September 30, 2011

The Seasick Joke: The Fake Assassination of Osama Bin Laden And His Fake Burial At Sea

"There's a great black wave in the middle of the sea
For me
For you"
- Arcade Fire, "Black Wave/Bad Vibrations"

On September 27, 2011, Politico reported on the Obama administration's decision to not release the photo of Osama Bin Laden's dead body. Here is an excerpt from Politico reporter Josh Gerstein's article, "CIA, Pentagon fight to keep Osama bin Laden death photos secret":
Photos and videos of Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden after he was killed in May in a U.S. military/Central Intelligence Agency raid in Pakistan should not be released publicly because they would reveal military and intelligence secrets and could lead to violence against U.S. personnel, the Obama administration argued in papers filed in federal court in Washington late Monday night.

The new filings from the Justice Department provide scant details about the imagery, but CIA National Clandestine Service Director John Bennett wrote that the CIA has "52 unique....photographs and/or videorecordings" depicting bin Laden during or after the May operation. Bennett did not break down the tally further, but said all the imagery is classified "TOP SECRET," meaning that disclosure of the material could lead to "exceptionally grave damage" to U.S. national security.
The U.S. shadow government's case for not releasing any photo is pathetic and weak. Washington's arguments against making public what is undoubtedly the image of the century - the dead corpse of the man who was responsible for the biggest attack on America in its history - is flimsy and asinine.

The decision to withhold evidence of Bin Laden's corpse makes any thinking person question if Washington even has the image of a dead and buried Osama Bin Laden or if the political myth makers are just making stuff up again, as they are known to do.

Dealing in lies is the CIA's only trade. The U.S. military-industrial-intelligence-national security complex is run on lies, myths, fantasies and illusions. Without them its power, resources, and prestige would go down the toilet.

Gerstein broke down the government's arguments for not releasing any photo related to Bin Laden's capture, death and burial, writing:
First, while the arguments for withholding imagery from the raid and its immediate aftermath are legally strong, those for withholding the images of bin Laden's burial seem substantially weaker. It's hard to see how that event implicates any national security secrets. Second, the CIA's claim that none of the images or videos can be released even in part seems conclusory. A heavily-edited video of bin Laden's burial, for example, might or might not not be very interesting, but for that same reason it seems less likely to produce the negative consequences the government warns about.
In his article, Gerstein includes a statement made by President Obama on CBS's '60 Minutes' back in May about why the White House chose not to release any photo or video of its covert operation to kill Bin Laden. Obama made an ass of himself by mouthing out the shadow government's line, saying:
"It is important for us to make sure that very graphic photos of somebody who was shot in the head are not floating around as an incitement to additional violence. As a propaganda tool. You know, that’s not who we are. You know, we don’t trot out this stuff as trophies."
This is a very curious explanation by Obama. How can anybody believe that the U.S. government is not afraid of hunting down the world's biggest terrorist, but it gets weak in the knees when it has to release the photo of its victory?

We're supposed to believe that the guys who run the Pentagon and CIA are afraid of provoking hatred and anger against America - the same guys who think nothing of massacring entire villages in Afghanistan and destroying the lives of innocent women and children in Iraq?

If you buy Washington's story about the assassination of Bin Laden then you obviously have no clue about the shady history of the CIA and the record of government lies in Washington.

There is a reason why the CIA and the Obama administration chose not to release the photo of Osama Bin Laden's dead body and it isn't because of the fear that it will be used as a "propaganda tool" by Al-Qaeda and others to hurt US national security, as President Obama claims.

The real reason for not releasing the photo is because there is no photo. There is no dead body of Bin Laden riddled with American bullets.

Former U.S. counter-terrorism officer Steve R. Pieczenik told the Alex Jones show in May that Bin Laden died in late 2001 due to health reasons. Other high-level government officials from around the world have said more or less the same thing.

Pieczenik's prescient comments were blacked out by the establishment media. His experience in catching and killing terrorists, his honorable service to America, and his patriotism were all pushed aside. The words of an American hero were sidelined to the realm of "loony conspiracy theories," by the corporate/CIA media. That is not just sad. That is treason.

The whole story about Bin Laden's death at the hands of Navy SEALs was a big lie -- not the first of its kind and definitely not the last.

Washington has told a series of big lies to the American people and the world about the rationale behind the war on terror, starting with the big bang of big lies--9/11. These lies serve political, military, geopolitical, economic, and domestic objectives.

Whenever the legitimacy and power of the U.S. shadow government is threatened it resorts to the same old tricks to maintain its cult-like grasp over America such as staging terror attacks, manufacturing foreign threats, and making up stories about military victories.

The real history of this whole dark decade, from the false flag 9/11 attacks to the fake assassination of Bin Laden, may come out or it may not. But if ever the dark truth washes to shore, we will all collectively find out that Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda did not do the 9/11 attacks, and that Bin Laden's body was not in the wreckage in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

The only dead bodies at that sight were those of American soldiers who were probably sent on a suicide mission by the double-crossing and back-stabbing traitors who control the White House. May the demons who occupy that chamber of horrors rot in hell.

Americans Living in Vans, Hitting the Streets

Man in the street: "Who's going to fight? What are you going to do? This is revolution time, but who's going to do it?"

Report by Survive And Thrive TV:

James Corbett: A Brief History of Media Manipulation by U.S. Intelligence

Boiling Frogs Post: The EyeOpener - CIA in the News Media: A Brief History of Media Manipulation by U.S. Intelligence (By James Corbett).

This is a must see video. It is so well done. The information is so well documented and so well presented. Corbett is a warhorse in the infowar.

Germans shocked by brazen bullying of lawmakers during bankster bailout vote

Germans shocked by brazen bullying of lawmakers during bankster bailout vote
By Jane Burgermeister
Published: September 30, 2011

The brazen mobbing of German lawmakers during yesterday’s vote on establishing a new bigger bankster bailout fund has sparked outrage with the website freiewelt calling the vote on the most important piece of legislation by the current coalition government a „farce“.–kritiker-erzwingen.html

CDU politician Wolfgang Bosbach said he was thinking of quitting politics after party bosses pressured him to support a bill, which gives yet more free lunches to the bankers and super rich elite.

Two opponents to the bill FDP lawmaker Frank Schäffler and CDU Klaus-Peter Willsch were refused permission to address the parliament by their own parties in spite of the fact that a recent poll showed that 75% of the German people oppose more banker bailouts.

A new Emnid poll for Focus shows that every second German now wants the D Mark back. Even 52% of the voters of the extreme left wing Linke party want the D Mark back showing the depth of support across society for an end to the bankster’s euro currency, sold by the mainstream media under the cynical slogan of “European solidarity”.

The president of the German parliament Norbert Lammert had to use special powers for the lawmakers to be able give their speeches only to be mobbed himself in scenes reminiscent of the Reichtstag in the 1930s.

In his address, Frank Schaffler dared to point out the obvious fact that the new banker bailout violated laws. He also dared note that any government which violates laws is actually no better than a band of robbers – a remark which surely did not sit well with the ranks of yesmen masquerading as representatives of the people.

Schäffler listed the history of deceit and cynical lies of the coalition of Chancellor Angela Merkel when it came to telling the parliament and people the true facts about the bailouts and their costs.

Continued. . .

Activist Helga Morath on Germany's Economic Collapse

Max Keiser says mace the two-faced bankers aka financial terrorists in the face

Alfred Tennyson - Ulysses

The poem is read by British actor Sir Lewis Thomas Casson (26 October 1875 – 16 May 1969).

It little profits that an idle king,
By this still hearth, among these barren crags,
Match'd with an aged wife, I mete and dole
Unequal laws unto a savage race,
That hoard, and sleep, and feed, and know not me.
I cannot rest from travel: I will drink
Life to the lees: all times I have enjoy'd
Greatly, have suffer'd greatly, both with those
That loved me, and alone; on shore, and when
Thro' scudding drifts the rainy Hyades
Vext the dim sea: I am become a name;
For always roaming with a hungry heart
Much have I seen and known; cities of men
And manners, climates, councils, governments,
Myself not least, but honour'd of them all;
And drunk delight of battle with my peers,
Far on the ringing plains of windy Troy.
I am a part of all that I have met;
Yet all experience is an arch wherethro'
Gleams that untravell'd world, whose margin fades
For ever and for ever when I move.
How dull it is to pause, to make an end,
To rust unburnish'd, not to shine in use!
As tho' to breathe were life. Life piled on life
Were all too little, and of one to me
Little remains: but every hour is saved
From that eternal silence, something more,
A bringer of new things; and vile it were
For some three suns to store and hoard myself,
And this gray spirit yearning in desire
To follow knowledge, like a sinking star,
Beyond the utmost bound of human thought.

