. They are children who believe the government is their daddy.

Mike Adams - Do guns kill people? Pistol, shotgun, assault rifle put to the test

DEMCAD: Conn School Shooting! Israel Land Grab? U.S. Framing Syria! Libor Rigging!

Gotta love common sense.

The TV pundits suck. Internet pundits rock.

DEMCAD: Conn School Shooting! Israel Land Grab? U.S. Framing Syria! Libor Rigging!

Alex Jones: Left Now Calling For The Killing Of Gun Owners!

Ignorance is very dangerous. It is worse than evil.

December 15, 2012

Obama's Sneaky War On Syria Puts Him In The Company With Jihadist Terrorists

Both Al-Qaeda and Obama have their sights on Syria.

President Barack Obama is depicted as a reluctant wartime president by the state-run media, but his no-holds-barred approach to arming the Jihadist terrorists inside Syria against the Assad regime raises questions about his reserved image and his real intentions towards Syria.

Italian geographer Manlio Dinucci sheds light on Obama's enthusiastic support for secret wars in his article, "Obama prefers to keep it hidden," writing:
President Obama does not like war. Not because he is a Nobel Peace prize-winner, but because open aggressive action would reveal US strategy and the interests upon which it is based. So he has launched a grand plan which, as the Washinton Post notes, "reflects the Obama administration’s affinity for espionage and covert action over conventional force."
The Obama administration has armed and bankrolled the mischaracterized "rebels" in Syria since the beginning of the crisis, following a policy set forth by the Bush administration and its revolutionary neoconservative operators. Syria has been on the Pentagon's list of nation-state targets since the end of the Cold War, but it wasn't until after 9/11 that the plan went into motion.

Geopolitical analyst Tony Cartalucci, citing work done by award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh, says that 2007 was the year that marked a serious turn in Washington towards organizing for regime change in Syria.

In his article called, "US-Backed Syrian Opposition Demands Support for Al Qaeda," Cartalucci informs readers that Washington's recent condemnation of a particular terrorist group in the opposition in Syria was merely a ploy to save its narrative and mask its nearly limitless support for the "rebels." An excerpt:
As part of the US' charade in declaring support and recognition of the so-called "Syrian" opposition, it added one of the more extreme groups that make up the militant front operating inside Syria to a list of sanctioned terrorist organizations. The idea was to have a scapegoat to pin atrocities on while the West armed, funded, and provided military support for the rest of the extremist groups ravaging Syria.
Singling out one group from the rest of the opposition was a desperate move by the Obama administration. They had no choice but to at least acknowledge the presence of some terrorists in Syria since most of the world has rejected their asinine narrative that it is just a bunch of freedom fighters against a dictator.

Obama disguises his sympathies for the Jihadist terrorist rebels in his public speeches by differentiating between the good rebels and the bad rebels, but they're all the same. And the "rebels" themselves do not hide their reliance on the tricks of the devil. They are proud to admit it.

The Jihadist terrorists are also proud to show off their chemical weapons capability. They show poorer judgment and have less compassion for Syrian civilians than officials in the Syrian government. If anybody is going to use chemical weapons in Syria it will more likely be them and their bloodthirsty backers rather than the Assad regime. As Cartalucci wrote on December 4 in his article, "US Repeats Syrian Chemical Weapons "Warnings":
It is unlikely that the Syrian government would use such weapons, thus giving the West the excuse it would need to directly intervene militarily, a scenario the West has been attempting to sell for the last 2 years, and particularly so following NATO's military operations in Libya throughout 2011.

Conversely, NATO's proxy forces operating in Syria possess both the means and motivation to carry out chemical attacks, therefore blaming Syria's government and granting the West the impetus needed to intervene more directly.  
Bush took out Saddam by using the WMDs lie, famously saying that in his line of work "you have to keep repeating things to catapult the propaganda." Obama has committed himself to the same task regarding Syria. He is repeating the baseless propaganda talking point that Assad must be stopped from using chemical weapons against his people in order to stir the imagination of the American people and get them to support U.S. military action in Syria.

As numerous observers have said, Obama likes to wage illegal wars under the public radar, but it's hard to hide the consequences of secret wars and secret arms shipments to terrorist groups when events like the Benghazi attack surface to the consciousness of the American public.

Despite his image as a wiser president than George W. Bush, Obama is not that bright. As national security expert Flynt Leverett said in a recent interview with Scott Horton:
"I don’t think the main problem with Obama is that he is a Democrat.  I think the main problem is that he doesn’t really understand where the United States is in the world right now, he doesn’t really have a strategic vision for the United States, and whatever vision he does have doesn’t compel him enough, doesn’t matter enough to him that he is actually to spend and risk political capital to realize it."
Obama is a script reader and one of the world's most powerful perception makers because of the prestige of his office. There is nothing special about him. He was chosen to execute a policy that was prepared long before he became president.

Obama's opposition to the Iraq War in 2002 was a smart political move and made him look like a prophetic visionary, but had he been president during that time he would've taken America to war in Iraq just as deceptively as Bush had done.

Obama's sneaky war on Syria is, to quote from his astute anti-Iraq war speech, "without a clear rationale and without strong international support," and, "will only fan the flames of the Middle East."

Obama thinks it is less dumb to secretly support Jihadist terrorist groups to destroy a country than to invade and occupy it, but the result is the same: a Middle East on fire.

And a Middle East on fire is what Obama and his handlers want.