This is my son, mine own Telemachus,
To whom I leave the sceptre and the isle--
Well-loved of me, discerning to fulfil
This labour, by slow prudence to make mild
A rugged people, and thro' soft degrees
Subdue them to the useful and the good.
Most blameless is he, centred in the sphere
Of common duties, decent not to fail
In offices of tenderness, and pay
Meet adoration to my household gods,
When I am gone. He works his work, I mine.
There lies the port: the vessel puffs her sail:
There gloom the dark broad seas. My mariners,
Souls that have toil'd and wrought, and thought with me--
That ever with a frolic welcome took
The thunder and the sunshine, and opposed
Free hearts, free foreheads--you and I are old;
Old age hath yet his honour and his toil;
Death closes all; but something ere the end,
Some work of noble note, may yet be done,
Not unbecoming men that strove with Gods.
The lights begin to twinkle from the rocks:
The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep
Moans round with many voices. Come, my friends,
'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
Push off, and sitting well in order smite
The sounding furrows; for my purpose holds
To sail beyond the sunset, and the baths
Of all the western stars, until I die.
It may be that the gulfs will wash us down:
It may be we shall touch the Happy Isles,
And see the great Achilles, whom we knew.
Tho' much is taken, much abides; and tho'
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

Ulysses - Alfred, Lord Tennyson (by Sir John Gielgud)

September 29, 2011

Am-Erica is Al-Qaeda: Another Look At The Terrorist Threat

"Opinions have caused more ills than the plague or earthquakes on this little globe of ours." - Voltaire.
It is a plain fact that Al-Qaeda is a proxy army that was invented by the CIA to intimidate the American people into giving up their rights and constitution and to serve as a justification for the American and Israeli wars of conquest in the Middle East.

This sounds crazy on the surface because of the U.S. government's assertion that Al-Qaeda is a strategic threat to the United States and that it was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. But ask yourself what is more crazier: thinking for yourself or trusting the government?

Why is it considered insane to question government narratives and statements? Since when did the U.S. government become God?

The media's blackout of scientific and eyewitness evidence that proves the CIA and Mossad coordinated the 9/11 attacks from the shadows should make anyone who has an independent mind to dig deeper and ask questions.

Historian Webster G. Tarpley said on Infowars Nightly News on September 28, 2011 that, "what we've learned in Libya is that Al-Qaeda is the CIA Arab legion, it always has been, it always will be."

Tarpley says the CIA speaks through Al-Qaeda, so technically speaking there is no "Al-Qaeda." It is an imaginary terrorist threat that was created to keep Americans docile and afraid.

The links between Western intelligence agencies and radical Islamist groups emerged in the war against Gaddafi. Back in March, The Telegraph reported that the rebels in Libya had deep connections to Al-Qaeda. These seasoned Al-Qaeda soldiers were financed and trained by the Western powers to do their dirty work in countries like Libya that oppose the arrogant banksters' plan for world hegemony.

America was conquered by the parasitic banksters in 1913 when the tyrannical Federal Reserve was created. The American government lost its independence and sovereignty overnight to the same group of thieves that America went to war against in 1776.

A century after the creation of the Fed, America is a country possessed by fantasies, deceptions, and delusions, where reality is whatever the government and media say it is.

National illusions and mythic narratives are religiously maintained by the priests of power in Washington. The voice of the American people was crushed and silenced a long time ago.

What exists in Washington is not a government but a vampiric machine of death, brutality and destruction that breeds terror and chaos to stay alive. The U.S. military-industrial-terrorism complex is devising all kinds of false villains to generate fear, anger and hate in America against innocent nations in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Washington's Promethean quest is to destroy all democratic nation states, establish a dictatorial global government, and usher in a technocratic planetary civilization that will replace both Islamic and Western civilizations.

Al-Qaeda is just one of the many villains that Washington creates for political and strategic purposes. The two-faced rulers of America rely on a tried and true tactic of manufacturing threats and creating fake enemies to expand the pentagon budget and justify military force in other nations.

Kurt Nimmo writes about Washington's tradition of creating fantasy villains in his article, "U.S. Invented Soviet Threat,":
As a growing number of historians have realized for years, the so-called Cold War was largely an illusion – known as “policy by press release” – invented by the military industrial complex, the same folks who are selling us new wars and conjured-up threats from the likes of al-Qaeda and now the so-called Haqqani network.
The Haqqani network appeared out of nowhere because that is where all of America's enemies come from. Scary sounding names like "Al-Qaeda," and "Haqqani," come right out of government fiction.

Washington's playwrights should get a Nobel prize for literature. Seriously. I think they put Shakespeare to shame. Their great tragicomedy, "World War III: From Ashes to Ashes," is probably the best thing any totalitarian government has ever written.

For the normal and sane person this past decade has been like a bad movie, but for the psychopathic clique that engineered 9/11 and the war on terror it has been a wild blast. The only criticism is that the chief actors in this drama, Bush and Obama, have given very bad performances.

But no worries. New actors are always lining up to mouth Satan's words in Washington. Webster Tarpley speculates that David Petraeus, the former military commander in Afghanistan and the current head of the CIA, could become President and turn into an American Pinochet.

That's the action on the domestic front. What about overseas? Now that the villain of Act One, played by Osama Bin Laden, is dead and gone, the curtains are being opened for Act Two and new villains are required. This second Act will feature an apocalyptic war in Pakistan and Iran, and probably the entire region. This is when the action will really begin.

Paul Craig Roberts, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration, says America is gearing up to strike Pakistan hard. He wrote about the dubious threat posed by the Haqqani network to U.S. interests and security on September 27 in his article, "The Latest Orchestrated Threat and The End of History." Roberts said:
Have you ever before heard of the Haqqanis? I didn't think so. Like Al Qaeda, about which no one had ever heard prior to 9/11, the "Haqqani Network" has popped up in time of need to justify America's next war -- Pakistan.

President Obama's claim that he had Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden exterminated deflated the threat from that long-serving bogyman. A terror organization that left its leader, unarmed and undefended, a sitting duck for assassination no longer seemed formidable. Time for a new, more threatening, bogyman, the pursuit of which will keep the "war on terror" going.
Washington's creation of this new threat is either a stroke of bold genius or another lame attempt at reviving fear in America against terrorism.

For this trick to really work Washington's shadow state has to stage another false flag terrorist attack in a major American city like Chicago or Denver and then blame it on Pakistan or some other scapegoat. Otherwise, the smoke and mirrors game might collapse.

What moves history - and mass opinion - towards a desired direction that the ruling elite want is blood and trauma, as we found out on 9/11. Without those two major ingredients, America's war on terror scam can't work.

The myth that Al-Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden did 9/11 had staying power, but now a new villain and a new terrorist event is needed to push history over the abyss.

Who will be that new villain that America will love to hate?

When will a new false flag terrorist attack, which will be used to completely phase out the American republic, occur? And in which city will the attack happen? And how many bodies will be obliterated?

These are some of the big questions that are being discussed by the history makers in Washington and Israel.

CIA Speaks Through Al-Qaeda: Webster Tarpley Reports




Bibi: Israel Will Raise ‘David’s Sword’ Against Iran

Bibi: Israel Will Raise ‘David’s Sword’ Against Iran
By Richard Silverstein
Published: September 28, 2011

While Yisrael HaYom may be the best paper Sheldon Adelson’s money can buy on behalf of his political fixer, Bibi Netanyahu (and Bibi may be the best Israeli politician Adelson’s money can buy), there are sometimes benefits to reading it. You do get to read the unfiltered Bibi, unfettered by concerns for the sensitivities of his western audience.

For example, after his UN speech he gave an exclusive interview to the newspaper in which he waxed eloquent on the imagined accomplishments of his UN speech. First, he (almost single-handedly to hear him tell it) stopped Palestinian statehood. Second, the rest of the world now “understands” Israel’s views on these matters. Note, he didn’t say “agrees” with Israel, because he knows that would be a lie. But in his skewed view just having the world “understand” Israel’s hard right nationalist outlook is a genuine achievement. Third, Bibi believes, with a straight face no doubt, that he’s done more for peace than Yitzhak Rabin. Don’t ask me how he determines this. I don’t recall any peace treaties he signed, any international agreements he initialed, all of which Rabin did. I suppose Bibi may mean that he kept Israel more secure than Rabin in terms of few terror attacks. But this is a cold peace, not a true peace. Rabin aimed for a true peace and didn’t get there because one of Bibi’s supporters assassinated him.

Continued. . .

Military Takeover of America: Nightly News Report

September 28, 2011

5 Reasons Why Ron Paul Is The Military's Choice For President

The big open secret about Ron Paul is that he is a powerhouse in the 2012 presidential race, not some little nobody who can be pushed around. He is not simply running on a political platform to get a fifth of the votes and go home, he is leading a revolution of ideas that is awakening a revolutionary nation from a long, media-induced sleep.

This revolution will ultimately be successful because Dr. Paul's message is so timely and he has the support of the two most important groups who can make or break a revolution: the young people and the military.

Ron Paul has gotten more donations from the military than President Obama and every Republican candidate. They don't even come close to him. Dr. Paul is the Usain Bolt of military donations. Between April and June he received over $35000 dollars from the military. Mitt Romney and Herman Cain barely got $5000 dollars each. And Perry didn't even register on the scoreboard.

Below I have listed five reasons why Dr. Paul is the clear choice for President in the military's eyes.

1. Ron Paul is the candidate of peace.

Most American soldiers are tired of fighting in useless and immoral wars that have nothing do with America's security. They want to be with their families and have normal lives. Dr. Paul gives them that hope.

The soldiers who know what's going on don't want to be led by the barbarians in Israel, the anti-American neocons, and smooth talking globalist politicians like Bush and Obama who tricked them into Afghanistan and Iraq.

Soldiers are resorting to suicide to escape a Sisyphean fate in the Middle East. More soldiers have died outside of the battlefield than dying at the enemy's hands. Reflect on that profound fact. It is a shame that it is suppressed by the establishment media. The exploitation of patriotic soldiers is one of the most inhuman aspects of empire-building and aggressive wars.

It is natural that American soldiers are worn out after fighting for so many years against a shapeless and shifting enemy. They have done more than anybody else to keep patriotism and bravery alive.

The military loves Ron Paul because he will end the exhausting occupations and reunite soldiers with their families. But Dr. Paul is not a peacenik. He has stated that America should go to war if America's security is really threatened, and direct objectives are outlined so the military can go in, win, and get out. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the entire war on terror does not fit that criteria. They are false wars because they are based on lies.

Real wars are supposed to be fought and won in a very short time frame. This whole business of a "long war" is just that - a business. The point of the endless war on terror is to make endless profits for the military-industrial complex and the banksters, and destroy Islamic civilization in order to pave the way for a new dictatorial global government. Christianity and Judaism are also threatened with extinction by the hidden luciferian plan for the global conquest of all nations and all civilizations.

2. Ron Paul is part of the military family.

Dr. Paul served as a flight surgeon in the Air Force during the Vietnam War. He respects and values military service because he believes in the honour code. The rest of the republican field and President Obama are professional politicians who know nothing about sacrifice, honor and patriotism. They are traitors, cowards, and moral degenerates who have nothing in common with the military ethic of service and sacrifice.

So it is obvious why proud and noble soldiers in the U.S. military want to support a man who actually cares about them as opposed to heartless scumbags like Bush, Cheney, Clinton, Obama, Perry, Romney, and every other Republican candidate.

3. Ron Paul is the candidate of national security and national defense.

The myth that Dr. Paul won't act to protect America as President is nonsense. This myth has entered the popular consciousness because Dr. Paul is not a warmonger and warmongering is equated today with security.

Paul is perceived as anti-security because he doesn't support bombing cities and villages based on made up intelligence reports and government lies. Some people view Dr. Paul's cautiousness on foreign policy as a sign of cowardice or kookiness, and say that if Paul was President he would expose America to all its enemies.

But the truth is that America has no real military enemies. All its military, national and non-state enemies are imaginary that were invented or exaggerated by the military-industrial complex and the two-faced neocons to justify the massive pentagon budget, the federal government's indebtedness to foreign central banksters, and the dominance of the military-industrial-terrorism complex.

America's real enemy is debt - bankster debt, the kind of debt that is created out of thin air to hold America down. This evil enemy is the common enemy of all nations in which the private central banksters hold power.

Dr. Paul knows America's real enemy is debt and a designed economic collapse. He is extremely wise for calling for caution on military matters and maintaining a position of neutrality towards all nations. His foreign policy is in line with the foreign policy of the American founding fathers. He is being true to the original spirit of America and its divine mission to peacefully spread the ideas of freedom throughout the world.

4. Ron Paul is a true moral and fiscal conservative.

Military men love moral, disciplined, and faithful men like Ron Paul. They also love the fact that Dr. Paul has a good character and a conscience. Political assassins like Bush and Obama have no soul, and soldiers hate that.

Soldiers know where Dr. Paul stands on the major issues because he is consistent and that is why they respect him so much. They didn't respect President Bush and they don't respect President Obama because both morons changed their scripts once they got elected.

Why should the President be respected simply because he is the President? Respect must be earned. It should not come with the Office of the President or with a new war. Otherwise, vain, immoral and ambitious men will feel free to take advantage of the respect and prestige of the office without fearing any repercussions from the American people.

Clinton, Bush and Obama have shamelessly taken advantage of the prestige of the President's Office by promoting and defending the private interests of the corrupt few.

What is most disturbing about these robotic political assassins is the dark nature of their treason against the American people. In an attempt to justify America's illegal wars, Bush and Obama have both used the god-like power of the bully pulpit to psychologically exploit the American people after they experienced the trauma caused by the false flag 9/11 attacks.

If elected President, Ron Paul will not allow these abuses of power and authority in Washington.

Dr. Paul's deep morality and fiscal sanity attracts people from all political viewpoints. The revolution he has sparked goes beyond left and right. No rational person can say the U.S. government is either conservative or liberal and that one party deserves all the blame for the political crisis that's unfolding in Washington.

The federal government can't be defined by traditional left-right terms. It is a monster from hell that knows no bounds and rules by terror.

The implementation of the radical principles of totalitarianism in Washington by the insane plutocrats and their political assassins has been so successful that the government's lies and fables have been ingrained inside the heads of millions of people. The two biggest lies are the ones about the 9/11 attacks and the fake assassination of Osama Bin Laden on May 2, 2011.

Essentially, the President acts as a psychotherapist and a manipulative mental health specialist, whose chief role is not to command the military, but to remind the American people what thoughts are sane and what thoughts are "conspiratorial" or "paranoid."

Ron Paul would reverse this dangerous slide towards totalitarianism and restore the constitutional principles that America was founded on.

5. Ron Paul supports the rights of Vietnam Prisoners of War and military veterans of all wars.

Ron Paul doesn't just pay lip service to honouring the sacrifices made by soldiers. He backs up his words with concrete action in the Congress. Unlike 99% of politicians, Dr. Paul truly cares about the health, safety and well-being of every soldier and veteran.

In April 2005, Dr. Paul wrote the following in an article called, "More Empty Rhetoric for Veterans":
Our invasion of Iraq will swell the ranks of our combat veterans, many of whom will need medical care as they grow older. Sadly, health issues arising from the first war with Iraq still have not been addressed. Congress should immediately end the silence and formally address Gulf War Syndrome, which has had a devastating impact on veterans who served in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. As a medical doctor, I believe the syndrome is very real, and likely represents several different maladies caused by exposure to conditions specific to the Gulf region at the time. Congress and the VA should stop insulting Gulf War veterans and recognize that the syndrome is a serious illness that needs treatment. We can only hope and pray that our soldiers in Iraq today do not suffer from similar illnesses in the future.

It’s easy to talk about honoring veterans and their sacrifices, even while the federal government treats veterans badly. Congress wastes billions of dollars funding countless unconstitutional programs, but fails to provide adequately for the men and women who carry out the most important constitutional function: national defense.

We can best honor both our veterans and our current armed forces by pursuing a coherent foreign policy. No veteran should ever have to look back and ask himself, “Why were we over there in the first place?” Too often history demonstrates that wars are fought for political and economic reasons, rather than legitimate national security reasons. Supporting the troops means never putting them in harm’s way unless America is truly threatened.
Dr. Paul represents the conscience of America. You don't have to wonder what it would be like if Thomas Jefferson was alive and he was running for President in 2012 because his ideas and philosophy are being voiced by Dr. Paul.

A vote for Dr. Paul is a vote for Jefferson, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the American Revolution. A vote against Dr. Paul is a vote against the American Revolution.

Paul is standing in for Jefferson, Washington, Adams, Franklin, Madison and the rest of the founding fathers. His legacy is up there with other great American leaders. It is as if he is a walking statue. He is a living, breathing American hero.

If Dr. Paul becomes President in 2012 America will rise from the ashes of lies and shattered hopes. If not then America will be further destroyed and enslaved by the banksters and kleptocrats who run the country.

Bacevich: US wars serve powerful interests

Obama Tells His Cult Followers To Stop Crying And March

Obama has still got it. And his pimp stride is back.

Skip to the 26 minute mark.

September 27, 2011

September 26, 2011

The Ratings Collapse of The Establishment Media Represents A Huge Cultural Change In The West

There is a massive media shift taking place in America and other Western countries as more and more young people reject mainstream media institutions. They are turning to blogs, Internet news anchors, social media websites like Twitter and Facebook, and internet-based commentators to get their news and alternative perspectives of reality.

Big media companies have no chance competing against the rising independent media in a free-market atmosphere. They are history unless they can successfully lobby the federal government to censor anti-government websites in the name of cyber security.

But such extreme measures to silence free speech and maintain the authority of the establishment media are likely to be resisted by sophisticated activists. Young people have every kind of technological gadget at their disposal to access their favorite podcasts, blogs and radio shows which are independently operated and offer unique perspectives to world events.

This huge shift in news consumption will have cultural, social and political ramifications for many years to come, possibly altering the very nature of our societies and our governments. What we are witnessing is no small revolution - it is the liberation of the Western media and, by extension, the Western public mind, from government and corporate narratives about history and reality.

The biggest winners in this shift towards a free media are Internet broadcasters like Alex Jones, Amy Goodman, Max Keiser, Cenk Uygur, and Keith Olbermann who are keeping a safe distance from the dying mainstream corporate media. There are probably others that I am unaware of.

What these 21st century news anchors have that regular news anchors on television lack is credibility, intelligence, respect and trust. I would even add humanity. If you saw Goodman's coverage of Troy Davis's unjust execution last week you'll know what I'm referring to.

Alex Jones has the most credibility and trust because of his fearless stance that 9/11 was an inside job which he made in the summer of 2001, two months before the towers even collapsed. You can't buy that kind of credibility and integrity (Glenn Beck probably knows that now after experiencing a hyped and manufactured popularity with conservatives).

Credibility comes with time and Alex has credibility that is unequal to any other news anchor on television or the Internet. There are many ignorant and clueless people out there who may disagree, but I think a decade is enough time to recognize Alex's intelligence, honesty and courage. Alex's word is weighed in gold. He has intellectual depth and his words are full of emotion, two things that are extremely rare nowadays in the land of the free.

Moreover, the ratings collapse of state-corporate television comes as the long track record of its censorship practices become more widely recognized in American and Western society. At the website, "," DJ Pangburn's article called, "Occupy Wall Street Protest Being Systematically Ignored by Mainstream Media," draws attention to the hypocrisy of the regime-change friendly American media that wants Arabs and Persians to be free but not the American people.

It is worth asking the question: does the American corporate/state media serve the American people and America's national interests? If not, then the owners of U.S. media companies and establishment presstitutes need to be held accountable for their treasonous actions.

The article highlighted above explains how Internet news anchor Keith Olbermann is successfully counteracting the establishment media's censorship of "Occupy Wall Street" protesters. DJ Pangburn writes:
Death and Taxes has been down to the Occupy Wall Street protest and assemblies a number of times since its inception on September 17th. In that time, most of the reporting has been done by independent media—they can be seen everywhere at the encampment. And when corporate media does decide to get involved, it conveniently reports around the time of an arrest.

Keith Olbermann, for his part, took the mainstream media to task last night on his show for their laughable coverage, calling it “media hypocrisy” and sending his own crew to cover the occupation.
The establishment media's censorship extends beyond Wall Street criminality and anti-government protests in America. It is an undying fact that the media in America and the West has consistently censored important evidence about the 9/11 attacks which contradicts the official fable that was scripted by the totalitarian nutcases who run the U.S. and Israeli governments.

Peter Philips, one of the co-founders of the popular website, 'Project Censored,' addressed the social, political, ethical and human consequences of media censorship in a speech on September 8, 2011. He said:
"If you watch corporate media you're literally embedded in a state of excited news and entertainment and all this kind of stuff, which is kind of an excited delirium of knowinglessness. You don't know what's going on. We don't know what the powerful are doing. We're focused out. And this is deliberate. They want us to be that way. They want us to not be aware of what's happening.

So we have to go back to the universal declaration of human rights, go back to our roots and what we believe are the core values of democracy in this country. Yes, we need 9/11 truth, but we need 9/11 truth and truth about the military empire of this world and our involvement in it."
Philips's message goes beyond left and right. The issues of the day that weigh heavy on all hearts are about truth, justice, law and order, government accountability, and media accountability.

There are core values and principles that should be at the heart of America and all Western societies. Without free speech, free elections, and a free press then the West is no better than totalitarian China, Soviet Russia, and Islamist Iran.

If the West is not a sanctuary for people who want to be intellectually, physically and spiritually free then that makes the entire planet a prison, as Alex Jones says. We cannot allow that to happen and we will not.

Our dedication as citizens to freedom and the truth about 9/11, Wall Street thievery, and other freedom-threatening issues has spurred the development of a vast and influential independent media across the West.

The collapse of the Western establishment media is a refutation of Western totalitarianism and our governments' attempt at thought control.

There will come a time not long from now when the "crazy conspiracy theorists" and "straitjacket nut jobs" will be proven right about the false flag 9/11 attacks, the hidden plan for a dictatorial world government, and the demonic goals of the transnational police state that has been unjustifiably set up in America, Canada, Australia, England, France, and other Western nations.

After the collapse of the establishment media comes the collapse of government authority. The sooner this profound political crisis is recognized by the majority of the people, the better chance we have at restoring real authority in our broken countries.

Occupy Wall Street Protest Enters Second Week; 80 Arrested at Peaceful March

There are a lot of communists at this protest. I wish it was different. I wish they didn't blame everything on "capitalism." Capitalism did not create this crisis. Corporate fascism did. The banking plutocracy did. That's a big difference.

But at least these red shirts are doing something.

Alex Confronts Vicente Fox & Rick Perry 2003



5 Reasons Why The Establishment Media Fears Ron Paul Like The Plague

The establishment media in America has now become the official fringe media. CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, NPR, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Time Magazine, and every other "mainstream" media source are all in the same sinking boat. Their boat of greed, lies, hate and hypocrisy is no match for the iceberg of truth.

The fringe establishment media protects the criminal 1 percent that has taken America hostage and refuses to question political leaders in Washington about the crimes they commit and the lies they tell. It covers protests around the world from Iran to China but it does not want to cover the Occupy Wall Street protesters who represent the voice of the American people and the voice of the American founding fathers.

Establishment media clowns try to dismiss 9/11 truth tellers as "conspiracy theorists" and "nut jobs" but they have failed. They try to ignore Ron Paul's rising popularity and mainstream acceptance but they can't cover up reality. They fear Ron Paul more than the plague because they know that what he stands for is the exact opposite of what they have supported for the past several decades.

Ron Paul is the 21st century embodiment of the founding fathers and represents the tradition of the American revolution. The fringe establishment media represents the loyalist side that stood by the tyrannical British King in 1776. Establishment journalists and commentators are standing by the criminal oligarchy that owns Washington and wants to destroy America's liberty and constitution.

Below are five reasons why the fringe loyalist media is so scared of Ron Paul.

1. Ron Paul is opposed to every government policy that the mainstream media has signed off on by either supporting it outright or by ignoring its ramifications for American society: endless war on terror, criminal bank bailouts, lawless surveillance, torture, Federal Reserve money printing, the 2001 Patriot(Traitor) Act, police state laws, and the illegal war on drugs.

These elitist and unconstitutional policies have been supported by the now fringe media in the United States (CNN, Fox News, NY Times, Washington Post, etc). Ron Paul wants to end these morally bankrupt policies, restore common sense in Washington, and bring freedom back to America.

2. Ron Paul is not interested in taking the presidency and continuing business as usual. He is a revolutionary candidate in the tradition of the American founding fathers who wants to save America from financial destruction. He has stated that he wants to "change the course of history."

Ron Paul wants to end the empire, bring home the heroic soldiers, and restore the American constitution. The elitist fringe media does not want to cover a revolutionary candidate who wants to represent the vast majority of the American people, protect the Constitution, reaffirm American values on the world stage, and bring peace to the world.

3. Ron Paul is against elite immunity and the culture of corruption in Washington. If he were elected President a bunch of scoundrels in Washington and the sociopaths who lie for them in the establishment media would be held accountable in a very real way - like being put in jail.

4. Establishment news agencies like MSNBC profit from the corrupt money printing policies of the Federal Reserve. MSNBC's parent company, GE, has received billions of dollars of taxpayer money. Under a Ron Paul presidency this illegal activity would be immediately stopped and the looting of the American people would come to an end.

Ron Paul wants to end the corrupt Federal Reserve System not because he is an ideologue but because the Fed is an unconstitutional, illegal and private central bank that was specifically created to enrich a few politically connected banks on Wall Street. The Fed's unjust policies are disastrous for the average American taxpayer and American family.

5. Ron Paul tells the truth and he is for real. The Kremlin in Washington is scared of his ideas and his high popularity. The establishment traitors know just how real, honest and independent Ron Paul is, unlike 99% of the political mercenaries in Washington who hate the American people and the American constitution. The fringe establishment media is on the side of the treasonous oligarchy that has hijacked the federal government and the two political parties.

Ron Paul is the antithesis of the cold-hearted, treasonous, and two-faced establishment that owns Washington, as well as their political, academic and media whores.

Washington's criminal establishment is responsible for evil crimes against the American people such as the murder of President John F. Kennedy, the false flag 9/11 attacks that started the illegal war on terror, and the 2008 robbery of the American people via bank bailouts and Federal Reserve money printing.

American War Machine with Peter Dale Scott



NYPD Crackdown on Occupy Wall Street: Luke Rudkowski Reports

September 25, 2011

5 Demands of The Occupy Wall Street Revolution

1. Bring the CEOs of the major banks that were involved in the 2008 financial scandal and robbery to justice, i.e. hang them in the streets or put them behind bars like Bernie Madoff.

2. End the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. Follow the advice of the American founding fathers which is that the power to create money belongs to the American people, not foreign bankers. Restore Depression-era laws and regulations against the banks. Restore sound money in the United States and create economic competition instead of allowing banking monopolies to run the show.

3. Introduce a state owned bank at the federal level to give out loans without paying interest to the heartless banksters. Stop all bank and corporate bailouts.

4. Bring the leaders of both political parties to justice for supporting banking thieves while screwing the American middle class, small businesses and the other 99 percent of America.

5. Demand regime change in Washington, which means getting rid of the two parties, the Federal Reserve, the CIA and the criminal mainstream media. Also, demand an end to the corrupt IMF and World Bank.

Keiser Report: Cultural Fragging!

September 24, 2011

The Key Term Is False Flag, Not Blowback

The Key Term Is False Flag, Not Blowback

Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
September 24, 2011

"You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security." - Gladio terrorist Vincenzo Vinciguerra.
A lie that is commonly repeated in the political debate about the causes and roots of the 9/11 attacks is that America was attacked as a consequence of its occupation of Arab lands and its one-sided support for Israel.

This "blowback" theory limits critical questioning of U.S. covert operations, government drills, and false flag events. Author and researcher Webster Tarpley says that the 46 government drills that were taking place on September 11, 2001 explain the systematic undermining of the U.S. military which allowed the cold-blooded traitors to move forward with their plan to mass murder 3,000 American citizens.

But anti-war libertarians like Ron Paul and many liberals avoid the unspeakable nature of 9/11. Instead, they unthinkingly cling to the false theory of blowback despite all the evidence to the contrary.

I am convinced that this false theory was deliberately injected in the media and academia by U.S. and Israeli intelligence officials to divert left-wing and libertarian intellectuals from examining the evidence for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Towers and coming to a more sinister conclusion about the U.S. government's role in the atrocity.

Ron Paul has popularized the blowback theory in television interviews and the many Republican presidential debates that he has participated in since 2007. He is sincere about his belief and believes the blowback theory is the correct one. But while it is more sophisticated than the ludicrous claim that 19 Arab terrorists attacked America because they hate freedom and democracy, that does not make it true.

A week and a half ago, Paul was asked in an interview on CNN about the blowback thesis. I thought it was interesting that Paul said that "the CIA is actually the one that introduced the term blowback." This got my head thinking. Why would the leading terrorist organization in the world try to educate and enlighten people about the consequences of its covert military actions? Why did the CIA introduce a theory into the American people's heads that will make them more suspicious of CIA activities and U.S. foreign policy?

Does the CIA want to help explain the phenomena of counter-terror attacks on the U.S. homeland so the American people can better understand the motives and strategy of anti-American terrorists? Of course not. The CIA is not interested in enlightening the American people in any way. Their aim is to confuse, dumb-down, distract, and divert public attention so they can continue killing people and dominating the world in the American people's name.

If it is true that the CIA did in fact introduce the theory of blowback into the popular lexicon, then the reasons for doing so are nefarious. The theory of blowback explains nothing about the 9/11 attacks. It is a smoke screen, a diversion tactic, a false sign post that leads the searcher of truth down a dead end road.

People who espouse this theory are following a cold trail. They ignore the facts because their pride is wounded when they learn they are wrong. Their basic assumption is that the CIA and Mossad are not evil or competent enough to kill three thousand innocent Americans to advance an imperialist political agenda in the Middle East.

More than any other group, libertarians fall into the trap of thinking the U.S. government is not capable of conspiring against the American people because they naively assume that it is too incompetent to systematically kill American citizens and destroy their rights. It's a stupid belief because killing, lying, and keeping secrets are three things that every government excels at.

Libertarians and liberals also feel smart by voicing the blowback theory. "Oh look at me. I have the theory to explain 9/11. I am so smart. I am never wrong. I read Ayn Rand every day. I know everything about how the world works. Conservatives are government loving fools. And the ones who say the government did it are crazy conspiracy theorists who have no logic and no understanding."

Is the blowback theory completely and always false? No. It sheds light on the fact that people in the Middle East are angered by the injustice of U.S. foreign policy and want to take revenge on America. This is common sense 101. A child can understand this. But the theory doesn't explain the 9/11 attacks, which was as much directed against Muslims as against Americans and the American system of checks and balances.

It takes intellectual courage to get beyond the theory of blowback and really start hunting for the truth in the post-9/11 wilderness. Libertarians, conservatives and progressives need to search the term "false flag," look up government drills on 9/11, and learn about the unspoken structure of the U.S. shadow government, which has its own destructive goals, motives, and methods.

There is so much evidence out there. Where should people start in the field of 9/11 facts? Begin with the controlled collapse of Building 7. Or listen to Webster Tarpley's explanation about the 46 government drills and exercises on the day of 9/11 that were intended to fool and distract honest American military officers.

The hands of the good cops in the U.S. military and government were tied because of the numerous government drills on 9/11, which created the opportunity for the bad cops, the globalists and zionists, to stab America in the back under the cover of darkness.

In an interview with Bonnie Faulkner of the KPFA radio program 'Guns and Butter' on September 7, 2011, Tarpley said:
"9/11 was of course an inside job. It was, very specifically, a state-sponsored, false flag, synthetic terror action. It was a war provocation designed to produce the war of civilization and the clash of civilizations in the form of the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war, and other wars that we've come close to or are now in.

This was carried out by this rogue network or invisible government which has been infesting the U.S. federal government in the current form since about the middle of the 1890s, since the time of [President] Grover Cleveland.

So, rather than waste time with trying to blame this on Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Israel or anybody else, the attention has to be focused on the U.S. federal bureaucracy, and, above all, the interface between Wall Street and the intelligence community. If you can think of somebody like [Former CIA Director] Allen Dulles, the Wall Street bond lawyer, and the reputed Nazi sympathizer, who was one of the people to help create the CIA. If you think of his brother, John Foster Dulles, that sort of gives you the neck of the woods that we're talking about.

Where those Wall Street lawyer types meet the intelligence community, and that of course is the CIA preeminently, that's where you have to look for the problem. These other countries that get involved are at most very peripheral sub-contractors who deliver things that the U.S. invisible government wants."
Tarpley emphasized the role of government drills and exercises in the cloak-and-dagger 9/11 operation, which were conducted by traitors and ringleaders inside the invisible government. "They made it happen," he says.

Tarpley criticized the blowback theory as well as other theories that avoid the reality of the existence of an invisible government in Washington, saying:
"There is a much weaker version, completely different, really, which is let it happen on purpose. The "let it happen on purpose" essentially says that there really is a terrorist organization out there and they really want to attack, and they will if you let them. And the accusation against Bush and Cheney was that they let it happen, or somebody let it happen.

I would just point out in passing that the official version of the 9/11 Commission; the unanswered questions, in other words, accepting the Kean-Hamilton Report with unanswered questions; the blowback version which says, "Yes it happened that way but you deserved it. It was good because finally the third world is fighting back." This is something a lot of left liberals have a very deep emotional need to believe; and the "lihop - let it happen on purpose"; all of these are ultimately the same. Their world picture is all the same.

Again, the official version, the unanswered questions, the blowback, and the lihop, it's all the same because it all says there really is a terrorist organization out there that wants to attack you and will attack you, and if you drop your guard they'll attack, so therefore you need to fight them in some better way. Maybe not with Bush-Cheney but maybe with Kerry or with Obama, right. That's more or less what it comes down to.

I'm arguing something different. Now, the drills that you mentioned, the air drills have three components. Some people have said these are "lihop" drills, in other words, that when you remove the air defense then the terrorists strike. Well, no, it's not that way at all. The air drills are to prevent loyal elements in the air force, in particular, from simply taking matters into their own hands and shooting down the planes before they can reach their targets. There's always this danger. So they had to prevent that from ever happening."
Tarpley goes on to explain the purpose and rationale of the drills at the 18 minute mark in the interview. His essential point about 9/11 is, "It's the drills, stupid." The drills blindfolded the loyal soldiers and officers while enabling the traitors to cut America's throat.

II. Definitions of False Flag

Here is Wikipedia's definition of false flag:
False flag (aka Black Flag) operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.[citation needed] The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time.
Here is a definition by the writer Number Six, from his article, "Operation False Flag: A Modern Primer,":
Definition: When governments or organizations (usually connected to the former) stage highly sophisticated attacks on their own or foreign soil with the purpose of placing the blame on a desirable enemy foreign or domestic, one who has otherwise done no wrong. Essentially a setup, it provides the government entity with an excuse via fabricated evidence in complicity with media to fulfill its various agendas (i.e. war or law making).
And here is a definition in my own words: A false flag is when the rulers of a country implement or instigate an attack on their own population to generate fear and hatred against outsiders and foreign countries that stand in the way of the objectives of the rulers. In a democracy the rulers' political and geopolitical objectives are unspoken and kept hidden from the people.

Alex Details Operation Mountain Guardian: Nightly News Report

Palestinians Speak: Will Palestinian statehood make a difference in Gaza

Source: Scoop Independent News:
Julie Webb-Pullman: In recent days I interviewed Gazans working in an office building in Gaza City, people in the street, and some students at the Al Azhar University. I asked first what they thought of Presdient Abbas taking the bid for statehood to the United Nations, and secondly, whether they thought it would make any difference to life in Gaza if successful.

Many expressed concern that it was Abbas acting alone, without consultation with Gazans, or even other political parties, others said they already 'have' a state as per the 1949 UN partition, 1988 declaration of independence, and the numerous UN resolutions upholding pre-1967 borders, but the international community fails to accord it proper recognition or enforcement.

Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers

Washington's Blog - Psychologists: Questioning 9/11 Is the Sane Thing To Do

September 23, 2011

U.S. And Israeli Officials Walk Out On 9/11 Truth At The UN

U.S. And Israeli Officials Walk Out On 9/11 Truth At The UN

Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
September 23, 2011

In his speech at The United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, September 22, 2011, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blasted Western hypocrisy and questioned the U.S. government's version of the 9/11 attacks, implying that it was an inside job.

His statements about the validity of the 9/11 story were similar to those he made last year at the United Nations. And just like last year, U.S., Israeli and European officials ran away like vampires coming across sunlight.

Ahmadinejad is obviously not the ideal candidate to spread 9/11 truth and educate world public opinion about the fraudulent basis for America's war on terror, but we must look beyond the messenger. What is important is the message of truth, no matter who speaks it, because without truth there won't be understanding and peace.

The world benefits tremendously when dissenting voices are given a world stage instead of being marginalized and silenced as conspiracy theorists. Dissent is what moves civilization and society forward. Without the global recognition of 9/11 Truth there will be no Palestine, no peace in the Middle East, no law and order in the world, no American republic, and no freedom anywhere in the world.

American officials are afraid of the truth about 9/11 getting out because their tyrannical political project called the new world order will be ruined. This evil project, which got a major boost from the false flag 9/11 attacks, is aimed at America's freedoms, the Middle East, and the world at large.

What does this project entail, who is behind it, and what do they want?

Criminal bankers in Europe and traitorous factions within the American establishment seized control of America's finances in 1913 by creating an unconstitutional private central bank, and then fully hijacked the U.S. government when President John F. Kennedy was murdered by a CIA-led plot. Since then other sinister plots have been directed against the U.S. Constitution and the American people, the most obvious being the 9/11 attacks.

The usurpers in Washington committed the 9/11 state crime to completely destroy America's constitutional republic, create a permanent police state to be used against the American people, and launch aggressive wars in the Middle East in a quest for world domination.

Their ultimate aim is to bring into the world through various means an evil one world empire that will be controlled by a handful of private international banksters, corrupt multinational corporations and criminal oligarchs. The global financial crisis was also engineered by these same corrupt interests in order to consolidate economic, political and military power in a dictatorial world government.

Israel's evil government has also poisonously used the 9/11 tragedy to profit at the expense of innocent Muslim nations, the American people, and American soldiers. Israel's state murderers have pointed to the 9/11 attacks to paint all Muslims as irrational extremists who want to fight a holy war with Israel and the West. But this is false. Israel's propaganda and slander machine has blinded America and the West, and disguised the true nature of the Israel-Palestinian conflict as well as Israel's aims and motives in the region.

When the truth about 9/11 was presented by President Ahmadinejad to a large global audience on the biggest diplomatic platform, U.S., European and Israeli officials did not know how to respond. They ran away from the truth like cowards because they can't morally defend their evil crimes and lies. Their walkout is a clear demonstration that they are morally and politically bankrupt.

Of course, Ahmadinejad is not a saint for speaking the truth about 9/11. He has his own political objectives and goals which must be rejected. Regardless of his credentials as a 9/11 truth teller, he is a speaker of an extremist government that violates the rights of millions and insults the authority of God. Iran's poisonous mix of politics and religion is not a model for the world, as Ahmadinejad claims, but a warning to other nations that religion has no place in the state.

But let's put politics aside for a minute, and talk about the truth for a change. We all agree that facts matter. A sane and honest global political reality must be based on the truth about world events and world conflicts. It is a matter of world peace and human survival that we get to the bottom of 9/11.

By putting the issue of 9/11 truth on a global stage, Ahmadinejad is helping to break the dam of silence around the issue at the UN and world capitals. He is not the best messenger, but any messenger will do in this circumstance, when few dare to speak the truth because of the fear that they will be labeled "anti-Semitic" and a "despicable conspiracy theorist."

Moreover, President Ahmadinejad is not the only individual who has been unfairly denounced as a "conspiracy theorist," and a "nut," for questioning the official 9/11 story, which many psychologists say "is the sane thing to do." Millions of people around the world, including millions of Americans, have been mislabeled as "crazy conspiracy theorists," for saying the U.S. government lied about the 9/11 attacks.

Earlier in the year, Richard Falk, who was appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council to serve as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on "the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967," came under fire from the U.S. ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, and the Secretary-General of the UN, Ban Ki-moon, for raising questions about the 9/11 fable.

In a statement about Falk's 9/11 comments, written on January 25, 2011, Rice said:
In this blog post, dated January 11, 2011, Mr. Falk endorses the slurs of conspiracy theorists who allege that the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks were perpetrated and then covered up by the U.S. government and media.

Mr. Falk’s comments are despicable and deeply offensive, and I condemn them in the strongest terms. I have registered a strong protest with the UN on behalf of the United States. The United States has in the past been critical of Mr. Falk’s one-sided and politicized approach to his work for the UN, including his failure to condemn deliberate human rights abuses by Hamas, but these blog comments are in another category altogether.

In my view, Mr. Falk’s latest commentary is so noxious that it should finally be plain to all that he should no longer continue in his position on behalf of the UN. I would note that U.S. and many other diplomats walked out in protest in September 2010 when Iranian President Ahmadinejad made similarly slanderous remarks before the UN General Assembly.
Falk's comments were ignored by the corporate whore media and the stupid progressive media, but the truth-telling blogosphere paid close attention. Sites like, Activist Post, We Are Change, Veterans Today, and others all covered the story.

The media blackout on 9/11 facts is beyond shameful, it is criminal. The world is starving for the truth about 9/11 and the real aim of America's wars in the Middle East. What we need most of all is not a global food drive but a global truth drive.

At the time when Falk was demonized by U.S., Israeli and UN officials, I wrote an article called, "Dark Side of Ban Ki-moon And The United Nations Shines Through As They Condemn Richard Falk For His Views on 9/11," in which I said that Falk's credibility as a global human rights leader increased tenfold because of his courageous stance on 9/11.

Falk's support for a new 9/11 investigation, along with the support of other respected human rights leaders, is crucial for the creation of a new Nuremberg Trials.

The slander against Falk by U.S., Israeli and UN officials backfired because all they have is lies and hate to work with, while peacemakers like Falk have the truth and humanity on their side.

Silencing the truth about the 9/11 attacks has failed in America and on the world stage. The cowardly walkout at Ahmadinejad's speech proves that the two-faced leaders of Israel, America and Britain have no answer to the 9/11 questions. They turned their backs not on Ahmadinejad, but on humanity, on the victims of 9/11, on the victims of 7/7, and on the millions of victims of the false war on terror.

It is only a matter of time before 9/11 truth-tellers and questioners are vindicated because the truth is on our side.

History is on our side.

The heavens are on our side.

We are with the wind, the seas, the mountains, and the trees. The rotten government liars and war criminals are with the bombs, the shame, the terror, and the chaos. They have nothing but lies to tell and wars to sell. Their legitimacy to rule the Earth in mankind's name is as empty and phony as Satan's claim that he is the creator of this world.

No matter how hard the evil state terrorists in Israel, Washington and London try to block the truth about their satanic crimes they will fail because they can't permanently change the color of black to white. Reality can be modified and manipulated but it cannot be erased.

They can run away from the stinging words of an Iranian President, but they can't run away from their evil crimes and poisonous legacy.

The day is coming when they will have to face the wrath of God, the wrath of the American people, the wrath of American soldiers, and the wrath of all the nations that have been destroyed by their bombs and lies.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Speech at the UN (last 15 minutes of speech)

70% of Israelis Endorse UN Acceptance of Palestinian State

70% of Israelis Endorse UN Acceptance of Palestinian State
By Richard Silverstein
Published: September 23, 2011

The Truman Institute at the Hebrew University has done a poll of Israeli and Palestinian opinion about the PA’s UN bid for statehood. Remarkably, the poll finds nearly 70% of Israelis prepared to accept a Palestinian state through a UN vote. This despite the opposition of their own prime minister. Does Barack Obama know that a plurality of Americans and majority of Israelis support a plan he rejects? This shows how completely out of touch both Netanyahu and Obama are, and how isolated they are in their own arms.

And hey, you didn’t read this in Haaretz. You read it in the Jerusalem Post, no less!

Continued. . .

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson - on People in Power

September 22, 2011

JFK, 9/11, Troy Davis, And The Murder of American Justice

JFK, 9/11, Troy Davis, And The Murder of American Justice

Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
September 22, 2011

"Time is the one incorruptible judge.
One minute is long enough to accuse a man.
To prove his innocence takes longer."
- Sophocles, "Oedipus the King."

The murder of Troy Davis, who was wrongly accused of killing a cop twenty years ago, is not a unique case. Davis suffered the fate of the scapegoat. The burden of guilt for a crime he did not commit was laid on his shoulders and he was forced to carry it to his grave.

His death was a preventable tragedy. But politicians, judges and public officials went along with the ritual of public execution because they don't like to admit their mistakes to the public and change course. Their excessive pride and egotism lead to tragedies and needless suffering.

Davis's tragic death brought a sense of healing and closure to the family of the deceased police officer, Mark Allen MacPhail, but it has shattered the belief that the American Justice System works. Two wrongs don't make a right. The death of another innocent man at the hands of the Deaf and Blind State is a further indication that justice does not exist in America.

The murderers of President John F. Kennedy have never been brought to justice. Instead, they were promoted to the highest office in the land. The conspirators behind JFK's murder included President Johnson, President Ford, who served on the Warren Commission, and President George H. W. Bush, who became head of the CIA in the 1970s and then president in 1988.

There is a connection between Troy Davis and Lee Harvey Oswald. Their lives followed the pattern of the scapegoat. Both were wrongly blamed for evil acts and then executed.

The scapegoating trend in American society is very disturbing and cruel, but it's not unique to America. Every society suffers from the miscarriage of justice. But America is a special country. And it is lost and blind because it refuses to face its real demons and find the real culprits for evil deeds like the murder of JFK and the 9/11 attacks.

Why has the American Justice System has betrayed the American people and the American Constitution? Why are murderers like George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Barack Obama are allowed to walk free in the White House while innocent men like Troy Davis are executed? The answer is because the corrupt usurpers of America believe they are above the law and retribution. They believe they can get away with any crime as long as the American people are kept in a state of ignorance. And they're right.

The Troy Davis travesty is standard operating procedure. The rape of justice in America goes so much deeper, and higher. The victims of 9/11 and their family members have been treated as less than human by the government murderers behind the 9/11 attacks. And the people in Iraq and Afghanistan have gotten the same treatment.

When cases are brought against the criminal murderers in power they are dismissed in a court of law and ignored by the shameless media. Here is just one example. April Gallop, an Army specialist who survived the missile attack on the Pentagon on 9/11, brought charges of conspiracy to murder against Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and Richard Myers. But her case was dropped on April 27, 2007, by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. One of the judges who denied Gallop and all Americans the justice they are due was George W. Bush's cousin, John M. Walker, Jr.

No one in the media covered Gallop's case. Instead, the media concentrated on the fake assassination of Osama Bin Laden, which happened a couple of days after the court dismissed Gallop's explosive case. They want to keep giving the issue of 9/11 truth and justice the silent treatment.

Justice and freedom cannot survive in a land where the highest leaders are murderers and war criminals who kill their own people for profit and power. To get to the root of the problem, we need to understand the scapegoat symptom and how it works against justice in human society.

In an article called, "The Scapegoat in American Culture: From Lee Harvey Oswald To Osama bin Laden," I wrote:
The American empire is no different than any other world empire. It engages in acts of evil around the world, it commits crimes against sovereign nations, and it oppresses its own people in the name of "national security." But none of this would be possible if the rulers of the empire were not exceptionally good at one thing in particular, which is manufacturing a scapegoat to justify its acts of evil and its atrocities.
In Sophocles's 'Oedipus The King,' the guilty king of Thebes, Oedipus, commits unspeakable crimes whose real nature he is unaware of because he does not know the truth about his birth and his destiny. He is blind to his own madness and folly.

But the same can't be said of the guilty brutes who control America. They know what they are doing and why they are doing them; the financial crimes, the assassinations, the murders, the wars, the false flag terror attacks, the deceptions, all of it. And they are holding the American people hostage by denying them the truth abut their crimes against America and humanity, which includes 9/11.

Troy Davis's life was not saved, but America can be saved if the truth is told and real justice is done. Davis's last message to the MacPhail family can be directed to all of America: "dig deeper and find the truth."

Only true justice can bring peace and healing to the victims of 9/11 and the victims of the war on terror, as well as the nations of Iraq, Afghanistan, America, and every other nation that is involved in the tragedy.

The state murderers in America and Israel who did the 9/11 attacks are afraid of one thing above all else: daylight.

Near the end of Sophocles's play, Oedipus says, "Daylight has no mercy. It shows too much, too clearly."

Foreign Banking Cartel Runs U.S. Gov. - Alex Jones Report




Thomas Drake: "I Chose My Conscience Over My Career!"

Hillary Mann Leverett on Obama's Blunder on Palestinian Statehood

Col. Wilkerson: "The American Republic Is Expiring!"

Luke Rudkowski Details 9/11 Lockdown: Infowars Report




Peter Phillips And Mickey Huff of Project Censored Speak About 9/11 Truth & The Media Blackout

Media Roots:
MEDIA ROOTS- Project Censored spoke about corporate media censorship, managed news and the media blackout surrounding 9/11 at Oakland's anniversary film festival on September 8, 2011. Watch the powerful talks by Mickey Huff, Director of Project Censored, and Peter Phillips.

September 21, 2011

September 20, 2011

Yes We Camp!

A Second Western Renaissance (Or Not)

A Second Western Renaissance (Or Not)

Saman Mohammadi
The Excavator
September 20, 2011

"Recovery is a re-gaining---regaining of a clear view." - J. R. R. Tolkien
In a previous article I referred to a new Enlightenment in the West, and the end of a dark age of propaganda and misinformation about global politics. My thoughts about this huge shift in American and Western culture are very loose and I don't have a firm opinion about the change that we are going through during this period in history. I don't like planting flags and defending inflexible positions. I like planting seeds in the mind. I'm interested in dialogue and learning. So I was happy that my article was criticized by the staff writers at the website, "The Daily Bell," who have written on the general theme of cultural rebirth and a new renaissance on numerous occasions, and from a more informative position than I have.

In their article called, "Is It a New Enlightenment Yet?," they ask that I should "reconsider," my, "use of 'Enlightenment' to describe what is going on today." Instead, I should use the labels, "Reformation" or "Renaissance."

I like this disagreement over words and language because it is a reminder to me that I should always keep in mind the fact that words bring up powerful emotions and can stir confusion very easily. One of my beliefs is that most of our problems, whether about public denial about 9/11 truth or the global economic crisis, arise from a failure of communication. The writer Stuart Chase taught me this truth.

Culture is filled with a great deal of misunderstanding and poisoned by the misuse of labels. We don't have to look to the past to find examples because there are so many examples to point to in the current age. 9/11 truth tellers are misunderstood as crazy and mislabeled as conspiracy theorists. And so are all kinds of people who go against the current. Dave Chappelle said in his interview on the The Actors Studio that it is dismissive to call someone crazy, and that is wisdom that all of us have to learn.

Labels are very dangerous things that have the power to obstruct thought, deform human beings and create needless divisions in society. One of my new favorite lines is, "God save us from labels," by Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Imagine how freer our culture and our countries would be if labels like "conspiracy theorist" didn't exist. But using labels to marginalize critics is nothing new. If there wasn't an art of rhetoric there would be no art of war.

I mindlessly use labels and ideas sometimes, like when I referred to a Second Enlightenment, as you have too most likely. Since there is a history behind every label and idea, it is good to begin there - at the base, not on the roof. That's why it is so important to know your history. It gives you grounding.

Over the past few weeks I've been reading a lot of books about the origins of the Renaissance, and one of the illuminating passages that I've come across is by James Bruce Ross and Mary Martin McLaughlin, who write in their introduction to "The Portable Renaissance Reader":
"Even among those who have studied them more objectively, the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries have provoked sharp disagreement. Some have sought in their complexity a unified meaning, or a common mainspring that set in motion the processes of change in every area. To others, these changes seem to have produced only diversity, a melange of movements and a galaxy of "divided and distinguished worlds." Testifying to the efforts of many explorers to mark trails through the forest of these centuries with conveniently labeled signposts are the three familiar abstractions, Renaissance, Reformation, and Counter Reformation. But even these labels are disputable; a good many people, for example, prefer "Protestant Revolt" to "Reformation," and others reject both the name and the idea of a "Renaissance." The signposts themselves have sometimes loomed so large that they have obscured the lines of connection between religious and cultural movements, which were not only contemporaneous but closely related. And they have often obstructed a wider view of this age, a view that would embrace the plains and foothills as well as the peaks of its landscape.
Long regarded as a cultural movement--the revival of arts, letters, and learning that they described--the Renaissance is, as a historical period, the creation of nineteenth-century historians. In its classic portrayal, Jacob Burckhardt's brilliant essay, The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, certain figures and facets of Italian culture from Dante to Michelangelo are drawn in sharp perspective, while others are shadowy or not apparent.

"My starting point," Burckhardt said, "has to be a vision," and, though he called it the "Renaissance," what he saw was "the first mighty surging of a new age." Its characteristics--a new kind of state, a "work of art," a new type of individual, the self-aware and many-sided personality, a new culture molded by the recovery of the ancient past and the "discovery of the world and of man," a society marked by immorality and religious indifference--are displayed in a carefully constructed mosaic. For all its high qualities, it is the idealized portrait of an age, glowing with worldly individualism and novelty, but static and foreshortened in time and space.

Its creator himself warned his readers that "in the wide ocean upon which we venture the ways and directions are many," and that the same studies which had served for his work might easily lead to essentially different conclusions. But his picture was so appealing, and his techniques so useful, that, extended to other areas of Europe, they shaped the modern conception of the Renaissance. Through the catchwords of textbooks and the colorful cliches of romances, his insights have filtered down in the common notion of a "golden age" populated by glamorous figures somewhat larger than life. Only in this century have numerous critics inquired whether the vision of Burckhardt and his followers was perhaps an optical illusion.

The controversy they have touched off is ironically sketched by one of its participants in a dialogue between a Dreamer who sees the Renaissance as a glorious world, splendid in purple and gold, and a Questioner who voices the objections of more critical scholars. Beholding "the rise of individualism, the awakening of a desire for beauty, the triumph of worldly pleasure and the joy of life," the Dreamer sees in his reverie a procession of painters and poets like Michelangelo and Ariosto, Durer and Ronsard, even catching sight of St. Francis of Assisi and Jan van Eyck. The Questioner, laughing, challenges this Renaissance, declaring that it does not stand firm in time or space, in content or meaning, that it is too vague, too incomplete, and haphazard." (Pg. 2-4).
I don't know if what the West is going through right now can be called a rebirth. All I know is that a birth is coming because an era has died. It is probably a new birth and not a rebirth. But is that a good thing?

We need to be self-conscious about this historic change that we're all experiencing. I don't know if the project of the Renaissance was a self-conscious one. I've read some of the letters of Kepler and Erasmus and they possessed self-awareness about their work and ideas. We should at least be as open as them, and use the Internet to lay open our thoughts, fears, ideas, hopes, questions, and dreams.

It does not matter what your views are about the state of the world, we all can agree that our world is falling apart and that we are entering uncharted territory. It is during times like these when a culture must look to its past for inspiration and guidance.

There are many heroes, sages and geniuses in Western culture who have illuminated the historical path to individual freedom. I'm talking about George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Giordano Bruno, John Milton, and the list goes on and on. Names can be taken from every country in the West and from every field; literature, politics, medicine, science, technology, religion. We must recall them now and put them in our memories because we need to remember their examples as the struggle for freedom against the authoritarian financial oligarchy comes to a head.

Everybody is familiar with the demons and tyrants of the West. I don't want to discuss that part of the West. I want to read about and learn from the angels of the West.

I think the fruits of Western Civilization are larger than those of any other civilization. But those fruits have rotted over the years because of a lack of education about what made the West great, and a lack of commitment to preserving the sacred knowledge that has been gathered by Western minds.

Freedom from the government and organized religion is the West's sweetest fruit, but in this century it is being discarded and replaced with a poisonous fruit that was not grown in the open air of culture, but rather inside the dark halls of power whose gatekeepers include plutocratic private banks, totalitarian technocrats, and fascist corporations. Their poisonous fruit is an authoritarian and private world government, which is the antithesis of what America and the West stands for.

What the West needs now is freedom from the unaccountable monopolistic banks and fascist corporations. But the preservation of individual liberty is not possible without remembering what kind of cultural soil generated the original fruit.

In the book, "Northrop Frye in conversation," by David Cayley, Canadian literary theorist Northrop Frye said that a society without a clear sense of its own history and a memory of its past cultural accomplishments is senile. Frye's words:
I think that forgetting the Bible is on a par with forgetting the rest of our cultural heritage. I've always, of course, maintained that when you lose your memory you become senile, and that's just as true of a society as it is of an individual. (David Cayley. 1992. Northrop Frye in Conversation. Anansi Press. Pg. 195).
Frye also said that a society that does not worship God is bound to worship something else in its place - the State, or a man. In Germany it was Hitler. In Russia it was the State. In Iran it is both a man and a State.

The writers at The Daily Bell write:
The freer a society, the more apt it is, perhaps, to have a religious nature and to substitute the rule of God (a god or gods) for the rule of man. History shows us this over and over.
I agree that the belief in God and the moral law of the universe is connected to a culture's belief in individual freedom and personal responsibility. People who worship the State and trust its every word are mentally and spiritually lost. When they commit atrocities their excuse is, "I was just following orders." They talk as if they're not independent human beings with a free will and a duty to recognize good from evil.

When a person has a greater loyalty to God and to his own Self than his government or country then that person is on the right path. Such a person is way more likely to flourish in a free society with a free market of ideas than in a society in which the State is God and human beings are robots, or even worse, rats.